Processing math: 100%
Femtosecond laser-induced periodic structures: mechanisms, techniques, and applications
  • Abstract

    Over the past two decades, femtosecond laser-induced periodic structures (femtosecond-LIPSs) have become ubiquitous in a variety of materials, including metals, semiconductors, dielectrics, and polymers. Femtosecond-LIPSs have become a useful laser processing method, with broad prospects in adjusting material properties such as structural color, data storage, light absorption, and luminescence. This review discusses the formation mechanism of LIPSs, specifically the LIPS formation processes based on the pump-probe imaging method. The pulse shaping of a femtosecond laser in terms of the time/frequency, polarization, and spatial distribution is an efficient method for fabricating high-quality LIPSs. Various LIPS applications are also briefly introduced. The last part of this paper discusses the LIPS formation mechanism, as well as the high-efficiency and high-quality processing of LIPSs using shaped ultrafast lasers and their applications.

    Keywords

  • Femtosecond-LIPSs have become a useful laser processing method, with broad prospects for adjusting material properties, - . HSFLs on the surfaces and interiors of dielectrics demonstrate birefringence effects, which have been used in data storage and waveplates, , . LIPSs produce a significant dispersion of incident light and have been used to prepare pure and bright structural color surface, . Composite structures with LIPSs can enhance light absorption and luminescence and adjust the wetting properties of a material surface, , . The anisotropic electrical properties of LIPSs are an emerging research topic, .

    The main contents of this review are as follows. Section Several models of LIPS formation discusses the formation mechanism of LIPSs. Section Ultrafast dynamics of LIPS formation based on pump-probe imaging presents the ultrafast dynamics studied by the pump-probe imaging method. The pulse shaping of a femtosecond laser in the temporal–frequency domain, polarization, and spatial distribution is an efficient method for fabricating regular LIPSs with high efficiency, as described in Section Efficient fabrication of high-quality LIPSs with shaped ultrafast laser pulses. Section Femtosecond laser direct writing of <100 nm nanostructures introduces promising methods for laser processing nanostructures with feature sizes smaller than 100 nm. In the Section Applications of LIPSs, we briefly introduce LIPS applications in the fields of data storage, structural color surfaces, light absorption and luminescence enhancement, and the adjustment of conductive properties. The last section presents the outlook on the LIPSs. storage, structural color surfaces, light absorption and luminescence enhancement, and the adjustment of conductive properties. The last section presents the outlook on the LIPSs.

    Laser-induced periodic structures (LIPSs) have been intensively studied since 1965 when Birnbaum et al. found LIPSs on the surface of germanium and gallium arsenide, . Over the past two decades, ultrafast laser technology has developed rapidly. Femtosecond LIPSs (femtosecond-LIPSs) have become ubiquitous in a variety of materials, including metals, semiconductors, dielectrics, and polymers-, -. The periods of LIPSs change significantly with the laser fluence and the number of overlapping pulses. Based on the ratio of the period (Λ) to the laser wavelength (λ), LIPSs are divided into low-spatial-frequency LIPSs (LSFLs, Λ>0.5λ) and high-spatial-frequency LIPSs (HSFLs, Λ<0.5λ), as shown in Fig. 1. However, the formation mechanism of femtosecond-LIPSs does not yet have a clear explanation.

    Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) LSFLs on silicon8, and (b) HSFLs on ZnSe induced by 800 nm femtosecond laser. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.8, Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement; (b) ref.9, American Physical Society.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) LSFLs on silicon, and (b) HSFLs on ZnSe induced by 800 nm femtosecond laser. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref., Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement; (b) ref., American Physical Society.

    Femtosecond lasers have ultrashort pulse durations and high peak powers. The interaction between femtosecond laser and matter has the advantages of minimal thermal effect and no material selectivity, . Compared with nanosecond and other long-pulse lasers, femtosecond lasers could induce more regular and deeper periodic structures on different types of materials, such as metals, semiconductors, dielectrics, and polymers, without being overwhelmed by huge thermal effects-.

    The formation of periodic nanostructures after irradiation with a single laser beam is an interesting phenomenon. In particular, the periods of femtosecond-LIPSs change significantly with the laser fluence and the number of overlapping pulses, which renders the formation mechanism of LIPSs more complicated to determine. Numerous experimental, theoretical, and numerical studies have been performed, and several models have been proposed to explain the formation of LIPSs, -, , , , , which are described below.

    After irradiation with continuous and long-pulse lasers, LSFLs perpendicular or parallel to the polarization direction formed on the surfaces of semiconductor materials, where the periods were nearly equal to the laser wavelength, λ. It was proposed that these LSFLs were caused by the interference between the incident light and scattered light from the ablated surface, , , as shown in Fig. 2. When the laser was perpendicular to the sample, period Λ was equal to laser wavelength λ. When the laser was obliquely incident at an angle θ, period Λ = λ/ (1 ± sin θ), where + and – represent the forward and backward scattered light, respectively. This model was refined and developed by Sipe et al. They performed detailed theoretical studies and found that the generation of periodic structures depended significantly on the roughness of the material surface. Rough structures with a height significantly smaller than the laser wavelength resulted in a periodic distribution of the laser field itself. The incident angle and polarization direction highly influenced the period and orientation of the LSFLs. This model has often been used to explain classical LSFLs induced by nanosecond or continuous wave (CW) lasers.

    Over the last two decades, scattering models have been developed and improved to explain the formation of femtosecond-LIPSs, . According to the Drude model, the dielectric constants of semiconductors and dielectrics depend on the numerical density of free electrons excited by femtosecond laser. According to the Sipe model, the periodic deposition of laser energy depends on the surface roughness and dielectric constants. The formation of femtosecond-LIPSs on semiconductors and dielectrics was studied by comprehensively considering the Sipe and Drude models, , , , and developed into the Sipe-Drude model. The numerical density of free electrons and dielectric constants varied with the laser fluence, wavelength, and pulse number, which further tuned the periods of LIPSs, as shown in Fig. 2.

    Figure 2. (a) The schematic of light irradiated on a rough surface at an incident angle θ, where ki is the wave-vector component parallel to the surface, and l is the thickness of selvedge region. (b) The efficacy factor η as a function of the normalized LIPS wave vector for silica at different excited state. (c) The efficacy factor η along the positive ky-axis for silica at different excitation levels, with circles marking ky-positions where LIPS formation could be expected. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.16, American Physical Society; (b, c) ref.22, AIP Publishing.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (a) The schematic of light irradiated on a rough surface at an incident angle θ, where ki is the wave-vector component parallel to the surface, and l is the thickness of selvedge region. (b) The efficacy factor η as a function of the normalized LIPS wave vector for silica at different excited state. (c) The efficacy factor η along the positive ky-axis for silica at different excitation levels, with circles marking ky-positions where LIPS formation could be expected. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref., American Physical Society; (b, c) ref., AIP Publishing.

    The SPP model was used to explain the formation of LSFLs on semiconductors. The periods are expressed as follows

    Figure 3. (a) Schematic illustration of SPPs. (b) Dispersion curves of SPPs and light in air. (c) SPP excitation on ZnO surface in the excited state launched by a groove. (d) The SEM image of the nanostructures on the ZnO surface irradiated by 800 nm femtosecond laser, where the LSFLs originated from the nanogroove or the ablation edge, as shown as the red arrows. Figure reproduced with permission from: (b) ref.49, AIP Publishing; (c, d) ref.21, American Chemical Society.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (a) Schematic illustration of SPPs. (b) Dispersion curves of SPPs and light in air. (c) SPP excitation on ZnO surface in the excited state launched by a groove. (d) The SEM image of the nanostructures on the ZnO surface irradiated by 800 nm femtosecond laser, where the LSFLs originated from the nanogroove or the ablation edge, as shown as the red arrows. Figure reproduced with permission from: (b) ref., AIP Publishing; (c, d) ref., American Chemical Society.

    Under femtosecond laser irradiation, a large number of free electrons are excited, forming a plasma layer on the surface of a material. The femtosecond laser further causes the collective oscillation of the surface plasma and forms surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs), as shown in Fig. 3(a). The excitation of SPPs causes a periodic distribution of the laser field and energy deposition in the free electrons. The lattice is heated, melted, or even ablated via electron–phonon coupling, which further induces the formation of LIPSs, , , , -. However, in the case of vertical incidence (Fig. 3(b)), the wave vector of the SPPs is always larger than that of the incidence light. Therefore, grating structures or a single nanogroove, are fabricated on the sample surface in advance, and the scattered light can provide an additional wave vector, Δk, which satisfies the vector matching condition and induces SPP excitation, as shown in Fig. 3(c).

    Λ=λλλSPP±sin(θ),λSPP=λ×Re(ϵ+ϵdϵϵd),

    where λSPP is the SPP wavelength, θ is the angle of incidence, ε is the dielectric constant of the metal, and εd is the dielectric constant of the dielectric. Under femtosecond laser irradiation, a large number of free electrons are excited, resulting in a significant change in the dielectric constant, according to the Drude model. The SPP wavelength and LSFL period can be calculated based on the dielectric constant in the excited state, which agrees well with the experimental results for semiconductors, , . The LSFL periods induced by femtosecond laser pulses on semiconductors and metals are always smaller than the SPP wavelengths. With more laser pulse irradiation, the LSFL-assisted SPP is coupled with the laser field, forming a positive feedback effect, and leading to the formation of shorter-period LSFLs.

    Another mechanism that has been proposed for the formation of HSFLs in fused silica is photon–plasmon scattering. By adjusting the pulse energy and cumulative pulse number of the 800 nm femtosecond laser, the HSFLs period varied from 140 to 320 nm. This phenomenon was interpreted in terms of the interference between the incident light field and the electric field of the bulk plasma wave, resulting in the periodic modulation of the electron concentration and structural changes in the fused silica.

    The periodic distribution of the nanoplanes evolved from a random distribution of nanoplasma over many shots owing to the memory mechanism and mode selection. The period, λ0/2n, is the minimum spacing required in planar metal waveguides to support this mode with the field maxima at the metal–dielectric interface.

    Figure 4. (a) SEM image of HSFLs inside fused silica induced by 800 nm femtosecond laser pulses. (b) Nanoplasma growth into plane governed by local field distribution, where Epol and Eeq are the local fields on the polar axis and in the equatorial plane, respectively4, 20. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.20, American Physical Society.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (a) SEM image of HSFLs inside fused silica induced by 800 nm femtosecond laser pulses. (b) Nanoplasma growth into plane governed by local field distribution, where Epol and Eeq are the local fields on the polar axis and in the equatorial plane, respectively, . Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref., American Physical Society.

    The groove widths of HSFLs induced by femtosecond laser pulses are usually smaller than 100 nm, whereas the depth can reach hundreds of nanometers to micrometers. The widths of these periodically arranged nanogrooves are significantly smaller than the diffraction limit of the laser, , -. Figure 4(a) shows 20 nm-thick nanosheet-like nanostructures with a period of ~λ/2n in fused silica (refractive index n) induced by linearly polarized 800 nm femtosecond laser pulses. It was proposed that these nanosheets were produced by the asymmetrically localized laser-field enhancement of the nanoplasma, as shown in Fig. 4(b).

    In recent years, several other models have been proposed to explain the formation of LIPSs, such as self-organization, , , evanescent waves, and Coulomb explosions, . During the femtosecond laser irradiation of SiC, ZnSe, and ZnO crystals, the generation of second harmonics induces the formation of HSFLs, , . The ripples of LSFLs on metal surfaces gradually split and evolve into HSFLs with an increase in femtosecond laser pulse irradiation, .

    During the femtosecond laser irradiation of semiconductor materials such as Si and ZnS, the surface plasmon layer supports two types of SPPs: those at the plasma–air interface and those at the plasma–substrate interface. The local laser fluence and accumulated pulse number are key factors affecting the formation of LSFLs and HSFLs. Two SPP waves interfere with each other to form standing waves that induce the formation of HSFLs, . A femtosecond laser was obliquely incident on a stainless steel surface and induced two periodic structures, LSFLs and HSFLs, which were caused by forward- and backward-propagating SPPs, respectively. Numerical simulation results using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method indicated that the coherent superposition of the scattering far-field (propagation) of the microstructured surface and refracted fields induced LSFLs, while the scattering near-field (evanescent) and refracted fields induced HSFLs.

    Figure 5 shows the optical microscope (OM) images of the transient LSFLs on the Si surface at different delay times. The LSFL period was 680 ± 15 nm, and the direction was parallel to the nanogroove. The annular structures were caused by the diffraction effect of the concave lens. Surprisingly, periodic ripples quickly emerged. The transient ripples were clear at a delay time of 4.0 ps, which indicated that these ripples were due to surface melting, excluding other thermodynamics such as ablation and hydrodynamics. The AFM measurements further showed that the height fluctuation in the LSFL region was less than 0.6 nm, and had no spatial periodicity. The LSFL period was predicted based on the SPP model, and it coincided with the experimental results. The formation of LSFLs on silicon was due to the periodic energy deposition caused by the SPP excitation, rather than self-organization processes.

    Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) are typically used to observe LIPSs. The resolutions of these methods are very high, however they cannot be used to study the dynamics of LIPS formation. Pump-probe spectroscopy is an effective method to study the kinetics of femtosecond laser ablation. However, transient images of LIPSs cannot be observed directly, . Therefore, we developed a collinear pump-probe imaging method to study the transient processes of LIPS formation, , , , , . The spatial resolution is 300 nm and the temporal resolution is 0.6 ps. To show clearly the changes in the surface microstructure, the same spot was observed at three different times: before the arrival of the pump pulse, at the designed delay time, and after the ablation spot solidified.

    The dielectric constant is a key factor affecting the SPP wavelength, . The dielectric constant in the ground state was usually used to study SPP on metal surfaces, which was an important factor that caused the deviation between the SPP theory and the experimental results. Therefore, Cheng et al. proposed and studied in detail the effects of hot electron localization and d-band transitions on the dielectric constant and SPP wavelength for gold at the highly excited states during femtosecond laser irradiation. The LSFL period calculated by the developed SPP model decreased from 780 nm to 685 nm as the fluence increased to 0.75 J/cm2. However, as F was further increased to 2.5 J/cm2, the LSFL period increased to 756 nm. The developed SPP model accorded well with the experimental results, indicating that SPP excitation was the key during the formation of LSFLs on metal surfaces.

    The pump-probe imaging experiments were further carried out to investigate the role of SPPs and thermal effects on the formation of LIPSs on noble-metal surfaces. Under the irradiation of the second femtosecond laser pulse, transient periodic ripples were clearly observed on the gold film, but no obvious ripples remained after the surface solidified. The surface defects produced by the first laser pulse launched SPPs on the Au film, which caused further modulated energy deposition and induced transient LIPSs. However, because of the small electron–phonon coupling coefficient of Au, the slow heat process and strong melting effect caused the ripples to disappear. When the Au film was immersed in water, the LIPSs were retained because of the high cooling rate of the molten layers. These experimental results indicated that the SPPs played an important role in the formation of LIPSs, while the thermal effect greatly influenced whether the transient ripples were retained after the molten surface solidified .

    Figure 7. LSFL periods as a function of laser fluence F. The black squares and error bars show the experimental data, and the red curve shows the theoretical values. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.25, American Physical Society.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    LSFL periods as a function of laser fluence F. The black squares and error bars show the experimental data, and the red curve shows the theoretical values. Figure reproduced with permission from ref., American Physical Society.

    The phenomena of femtosecond-LIPSs are very rich, and the formation mechanisms are very complicated. Are LIPSs caused by the periodic deposition of laser energy or by self-organization during laser excitation, melting, and solidification? The propagating SPP model has been widely accepted to explain the formation of LSFLs on semiconductor and metal surfaces, however several key issues remain to be addressed. First, the SPPs on the surfaces of gold and silver are very strong, however it is difficult to form regular LSFLs on these noble metals. Second, the periods of the LIPSs on metal surfaces are significantly smaller than the SPP wavelengths, . The further development of new methods is required to solve these problems.

    However, the period dependence of the LSFLs on metal surfaces was much different from the SPP model, , . The SPP wavelengths were calculated by using the dielectric constants of silver, gold, copper, and aluminum in the ground states, which were significantly larger than the periods of LSFL ripples, , . The d-band electrons in gold and silver could be excited to states above the Fermi surface, . The free-electron density and plasma frequency both increased with laser fluence, resulting in longer SPP wavelengths. The LSFL periods were very different from those of the SPP model, which is a difficult problem to solve.

    Noncollinear pump-probe imaging techniques have also been applied to observe the formation of LSFLs. Murphy et al. reported the formation of LSFLs on silicon irradiated with multiple pulses. Using optical diffraction microscopy, Kafka et al. detected the formation of LSFLs on Cu films irradiated with a single femtosecond pulse. Garcia-Lechuga et al. used a moving-spot multiple-pulse irradiation approach, and observed the birth and growth of individual ripples on a silicon surface. It was demonstrated that the formation of LIPSs was initiated by free carrier generation, leading to non-thermal melting, liquid-phase overheating, and rapid solidification into the amorphous phase.

    Figure 6 shows the evolution of the LSFLs formed on an Au film. The transient LSFLs began to appear at 45 ± 10 ps, and become more numerous and clearer over time. Between 400 and 600 ps, the ripples appear to be the most distinct and regular. The ripples are perpendicular to the laser polarization with a period of 740 ± 10 nm.

    The electronic band structures and optical properties of Ag and Ni are significantly different, and can represent noble and common metals, respectively. The dependence of the transient LSFL periods of Ag and Ni films on the laser fluence was studied using the collinear pump-probe imaging method. The experimental results agreed well with the theoretical values based on the developed SPP theory. Thus, the developed SPP model explains the formation mechanism of LSFLs on different types of metal surfaces.

    Figure 7 shows that the LSFL period increased from 685 nm to 770 nm when the fluence increased from 0.73 to 3.42 J/cm2 , which was similar to the results for Si, GaP, and ZnO crystals, , , . The SPP wavelength of gold was 780 nm for 800 nm light, which was significantly larger than the experimental value. With increasing laser fluence, free-electron density became larger, which led to longer SPP wavelength and LSFL period. Obviously, there is a great deviation between the SPP theory and the experimental results.

    Figure 6. Evolution of LSFLs formed on Au film irradiated by a single 800 nm laser pulse with a fluence of 1.96 J/cm2. The laser polarization, E, is perpendicular to the prefabricated nanogroove. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.25, American Physical Society.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Evolution of LSFLs formed on Au film irradiated by a single 800 nm laser pulse with a fluence of 1.96 J/cm2. The laser polarization, E, is perpendicular to the prefabricated nanogroove. Figure reproduced with permission from ref., American Physical Society.

    Figure 5. OM images of silicon surface irradiated by a single 800 nm femtosecond pulse of 0.18 J/cm2. The double arrows in (a) show the laser polarization direction. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.52, Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    OM images of silicon surface irradiated by a single 800 nm femtosecond pulse of 0.18 J/cm2. The double arrows in (a) show the laser polarization direction. Figure reproduced with permission from ref., Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.

    LSFLs are typically induced by multiple laser pulses. The material at the laser focus is partially ablated after each laser pulse irradiation, which makes the formation mechanisms more difficult to understand because of the effects of the scattered light and grating coupling feedback. Therefore, theoretical and experimental studies on the LSFLs induced by a single femtosecond laser pulse provide fundamental information on the origin of LSFLs on metal surfaces, -.

    The fabrication efficiency, depth, and regularity of the LSFLs when using shaped pulses of 16.2 ps were significantly better than those using Gaussian femtosecond laser pulses. The scan velocity for fabricating regular LSFLs was 2.3 times faster, while the LSFLs depth was 2 times deeper, and the diffraction efficiency was 3 times higher than that of LSFLs using Gaussian femtosecond laser pulses.

    By controlling the voltage of each element of the spatial light modulator (SLM) via computer programming, the phase and/or amplitude of the laser spectrum can be modulated, and the 4f zero-dispersion pulse-shaping system can generate shaped laser pulses with arbitrary temporal distributions. Specifically, the number of subpulses, interval between adjacent subpulses, and pulse energy of each subpulse can be flexibly adjusted.

    Regular LSFLs on silicon were processed using a 4f configuration zero-dispersion pulse-shaping system. A Gaussian pulse is shaped into pulse trains with an interval of 16.2 ps by using periodic π-phase step modulation. The transient LIPSs started appearing on the Si surface at a delay time of 4 ps, which was shorter than the interval between adjacent sub-pulses. Thus, the transient LIPSs have started to appear under the illumination of the two main subpulses. When the subsequent subpulse reached the sample surface, the transient LIPSs induced by the previous subpulses enhanced the excitation of the SPPs, as well as the periodic distribution of the laser field.

    Double temporally delayed femtosecond laser beams can efficiently induce uniform LSFLs in semiconductors, metals and dielectrics, . A femtosecond laser was further shaped into symmetrical three- and four-pulse sequences for the fabrication of double-grating structures and HSFLs on fused silica.

    Figure 8. (a–b) SEM pictures of LSFLs induced by the shaped pulse trains with an interval of 16.2 ps. (c) The cross section of LSFLs. (d) The 2D fast Fourier transform of (b). (e) Spectra of the 2D Fourier transform along the x-axis. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.8, Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (ab) SEM pictures of LSFLs induced by the shaped pulse trains with an interval of 16.2 ps. (c) The cross section of LSFLs. (d) The 2D fast Fourier transform of (b). (e) Spectra of the 2D Fourier transform along the x-axis. Figure reproduced with permission from ref., Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.

    When the subsequent small sub-pulses reached, the surface layer remained at a very high temperature. It was further excited and partially ablated, taking away some of the remaining heat (ablative cooling effect). Moreover, the ablated plume was further excited by the subsequent subpulses, and the debris was further ionized and vaporized, resulting in fewer deposited particles. Therefore, regular and uniform LSFLs were induced on the Si surface using a shaped pulse of 16.2 ps, as shown in Fig. 8.

    To efficiently fabricate uniform and regular LIPSs, three main challenges should be addressed: enhancement of periodic deposition of laser energy, reduction of residual heat, and avoidance of debris deposited on the ablation spots. A temporally shaped ultrafast laser is an efficient tool for fabricating regular LIPSs. By changing the sub-pulse interval, pulse number, and sub-pulse energy distribution of the burst pulse train, the regularity and uniformity of LIPSs were obviously improved, and the structural color was more vivid, .

    Lin et al. developed a correction method for the spatial distortion and light intensity, which could greatly improve the accuracy of the spatial pattern and uniformity of the light intensity simply by changing the phase map loaded on the SLM. This method was used to efficiently process colorful two-dimensional codes on silicon and shark-skin-like structures with superhydrophobic properties on stainless steel, .

    Maskless flexible spatial shaping based on spatiotemporal interference can modulate the interference intensity distribution into arbitrary patterns. It was verified using a Michelson interferometer, where the phase of one laser beam was controlled via SLM.

    Arbitrary spatial intensity distribution of femtosecond laser pulses can be modulated by loading a computer-generated hologram (CGH) on a SLM, and LIPSs can be processed in parallel with high efficiency. For example, Hayasaki et al. successfully realized the parallel processing of microstructures by loading a mixed-phase Fresnel lens on the SLM, .

    The laser focal point of a cylindrical lens is only a few to tens of micrometers wide, while its length is on the order of 1–10 mm, . Compared with ordinary circular lenses, the efficiency of femtosecond-LIPSs can be improved by a factor of 103–104 by using cylindrical lenses, which have been demonstrated in materials such as silicon and graphene oxide, , -. This method is very simple, and has important implications for the industrial application of femtosecond-LIPSs in the future.

    By using a liquid crystal SLM and/or Q-plate, a femtosecond Gaussian laser beam could be modulated into vortex light, radially polarized or angularly polarized beam-, and used to directly fabricate complex LIPS patterns, -. Two laser beams with s and p polarizations were collinearly focused on the SiC surface, and nanostructures with different morphologies were fabricated by adjusting the energy ratio of these two laser beams. Radially and angularly polarized femtosecond lasers were focused on transparent materials and HSFL patterns consistent with the polarization distribution were fabricated.

    Two-beam femtosecond laser interference was used to fabricate grating structures. By changing the laser polarization direction, interesting complex periodic structures covered with LIPSs have been efficiently fabricated, . Recently, large-area regular LSFLs were efficiently fabricated on a silicon wafer using double-beam femtosecond laser interference focused by cylindrical lens. The space of the double-beam interference fringes was an integer multiple of the SPP wavelength, thereby effectively exciting the resonance-enhanced SPPs. The fabricated nanogratings were very regular, uniform, and smooth, and the resolution of the diffraction light was almost the same as that with commercial gold gratings. Using a similar method, a large area of regular and uniform LIPSs was processed on the surface of quartz glass.

    Figure 9. SEM images of composite LIPSs prepared by three-beam interference. The insets show the polarization combinations of the three laser beams. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.37, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    SEM images of composite LIPSs prepared by three-beam interference. The insets show the polarization combinations of the three laser beams. Figure reproduced with permission from ref., under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    A wide variety of composite LIPSs such as hexagonally distributed nanogratings, hexagonal nanoflowers, and nanorings were efficiently fabricated on wide-bandgap SiC and ZnO semiconductors by changing the polarization combination of the three beams, , as shown in Fig. 9. The four-beam interference method was further developed, and composite LIPSs such as square nanostructures, symmetric petal structures, and asymmetric helix-like structures were prepared on the surface of a ZnO crystal.

    Multibeam interference is an efficient etching technology for processing regular periodic patterns, where the light intensity distribution in the interference field is usually imprinted on the materials. By combining laser interference technology with femtosecond-LIPSs, many complex LIPS patterns were fabricated with high efficiency and quality by simultaneously controlling the light intensity distribution and polarization distribution, . Experimental and theoretical results showed that the longer-period structure was determined by the intensity distribution, whereas the LIPS pattern was determined by the polarization distribution.

    Because of the diffraction limit, the size of the laser focus is typically a few hundred nanometers. The resolution of laser processing with high numerical aperture objectives is also on the order of hundreds of nanometers. The groove widths of HSFLs on semiconductor, dielectric, and metal surfaces induced by a femtosecond laser are typically less than 50 nm and less than 1/10 of the laser wavelength, opening up new avenues for laser processing with feature sizes smaller than 100 nm-. Liao et al. reported a single nanohollow channel with a width of 40 nm in porous glass using femtosecond laser-induced HSFL technology. It was used in nanofluidics in the field of single-molecule detection and biochip preparation. By precisely controlling the laser focus, fluences, and scanning speed, straight nanogrooves with widths smaller than 100 nm were prepared on the surfaces of fused silica and sapphire crystals.

    By controlling the laser polarization always perpendicular to the scanning direction, curved nanogrooves with widths smaller than 20 nm and curvature radii smaller than 100 nm were fabricated on a silicon surface. Lin et al. processed curved nanogrooves with a feature size of 12 nm on silicon surfaces using 800 nm femtosecond laser direct writing with orthogonally polarized dual beams.

    Figure 10. (a) SEM images of nanosquares , and (b) the cross section of nanogratings . (c) Curvature and separation control of nanogrooves fabricated by 800 nm femtosecond laser with polarization control. (d) SEM and AFM images of curved single nanogroove on silicon surface induced by 800 nm femtosecond laser with orthogonally polarized dual beams. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a, b) ref.136, under Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement; (c) ref.139,  under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License; (d) ref.27, American Chemical Society.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (a) SEM images of nanosquares , and (b) the cross section of nanogratings . (c) Curvature and separation control of nanogrooves fabricated by 800 nm femtosecond laser with polarization control. (d) SEM and AFM images of curved single nanogroove on silicon surface induced by 800 nm femtosecond laser with orthogonally polarized dual beams. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a, b) ref., under Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement; (c) ref., under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License; (d) ref., American Chemical Society.

    A single nanogroove with a width of 30 nm and a double-groove structure with an interval of 150 nm were fabricated on a ZnO crystal surface immersed in water by precisely controlling the 800-nm femtosecond laser fluence and scanning speed, as shown in Fig. 10. Double-groove grating structures and single-groove grating structures with different spacings were fabricated, with groove depths ranging from 200 to 300 nm and groove widths smaller than 40 nm. Nanosquare structures with dimensions of 150 nm × 150 nm and 150 nm × 250 nm were fabricated by direct writing twice along the vertical direction.

    Femtosecond-LIPSs provide a mask-free, high-efficiency processing method for tuning material properties. This method has been used in many fields, with applications that include structural colors, , , birefringent optical components, , , optical absorption and luminescence, , , and electrical properties.

    Structural colors originate from the interference, diffraction, or scattering produced by micro/nanostructures on the surface of a material. LIPSs have been widely used to produce structural colors on metals, semiconductors and transparent materials, , , -.

    The properties of such structural colors are determined by the period, depth, and orientation of the LIPSs. LIPSs with periods in the range of 400–1500 nm were prepared on the surface of stainless steel using femtosecond lasers with different wavelengths. These LIPSs demonstrated completely different colors under each diffraction order, such that the structural color of the stainless steel surface could cover most of the color gamut. The same LIPSs displayed different colors at different angles, , . Therefore, surfaces with different colors were prepared by controlling the orientation of the LIPSs. Liu et al. proposed to control the orientation of LIPSs in real time using a femtosecond laser double-pulse sequence with orthogonal polarization and equal pulse energy and fabricated LIPSs with arbitrary orientations on silicon surfaces that were not affected by the scanning path. This is of great significance for multi-layer encryption, anti-counterfeiting, and so on.

    The brightness and purity of the structural colors were affected by the regularity and depth of the LIPSs. The high-efficiency preparation of high-quality LIPSs has attracted increasing attention. Zhang et al. fabricated very regular and deep LSFLs on a silicon surface using temporally shaped pulses via a 4f zero-dispersion system and demonstrated very bright and pure structural colors, as shown in Fig. 11. Vivid structural colors on fused silica surfaces were prepared with high efficiency using the double-beam interference of femtosecond laser focused by cylindrical lens. Chemical etching-assisted LIPSs are also an effective method for producing bright structural colors, .

    Figure 11. Structural colors of “Chinese knot” pattern made up of LSFLs fabricated by a shaped pulse of 16.2 ps on Si surface under different diffraction angles. The inset shows an SEM image of regular LSFLs. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.8, Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Structural colors of “Chinese knot” pattern made up of LSFLs fabricated by a shaped pulse of 16.2 ps on Si surface under different diffraction angles. The inset shows an SEM image of regular LSFLs. Figure reproduced with permission from ref., Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.

    Figure 12. (a-c) Imaging of anisotropic nanostructures and 5D optical data storage in fused silica153, 155. (a) Image of the slow axis azimuth of voxels, where the pseudo-color represents the slow axis azimuth. (b) SEM image of the nanolamella-like structure after polishing and KOH etching. (c) The enlarged area in the dashed square in (b). (d) The birefringent images of data voxels of different layers in a 100-layer 5D optical data storage in fused silica after removing the background. Insets are enlargements of small region (10 μm × 10 μm). (e) Polar diagram of the measured retardance and azimuth of all voxels in (d). Figure reproduced with permission from: (a-c) ref.153, Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement; (d, e) ref.155, under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (a-c) Imaging of anisotropic nanostructures and 5D optical data storage in fused silica, . (a) Image of the slow axis azimuth of voxels, where the pseudo-color represents the slow axis azimuth. (b) SEM image of the nanolamella-like structure after polishing and KOH etching. (c) The enlarged area in the dashed square in (b). (d) The birefringent images of data voxels of different layers in a 100-layer 5D optical data storage in fused silica after removing the background. Insets are enlargements of small region (10 μm × 10 μm). (e) Polar diagram of the measured retardance and azimuth of all voxels in (d). Figure reproduced with permission from: (a-c) ref., Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement; (d, e) ref., under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

    Mechanisms and applications based on femtosecond laser-induced birefringence have been extensively studied, including various polarization-sensitive elements, - such as polarization beam splitters, polarization diffraction gratings, and polarization optical vortex rotation converters. HSFLs fabricated in amorphous silicon, , silicon carbide and indium tin oxide (ITO) thin films, exhibit birefringence effects two orders of magnitude higher than those of quartz glass, demonstrating that high-refractive-index materials can be used to fabricate birefringent elements. Large-area HSFLs have been efficiently fabricated on a glass surface coated with an ITO thin film using femtosecond laser direct writing focused via a cylindrical lens. The optical retardation reached 44 nm, which was eight times that of the HSFLs processed directly on a bare glass surface.

    HSFL nanostructures inside fused silica exhibit birefringence effects comparable to those of quartz crystals, , , and have been used in the storage of multi-dimensional data, as shown in Fig. 12. Zhang et al. demonstrated that HSFLs could encode the intensity and polarization state of light at multiple levels and successfully retrieved digital files that were optically encrypted into five dimensions. Experiments indicated that HSFLs in silica glass have high stability and rewritability, meeting some requirements for developing high-density data storage. Recently, Wang et al. demonstrated 100-layer 5D optical data storage based on femtosecond laser-induced birefringence with a high readout accuracy and no bit error rates , as shown in Fig. 12. At present, the limitations of optical storage technology lie mainly in efficient writing and fast and accurate reading. The writing speed has been increased to 225 kB/s-, which is mainly a result of the higher laser power and repetition frequency with pulse energy modulation, as shown in Fig. 12.

    The optical properties were significantly tuned after forming complex micro-nanostructures covered with LIPSs on the surfaces of metals, semiconductors, and dielectrics, , , , , -. “Black” silicon has been extensively studied and was shown to exhibit ultra-low reflectivity and very high absorption in the UV–NIR region as a result of nanostructures fabricated by femtosecond lasers, , , .

    Figure 13. (a) SEM image of composite nanostructures on ZnSe crystal. (b) The photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the plane surface and composite nanostructures irradiated by 1200 nm femtosecond laser. Insets (i) and (ii) show PL images of the nanostructures and plane surface, respectively. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.175, AIP Publishing.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (a) SEM image of composite nanostructures on ZnSe crystal. (b) The photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the plane surface and composite nanostructures irradiated by 1200 nm femtosecond laser. Insets (i) and (ii) show PL images of the nanostructures and plane surface, respectively. Figure reproduced with permission from ref., AIP Publishing.

    Various composite LIPSs have been efficiently fabricated on wide-bandgap SiC and ZnO semiconductors by the multi-beam interference of femtosecond lasers, . These composite nanostructures exhibited greatly enhanced light absorption in the UV–NIR region, as well as an intense blue emission when excited by infrared femtosecond lasers. Compared with the smooth surface of ZnSe crystals, the blue light intensity of the composite nanostructures excited by a 1200 nm femtosecond laser was enhanced by 30–100 times, as shown in Fig. 13.

    Recently, the effect of LIPSs on the electrical properties of ITO, , and the superconducting material niobium, has received increasing attention. ITO films are widely used as transparent conductive materials in solar cells, sensors, and displays. An ITO film with LIPSs exhibited good anisotropic conductivity and, if fabricated under appropriate conditions, could even achieve unidirectional conductivity, as shown in Fig. 14. Moreover, the transmittance in the near-infrared region was greatly enhanced, , . These results demonstrate the potentials of femtosecond LIPSs for efficiently fabricating large-scale transparent nanowires.

    Cubero et al., analyzed the effect of laser irradiation on the critical current value of superconductors by measuring hysteresis loops, and proved that LIPSs could change the superconducting properties of niobium. The secondary electron emission from a copper surface with LIPSs was effectively reduced, which was very effective in suppressing secondary electron emission in accelerators.

    Figure 14. (a–b) Schematic illustrations of the laser-induced structure in the ITO thin film on the substrate, and the resistivity measured longitudinally (IL) or transversely (IT) along the LIPS direction. (c) Microscopic configuration of the four-point probe measurement with the probes longitudinal (Micro-L) or transverse (Micro-T) aligned with the LIPSs. (d) and (e) are the I-V curves of the anisotropic resistivity surface and the unidirectional resistivity surface measured by the Micro-L or Micro-T method, respectively. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.41, under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (ab) Schematic illustrations of the laser-induced structure in the ITO thin film on the substrate, and the resistivity measured longitudinally (IL) or transversely (IT) along the LIPS direction. (c) Microscopic configuration of the four-point probe measurement with the probes longitudinal (Micro-L) or transverse (Micro-T) aligned with the LIPSs. (d) and (e) are the I-V curves of the anisotropic resistivity surface and the unidirectional resistivity surface measured by the Micro-L or Micro-T method, respectively. Figure reproduced with permission from ref., under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

    After femtosecond laser processing, the entire ablation area is covered with nanostructures, which can effectively increase the surface roughness and reduce the contact area with the droplet. This is an efficient method to alter the hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity of sample surfaces, and has been successfully demonstrated on various materials including metals, semiconductors, dielectrics, and polymers-.

    Femtosecond-LIPSs were optimized on steel, titanium alloy, and atomic layer deposition cemented carbide surfaces. The friction coefficient and the wear were reduced significantly, which revealed the great potential for tribological applications-.

    In this paper, the formation mechanisms, high-quality and high-efficiency processing methods, and applications of LIPSs were reviewed. We believe that the following problems that may be worth further investigation.

    HSFLs are typically formed after irradiation with multiple pulses. Their formation mechanism is more complex and difficult to determine than that of LSFLs, requiring extensive experimental and theoretical studies, including numerical simulations of the dynamics using the COMSOL and FDTD methods. In recent years, various far-field super-resolution imaging methods have been reported-. Combining the pump-probe method with far-field super-resolution imaging is very interesting and may be helpful in revealing the formation mechanism of HSFLs irradiated by a femtosecond laser.

    The formation mechanism of LIPSs has always been a hot topic in this field. The scattered light model and propagating SPP model are continuously being developed and refined and have been used to explain the formation of LSFLs on dielectrics, semiconductors, and metals. However, the formation mechanism of LSFLs requires further experimental and theoretical studies, especially ultrafast dynamics.

    The groove width of HSFLs is only tens of nanometers, which provides a new method of nanofabrication using ultrafast laser direct writing. However, before this can be widely applied, there are still many problems to be solved such as the slow scanning speed and poor uniformity of the nanogrooves. In the last decade, multi-dimensional laser shaping technologies in time/frequency and polarization have been rapidly developed, . Synchronizing laser direct writing and multi-dimensional laser shaping in real time will ensure that the nanogrooves grow along the direction of the direct laser writing, improve the local optical field enhancement, and reduce the residual heat of ablation. This is expected to efficiently fabricate high-quality nanopatterns with features less than 30 nm.

    Large-area LIPSs fabricated with high quality, efficiency, and stability can greatly promote their applications in many fields. By developing pulse-shaping methods based on the 4f configuration zero-dispersion system or Fabry-Perot interferometer, the regularity and depth of LIPSs can be effectively improved, which will improve the phase retardation and writing speed and reduce the bit error rate when reading out. Combining time/frequency shaping and spatial shaping can improve the regularity and depth of LIPSs fabricated with high efficiency, thereby improving the purity and brightness of the structural colors. By simultaneously controlling the polarization and spatial distribution of the laser field, nanostructures with designed patterns and specific nanogroove distributions can be processed with high efficiency. Combining time/frequency domain shaping and polarization shaping can improve the quality and efficiency of far-field nanofabrication and allow LIPS applications in new fields such as metasurfaces and microelectronics.

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12074123, 11804227, 91950112), and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2021YFA1401100), and the Foundation of ‘Manufacturing beyond limits’ of Shanghai. The English text of this manuscript was edited using the OSA Language Editing Services (http://languageediting.osa.org/).

    The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • References

    [1]

    Fork RL, Greene BI, Shank CV. Generation of optical pulses shorter than 0.1 psec by colliding pulse mode locking. Appl Phys Lett 38, 671–672 (1981).

    DOI: 10.1063/1.92500

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2]

    Chichkov BN, Momma C, Nolte S, Von Alvensleben F, Tünnermann A. Femtosecond, picosecond and nanosecond laser ablation of solids. Appl Phys A 63, 109–115 (1996).

    DOI: 10.1007/BF01567637

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3]

    Sugioka K, Cheng Y. Ultrafast lasers—reliable tools for advanced materials processing. Light Sci Appl 3, e149 (2014).

    DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2014.30

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4]

    Buividas R, Mikutis M, Juodkazis S. Surface and bulk structuring of materials by ripples with long and short laser pulses: recent advances. Prog Quant Electron 38, 119–156 (2014).

    DOI: 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2014.03.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5]

    Yang QX, Liu HL, He S, Tian QY, Xu B et al. Circular cladding waveguides in Pr:YAG fabricated by femtosecond laser inscription: Raman, luminescence properties and guiding performance. Opto-Electron Adv 4, 200005 (2021).

    DOI: 10.29026/oea.2021.200005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6]

    Wang HT, Hao CL, Lin H, Wang YT, Lan T et al. Generation of super-resolved optical needle and multifocal array using graphene oxide metalenses. Opto-Electron Adv 4, 200031 (2021).

    Google Scholar

    View full references list
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(67)

    1. Dong, B., Sun, Q., Wang, J. et al. Defect evolution and color center generation of high energy density femtosecond laser processed IIa diamond. Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering, 2025, 8(4): 043004. DOI:10.1063/10.0036174
    2. Guan, Y., Ding, Y., Fang, Y. et al. Far-field femtosecond laser-driven λ/73 super-resolution fabrication of 2D van der Waals NbOI2 nanostructures in ambient air. Nature Communications, 2025, 16(1): 4149. DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-59520-9
    3. Sun, X., Wang, W., Zhang, C. et al. Fabrication of color code by femtosecond laser-induced nanostructures on the surface of metal films with yttria-stabilized zirconia substrate. Optics Communications, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.optcom.2025.132151
    4. Sun, X., Wang, W., Mei, X. et al. Comparison of different methods for generating structural colors on polymer surface using femtosecond laser. Optics and Laser Technology, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113029
    5. Liu, X., Huang, C., Liu, H. et al. The evolution mechanism of femtosecond laser-induced periodic structure on monocrystalline silicon with scanning rate and the associated material rearrangement process. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.mssp.2025.109714
    6. Ahmed, A.S., Sancio, D., Müller, D.W. et al. Femtosecond-DLIP on tin-alloyed bronze: Effect of pulse fluence on surface topography for antibacterial application. Materials Today Advances, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.mtadv.2025.100596
    7. Xu, L., Yan, W., Cui, W. et al. Repetition Frequency-Dependent Formation of Oxidized LIPSSs on Amorphous Silicon Films. Photonics, 2025, 12(7): 667. DOI:10.3390/photonics12070667
    8. Liao, J., Zhang, D., Li, Z. Conceptional Pure-Tungsten Metasurfaces Based on Femtosecond Laser Nanomanufacturing. Engineering, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2024.06.018
    9. Fang, Y., Hao, H., Wang, Q. et al. Metasurface-generated Spin-multiplexed & Grafted Perfect Vector Vortex Beams for High-dimensional Optical Information Encryption. Laser and Photonics Reviews, 2025, 19(10): 2402033. DOI:10.1002/lpor.202402033
    10. Wang, D., Lei, X., Li, K. et al. Enhancing the corrosion resistance of Zr alloy: Construction of wavy and coralline surface structures by femtosecond laser ablations in air and water. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.surfin.2025.106483
    11. Matei, A.T., Visan, A.I., Negut, I. Laser-Fabricated Micro/Nanostructures: Mechanisms, Fabrication Techniques, and Applications. Micromachines, 2025, 16(5): 573. DOI:10.3390/mi16050573
    12. Zheng, N., Smith, D., Ng, S.H. et al. Infrared Absorption of Laser Patterned Sapphire Al2O3 for Radiative Cooling. Micromachines, 2025, 16(4): 476. DOI:10.3390/mi16040476
    13. Hua, R., Xu, Z., Tao, Z. et al. Fabrication of high-quality surface microtextures on GaN by femtosecond laser direct writing. Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering, 2025, 8(1): 013005. DOI:10.1063/10.0028760
    14. Ahmed, K., Agrawal, A.K., Kaushik, S. et al. Plasmonic waveguide-mode based aluminum nanogratings for enhanced chemical and biological sensing in the UV regime. Journal of Optics United Kingdom, 2025, 27(3): 035001. DOI:10.1088/2040-8986/adab03
    15. Li, T., Tang, R., Xu, L. et al. Femtosecond Laser Ablation of High-Entropy Ceramics RE2(Ce0.2Zr0.2Hf0.2Sn0.2Ti0.2)2O7 (RE = Sm, Eu, Er) in Liquid for Colloid Synthesis. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2025, 129(7): 3707-3720. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c04851
    16. Yang, J., Zhou, S., Yang, M. et al. Antireflection microstructures on a ZnS surface fabricated by femtosecond laser direct writing assisted with wet etching. Optical Materials, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.optmat.2024.116597
    17. Ganeev, R.A., Yassine, A., Elnassar, Z. et al. 2D ripples and grooves formation on GaAs using different states of polarization of femtosecond pulses. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.mssp.2024.109062
    18. Li, Z., Chen, H., Han, M. et al. Femtosecond Laser-Induced Grid-Like Periodic Surface Structure on Silicon Substrate and Its Preliminary Application | [飞 秒 激 光 诱 导 硅 网 格 状 条 纹 结 构 及 其 初 步 应 用]. Zhongguo Jiguang Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2025, 52(4): 0402403. DOI:10.3788/CJL240884
    19. Li, K., Han, R., Suo, M. et al. High quality nanogratings far beyond diffraction limits on silicon efficiently fabricated using femtosecond laser dual-beam interference direct writing. Optics and Laser Technology, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111505
    20. Zhang, J., Han, B., Liu, Y. et al. Theoretical Study of Transient Properties for Laser-Induced Periodic Structures on Gold Surface | [激 光 诱 导 金 表 面 周 期 性 结 构 瞬 态 特 性 理 论 研 究]. Laser and Optoelectronics Progress, 2025, 62(1): 0114002. DOI:10.3788/LOP240826
    21. Yang, Q., Yu, M., Chen, Z. et al. A novel approach towards robust construction of physical colors on lithium niobate crystal. Opto Electronic Advances, 2025, 8(3): 240193. DOI:10.29026/oea.2025.240193
    22. Devi, N., Su, C.-R., Arpornwichanop, A. et al. Fabrication of superhydrophobic TiN-coated SS304 flow field plates via femtosecond laser processing for fuel cell applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.165
    23. Omeje, I.S., Iabbaden, D., Ganster, P. et al. Atomistic Simulations of Wetting Dynamics of Water Nanodroplets on Nanotextured Titanium: Implications for Medical Implants. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2024, 7(21): 24426-24436. DOI:10.1021/acsanm.4c03946
    24. Yin, J.-H., Cao, Y.-Z., Shang, Y.-Y. et al. Ablation mechanism and protection of aluminum alloy under high power laser irradiation: A review | [铝合金在高功率激光辐照下的烧蚀机理及损伤防护研究综述]. Journal of Central South University, 2024, 31(11): 4039-4059. DOI:10.1007/s11771-024-5811-4
    25. Li, R., Liu, S., Zhou, Y. et al. Absorbing-coating-assisted laser-induced periodic surface structures on solids. Optics and Laser Technology, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.110994
    26. Kang, H.-B., Tang, W.-J., Jia, C.-L. et al. Optical and fluorescent properties in Er, Yb:YAG double-line waveguide by femtosecond laser direct writing. Physica B Condensed Matter, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.physb.2024.416099
    27. Wu, J.-P., Zhao, J., Xiao, G.-J. et al. Fabrication and characteristics of the planar and ridge Er3+-doped germanate glass waveguides. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics, 2024, 35(24): 1637. DOI:10.1007/s10854-024-13413-7
    28. Legrand, Q., Valette, S. Separation of the topographical and chemical components of the wettability of textured surfaces by femtosecond laser. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.surfin.2024.104720
    29. Kalnins, K., Kim, V.V., Reddy, A.N.K. et al. Spatially Variable Ripple and Groove Formation on Gallium Arsenide Using Linear, Radial, and Azimuthal Polarizations of Laser Beam. Photonics, 2024, 11(8): 710. DOI:10.3390/photonics11080710
    30. Zheng, N., Buividas, R., Huang, H.-H. et al. Laser Machining at High ∼PW/cm2 Intensity and High Throughput. Photonics, 2024, 11(7): 598. DOI:10.3390/photonics11070598
    31. Xia, Z., Zhang, J., Qian, J. et al. Equivalent power densities model for multi-pulse ultrashort pulsed laser processing. Applied Physics A Materials Science and Processing, 2024, 130(6): 440. DOI:10.1007/s00339-024-07571-y
    32. Obata, K., Kawabata, S., Hanada, Y. et al. High performance micromachining of sapphire by laser induced plasma assisted ablation (LIPAA) using GHz burst mode femtosecond pulses. Opto Electronic Science, 2024, 3(6): 230053. DOI:10.29026/oes.2024.230053
    33. Banerjee, D., Akkanaboina, M., Kanaka, R.K. et al. Nanotubular Arrayed LIPSS Achieved with Femtosecond Bessel Beam on Silver Surface for SERS-Based Multiple Explosive Sensing. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2024, 128(11): 4655-4665. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00160
    34. Ren, Y., Guo, K., Li, Y. et al. Femtosecond laser induced periodic surface structures on crystals: Formation, evolution and application. Vacuum, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.112900
    35. Han, R., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Q. et al. Ultrafast dynamics of femtosecond laser-induced high spatial frequency periodic structures on silicon surfaces. Opto Electronic Science, 2024, 3(3): 230013. DOI:10.29026/oes.2024.230013
    36. Geng, J., Yan, J., Shi, L. s-Polarized Laser Oblique Incidence Induces“Leaf Vein-Like” Self-Organizing Stripe Structures | [s 偏振激光斜入射诱导类“叶脉”状自组织条纹结构]. Laser and Optoelectronics Progress, 2024, 61(3): 0314001. DOI:10.3788/LOP232621
    37. Liu, J., Zhang, H., Ai, S. et al. New channel guiding structures via femtosecond laser direct writing z-cut LiNbO3 crystals. Results in Physics, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107379
    38. Zhang, D., Chen, T., Shen, T. et al. Sub-diffraction limited nanogroove fabrication of 30 nm features on diamond films using 800 nm femtosecond laser irradiation. Heliyon, 2024, 10(2): e24240. DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24240
    39. Guo, Y., Zhao, H. Femtosecond laser processed superhydrophobic surface. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.12.005
    40. Yulianto, N., Titok Sugiarto, I., Panji Tresna, W. et al. Laser-Induced Periodic Nanoripples Generation on Gallium Nitride Using Near-infrared Ultrashort Pulsed Laser. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2024, 2696(1): 012002. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/2696/1/012002
    41. Dobrotvorskiy, S., Aleksenko, B.A., Basova, Y. et al. MECHANISM OF LIPSS FORMATION UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF PLASMA LENS DURING FEMTOSECOND LASER PROCESSING. International Journal of Mechatronics and Applied Mechanics, 2024, 2024(18): 7-17. DOI:10.17683/ijomam/issue18.1
    42. Vanlallawmzuali, Lalbiaktluangi, C., Singh, A., Zothanpuia, Yadav, M.K. Surface modification: strategies to prevent microbial growth on medical implants. Microbial Biofilms Role in Human Infectious Diseases, 2024. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-443-19252-4.00008-0
    43. Li, W., Wu, J., Li, Y. et al. Simulation study on the thermal effect of continuous laser heating quartz materials. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2024. DOI:10.3389/fchem.2024.1435562
    44. [No author name available]. Microstructural and properties of ultrafast laser selective micro-welding joints of sapphire and Invar alloys | [蓝宝石与 Invar 合金超快激光选区微焊接接头组织和性能]. Hanjie Xuebao Transactions of the China Welding Institution, 2023, 44(12): 41-48 and 62. DOI:10.12073/j.hjxb.20230613012
    45. Mincuzzi, G., Bourtereau, A., Gemini, L. et al. Through the Forming Process of Femtosecond-Laser Nanotextured Sheets for Production of Complex 3D Parts. Applied Sciences Switzerland, 2023, 13(22): 12500. DOI:10.3390/app132212500
    46. Ni, J., Wei, Q., Zhang, Y. et al. Super-resolution three-dimensional structured illumination profilometry for in situ measurement of femtosecond laser ablation morphology. APL Photonics, 2023, 8(10): 101302. DOI:10.1063/5.0165363
    47. Liu, Z., Yuan, Y., Li, Z. et al. Interaction Between Ultrafast Laser and Transparent Hard Materials: from Phase Change Mechanism to Eternal Optical Data Storage | [飞 秒 激 光 与 透 明 硬 质 材 料 的 相 互 作 用:从 相 变 机 理 到永 久 光 存 储]. Zhongguo Jiguang Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(18): 1813005. DOI:10.3788/CJL230742
    48. Daskalova, A., Angelova, L. Design of Surfaces with Persistent Antimicrobial Properties on Stainless Steel Developed Using Femtosecond Laser Texturing for Application in “High Traffic” Objects. Nanomaterials, 2023, 13(17): 2396. DOI:10.3390/nano13172396
    49. Jia, Y., Chen, F. Recent progress on femtosecond laser micro-/nano-fabrication of functional photonic structures in dielectric crystals: A brief review and perspective. APL Photonics, 2023, 8(9): 090901. DOI:10.1063/5.0160067
    50. Liu, Y., Zhu, X., Jin, C. et al. High-quality Subwavelength Grating Structures Fabrication on Fused Silica Surfaces by Femtosecond Laser | [融 石 英 表 面 高 质 量 亚 波 长 光 栅 结 构 的飞 秒 激 光 加 工]. Guangzi Xuebao Acta Photonica Sinica, 2023, 52(7): 0752307. DOI:10.3788/gzxb20235207.0752307
    51. Shi, H., Yao, Q., Yin, W. et al. Study on Polarization Dependence of Ultrafast Combination Pulse Ablation on Silicon Surface(Invited) | [超 快 复 合 脉 冲 烧 蚀 硅 表 面 的 偏 振 依 赖 性 研 究(特 邀)]. Guangzi Xuebao Acta Photonica Sinica, 2023, 52(7): 0752304. DOI:10.3788/gzxb20235207.0752304
    52. Shi, L., Geng, J., Qiu, M. Influence of Scanning Direction on the Quality of LIPSS on Metal-Si Hybrid Films(Invited) | [扫 描 方 向 对 金 属 和 硅 复 合 薄 膜 表 面 激 光 诱 导自 组 织 加 工 质 量 的 影 响(特 邀)]. Guangzi Xuebao Acta Photonica Sinica, 2023, 52(7): 0752303. DOI:10.3788/gzxb20235207.0752303
    53. Rajendran, R., Krishnadev, E.R., Anoop, K.K. Direct Femtosecond Laser Processing for Generating High Spatial Frequency LIPSS (HSFL) on Borosilicate Glasses with Large-Area Coverage. Photonics, 2023, 10(7): 793. DOI:10.3390/photonics10070793
    54. Li, P., Yin, R., Cheng, J. et al. Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Biomaterials and Approaches to Its Treatment and Prevention. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(14): 11680. DOI:10.3390/ijms241411680
    55. Bogatskaya, A., Gulina, Y., Smirnov, N. et al. An Experimental Study of Multiphoton Ionization in Fused Silica at IR and Visible Wavelengths. Photonics, 2023, 10(5): 515. DOI:10.3390/photonics10050515
    56. Wang, C., Chen, X., Jia, X. et al. Fabrication of the double-layer millimeter wave frequency selective surface by femtosecond laser. Optik, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170726
    57. Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., Xu, Y. et al. Extremely High-Quality Periodic Structures on ITO Film Efficiently Fabricated by Femtosecond Pulse Train Output from a Frequency-Doubled Fabry–Perot Cavity. Nanomaterials, 2023, 13(9): 1510. DOI:10.3390/nano13091510
    58. Banerjee, D., Akkanaboina, M., Kumar Kanaka, R. et al. Femtosecond Bessel beam induced ladder-like LIPSS on trimetallic surface for SERS-based sensing of Tetryl and PETN. Applied Surface Science, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.156561
    59. Lin, Y., Chen, S., Xu, C. et al. Femtosecond laser upgrading the quality of bismuth films to enhance ultra-broadband photodetection. Optics Express, 2023, 31(6): 9515-9525. DOI:10.1364/OE.482018
    60. Yin, W., Song, J., Ren, X. et al. Nonlinear ionization control by temporally shaped fs+ps double-pulse sequence on ZnO. Chinese Optics Letters, 2023, 21(2): 021602. DOI:10.3788/COL202321.021602
    61. Wu, Y., Xie, P., Ding, Q. et al. Magnetic plasmons in plasmonic nanostructures: An overview. Journal of Applied Physics, 2023, 133(3): 030902. DOI:10.1063/5.0131903
    62. Geng, J., Shi, L., Liu, J. et al. Laser-induced deep-subwavelength periodic nanostructures with large-scale uniformity. Applied Physics Letters, 2023, 122(2): 021104. DOI:10.1063/5.0138290
    63. Chen, Z., Yang, Q., Liu, H. Phase transition properties of the LIPSS induced by femtosecond laser direct writing on PMN-PT crystal | [飞秒激光直写诱导 PMN-PT 晶体表面 LIPSS 结构相变特性]. Guangdian Gongcheng Opto Electronic Engineering, 2023, 50(3): 220275. DOI:10.12086/oee.2023.220275
    64. Cao, G., Lin, H., Jia, B. Broadband Diffractive Graphene Orbital Angular Momentum Metalens by Laser Nanoprinting. Ultrafast Science, 2023. DOI:10.34133/ultrafastscience.0018
    65. Pimenov, S.M., Zavedeev, E.V., Arutyunyan, N.R. et al. Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on diamond-like nanocomposite films. Diamond and Related Materials, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.diamond.2022.109517
    66. Chen, L., Yang, J., Jiang, Q. et al. Regular Periodic Surface Structures on Indium Tin Oxide Film Efficiently Fabricated by Femtosecond Laser Direct Writing with a Cylindrical Lens. Materials, 2022, 15(15): 5092. DOI:10.3390/ma15155092
    67. Tan, D., Sun, K., Li, Z. et al. Photo-processing of perovskites: current research status and challenges. Opto Electronic Science, 2022, 1(11) DOI:10.29026/oes.2022.220014

    Other cited types(1)

  • Author Information

    • Yuchan Zhang On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    • Qilin Jiang On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    • Mingquan Long On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    • Ruozhong Han On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    • Corresponding author: Kaiqiang Cao, kqcao@lps.ecnu.edu.cn On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      KQ Cao, E-mail: kqcao@lps.ecnu.edu.cn
      • State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    • Shian Zhang On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    • Donghai Feng On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    • Corresponding author: Tianqing Jia, tqjia@phy.ecnu.edu.cn On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      TQ Jia, E-mail: tqjia@phy.ecnu.edu.cn
      • State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
      • Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
    • Zhenrong Sun On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    • Jianrong Qiu On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Optical Instrumentation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
    • Hongxing Xu On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, School of Physics and Materials Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Copyright

    Open Access. © The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
  • About this Article

    DOI: 10.29026/oes.2022.220005
    Cite this Article
    Yuchan Zhang, Qilin Jiang, Mingquan Long, et al. Femtosecond laser-induced periodic structures: mechanisms, techniques, and applications. Opto-Electronic Science 1, 220005 (2022). DOI: 10.29026/oes.2022.220005
    Download Citation
    Article History
    • Received Date March 21, 2022
    • Accepted Date May 09, 2022
    • Published Date June 20, 2022
    Article Metrics
    Article Views(21322) PDF Downloads(1602) Article has an altmetric score of 14
    Share:
  • Related Articles

[1]

Fork RL, Greene BI, Shank CV. Generation of optical pulses shorter than 0.1 psec by colliding pulse mode locking. Appl Phys Lett 38, 671–672 (1981).

DOI: 10.1063/1.92500

CrossRef Google Scholar

[2]

Chichkov BN, Momma C, Nolte S, Von Alvensleben F, Tünnermann A. Femtosecond, picosecond and nanosecond laser ablation of solids. Appl Phys A 63, 109–115 (1996).

DOI: 10.1007/BF01567637

CrossRef Google Scholar

[3]

Sugioka K, Cheng Y. Ultrafast lasers—reliable tools for advanced materials processing. Light Sci Appl 3, e149 (2014).

DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2014.30

CrossRef Google Scholar

[4]

Buividas R, Mikutis M, Juodkazis S. Surface and bulk structuring of materials by ripples with long and short laser pulses: recent advances. Prog Quant Electron 38, 119–156 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2014.03.002

CrossRef Google Scholar

[5]

Yang QX, Liu HL, He S, Tian QY, Xu B et al. Circular cladding waveguides in Pr:YAG fabricated by femtosecond laser inscription: Raman, luminescence properties and guiding performance. Opto-Electron Adv 4, 200005 (2021).

DOI: 10.29026/oea.2021.200005

CrossRef Google Scholar

[6]

Wang HT, Hao CL, Lin H, Wang YT, Lan T et al. Generation of super-resolved optical needle and multifocal array using graphene oxide metalenses. Opto-Electron Adv 4, 200031 (2021).

Google Scholar

[7]

Zhang YC, Jiang QL, Cao KQ, Chen TQ, Cheng K et al. Extremely regular periodic surface structures in a large area efficiently induced on silicon by temporally shaped femtosecond laser. Photonics Res 9, 839–847 (2021).

DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.418937

CrossRef Google Scholar

[8]

Jia TQ, Chen HX, Huang M, Zhao FL, Qiu JR et al. Formation of nanogratings on the surface of a ZnSe crystal irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses. Phys Rev B 72, 125429 (2005).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.125429

CrossRef Google Scholar

[9]

Wang JC, Guo CL. Ultrafast dynamics of femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface pattern formation on metals. Appl Phys Lett 87, 251914 (2005).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2146067

CrossRef Google Scholar

[10]

Wang L, Chen QD, Cao XW, Buividas R, Wang XW et al. Plasmonic nano-printing: large-area nanoscale energy deposition for efficient surface texturing. Light Sci Appl 6, e17112 (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2017.112

CrossRef Google Scholar

[11]

Miyaji G, Miyazaki K, Zhang KF, Yoshifuji T, Fujita J. Mechanism of femtosecond-laser-induced periodic nanostructure formation on crystalline silicon surface immersed in water. Opt Express 20, 14848–14856 (2012).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.014848

CrossRef Google Scholar

[12]

Xie HB, Zhao B, Cheng JL, Chamoli SK, Zou TT et al. Super-regular femtosecond laser nanolithography based on dual-interface plasmons coupling. Nanophotonics 10, 3831–3842 (2021).

DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2021-0329

CrossRef Google Scholar

[13]

Gnilitskyi I, Derrien TJY, Levy Y, Bulgakova NM, Mocek T et al. High-speed manufacturing of highly regular femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures: physical origin of regularity. Sci Rep 7, 8485 (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08788-z

CrossRef Google Scholar

[14]

Boneberg J, Leiderer P. Optical near-field imaging and nanostructuring by means of laser ablation. Opto-Electron Sci 1, 210003 (2022).

Google Scholar

[15]

Birnbaum M. Semiconductor surface damage produced by ruby lasers. J Appl Phys 36, 3688–3689 (1965).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1703071

CrossRef Google Scholar

[16]

Sipe JE, Young JF, Preston JS, Van Driel HM. Laser-induced periodic surface structure. I. Theory. Phys Rev B 27, 1141–1154 (1983).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.27.1141

CrossRef Google Scholar

[17]

Shimotsuma Y, Kazansky PG, Qiu JR, Hirao K. Self-organized nanogratings in glass irradiated by ultrashort light pulses. Phys Rev Lett 91, 247405 (2003).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.247405

CrossRef Google Scholar

[18]

Bonse J, Munz M, Sturm H. Structure formation on the surface of indium phosphide irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses. J Appl Phys 97, 013538 (2005).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1827919

CrossRef Google Scholar

[19]

Miyaji G, Miyazaki K. Ultrafast dynamics of periodic nanostructure formation on diamondlike carbon films irradiated with femtosecond laser pulses. Appl Phys Lett 89, 191902 (2006).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2374858

CrossRef Google Scholar

[20]

Bhardwaj VR, Simova E, Rajeev PP, Hnatovsky C, Taylor RS et al. Optically produced arrays of planar nanostructures inside fused silica. Phys Rev Lett 96, 057404 (2006).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.057404

CrossRef Google Scholar

[21]

Huang M, Zhao FL, Cheng Y, Xu NS, Xu ZZ. Origin of laser-induced near-subwavelength ripples: interference between surface plasmons and incident laser. ACS Nano 3, 4062–4070 (2009).

DOI: 10.1021/nn900654v

CrossRef Google Scholar

[22]

Höhm S, Rosenfeld A, Krüger J, Bonse J. Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on silica. J Appl Phys 112, 014901 (2012).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4730902

CrossRef Google Scholar

[23]

Bonse J, Krüger J, Höhm S, Rosenfeld A. Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures. J Laser Appl 24, 042006 (2012).

DOI: 10.2351/1.4712658

CrossRef Google Scholar

[24]

Reif J, Varlamova O, Uhlig S, Varlamov S, Bestehorn M. On the physics of self-organized nanostructure formation upon femtosecond laser ablation. Appl Phys A 117, 179–184 (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-014-8339-x

CrossRef Google Scholar

[25]

Cheng K, Liu JK, Cao KQ, Chen L, Zhang YC et al. Ultrafast dynamics of single-pulse femtosecond laser-induced periodic ripples on the surface of a gold film. Phys Rev B 98, 184106 (2018).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.184106

CrossRef Google Scholar

[26]

Rudenko A, Mauclair C, Garrelie F, Stoian R, Colombier JP. Self-organization of surfaces on the nanoscale by topography-mediated selection of quasi-cylindrical and plasmonic waves. Nanophotonics 8, 459–465 (2019).

DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2018-0206

CrossRef Google Scholar

[27]

Lin ZY, Liu HG, Ji LF, Lin WX, Hong MH. Realization of ~10 nm features on semiconductor surfaces via femtosecond laser direct patterning in far field and in ambient air. Nano Lett 20, 4947–4952 (2020).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01013

CrossRef Google Scholar

[28]

Tsibidis GD, Fotakis C, Stratakis E. From ripples to spikes: a hydrodynamical mechanism to interpret femtosecond laser-induced self-assembled structures. Phys Rev B 92, 041405(R) (2015).

Google Scholar

[29]

Vorobyev AY, Guo CL. Direct femtosecond laser surface nano/microstructuring and its applications. Laser Photonics Rev 7, 385–407 (2013).

DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201200017

CrossRef Google Scholar

[30]

Fraggelakis F, Mincuzzi G, Lopez J, Manek-Hönninger I, Kling R. Controlling 2D laser nano structuring over large area with double femtosecond pulses. Appl Surf Sci 470, 677–686 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.106

CrossRef Google Scholar

[31]

Zhang DS, Li XZ, Fu Y, Yao QH, Li ZG et al. Liquid vortexes and flows induced by femtosecond laser ablation in liquid governing formation of circular and crisscross LIPSS. Opto-Electron Adv 5, 210066 (2022).

Google Scholar

[32]

Parker AR. 515 million years of structural colour. J Opt A Pure Appl Opt 2, R15–R28 (2000).

DOI: 10.1088/1464-4258/2/6/201

CrossRef Google Scholar

[33]

Wu C, Crouch CH, Zhao L, Carey JE, Younkin R et al. Near-unity below-band-gap absorption by microstructured silicon. Appl Phys Lett 78, 1850–1852 (2001).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1358846

CrossRef Google Scholar

[34]

Bricchi E, Klappauf BG, Kazansky PG. Form birefringence and negative index change created by femtosecond direct writing in transparent materials. Opt Lett 29, 119–121 (2004).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.29.000119

CrossRef Google Scholar

[35]

Vorobyev AY, Guo CL. Colorizing metals with femtosecond laser pulses. Appl Phys Lett 92, 041914 (2008).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2834902

CrossRef Google Scholar

[36]

Shimotsuma Y, Sakakura M, Kazansky PG, Beresna M, Qiu JR et al. Ultrafast manipulation of self-assembled form birefringence in glass. Adv Mater 22, 4039–4043 (2010).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201000921

CrossRef Google Scholar

[37]

Xiong PX, Jia TQ, Jia X, Feng DH, Zhang SA et al. Ultraviolet luminescence enhancement of ZnO two-dimensional periodic nanostructures fabricated by the interference of three femtosecond laser beams. New J Phys 13, 023044 (2011).

DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/2/023044

CrossRef Google Scholar

[38]

Gu M, Li XP, Cao YY. Optical storage arrays: a perspective for future big data storage. Light Sci Appl 3, e177 (2014).

DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2014.58

CrossRef Google Scholar

[39]

Crouch CH, Carey JE, Shen M, Mazur E, Génin FY. Infrared absorption by sulfur-doped silicon formed by femtosecond laser irradiation. Appl Phys A 79, 1635–1641 (2004).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-004-2676-0

CrossRef Google Scholar

[40]

Solodar A, Cerkauskaite A, Drevinskas R, Kazansky PG, Abdulhalim I. Ultrafast laser induced nanostructured ITO for liquid crystal alignment and higher transparency electrodes. Appl Phys Lett 113, 081603 (2018).

DOI: 10.1063/1.5040692

CrossRef Google Scholar

[41]

Lopez-Santos C, Puerto D, Siegel J, Macias-Montero M, Florian C et al. Anisotropic resistivity surfaces produced in ITO films by laser-induced nanoscale self-organization. Adv Opt Mater 9, 2001086 (2021).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.202001086

CrossRef Google Scholar

[42]

Garrelie F, Colombier JP, Pigeon F, Tonchev S, Faure N et al. Evidence of surface plasmon resonance in ultrafast laser-induced ripples. Opt Express 19, 9035–9043 (2011).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.19.009035

CrossRef Google Scholar

[43]

Tsibidis GD, Skoulas E, Papadopoulos A, Stratakis E. Convection roll-driven generation of supra-wavelength periodic surface structures on dielectrics upon irradiation with femtosecond pulsed lasers. Phys Rev B 94, 081305(R) (2016).

Google Scholar

[44]

Emmony DC, Howson RP, Willis LJ. Laser mirror damage in germanium at 10.6 μm. Appl Phys Lett 23, 598–600 (1973).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1654761

CrossRef Google Scholar

[45]

Csete M, Marti O, Bor Z. Laser-induced periodic surface structures on different poly-carbonate films. Appl Phys A 73, 521–526 (2001).

DOI: 10.1007/s003390100973

CrossRef Google Scholar

[46]

Austin DR, Kafka KRP, Lai YH, Wang Z, Zhang KK et al. High spatial frequency laser induced periodic surface structure formation in germanium by mid-IR femtosecond pulses. J Appl Phys 120, 143103 (2016).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4964737

CrossRef Google Scholar

[47]

Bonse J, Höhm S, Kirner SV, Rosenfeld A, Krüger J. Laser-induced periodic surface structures-a scientific evergreen. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 23, 9000615 (2017).

Google Scholar

[48]

Bonse J, Rosenfeld A, Krüger J. On the role of surface plasmon polaritons in the formation of laser-induced periodic surface structures upon irradiation of silicon by femtosecond-laser pulses. J Appl Phys 106, 104910 (2009).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3261734

CrossRef Google Scholar

[49]

Zhou K, Jia X, Jia TQ, Cheng K, Cao KQ et al. The influences of surface plasmons and thermal effects on femtosecond laser-induced subwavelength periodic ripples on Au film by pump-probe imaging. J Appl Phys 121, 104301 (2017).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4978375

CrossRef Google Scholar

[50]

Gurevich EL, Gurevich SV. Laser induced periodic surface structures induced by surface plasmons coupled via roughness. Appl Surf Sci 302, 118–123 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.141

CrossRef Google Scholar

[51]

Liu JK, Jia TQ, Zhao HW, Huang YQ. Two-photon excitation of surface plasmon and the period-increasing effect of low spatial frequency ripples on a GaP crystal in air/water. J Phys D Appl Phys 49, 435105 (2016).

DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/43/435105

CrossRef Google Scholar

[52]

Liu JK, Jia X, Wu WS, Cheng K, Feng DH et al. Ultrafast imaging on the formation of periodic ripples on a Si surface with a prefabricated nanogroove induced by a single femtosecond laser pulse. Opt Express 26, 6302–6315 (2018).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.26.006302

CrossRef Google Scholar

[53]

Fuentes-Edfuf Y, Sánchez-Gil JA, Florian C, Giannini V, Solis J et al. Surface plasmon polaritons on rough metal surfaces: role in the formation of laser-induced periodic surface structures. ACS Omega 4, 6939–6946 (2019).

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00546

CrossRef Google Scholar

[54]

Kafka KRP, Austin DR, Li H, Yi AY, Cheng J et al. Time-resolved measurement of single pulse femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structure formation induced by a pre-fabricated surface groove. Opt Express 23, 19432–19441 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.019432

CrossRef Google Scholar

[55]

Jia X, Jia TQ, Peng NN, Feng DH, Zhang SA et al. Dynamics of femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on silicon by high spatial and temporal resolution imaging. J Appl Phys 115, 143102 (2014).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4870445

CrossRef Google Scholar

[56]

Cheng K, Cao KQ, Zhang YC, Han RZ, Feng DH et al. Ultrafast dynamics of subwavelength periodic ripples induced by single femtosecond pulse: from noble to common metals. J Phys D Appl Phys 53, 285102 (2020).

DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab82d9

CrossRef Google Scholar

[57]

Cao KQ, Chen L, Wu HC, Liu JK, Cheng K et al. Large-area commercial-grating-quality subwavelength periodic ripples on silicon efficiently fabricated by gentle ablation with femtosecond laser interference via two cylindrical lenses. Opt Laser Technol 131, 106441 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106441

CrossRef Google Scholar

[58]

Derrien TJY, Itina TE, Torres R, Sarnet T, Sentis M. Possible surface plasmon polariton excitation under femtosecond laser irradiation of silicon. J Appl Phys 114, 083104 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4818433

CrossRef Google Scholar

[59]

Tsibidis GD, Barberoglou M, Loukakos PA, Stratakis E, Fotakis C. Dynamics of ripple formation on silicon surfaces by ultrashort laser pulses in subablation conditions. Phys Rev B 86, 115316 (2012).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115316

CrossRef Google Scholar

[60]

Barberoglou M, Tsibidis GD, Gray D, Magoulakis E, Fotakis C et al. The influence of ultra-fast temporal energy regulation on the morphology of Si surfaces through femtosecond double pulse laser irradiation. Appl Phys A 113, 273–283 (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-013-7893-y

CrossRef Google Scholar

[61]

Tsibidis GD, Stratakis E, Loukakos PA, Fotakis C. Controlled ultrashort-pulse laser-induced ripple formation on semiconductors. Appl Phys A 114, 57–68 (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-013-8113-5

CrossRef Google Scholar

[62]

Miyaji G, Hagiya M, Miyazaki K. Excitation of surface plasmon polaritons on silicon with an intense femtosecond laser pulse. Phys Rev B 96, 045122 (2017).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.045122

CrossRef Google Scholar

[63]

Wortmann D, Gottmann J, Brandt N, Horn-Solle H. Micro- and nanostructures inside sapphire by fs-laser irradiation and selective etching. Opt Express 16, 1517–1522 (2008).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.16.001517

CrossRef Google Scholar

[64]

Gottmann J, Wortmann D, Hörstmann-Jungemann M. Fabrication of sub-wavelength surface ripples and in-volume nanostructures by fs-laser induced selective etching. Appl Surf Sci 255, 5641–5646 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.097

CrossRef Google Scholar

[65]

Richter S, Miese C, Döring S, Zimmermann F, Withford MJ et al. Laser induced nanogratings beyond fused silica-periodic nanostructures in borosilicate glasses and ULE™. Opt Mater Express 3, 1161–1166 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OME.3.001161

CrossRef Google Scholar

[66]

Hnatovsky C, Taylor RS, Rajeev PP, Simova E, Bhardwaj VR et al. Pulse duration dependence of femtosecond-laser-fabricated nanogratings in fused silica. Appl Phys Lett 87, 014104 (2005).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1991991

CrossRef Google Scholar

[67]

Corbari C, Champion A, Gecevičius M, Beresna M, Bellouard Y et al. Femtosecond versus picosecond laser machining of nano-gratings and micro-channels in silica glass. Opt Express 21, 3946–3958 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.003946

CrossRef Google Scholar

[68]

Taylor RS, Hnatovsky C, Simova E, Rajeev PP, Rayner DM et al. Femtosecond laser erasing and rewriting of self-organized planar nanocracks in fused silica glass. Opt Lett 32, 2888–2890 (2007).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.32.002888

CrossRef Google Scholar

[69]

Juodkazis S, Nishimura K, Okuno H, Tabuchi Y, Matsuo S et al. Three-dimensional laser microfabrication of metals, semiconductors, and dielectrics. Proc SPIE 6732, 67320B (2007).

DOI: 10.1117/12.751889

CrossRef Google Scholar

[70]

Taylor R, Hnatovsky C, Simova E. Applications of femtosecond laser induced self-organized planar nanocracks inside fused silica glass. Laser Photonics Rev 2, 26–46 (2008).

DOI: 10.1002/lpor.200710031

CrossRef Google Scholar

[71]

Liao Y, Pan WJ, Cui Y, Qiao LL, Bellouard Y et al. Formation of in-volume nanogratings with sub-100-nm periods in glass by femtosecond laser irradiation. Opt Lett 40, 3623–3626 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.40.003623

CrossRef Google Scholar

[72]

Liao Y, Ni JL, Qiao LL, Huang M, Bellouard Y et al. High-fidelity visualization of formation of volume nanogratings in porous glass by femtosecond laser irradiation. Optica 2, 329–334 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000329

CrossRef Google Scholar

[73]

Nayak BK, Gupta MC. Ultrafast laser-induced self-organized conical micro/nano surface structures and their origin. Opt Lasers Eng 48, 966–973 (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.05.009

CrossRef Google Scholar

[74]

Volkov SN, Kaplan AE, Miyazaki K. Evanescent field at nanocorrugated dielectric surface. Appl Phys Lett 94, 041104 (2009).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3075055

CrossRef Google Scholar

[75]

Dong YY, Molian P. Coulomb explosion-induced formation of highly oriented nanoparticles on thin films of 3C-SiC by the femtosecond pulsed laser. Appl Phys Lett 84, 10–12 (2004).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1637948

CrossRef Google Scholar

[76]

Huang M, Zhao FL, Cheng Y, Xu NS, Xu ZZ. Mechanisms of ultrafast laser-induced deep-subwavelength gratings on graphite and diamond. Phys Rev B 79, 125436 (2009).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.125436

CrossRef Google Scholar

[77]

Jia TQ, Zhao FL, Huang M, Chen HX, Qiu JR et al. Alignment of nanoparticles formed on the surface of 6H-SiC crystals irradiated by two collinear femtosecond laser beams. Appl Phys Lett 88, 111117 (2006).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2186067

CrossRef Google Scholar

[78]

Le Harzic R, Dörr D, Sauer D, Stracke F, Zimmermann H. Generation of high spatial frequency ripples on silicon under ultrashort laser pulses irradiation. Appl Phys Lett 98, 211905 (2011).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3593493

CrossRef Google Scholar

[79]

Hou SS, Huo YY, Xiong PX, Zhang Y, Zhang SA et al. Formation of long- and short-periodic nanoripples on stainless steel irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses. J Phys D Appl Phys 44, 505401 (2011).

DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/44/50/505401

CrossRef Google Scholar

[80]

Huang M, Cheng Y, Zhao FL, Xu ZZ. The significant role of plasmonic effects in femtosecond laser-induced grating fabrication on the nanoscale. Ann Phys 525, 74–86 (2013).

DOI: 10.1002/andp.201200136

CrossRef Google Scholar

[81]

Wang L, Xu BB, Cao XW, Li QK, Tian WJ et al. Competition between subwavelength and deep-subwavelength structures ablated by ultrashort laser pulses. Optica 4, 637–642 (2017).

DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.4.000637

CrossRef Google Scholar

[82]

Miyazaki K, Miyaji G. Nanograting formation through surface plasmon fields induced by femtosecond laser pulses. J Appl Phys 114, 153108 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4826078

CrossRef Google Scholar

[83]

Makin VS, Makin RS, Vorobyev AY, Guo CL. Dissipative nanostructures and Feigenbaum's universality in the "Metal-high-power ultrashort-pulsed polarized radiation" nonequilibrium nonlinear dynamical system. Tech Phys Lett 34, 387–390 (2008).

DOI: 10.1134/S1063785008050088

CrossRef Tech Phys Lett 34, 387–390 (2008).

" target="_blank">Google Scholar

[84]

Fuentes-Edfuf Y, Sánchez-Gil JA, Garcia-Pardo M, Serna R, Tsibidis GD et al. Tuning the period of femtosecond laser induced surface structures in steel: from angled incidence to quill writing. Appl Surf Sci 493, 948–955 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.106

CrossRef Google Scholar

[85]

Zhang H, Colombier JP, Li C, Faure N, Cheng GH et al. Coherence in ultrafast laser-induced periodic surface structures. Phys Rev B 92, 174109 (2015).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.174109

CrossRef Google Scholar

[86]

Rahmani M, Lei DY, Giannini V, Lukiyanchuk B, Ranjbar M et al. Subgroup decomposition of plasmonic resonances in hybrid oligomers: modeling the resonance lineshape. Nano Lett 12, 2101–2106 (2012).

DOI: 10.1021/nl3003683

CrossRef Google Scholar

[87]

Okamuro K, Hashida M, Miyasaka Y, Ikuta Y, Tokita S et al. Laser fluence dependence of periodic grating structures formed on metal surfaces under femtosecond laser pulse irradiation. Phys Rev B 82, 165417 (2010).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.165417

CrossRef Google Scholar

[88]

Jia TQ, Chen HX, Huang M, Zhao FL, Li XX et al. Ultraviolet-infrared femtosecond laser-induced damage in fused silica and CaF2 crystals. Phys Rev B 73, 054105 (2006).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.054105

CrossRef Google Scholar

[89]

Zhou K, Jia X, Xi HX, Liu JK, Feng DH et al. Periodic surface structures on Ni-Fe film induced by a single femtosecond laser pulse with diffraction rings. Chin Opt Lett 15, 022201 (2017).

DOI: 10.3788/COL201715.022201

CrossRef Google Scholar

[90]

Hashida M, Miyasaka Y, Ikuta Y, Tokita S, Sakabe S. Crystal structures on a copper thin film with a surface of periodic self-organized nanostructures induced by femtosecond laser pulses. Phys Rev B 83, 235413 (2011).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.235413

CrossRef Google Scholar

[91]

Bashir S, Rafique MS, Nathala CS, Ajami AA, Husinsky W. Femtosecond laser fluence based nanostructuring of W and Mo in ethanol. Phys B 513, 48–57 (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2017.03.008

CrossRef Google Scholar

[92]

Sakabe S, Hashida M, Tokita S, Namba S, Okamuro K. Mechanism for self-formation of periodic grating structures on a metal surface by a femtosecond laser pulse. Phys Rev B 79, 033409 (2009).

Google Scholar

[93]

Winter J, Rapp S, Schmidt M, Huber HP. Ultrafast laser processing of copper: a comparative study of experimental and simulated transient optical properties. Appl Surf Sci 417, 2–15 (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.070

CrossRef Google Scholar

[94]

Chan WL, Averback RS, Cahill DG. Nonlinear energy absorption of femtosecond laser pulses in noble metals. Appl Phys A 97, 287–294 (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-009-5383-z

CrossRef Google Scholar

[95]

Murphy RD, Torralva B, Adams DP, Yalisove SM. Laser-induced periodic surface structure formation resulting from single-pulse ultrafast irradiation of Au microstructures on a Si substrate. Appl Phys Lett 102, 211101 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4807830

CrossRef Google Scholar

[96]

Murphy RD, Torralva B, Adams DP, Yalisove SM. Polarization dependent formation of femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures near stepped features. Appl Phys Lett 104, 231117 (2014).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4882998

CrossRef Google Scholar

[97]

Yang M, Wu Q, Chen ZD, Zhang B, Tang BQ et al. Generation and erasure of femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on nanoparticle-covered silicon by a single laser pulse. Opt Lett 39, 343–346 (2014).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.39.000343

CrossRef Google Scholar

[98]

Das SK, Messaoudi H, Debroy A, McGlynn E, Grunwald R. Multiphoton excitation of surface plasmon-polaritons and scaling of nanoripple formation in large bandgap materials. Opt Mater Express 3, 1705–1715 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OME.3.001705

CrossRef Google Scholar

[99]

Liu JK, Zhao H, Cheng K, Ju JQ, Feng DH et al. Ultrafast dynamics of the thin surface plasma layer and the periodic ripples formation on GaP crystal irradiated by a single femtosecond laser pulse. Opt Express 27, 37859–37876 (2019).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.037859

CrossRef Google Scholar

[100]

Murphy RD, Torralva B, Adams DP, Yalisove SM. Pump-probe imaging of laser-induced periodic surface structures after ultrafast irradiation of Si. Appl Phys Lett 103, 141104 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4823588

CrossRef Google Scholar

[101]

Garcia-Lechuga M, Puerto D, Fuentes-Edfuf Y, Solis J, Siegel J. Ultrafast moving-spot microscopy: birth and growth of laser-induced periodic surface structures. ACS Photonics 3, 1961–1967 (2016).

DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00514

CrossRef Google Scholar

[102]

Jiang L, Wang AD, Li B, Cui TH, Lu YF. Electrons dynamics control by shaping femtosecond laser pulses in micro/nanofabrication: modeling, method, measurement and application. Light Sci Appl 7, 17134 (2018).

DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2017.134

CrossRef Google Scholar

[103]

Guay JM, Lesina AC, Baxter J, Killaire G, Ramunno L et al. Topography tuning for plasmonic color enhancement via picosecond laser bursts. Adv Opt Mater 6, 1800189 (2018).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.201800189

CrossRef Google Scholar

[104]

Giannuzzi G, Gaudiuso C, Di Franco C, Scamarcio G, Lugarà PM et al. Large area laser-induced periodic surface structures on steel by bursts of femtosecond pulses with picosecond delays. Opt Lasers Eng 114, 15–21 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.10.006

CrossRef Google Scholar

[105]

Han WN, Jiang L, Li XW, Wang QS, Li H et al. Anisotropy modulations of femtosecond laser pulse induced periodic surface structures on silicon by adjusting double pulse delay. Opt Express 22, 15820–15828 (2014).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.015820

CrossRef Google Scholar

[106]

Zhao Z, Zhao B, Lei YH, Yang JJ, Guo CL. Laser-induced regular nanostructure chains within microgrooves of Fe-based metallic glass. Appl Surf Sci 529, 147156 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147156

CrossRef Google Scholar

[107]

Shi XS, Jiang L, Li X, Wang SM, Yuan YP et al. Femtosecond laser-induced periodic structure adjustments based on electron dynamics control: from subwavelength ripples to double-grating structures. Opt Lett 38, 3743–3746 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.38.003743

CrossRef Google Scholar

[108]

Hasegawa S, Hayasaki Y. Holographic femtosecond laser manipulation for advanced material processing. Adv Opt Technol 5, 39–54 (2016).

DOI: 10.5937/savteh1601039M

CrossRef Google Scholar

[109]

Hasegawa S, Hayasaki Y, Nishida N. Holographic femtosecond laser processing with multiplexed phase fresnel lenses. Opt Lett 31, 1705–1707 (2006).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.31.001705

CrossRef Google Scholar

[110]

Hasegawa S, Hayasaki Y. Holographic femtosecond laser processing with multiplexed phase fresnel lenses displayed on a liquid crystal spatial light modulator. Opt Rev 14, 208–213 (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/s10043-007-0208-9

CrossRef Google Scholar

[111]

Li BH, Jiang L, Li XW, Lin ZM, Huang LL et al. Flexible gray-scale surface patterning through spatiotemporal-interference-based femtosecond laser shaping. Adv Opt Mater 6, 1801021 (2018).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.201801021

CrossRef Google Scholar

[112]

Lin YH, Shi H, Jia TQ. Distortion and light intensity correction for spatiotemporal-interference-based spatial shaping. Laser Optoelectron Prog 58, 0314002 (2021).

DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0314002

CrossRef Google Scholar

[113]

Shi H, Lin YH, Jia TQ, Cao KQ, Zhang YC et al. Efficient processing of super-hydrophobic biomimetic structures on stainless steel surfaces by spatiotemporal interference of two femtosecond laser beams based on spatial light modulator. Acta Photon Sin 50, 0650110 (2021).

Google Scholar

[114]

Huang J, Jiang L, Li XW, Wei QS, Wang ZP et al. Cylindrically focused nonablative femtosecond laser processing of long-range uniform periodic surface structures with tunable diffraction efficiency. Adv Opt Mater 7, 1900706 (2019).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.201900706

CrossRef Google Scholar

[115]

Zou TT, Zhao B, Xin W, Wang Y, Wang B et al. High-speed femtosecond laser plasmonic lithography and reduction of graphene oxide for anisotropic photoresponse. Light Sci Appl 9, 69 (2020).

DOI: 10.1038/s41377-020-0311-2

CrossRef Google Scholar

[116]

Dostovalov A, Bronnikov K, Korolkov V, Babin S, Mitsai E et al. Hierarchical anti-reflective laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSSs) on amorphous Si films for sensing applications. Nanoscale 12, 13431–13441 (2020).

DOI: 10.1039/D0NR02182B

CrossRef Google Scholar

[117]

Cao KQ, Chen L, Cheng K, Sun ZR, Jia TQ. Regular uniform large-area subwavelength nanogratings fabricated by the interference of two femtosecond laser beams via cylindrical lens. Chin Opt Lett 18, 093201 (2020).

DOI: 10.3788/COL202018.093201

CrossRef Google Scholar

[118]

Chen L, Cao KQ, Li YL, Liu JK, Zhang SA et al. Large-area straight, regular periodic surface structures produced on fused silica by the interference of two femtosecond laser beams through cylindrical lens. Opto-Electron Adv 4, 200036 (2021).

DOI: 10.29026/oea.2021.200036

CrossRef Google Scholar

[119]

Allegre OJ, Jin Y, Perrie W, Ouyang J, Fearon E et al. Complete wavefront and polarization control for ultrashort-pulse laser microprocessing. Opt Express 21, 21198–21207 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.021198

CrossRef Google Scholar

[120]

Allegre OJ, Perrie W, Edwardson SP, Dearden G, Watkins KG. Laser microprocessing of steel with radially and azimuthally polarized femtosecond vortex pulses. J Opt 14, 085601 (2012).

DOI: 10.1088/2040-8978/14/8/085601

CrossRef Google Scholar

[121]

Jin Y, Allegre OJ, Perrie W, Abrams K, Ouyang J et al. Dynamic modulation of spatially structured polarization fields for real-time control of ultrafast laser-material interactions. Opt Express 21, 25333–25343 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.025333

CrossRef Google Scholar

[122]

Ouyang J, Perrie W, Allegre OJ, Heil T, Jin Y et al. Tailored optical vector fields for ultrashort-pulse laser induced complex surface plasmon structuring. Opt Express 23, 12562–12572 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.012562

CrossRef Google Scholar

[123]

Beresna M, Gecevičius M, Kazansky PG, Gertus T. Radially polarized optical vortex converter created by femtosecond laser nanostructuring of glass. Appl Phys Lett 98, 201101 (2011).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3590716

CrossRef Google Scholar

[124]

Anoop KK, Rubano A, Fittipaldi R, Wang X, Paparo D et al. Femtosecond laser surface structuring of silicon using optical vortex beams generated by a q-plate. Appl Phys Lett 104, 241604 (2014).

Google Scholar

[125]

Hnatovsky C, Shvedov V, Krolikowski W, Rode A. Revealing local field structure of focused ultrashort pulses. Phys Rev Lett 106, 123901 (2011).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.123901

CrossRef Google Scholar

[126]

Lou K, Qian SX, Wang XL, Li YN, Gu B et al. Two-dimensional microstructures induced by femtosecond vector light fields on silicon. Opt Express 20, 120–127 (2012).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.000120

CrossRef Google Scholar

[127]

Tsibidis GD, Skoulas E, Stratakis E. Ripple formation on nickel irradiated with radially polarized femtosecond beams. Opt Lett 40, 5172–5175 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.40.005172

CrossRef Google Scholar

[128]

Nivas JJJ, Allahyari E, Cardano F, Rubano A, Fittipaldi R et al. Vector vortex beams generated by q-plates as a versatile route to direct fs laser surface structuring. Appl Surf Sci 471, 1028–1033 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.091

CrossRef Google Scholar

[129]

Nivas JJJ, He ST, Rubano A, Vecchione A, Paparo D et al. Direct femtosecond laser surface structuring with optical vortex beams generated by a q-plate. Sci Rep 5, 17929 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/srep17929

CrossRef Google Scholar

[130]

Jia TQ, Baba M, Suzuki M, Ganeev RA, Kuroda H et al. Fabrication of two-dimensional periodic nanostructures by two-beam interference of femtosecond pulses. Opt Express 16, 1874–1878 (2008).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.16.001874

CrossRef Google Scholar

[131]

Jia X, Jia TQ, Ding LE, Xiong PX, Deng L et al. Complex periodic micro/nanostructures on 6H-SiC crystal induced by the interference of three femtosecond laser beams. Opt Lett 34, 788–790 (2009).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.34.000788

CrossRef Google Scholar

[132]

Peng NN, Huo YY, Zhou K, Jia X, Pan J et al. The development of femtosecond laser-induced periodic nanostructures and their optical properties. Acta Phys Sin 62, 094201 (2013).

DOI: 10.7498/aps.62.094201

CrossRef Google Scholar

[133]

Jia X, Jia TQ, Zhang SA, Sun ZR, Qiu JR et al. Manipulation of cross-linked micro/nanopatterns on ZnO by adjusting the femtosecond-laser polarizations of four-beam interference. Appl Phys A 114, 1333–1338 (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-013-7975-x

CrossRef Google Scholar

[134]

Bonse J, Höhm S, Rosenfeld A, Krüger J. Sub-100-nm laser-induced periodic surface structures upon irradiation of titanium by Ti: sapphire femtosecond laser pulses in air. Appl Phys A 110, 547–551 (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-012-7140-y

CrossRef Google Scholar

[135]

Liao Y, Cheng Y, Liu CN, Song JX, He F et al. Direct laser writing of sub-50 nm nanofluidic channels buried in glass for three-dimensional micro-nanofluidic integration. Lab Chip 13, 1626–1631 (2013).

DOI: 10.1039/c3lc41171k

CrossRef Google Scholar

[136]

Liu JK, Jia TQ, Zhou K, Feng DH, Zhang SA et al. Direct writing of 150 nm gratings and squares on ZnO crystal in water by using 800 nm femtosecond laser. Opt Express 22, 32361–32370 (2014).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.032361

CrossRef Google Scholar

[137]

Huang M, Xu ZZ. Spontaneous scaling down of femtosecond laser-induced apertures towards the 10-nanometer level: the excitation of quasistatic surface plasmons. Laser Photonics Rev 8, 633–652 (2014).

DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201300212

CrossRef Google Scholar

[138]

Miyaji G, Miyazaki K. Fabrication of 50-nm period gratings on GaN in air through plasmonic near-field ablation induced by ultraviolet femtosecond laser pulses. Opt Express 24, 4648–4653 (2016).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.24.004648

CrossRef Google Scholar

[139]

Li ZZ, Wang L, Fan H, Yu YH, Chen QD et al. O-FIB: far-field-induced near-field breakdown for direct nanowriting in an atmospheric environment. Light Sci Appl 9, 41 (2020).

DOI: 10.1038/s41377-020-0275-2

CrossRef Google Scholar

[140]

Dusser B, Sagan Z, Soder H, Faure N, Colombier JP et al. Controlled nanostructrures formation by ultra fast laser pulses for color marking. Opt Express 18, 2913–2924 (2010).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.18.002913

CrossRef Google Scholar

[141]

Li GQ, Li JW, Yang L, Li XH, Hu YL et al. Evolution of aluminum surface irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses with different pulse overlaps. Appl Surf Sci 276, 203–209 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.067

CrossRef Google Scholar

[142]

Vorobyev AY, Guo CL. Spectral and polarization responses of femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on metals. J Appl Phys 103, 043513 (2008).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2842403

CrossRef Google Scholar

[143]

Gräf S, Kunz C, Undisz A, Wonneberger R, Rettenmayr M et al. Mechano-responsive colour change of laser-induced periodic surface structures. Appl Surf Sci 471, 645–651 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.051

CrossRef Google Scholar

[144]

Long JY, Fan PX, Zhong ML, Zhang HJ, Xie YD et al. Superhydrophobic and colorful copper surfaces fabricated by picosecond laser induced periodic nanostructures. Appl Surf Sci 311, 461–467 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.090

CrossRef Google Scholar

[145]

Yao JW, Zhang CY, Liu HY, Dai QF, Wu LJ et al. Selective appearance of several laser-induced periodic surface structure patterns on a metal surface using structural colors produced by femtosecond laser pulses. Appl Surf Sci 258, 7625–7632 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.105

CrossRef Google Scholar

[146]

Li GQ, Li JW, Hu YL, Zhang CC, Li XH et al. Femtosecond laser color marking stainless steel surface with different wavelengths. Appl Phys A 118, 1189–1196 (2015).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-014-8868-3

CrossRef Google Scholar

[147]

Liu W, Jiang L, Han WN, Hu J, Li XW et al. Manipulation of LIPSS orientation on silicon surfaces using orthogonally polarized femtosecond laser double-pulse trains. Opt Express 27, 9782–9793 (2019).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.009782

CrossRef Google Scholar

[148]

Huang J, Jiang L, Li XW, Wang AD, Wang Z et al. Fabrication of highly homogeneous and controllable nanogratings on silicon via chemical etching-assisted femtosecond laser modification. Nanophotonics 8, 869–878 (2019).

DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2019-0056

CrossRef Google Scholar

[149]

Zhang CY, Yao JW, Liu HY, Dai QF, Wu LJ et al. Colorizing silicon surface with regular nanohole arrays induced by femtosecond laser pulses. Opt Lett 37, 1106–1108 (2012).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.37.001106

CrossRef Google Scholar

[150]

Hwang JS, Park JE, Kim GW, Lee H, Yang MY. Fabrication of printable nanograting using solution-based laser-induced periodic surface structure process. Appl Surf Sci 547, 149178 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149178

CrossRef Google Scholar

[151]

Gnilitskyi I, Gruzdev V, Bulgakova NM, Mocek T, Orazi L. Mechanisms of high-regularity periodic structuring of silicon surface by sub-MHz repetition rate ultrashort laser pulses. Appl Phys Lett 109, 143101 (2016).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4963784

CrossRef Google Scholar

[152]

Bricchi E, Kazansky PG. Extraordinary stability of anisotropic femtosecond direct-written structures embedded in silica glass. Appl Phys Lett 88, 111119 (2006).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2185587

CrossRef Google Scholar

[153]

Lei YH, Sakakura M, Wang L, Yu YH, Wang HJ et al. High speed ultrafast laser anisotropic nanostructuring by energy deposition control via near-field enhancement. Optica 8, 1365–1371 (2021).

DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.433765

CrossRef Google Scholar

[154]

Zhang JY, Gecevičius M, Beresna M, Kazansky PG. Seemingly unlimited lifetime data storage in nanostructured glass. Phys Rev Lett 112, 033901 (2014).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.033901

CrossRef Google Scholar

[155]

Wang HJ, Lei YH, Wang L, Sakakura M, Yu YH et al. 100-layer error-free 5D optical data storage by ultrafast laser nanostructuring in glass. Laser Photonics Rev 16, 2100563 (2022).

Google Scholar

[156]

Beresna M, Gecevičius M, Kazansky PG. Polarization sensitive elements fabricated by femtosecond laser nanostructuring of glass [Invited]. Opt Mater Express 1, 783–795 (2011).

DOI: 10.1364/OME.1.000783

CrossRef Google Scholar

[157]

Drevinskas R, Kazansky PG. High-performance geometric phase elements in silica glass. APL Photonics 2, 066104 (2017).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4984066

CrossRef Google Scholar

[158]

Brasselet E, Royon A, Canioni L. Dense arrays of microscopic optical vortex generators from femtosecond direct laser writing of radial birefringence in glass. Appl Phys Lett 100, 181901 (2012).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4705414

CrossRef Google Scholar

[159]

Fernandes LA, Grenier JR, Herman PR, Aitchison JS, Marques PVS. Femtosecond laser fabrication of birefringent directional couplers as polarization beam splitters in fused silica. Opt Express 19, 11992–11999 (2011).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.19.011992

CrossRef Google Scholar

[160]

Beresna M, Kazansky PG. Polarization diffraction grating produced by femtosecond laser nanostructuring in glass. Opt Lett 35, 1662–1664 (2010).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.35.001662

CrossRef Google Scholar

[161]

Drevinskas R, Beresna M, Gecevičius M, Khenkin M, Kazanskii AG et al. Giant birefringence and dichroism induced by ultrafast laser pulses in hydrogenated amorphous silicon. Appl Phys Lett 106, 171106 (2015).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4919538

CrossRef Google Scholar

[162]

Drevinskas R, Beresna M, Zhang JY, Kazanskii AG, Kazansky PG. Ultrafast laser-induced metasurfaces for geometric phase manipulation. Adv Opt Mater 5, 1600575 (2017).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.201600575

CrossRef Google Scholar

[163]

Song J, Dai Y, Tao WJ, Gong M, Ma GH et al. Surface birefringence of self-assembly periodic nanostructures induced on 6H-SiC surface by femtosecond laser. Appl Surf Sci 363, 664–669 (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.096

CrossRef Google Scholar

[164]

Cerkauskaite A, Drevinskas R, Solodar A, Abdulhalim I, Kazansky PG. Form-birefringence in ITO thin films engineered by ultrafast laser nanostructuring. ACS Photonics 4, 2944–2951 (2017).

DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01082

CrossRef Google Scholar

[165]

Zhang FZ, Chen L, Zhang YC, Jiang QL, Feng DH et al. High-performance birefringence of periodic nanostructures in FTO thin film fabricated by IR-UV femtosecond laser. Front Phys 10, 861389 (2022).

DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.861389

CrossRef Google Scholar

[166]

Chen L, Cao KQ, Liu JK, Jia TQ, Li YY et al. Surface birefringence of regular periodic surface structures produced on glass coated with an indium tin oxide film using a low-fluence femtosecond laser through a cylindrical lens. Opt Express 28, 30094–30106 (2020).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.402037

CrossRef Google Scholar

[167]

Li H, Zhang CY, Li XF, Xiang J, Tie SL et al. Enhanced upconversion luminescence from ZnO/Zn hybrid nanostructures induced on a Zn foil by femtosecond laser ablation. Opt Express 23, 30118–30126 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.030118

CrossRef Google Scholar

[168]

Vorobyev AY, Guo CL. Femtosecond laser blackening of platinum. J Appl Phys 104, 053516 (2008).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2975989

CrossRef Google Scholar

[169]

Vorobyev AY, Guo CL. Effects of nanostructure-covered femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on optical absorptance of metals. Appl Phys A 86, 321–324 (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-006-3800-0

CrossRef Google Scholar

[170]

Vorobyev AY, Topkov AN, Gurin OV, Svich VA, Guo CL. Enhanced absorption of metals over ultrabroad electromagnetic spectrum. Appl Phys Lett 95, 121106 (2009).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3227668

CrossRef Google Scholar

[171]

Vorobyev AY, Guo CL. Direct creation of black silicon using femtosecond laser pulses. Appl Surf Sci 257, 7291–7294 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.03.106

CrossRef Google Scholar

[172]

Yang J, Luo FF, Kao TS, Li X, Ho GW et al. Design and fabrication of broadband ultralow reflectivity black Si surfaces by laser micro/nanoprocessing. Light Sci Appl 3, e185 (2014).

DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2014.66

CrossRef Google Scholar

[173]

Wang PQ, Liu Z, Xu KC, Blackwood DJ, Hong MH et al. Periodic upright nanopyramids for light management applications in ultrathin crystalline silicon solar cells. IEEE J Photovolt 7, 493–501 (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2641298

CrossRef Google Scholar

[174]

Zhao QZ, Ciobanu F, Malzer S, Wang LJ. Enhancement of optical absorption and photocurrent of 6H-SiC by laser surface nanostructuring. Appl Phys Lett 91, 121107 (2007).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2786863

CrossRef Google Scholar

[175]

Pan J, Jia TQ, Huo YY, Jia X, Feng DH et al. Great enhancement of near band-edge emission of ZnSe two-dimensional complex nanostructures fabricated by the interference of three femtosecond laser beams. J Appl Phys 114, 093102 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4820462

CrossRef Google Scholar

[176]

Jia X, Jia TQ, Zhang Y, Xiong PX, Feng DH et al. Optical absorption of two dimensional periodic microstructures on ZnO crystal fabricated by the interference of two femtosecond laser beams. Opt Express 18, 14401–14408 (2010).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.18.014401

CrossRef Google Scholar

[177]

Liu P, Wang WJ, Pan AF, Xiang Y, Wang DP. Periodic surface structures on the surface of indium tin oxide film obtained using picosecond laser. Opt Laser Technol 106, 259–264 (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.04.019

CrossRef Google Scholar

[178]

Cubero Á, Martinez E, Angurel LA, De La Fuente GF, Navarro R et al. Surface superconductivity changes of niobium sheets by femtosecond laser-induced periodic nanostructures. Nanomaterials 10, 2525 (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/nano10122525

CrossRef Google Scholar

[179]

Cubero A, Martínez E, Angurel LA, De La Fuente GF, Navarro R et al. Effects of laser-induced periodic surface structures on the superconducting properties of Niobium. Appl Surf Sci 508, 145140 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145140

CrossRef Google Scholar

[180]

Zuo P, Jiang L, Li X, Tian MY, Xu CY et al. Maskless micro/nanopatterning and bipolar electrical rectification of MoS2 flakes through femtosecond laser direct writing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11, 39334–39341 (2019).

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b13059

CrossRef Google Scholar

[181]

Nivas JJJ, Valadan M, Salvatore M, Fittipaldi R, Himmerlich M et al. Secondary electron yield reduction by femtosecond pulse laser-induced periodic surface structuring. Surf Interfaces 25, 101179 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101179

CrossRef Google Scholar

[182]

Zorba V, Stratakis E, Barberoglou M, Spanakis E, Tzanetakis P et al. Biomimetic artificial surfaces quantitatively reproduce the water repellency of a lotus leaf. Adv Mater 20, 4049–4054 (2008).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.200800651

CrossRef Google Scholar

[183]

Parker AR, Lawrence CR. Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature 414, 33–34 (2001).

DOI: 10.1038/35102108

CrossRef Google Scholar

[184]

Chen F, Zhang DS, Yang Q, Yong JL, Du GQ et al. Bioinspired wetting surface via laser microfabrication. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5, 6777–6792 (2013).

DOI: 10.1021/am401677z

CrossRef Google Scholar

[185]

Yong JL, Yang Q, Chen F, Zhang DS, Farooq U et al. A simple way to achieve superhydrophobicity, controllable water adhesion, anisotropic sliding, and anisotropic wetting based on femtosecond-laser-induced line-patterned surfaces. J Mater Chem A 2, 5499–5507 (2014).

DOI: 10.1039/C3TA14711H

CrossRef Google Scholar

[186]

Zouaghi S, Six T, Bellayer S, Moradi S, Hatzikiriakos SG et al. Antifouling biomimetic liquid-infused stainless steel: application to dairy industrial processing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9, 26565–26573 (2017).

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b06709

CrossRef Google Scholar

[187]

Wu D, Wang JN, Wu SZ, Chen QD, Zhao S et al. Three-level biomimetic rice-leaf surfaces with controllable anisotropic sliding. Adv Funct Mater 21, 2927–2932 (2011).

DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201002733

CrossRef Google Scholar

[188]

Yong JL, Chen F, Li MJ, Yang Q, Fang Y et al. Remarkably simple achievement of superhydrophobicity, superhydrophilicity, underwater superoleophobicity, underwater superoleophilicity, underwater superaerophobicity, and underwater superaerophilicity on femtosecond laser ablated PDMS surfaces. J Mater Chem A 5, 25249–25257 (2017).

DOI: 10.1039/C7TA07528F

CrossRef Google Scholar

[189]

Yong JL, Chen F, Yang Q, Fang Y, Huo JL et al. Femtosecond laser induced hierarchical ZnO superhydrophobic surfaces with switchable wettability. Chem Commun 51, 9813–9816 (2015).

DOI: 10.1039/C5CC02939B

CrossRef Google Scholar

[190]

Moradi S, Kamal S, Englezos P, Hatzikiriakos SG. Femtosecond laser irradiation of metallic surfaces: effects of laser parameters on superhydrophobicity. Nanotechnology 24, 415302 (2013).

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/41/415302

CrossRef Google Scholar

[191]

Lin Y, Han JP, Cai MY, Liu WJ, Luo X et al. Durable and robust transparent superhydrophobic glass surfaces fabricated by a femtosecond laser with exceptional water repellency and thermostability. J Mater Chem A 6, 9049–9056 (2018).

DOI: 10.1039/C8TA01965G

CrossRef Google Scholar

[192]

Moradi S, Hadjesfandiari N, Toosi SF, Kizhakkedathu JN, Hatzikiriakos SG. Effect of extreme wettability on platelet adhesion on metallic implants: from superhydrophilicity to superhydrophobicity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8, 17631–17641 (2016).

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b03644

CrossRef Google Scholar

[193]

Bonse J, Koter R, Hartelt M, Spaltmann D, Pentzien S et al. Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on steel and titanium alloy for tribological applications. Appl Phys A 117, 103–110 (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-014-8229-2

CrossRef Google Scholar

[194]

Bonse J, Koter R, Hartelt M, Spaltmann D, Pentzien S et al. Tribological performance of femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on titanium and a high toughness bearing steel. Appl Surf Sci 336, 21–27 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.111

CrossRef Google Scholar

[195]

Wang Z, Zhao QZ, Wang CW. Reduction of friction of metals using laser-induced periodic surface nanostructures. Micromachines 6, 1606–1616 (2015).

DOI: 10.3390/mi6111444

CrossRef Google Scholar

[196]

Bonse J, Kirner SV, Koter R, Pentzien S, Spaltmann D et al. Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on titanium nitride coatings for tribological applications. Appl Surf Sci 418, 572–579 (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.132

CrossRef Google Scholar

[197]

Wang Z, Zhao QZ. Friction reduction of steel by laser-induced periodic surface nanostructures with atomic layer deposited TiO2 coating. Surf Coat Technol 344, 269–275 (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.03.036

CrossRef Google Scholar

[198]

Kunz C, Bonse J, Spaltmann D, Neumann C, Turchanin A et al. Tribological performance of metal-reinforced ceramic composites selectively structured with femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures. Appl Surf Sci 499, 143917 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143917

CrossRef Google Scholar

[199]

Xing YQ, Wu Z, Yang JJ, Wang XS, Liu L. LIPSS combined with ALD MoS2 nano-coatings for enhancing surface friction and hydrophobic performances. Surf Coat Technol 385, 125396 (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125396

CrossRef Google Scholar

[200]

Lu DL, Liu ZW. Hyperlenses and metalenses for far-field super-resolution imaging. Nat Commun 3, 1205 (2012).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2176

CrossRef Google Scholar

[201]

Hell SW, Sahl SJ, Bates M, Zhuang XW, Heintzmann R et al. The 2015 super-resolution microscopy roadmap. J Phys D Appl Phys 48, 443001 (2015).

DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/44/443001

CrossRef Google Scholar

[202]

Liu YL, Chen YH, Wang F, Cai YJ, Liang CH et al. Robust far-field imaging by spatial coherence engineering. Opto-Electron Adv 4, 210027 (2021).

Google Scholar

[203]

Weiner AM. Ultrafast optical pulse shaping: a tutorial review. Opt Commun 284, 3669–3692 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2011.03.084

CrossRef Google Scholar

[204]

Drever RWP, Hall JL, Kowalski FV, Hough J, Ford GM et al. Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator. Appl Phys B 31, 97–105 (1983).

Google Scholar

Links
Related Articles
Show full outline

Catalog

    Hongxing Xu

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed
    Femtosecond laser-induced periodic structures: mechanisms, techniques, and applications
    • Figure  1

      Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) LSFLs on silicon8, and (b) HSFLs on ZnSe induced by 800 nm femtosecond laser. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.8, Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement; (b) ref.9, American Physical Society.

    • Figure  2

      (a) The schematic of light irradiated on a rough surface at an incident angle θ, where ki is the wave-vector component parallel to the surface, and l is the thickness of selvedge region. (b) The efficacy factor η as a function of the normalized LIPS wave vector for silica at different excited state. (c) The efficacy factor η along the positive ky-axis for silica at different excitation levels, with circles marking ky-positions where LIPS formation could be expected. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.16, American Physical Society; (b, c) ref.22, AIP Publishing.

    • Figure  3

      (a) Schematic illustration of SPPs. (b) Dispersion curves of SPPs and light in air. (c) SPP excitation on ZnO surface in the excited state launched by a groove. (d) The SEM image of the nanostructures on the ZnO surface irradiated by 800 nm femtosecond laser, where the LSFLs originated from the nanogroove or the ablation edge, as shown as the red arrows. Figure reproduced with permission from: (b) ref.49, AIP Publishing; (c, d) ref.21, American Chemical Society.

    • Figure  4

      (a) SEM image of HSFLs inside fused silica induced by 800 nm femtosecond laser pulses. (b) Nanoplasma growth into plane governed by local field distribution, where Epol and Eeq are the local fields on the polar axis and in the equatorial plane, respectively4, 20. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.20, American Physical Society.

    • Figure  5

      OM images of silicon surface irradiated by a single 800 nm femtosecond pulse of 0.18 J/cm2. The double arrows in (a) show the laser polarization direction. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.52, Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.

    • Figure  6

      Evolution of LSFLs formed on Au film irradiated by a single 800 nm laser pulse with a fluence of 1.96 J/cm2. The laser polarization, E, is perpendicular to the prefabricated nanogroove. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.25, American Physical Society.

    • Figure  7

      LSFL periods as a function of laser fluence F. The black squares and error bars show the experimental data, and the red curve shows the theoretical values. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.25, American Physical Society.

    • Figure  8

      (ab) SEM pictures of LSFLs induced by the shaped pulse trains with an interval of 16.2 ps. (c) The cross section of LSFLs. (d) The 2D fast Fourier transform of (b). (e) Spectra of the 2D Fourier transform along the x-axis. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.8, Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.

    • Figure  9

      SEM images of composite LIPSs prepared by three-beam interference. The insets show the polarization combinations of the three laser beams. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.37, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    • Figure  10

      (a) SEM images of nanosquares , and (b) the cross section of nanogratings . (c) Curvature and separation control of nanogrooves fabricated by 800 nm femtosecond laser with polarization control. (d) SEM and AFM images of curved single nanogroove on silicon surface induced by 800 nm femtosecond laser with orthogonally polarized dual beams. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a, b) ref.136, under Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement; (c) ref.139, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License; (d) ref.27, American Chemical Society.

    • Figure  11

      Structural colors of “Chinese knot” pattern made up of LSFLs fabricated by a shaped pulse of 16.2 ps on Si surface under different diffraction angles. The inset shows an SEM image of regular LSFLs. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.8, Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.

    • Figure  12

      (a-c) Imaging of anisotropic nanostructures and 5D optical data storage in fused silica153, 155. (a) Image of the slow axis azimuth of voxels, where the pseudo-color represents the slow axis azimuth. (b) SEM image of the nanolamella-like structure after polishing and KOH etching. (c) The enlarged area in the dashed square in (b). (d) The birefringent images of data voxels of different layers in a 100-layer 5D optical data storage in fused silica after removing the background. Insets are enlargements of small region (10 μm × 10 μm). (e) Polar diagram of the measured retardance and azimuth of all voxels in (d). Figure reproduced with permission from: (a-c) ref.153, Optica Publishing Group, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement; (d, e) ref.155, under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

    • Figure  13

      (a) SEM image of composite nanostructures on ZnSe crystal. (b) The photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the plane surface and composite nanostructures irradiated by 1200 nm femtosecond laser. Insets (i) and (ii) show PL images of the nanostructures and plane surface, respectively. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.175, AIP Publishing.

    • Figure  14

      (ab) Schematic illustrations of the laser-induced structure in the ITO thin film on the substrate, and the resistivity measured longitudinally (IL) or transversely (IT) along the LIPS direction. (c) Microscopic configuration of the four-point probe measurement with the probes longitudinal (Micro-L) or transverse (Micro-T) aligned with the LIPSs. (d) and (e) are the I-V curves of the anisotropic resistivity surface and the unidirectional resistivity surface measured by the Micro-L or Micro-T method, respectively. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.41, under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

    • Figure  1
    • Figure  2
    • Figure  3
    • Figure  4
    • Figure  5
    • Figure  6
    • Figure  7
    • Figure  8
    • Figure  9
    • Figure  10
    • Figure  11
    • Figure  12
    • Figure  13
    • Figure  14