Processing math: 0%
Tunable and reconfigurable metasurfaces and metadevices
  • Abstract

    Metasurfaces, two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials, are engineered surfaces consisting of deep subwavelength features that have full control of the electromagnetic waves. Metasurfaces are not only being applied to the current devices throughout the electromagnetic spectrum from microwave to optics but also inspiring many new thrilling applications such as programmable on-demand optics and photonics in future. In order to overcome the limits imposed by passive metasurfaces, extensive researches have been put on utilizing different materials and mechanisms to design active metasurfaces. In this paper, we review the recent progress in tunable and reconfigurable metasurfaces and metadevices through the different active materials deployed together with the different control mechanisms including electrical, thermal, optical, mechanical, and magnetic, and provide the perspective for their future development for applications.

    Keywords

  • The importance of active, tunable, or reconfigurable devices in modern electromagnetic and photonic systems is undebatable. It is highly desirable to create such metasurfaces capable of dynamic manipulations of the incident wave. For example, tunable frequency selectively or perfectly absorbing metasurfaces allows accurate resonance tuning to perfectly match the operational condition or switching of operational frequency in signal modulation. A tunable metalens made from active wave-front shaping metasurface allows fine tuning of focal length which is very desirable in the imaging process.

    Each type of these materials has different properties and tuning mechanisms. For example, indium tin oxide (ITO) can be stimulated electrically and optically, and liquid crystals can be tuned electrically, optically, thermally, and magnetically. Moreover, the electrical tuning of the transparent conductive oxides is happening in a very thin layer of the material and requires extra dielectric material as an insulator. Whereas, a simple capacitor structure with a ferroelectric material as the dielectric would suffice to tune the whole ferroelectric film, no matter how thick or thin it is. As a result, as shown in Fig. 1, this review is divided into two parts: tunable materials and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). In each part, first, the properties of the tunable material are described in details, and then the different mechanisms of tunability with examples are explained.

    Metamaterials are artificial media in which the propagation properties of the electromagnetic wave are mainly defined by their underlying structures with the feature size far smaller than the operational wavelength-. Metasurfaces are the two-dimensional equivalent of metamaterials, composing discrete subwavelength structures in an ultrathin film at the interface and possessing the capability of full control of light properties in terms of amplitude, phase, dispersion, momentum and polarization-. These newly invented devices have attracted enormous attention for their versatile functionality, ultra-thin feature, and easiness for integration compared with conventional refractive optics. There has been intensive research on different types of metasurfaces such as frequency selective metasurfaces-, high-impedance metasurfaces35-37, perfectly absorbing metasurfaces, and wave-front shaping metasurfaces-.

    Figure 1. Schematic art view of the different mechanisms in tunable metasurfaces.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Schematic art view of the different mechanisms in tunable metasurfaces.

    Various tuning mechanisms have been studied and reported, such as electrical-, thermal-, optical-, magnetical-, mechanical stretching-, and micro-nanoelectromechanical systems (M-NEMS)-. M-NEMS, which uses a combination of electrical, mechanical, and/or thermal control mechanisms to add tunability to current passive devices, is a well-known technology for designing reconfigurable devices in a variety of applications. Besides M-NEMS, in order to tune a metasurface, one needs to change the property of its underlying unit cells or its ambient. This could be done by employing active materials in unit cells, which can have their properties changed by external stimuli. A great variety of active or tunable materials are available in nature and have been used in metamaterials and metasurfaces so far, such as, transparent conductive oxides, , , ferroelectrics-, two dimensional (2D) materials (i.e. graphene and MoS2), , -, phase change materials-, liquid crystals (LCs), -, and semiconductors, .

    κ(ω)=εr2+ε
    Figure 2. The metal-oxide-semiconductor heterostructure with ITO as the active material.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    The metal-oxide-semiconductor heterostructure with ITO as the active material.

    Figure reproduced from ref., American Chemical Society.
    \omega _{\rm{p}}^2 = \frac{{N{e^2}}}{{{\varepsilon _0}{m^{\rm{*}}}}},
    {\varepsilon '_{\rm{r}}}(\omega ) = {\varepsilon _\infty } - \frac{{\omega _{\rm{p}}^2}}{{{\omega ^2} + {{\mathit{\Gamma}} ^2}}},

    In one example of a modulator, as shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), the ITO layer is used as the top electrode and the voltage is applied directly to the ITO layer. Formation of a 5 nm depletion (under positive voltage Vp=10 V) and accumulation layer (under negative voltage Vp=10 V) is assumed. The rest of the ITO layer remains un-changed with the value of the blue markers (voltage Vp=0 V).

    \rho = \frac{1}{\sigma } = \frac{{{m^{\rm{*}}}}}{{N{e^2}\tau }}.

    In order to tune the electron density in the ITO layer, different structures have been proposed. As shown in Fig. 2, a metal-oxide-semiconductor heterostructure with ITO as the active material is used to realize the tunability with the DC voltage applied to the two gold electrodes. Since the ITO is conductive, the electrons with negative charges are absorbed toward the positive electrode and accumulated in the conductive oxide-dielectric interface. The simulation and measurement results showed that the electron density was increased from N=1×1021 cm-3 to N=2.8×1022 cm-3 in an electron accumulation layer of (5±1) nm layer of ITO, while the DC voltage increased from 0 to 2.5 volts.

    {\tilde \varepsilon _{\rm{r}}}(\omega ) = {\varepsilon '_{\rm{r}}}(\omega ) + {\rm{i}}{\varepsilon ''_{\rm{r}}}(\omega ) = {\varepsilon _\infty } - \frac{{\omega _{\rm{p}}^2}}{{{\omega ^2} + {\rm{i}}\omega {\mathit{\Gamma}} }},

    The electrical conductivity σ and resistivity ρ are given by:

    Transparent conductive oxides (TCO) are materials optically transparent and electrically conductive. These materials have been widely used in photovoltaics, organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs), displays, and electro-optics devices in general-. Recently, the tunable property of TCOs such as ITO has attracted great attention for its application in metasurface and nano-optics.

    {\varepsilon ''_{\rm{r}}}(\omega ) = \frac{{{\mathit{\Gamma}} \omega _{\rm{p}}^2}}{{\omega ({\omega ^2} + {{\mathit{\Gamma}} ^2})}}.
    {\mathit{\Gamma}} = \frac{1}{\tau } = \frac{e}{{\mu {m^{\rm{*}}}}},

    The same principle is used to achieve tunability for the amplitude of the reflected light as shown in Fig. 5(d). However, since the ITO layer (6 nm) is on top of the insulator layer (20 nm), the electric field and DC voltage are opposite compared to previous design and the voltage is applied directly to the ITO layer. Strong absorption modulation is shown when the ITO is operated in the ENZ spectrum [shown in Fig. 5(e)].

    The changes in refractive index versus wavelength at different bias voltages are shown in Fig. 3. The refractive index decreases and the extinction coefficient increases as the bias voltage increases. The change in refractive index due to bias voltage is much larger at higher wavelengths as it is getting closer to epsilon-near-zero. Change of the refractive index can reach 1.39 (around 70%) at 800 nm, which is extremely large compared to other types of materials.

    Furthermore, it was found that there is no change in refractive index when DC voltage was applied reversely since the opposite electric field would result in the formation of the depletion layer. When the thickness of the ITO layer is reduced by half, the same change in the refractive index was observed for the same electric field because the change is only due to the accumulation of electrons in a thin layer at the ITO-SiO2 interface.

    The epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) wavelength (λENZ) is the wavelength at which the real part of the dielectric constant passes through zero-. If the imaginary part of the permittivity is zero or very small at the same wavelength, the refractive index would become close to zero, much smaller than the refractive index of vacuum. Although common materials i.e. metals have {\tilde \varepsilon _{\rm{r}}} at plasma frequency, the imaginary part of the permittivity is quite large. However, in transparent conductive oxides, the ENZ wavelength can be tuned in the visible or near infrared spectrum with a very small value of the imaginary part of the permittivity due to low loss . The epsilon-near-zero is given by:

    Figure 5. Tunable metasurfaces using ITO as an active layer.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Tunable metasurfaces using ITO as an active layer.

    (a) Schematic of the tunable metasurface which consists of a quartz substrate, gold backplane, and a thin ITO film followed by a thin alumina film on which gold stripe nanoantenna array is patterned on. (b) Measured relative reflectance change from the metasurface for different applied voltages. (c) Measured and simulated phase shift as a function of applied bias for the applied voltage. The black lines show the cross-section for analyzing the phase. (d) Device schematic showing an electrically-tunable ITO film clamped between an HfO2-coated Au substrate and an array of Au strips. With positive and negative electric biases, the carrier concentration of ITO can be decreased (depletion) or increased (accumulation), leading to changes in the optical properties of the ITO. (e) Reflectance spectra were taken from the device measured using an FT-IR microscope. The red, blue, and green curves denote the reflectance spectra under 0 V for no bias, −5 V for accumulation, and +5 V for depletion, respectively. The grey curves represent reflectance spectra for intermediate voltages with an incremental step size of 1 V. (f) Schematic structure of the meta-molecule and (g) top-view small-scale SEM image of the metamaterial. (h) Measured reflectance changes of a 1550 nm probe laser as a function of delay time between pump and probe pulses. The red solid line is the exponential fit to the data. (i) The calculated reflectance spectrum of the metamaterial with different pump intensity by the finite element method. Figure reproduced from: (a–c) ref., American Chemical Society; (d, e) ref., Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License; (f–i) ref., Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    n(\omega ) = \sqrt {\frac{{\sqrt {{{\varepsilon '}_{\rm{r}}}^2 + {{\varepsilon ''}_r}^{\;2}} + {{\varepsilon '}_{\rm{r}}}}}{2}} ,

    By changing the carrier concentration, the plasma frequency changes, thereby changing the dielectric constant. The complex refractive index is given by:

    As shown in Fig. 5(h), the measured reflectance peak at 1550 nm (center of the transparency window) is tuned by increasing the delay time between the pump and probe pulses by using the femtosecond laser pump and probe method. The refractive index n of the polycrystalline ITO is given by:

    n = {n_0} + {n_2}I = {n_0} + \frac{{3Re_\chi ^{(3)}}}{{4c{\varepsilon _0}n_0^2}}{I_0},

    where c is the speed of light in vacuum. As shown in Eq. (10), changing plasma frequency will change the epsilon-near-zero wavelength. If the electron density N increases, according to Eq. (3), the plasma frequency increases and the epsilon-near-zero wavelength decreases. According to Eq. (8), when the {\varepsilon '_{\rm{r}}} , the real part of the permittivity, becomes zero, refractive index n becomes the minimum possible value of \sqrt {{{\varepsilon ''}_{\rm{r}}}/2} epsilon-near-zero wavelength. However, as seen from Eq. (5), the imaginary part of the permittivity {{\varepsilon ''}_{\rm{r}}} is correlated with loss and increases as the plasma frequency increases.

    Figure 3. The refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k) in a 5 nm accumulation layer, extracted data from the ellipsometry measurements.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    The refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k) in a 5 nm accumulation layer, extracted data from the ellipsometry measurements.

    Figure reproduced from ref., American Chemical Society.

    Fitting of the real and imaginary part of the dielectric constant of the active ITO layer is shown in Fig. 4(c). When a negative voltage is applied to the ITO film, positive carriers (holes) accumulate at the ITO-HfO2 interface. On the other hand, under positive bias, the active layer will be depleted and negative carriers (electrons) would accumulate at the interface. The carrier concentrations for the accumulation and depletion states are calculated as Na=3.23×1021 cm-3 and Nd=1.57×1021 cm-3, respectively. By comparison with the original value N0=3.05×1021 cm-3, we can see that the free carriers are more easily depleted than accumulated.

    where τ is the scattering time, e is the electron charge, μ is the electron mobility, ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, m* is the effective electron mass, and N is the carrier (electron/hole) concentration. The real and imaginary parts of the permittivity are given by:

    It could be seen from Eq. (8) that changing the dielectric constant will change the refractive index. The properties of ITO film, i.e. the conductivity and carrier concentration, could be controlled during the film deposition, which in turn will change the dielectric constant and the tunability of the refractive index of ITO film.

    ITO is a conducting material and has free electrons. It is modeled using the Drude model:

    {\lambda _{{\rm{ENZ}}}} = \frac{{2{\rm{ \mathsf{ π} }}c}}{{{\omega _{{\rm{ENZ}}}}}} = \frac{{2{\rm{ \mathsf{ π} }}c}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{\omega _{\rm{p}}^2}}{{{\varepsilon _\infty }}} - {{\mathit{\Gamma}} ^2}} }},

    ITO film can also have its properties tuned by optical excitation, , . Y. Zhu, et al. reported that under the excitation of a femtosecond laser with a wavelength at the optical communication range, the hot-electron injection from gold to ITO film enhanced nonlinearity of polycrystalline ITO. Furthermore, the field reinforcement provided by plasmonic resonances also contributes to the nonlinearity enhancement of ITO.

    where n0 and n2 are linear and nonlinear refractive indices of poly-crystalline ITO, respectively, and {3Re_\chi ^{(3)}} is the real part of the third-order nonlinear susceptibility of polycrystalline ITO. Since n2 is negative in polycrystalline ITO, the linear refractive index of polycrystalline ITO decreases under the excitation of a pump laser. Therefore, when there is a zero delay between probe and pump pulses, the central wavelength of the transparency window shifted towards the short-wavelength direction. Hence, the reflectance of the 1550 nm probe laser increased under excitation of the pump laser. The central wavelength of the transparency window could be tuned by 86 nm [shown in Fig. 5(i)].

    Figure 4. The tunability of ITO in a multilayer modulator.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    The tunability of ITO in a multilayer modulator.

    (a) Cross section of the multilayer ITO modulator. (b) Picture of the fabricated modulator. (c) Solid and dashed lines are from further fitting by the Drude model. Figure reproduced from ref., Optical Society of America.
    {\tilde n^2} = {(n + {\rm{i}}\kappa )^2} = {\tilde \varepsilon _{\rm{r}}}{\tilde \mu _{\rm{r}}},

    where {\tilde n} is the complex refractive index, n is the ordinary refractive index, κ is the extinction coefficient, {\tilde \varepsilon _{\rm{r}}} is the complex relative permittivity (dielectric constant), and {\tilde \mu _{\rm{r}}} is the complex relative permeability. Since ITO is a non-magnetic material at optical frequencies, its relative permeability is very close to 1. Hence the refractive index and extinction coefficient is given by:

    where {\tilde \varepsilon _{\rm{r}}} is the material permittivity, {\varepsilon _\infty } is the high frequency permittivity, ω is the angular frequency, ωp is the plasma frequency, and Γ is the damping rate. The plasma frequency and the damping rate are defined as:

    Combination of tunable ITO layer with metal plasmonic resonators has been used to design different active metasurfaces, , , , , . As shown in Fig. 5(a), a reflective gold plasmonic resonator is used to modulate the amplitude and phase of the electromagnetic wave. Each unit cell has one gold resonator on top and one gold backplate at the bottom. Between them, there are two layers of Al2O3 insulator and ITO with a thickness of 5 nm and 20 nm, respectively. By applying a DC bias voltage, an electric field is created between the top gold resonator and bottom gold plate and a charge accumulation layer is formed in the ITO film at the interface with the Al2O3 insulator. This charge accumulation layer causes a huge change in the refractive index of ITO film which in turn changes the phase and amplitude of the reflected electromagnetic waves. Since the change in refractive index happens only in ~5 nm thick layer of the ITO, the largest change in the phase of the reflected wave occurs near the resonance of the plasmonic structure, whereas the loss is usually very high and the efficiency is very low. The relative reflectance change and phase change are shown in Figs. 5(b) and 5(c). The maximum relative reflectance change of 30% and phase change of 184° are obtained at 2.5 V DC bias. Relative reflectance change is defined as the ratio of reflectance change due to applying bias [ΔR=R(V)-R(0)] to that without an applied bias [R(0)].

    K = \frac{{{\eta _{\rm{r}}}}}{{\tan \delta }}.
    Figure 7. Thermal tuning of ferroelectric materials in active metamaterials.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Thermal tuning of ferroelectric materials in active metamaterials.

    (a) Microscopic image of the metamaterial consisting of a gold electric split-ring resonator array fabricated on an STO substrate and (b) measured normalized THz transmission amplitude spectra through the metamaterial. (c) and (e) show the unit cell of the proposed frequency tunable metallic ring and cross absorbers, respectively and (d) and (f) show the calculated absorption spectra of the proposed frequency tunable metallic ring and cross absorbers at different temperatures, respectively. (g) Schematic view of the structure. (h) Scanning electron microscopy image of the metamaterial. (i) Theoretical and experimental transmission spectra. Figure reproduced from: (a, b) ref., Optical Society of America; (c–f) ref., Optical Society of America; (g–i) ref., Springer Nature.

    Tunable metasurface has also been demonstrated using BST as the tunable ferroelectric material, as shown in Figs. 8(a) and 8(b). Common split ring resonators (SRR) are designed to have the desired resonance frequency and separate interdigital electrodes are added to apply DC voltage and electric field to tune the BST layer beneath the SRR resonator specifically in the area in the vicinity of the SRR gaps. As shown in Fig. 8(c), by increasing the electric field from 0 to 33 kV/cm, the resonance frequency is increased from 1.52 THz to 1.57 THz. This approach is straightforward and adaptable to other frequencies. This type of electrical tuning method is simpler and easier for practical applications.

    {\eta _{\rm{r}}} = \frac{{\varepsilon (0) - \varepsilon ({E_0})}}{{\varepsilon (0)}}.

    Most common ferroelectric materials used to design tunable metasurfaces are barium strontium titanate (BST), barium titanate (BTO), lithium niobate (LiNbO3), -, and strontium titanate (STO), , -. Electrical and thermal tuning of ferroelectric materials is two most commonly used approaches for realizing tunable metasurfaces by changing the dielectric constant of ferroelectric materials in paraelectric phase.

    In ferroelectric materials, the crystal structure lacks a center of symmetry. As a result, they have a spontaneous electric polarization that can be reversed by the application of an external electric field. Tunability, η, of an electrically tunable ferroelectric material, is defined as the ratio of its permittivity at a zero applied electric field to its permittivity at a specific non-zero applied electric field E0:

    The relative permittivity of a ferroelectric crystal is temperature dependent and undergoes a phase transition as the temperature is increased. The crystal possesses a spontaneous polarization below the phase transition temperature known as the Curie temperature (TC).

    Figure 6. Phase transition in ferroelectric materials.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Phase transition in ferroelectric materials.

    (a) Temperature dependence of the dielectric constant of a ferroelectric material. The material transitions from a polar to a non-polar phase at the Curie temperature Tc. (b, c) The corresponding polarization and dielectric constant as a function of applied field below and above Tc. Figure reproduced from: (a–c) ref., AIP Publishing.

    The performance of a tunable dielectric material is generally evaluated using the figure of merit (K):

    A new active BST-silicon hybrid metamaterial with aluminum square split-ring resonators (SRRs) was reported. Experimental design with the illustration of the device and the microscopic image of the device are shown in Figs. 8(d) and 8(e). Under the optical excitation, a conductive silicon layer is generated beneath the 150 nm thin BST layer where the electron density was enhanced due to carrier generation. The electrons would migrate into the BST film from silicon layer and get trapped there until a new equilibrium is reached and leads to a large increase of the absorption coefficient in BST film. Figure 8(f) shows the measured amplitude transmission with the different electric current. An LC resonance is observed at 0.64 THz at zero gate current. The amplitude modulation depth reaches ~70% at the resonance frequency and ~79% at 1 THz when the current is increased to 530 mA.

    Figure 8. Electrical tuning of the ferroelectric material in active metamaterials.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Electrical tuning of the ferroelectric material in active metamaterials.

    (a) Schematic view of the SRR unit cell and the IDE patterns. (b) SEM image of the SRRs and the IDE patterns. (c) Transmission spectra of the metamaterial at various electric fields. (d) Schematic illustration of the metamaterial and experimental design. (e) Microscopic image of the fabricated BST–silicon hybrid metamaterial. (f) Measured transmission amplitude spectra of the BST–silicon hybrid metamaterial at various gate currents. Figure reproduced from: (a–c) ref., AIP Publishing; (d–f) ref., John Wiley and Sons.

    The variation in dielectric constant with temperature is most pronounced near the Curie temperature resulting in a considerably large permittivity and tunability. It is thus desirable for tunable applications to operate the crystal just above the Curie temperature to take advantage of the high tunability while avoiding losses associated with the hysteresis of the ferroelectric phase.

    Relative tunability can be defined as:

    \eta = \frac{{\varepsilon (0)}}{{\varepsilon ({E_0})}}.

    A few examples of thermal tuning of ferroelectric materials in metasurfaces are shown in Fig. 7. A planar terahertz metamaterial made of gold split-ring resonators array is fabricated on a single-crystal strontium titanate (SrTiO3) substrate [Fig. 7(a)]. As shown in Fig. 7(b), the resonance frequency of the metamaterial is tuned over 43% by changing the temperature from 409 K to 150 K. As the temperature changes the refractive index of the STO substrate changes (Δn~11), which leads to change in the resonance frequency. Figures 7(c) and 7(e) show two absorber metasurfaces which have 17 μm thick STO film between the gold ring/cross resonators and back plate. The resonance frequency in the ring resonator is increased from 0.126 THz at 150 K to 0.227 THz at 400 K, which is up to 80% frequency tuning [shown in Fig. 7(d)]. In the cross resonator, the resonant frequency is increased from 0.116 THz at 150 K to 0.208 THz at 400 K and a 79% frequency tunability is obtained [shown in Fig. 7(f)]. In Figs. 7(g) and 7(h), a negative permeability metamaterial which is made of STO bars (width w=42.5 μm) with a thickness of t=52 μm is shown. The theoretical and experimental magnitudes of the transmittance are shown in Fig. 7(i). The resonance frequency has been tuned from 0.2 THz at 180 K to 0.28 THz at 324 K.

    Graphene, a two-dimensional (2D) material with unprecedented properties has attracted tremendous attention for future electronic and photonic applications since it was discovered in 2004. Graphene has a low carrier density of states near the Dirac point, hence its Fermi level can be tuned with small bias gate voltage, . This phenomenon leads to novel ways of manipulating the interaction between light and matter. Moreover, it has high carrier mobility, which makes it a desirable candidate for plasmonic material with relatively low loss.

    Another tunable hyperbolic absorber metamaterial at THz spectrum made by stacking graphene sheets and dielectric layers is shown in Fig. 9(h). The dielectrics are 100 nm thick SiO2 films, and the number of the layers is N. The surface conductivity σ(ω, μc) of a monolayer graphene could be tuned by chemical potential (μc), which is controlled by electrostatic biasing. By applying a voltage to the graphene layers μc is increased from 0 to 0.4 eV. As it could be seen the absorbance resonance of the metasurface with 10 and 20 layers is increased [shown in Figs. 9(i)-9(l)].

    Due to these unique properties, graphene has been used to design different types of tunable metasurfaces from THz to near-IR-. Majority of these metasurfaces employ either metal or dielectric resonators with a layer of graphene to realize the tuning function, , , -, while some metasurfaces use the patterned graphene as plasmonic resonator directly, , , -. There are also metasurfaces which use multilayers of graphene with different materials, such as dielectric or ferroelectric materials, to achieve tunability without using any nanostructured resonators-.

    Figures 9(d) and 9(e) show schematics of a tunable absorber metasurface over a broad terahertz frequency range composed of graphene micro-ribbon arrays. Figure 9(f) is the AFM image of the fabricated graphene micro-ribbon array sample. The carrier concentration in the graphene monolayer is controlled using the Vg applied to the top gate on ion-gel. As can be seen in Fig. 9(g), in the transmission spectra in mid-IR, T/TCNP, the resonance frequency of the metasurface shifts to lower wavelength and higher frequency by increasing Vg from -0.5 to -2.2 V.

    Figure 9. Tunable metamaterials using graphene as the active material.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Tunable metamaterials using graphene as the active material.

    (a) Schematic view of the ultrathin optical modulator based on a tunable metasurface absorber. (b) SEM image of the metasurface on graphene (a zoomed-in view of a portion of the metasurface is shown in the inset). (c) Normalized measured reflection spectra of the metasurface absorber for different gate voltages (VGVCNP=VCNP is the gate voltage when the concentrations of electrons and holes in the graphene sheet are equal) to the reflection spectra from a 300 nm Al film on the same silicon substrate. Schematic (d) top and (e) side view of a typical graphene micro-ribbon array on a Si/SiO2 substrate, (f) AFM image of a graphene micro-ribbon array sample with a ribbon width of 4 mm and a ribbon and gap width ratio of 1:1, and (g) relative mid-infrared transmission spectra (T/TCNP) of the graphene ribbon array as gate voltage (VgVCNP) varies from-0.3 to 2.2 V (the voltages corresponding to the un-labeled lines, starting with the red line and alternating downwards, are 2.0 V, 1.6 V, 1.2 V, 0.7 V and 0.3 V). (h) Schematic view of the composite multilayer material made by stacking graphene sheets and dielectric layers (under certain conditions, it exhibits hyperbolic-like iso-frequency wavevector dispersion which is shown in the inset, where Vg indicates the direction of the group velocity), (i) reflection and (j) transmission for a finite thickness graphene-silica multilayered HM, at normal polarization, calculated by transfer matrix method (solid lines) and EMA (circles) when graphene layers are unbiased, i.e., μc=0 eV, and (k) reflection and (l) transmission versus frequency, for the same set of parameters, except that now graphene layers are biased with μc=0.4 eV. Figure reproduced from: (a–c) ref., American Chemical Society; (d–g) ref., Springer Nature; (i–l) ref., Optical Society of America.

    Figures 9(a) and 9(b) show a tunable perfect absorber metasurface composed of optical antennas on graphene as shown in ref.. Aluminum (Al) is used as the resonators, gate pad, and bottom plate. Aluminum oxide is used as the dielectric spacing between the bottom Al and top graphene monolayer. By applying DC voltage to the graphene via gate pad, the absorber is switched on and off the critical coupling condition, which causes a modulation depth of up to 95% [shown in Fig. 9(c)]. Since the resonant frequency of the metasurface is controlled by the dimensions of the unit cells, it could be scaled from the near-infrared to the terahertz by changing the metasurface and cavity dimensions.

    Chalcogenide phase change materials composed of alloys of Germanium (Ge), Antimony (Sb), and Tellurium (Te) can be easily transited between disordered-amorphous state and ordered-crystalline state by a heat-quench cycle. They have been used in optical storage and non-volatile memory by exploring the change in the optical or electronic properties. More recently, this GST based chalcogenide material has gained a lot of interest as a new platform for tunable and reconfigurable metasurfaces due to their pronounced contrast of dielectric properties, high switching speed, and good thermal stability. When the chalcogenide is heated above the glass transition temperature by a laser pulse or electronic excitation, they produce a thermal nature transition process occurring by nucleation and crystallization growth. Re-amorphization is achieved by heating the material above the melting temperature followed by rapid cooling. The large optical/electronic contrast between the two states is attributed to atom re-arrangement.

    Figure 10. Tunable metamaterials using GST as the active material.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Tunable metamaterials using GST as the active material.

    (a) Schematic diagram of the plasmonic metamaterial which has an array of gold nano-disks on a thin layer of GST (T=40 nm, t=20 nm, d=280 nm, a=1.2 µm). (b) Measured normalized transmission spectra of continuously tuning of the hybrid plasmonic metamaterial measured at different baking time during the crystallization process. (c) The schematic view of the active plasmonic metasurface for beam switching which consists of a 50 nm thick GST-326 layer underneath a geometric phase metasurface for beam switching (two types of nano-antennas A and B with different plasmon resonances are alternated line-wise), when the active layer is in the amorphous phase, only type A rods interact with the incident light and deviate the beam to the left and when the active layer is in the crystalline phase, only type B rods interact with the incident light and deviate the beam into the opposite direction due to their relative orientation (right). (d) Infrared camera images and intensity plots of the beam transmitted by the active metasurface in the amorphous (left) and crystalline (right) state. (e) Schematic view of switchable THz quarter-wave plate design. The top left inset is a microscope image of one unit cell in the fabricated sample (P=150, Lx=90, Ly=124, lx=9, ly=5 and w=9 μm, and the scale bar is 50 μm). The top right inset is the simulated ellipticities of the output THz waves. (f) Schematic backside view of the resistive heater with a square aperture (6 mm × 6 mm) milled at the center to allow THz to pass through. (g) Measured transmission spectra along two slots at 300 K (solid line) and 400 K (dot line). (h) Measured the phase difference between y- and x-axes at 300 K (solid line) and 400 K (dot line). Figure reproduced from: (a, b) ref., Optical Society of America; (c, d) ref., Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License; (e–h) ref., Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Vanadium dioxide (VO2), another phase change material, also attracted much attention and has featured prominently in the tunable metamaterial field due to its special property of phase transition from insulator to metal and vice versa as temperature changes. Their phase transition temperature is lower compared with chalcogenide glass, making it easy to be thermally, electrically, or optically stimulated. When phase changes between two states, VO2 is accompanied by significant changes in optical and electronic properties. It is a suitable functional material for many optoelectrical applications, such as active polarizer in near-infrared region, tunable absorber, , , tunable switching, , beam steering, switchable quarter wave plate (QWP) in THz, , and active nanoantennas for tuning THz resonance193-195. By hybridizing metasurfaces with VO2, an ultrathin switchable THz QWP with a switching range of 34 GHz was experimentally demonstrated. Fig. 10(e) shows a schematic of the switchable QWP, which is composed of ultrathin asymmetric cross-shaped resonator arrays with VO2 pads inserted at the end of the cross-shaped resonators. A linear normal incident THz wave polarized at θ = 45° to the two slots is converted into a circularly polarized light. The inserted VO2 is able to change the effective length of the metal resonators in the metasurface through the phase transition controlled by a resistive heater shown in Fig. 10(f). Through the VO2 phase transition, the operating frequency of the QWP is switched between f1=0.468 THz and f2=0.502 THz, as illustrated in Figs. 10(g) and 10(h).

    The thin GST layer was introduced into the metal-dielectric-metal configuration for realization of a tunable plasmonic resonance-, absorber, -, reflector, circular dichroism, , chirality, and negative index metamaterials. A non-volatile all-optical modulation of resonance in infrared is reported as a broadband switch through the combination of chalcogenide glass phase change medium with nanostructured plasmonic metamaterials. The single pulse laser excitation was used to homogenously phase transition across the large areas of the hybrid metamaterial devices, which bring dramatic changes in the optical transmission and reflection characteristics. Similarly, as shown in Fig. 10(a), non-volatile tuning of gold nano-disk resonance is achieved over a broad spectral range of 500 nm (1.89 μm to 2.27 μm) by including thin GST layer as a refractive index tunable environment. Transmission spectra of the hybrid plasmonic crystal are measured at different intermediate phases and shown in Fig. 10(b). With an increasing baking time, a more metal-like portion generated in the phase-change thin film is seen due to a red-shift of the lattice resonance. Specifically, at 1.89 μm wavelength, the transmittance is increased from 16% (black curve) to 72% (blue curve) after baking for 20 min. Laser-induced reversible switching of infrared nanoantenna resonances was demonstrated with a thin layer of GST surrounding the Al nanostructure, . Furthermore, all-optical, non-volatile, and reversible switching of phonon-polaritons is realized by controlling the structural phase of GST thin layer on top of crystal quartz. As shown in Fig. 10(c), with the integration of plasmonic metasurfaces and the phase change material, active metasurfaces were achieved for dynamic beam switching and bifocal zoom lensing. Two different sets of plasmonic antenna elements A and B provide beam refraction in opposite directions but are spatially staggered within one light interaction area on top of a thin GST layer. The lengths for A and B type antennas have been chosen such that their respective plasmon resonance wavelengths match the operating wavelength either in the amorphous or crystalline PCM state. As a result, each set of plasmonic antennas strongly interacts with the incident light at a certain operating wavelength. The resulting images for right-handed circular polarized (RCP) light illumination from the infrared camera and intensity plots of the beam transmitted by the active metasurface are shown in Fig. 10(d). When the GST is in its amorphous state, antenna set A interacts with the incident light and refracts the cross-converted portion of the incoming beam, left-handed circular polarized (LCP) to the right side of the non-converted RCP part. For crystalline GST, the incident beam interacts with antenna set B, thus, the converted portion is refracted to the opposite direction.

    Chalcogenide phase change material has also emerged as a paradigm for the realization of non-volatile, all-optical dielectric metamaterials, presenting Mie resonances with low-loss as opposed to noble metals. Phase change GST rods were patterned to a different size in their amorphous and crystalline states for the realization of tunable gradient metasurfaces. Specifically, at low fluence, the femtosecond laser pulses only melt a thin layer of amorphous GST film, which leads to partial crystallization state through an interfacial solidification process. Utilization of diffraction-limited optical writing system, various reconfigurable metasurfaces, and photonics devices were demonstrated in the thin GST film. With this capability, reconfigurable phase change photomask for 3D optical lithography and waveguides for optical trapping were demonstrated, .

    The ability of a metamaterial absorber array hybridized with liquid crystals to work as a spatial light modulator in THz wavelengths has been reported. As shown in Fig. 12(e), the orientation of the LC molecules is electronically controlled and used to tune the resonance frequency of the absorber metamaterial. The measured and numerical simulated frequency dependent absorptivities in the two biasing conditions for an individual pixel are shown in Fig. 12(f). Measured absorptivities are in good agreement with numerical simulations and show a modulation performance of the reflectivity of 75%.

    Liquid crystals are often used as an ambient or dielectric material in the metasurfaces. As the phase of the LC is changed, its dielectric constant and refractive index changes as well. Various types of active metasurfaces employ different mechanisms for tuning the liquid crystal, i.e. applying electric field, , , -, magnetic field, , optical pumping, , or thermal heating, , , , .

    Figure 11. Liquid crystal molecules orientation and periodicity in (a) smectic, (b) nematic, and (c) isotropic phases.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Liquid crystal molecules orientation and periodicity in (a) smectic, (b) nematic, and (c) isotropic phases.

    Aggregation-free elastic self-alignment of nanorods dispersed in LCs and their realignment by shearing and magnetic fields have been experimentally demonstrated. The anisotropic fluids in both columnar hexagonal and nematic LC phases impose a nematic-like orientational ordering of gold nanorods (GNRs) with the GNRs aligning along the LC director n (a unit vector describing the average local orientation of cylindrical micelles forming the LC). As shown in Figs. 12(j) and 12(k). The diameter of micelles is 2-3 nm and gold nanorods have a diameter of 15-25 nm and length of ~50 nm. Polarized surface plasmon resonance spectra taken from samples with magnetically realigned n show that the LC matrix aligns GNRs along n [Fig. 12(l)] and GNR orientation in the nematic fluid can be controlled by magnetic fields (11.7 T in the experiments) via switching of n.

    New types of light-driven plasmonic color filters by overlaying photoresponsive liquid crystals on gold annular aperture arrays are designed and experimentally demonstrated. Figure 12(a) shows the schematic of the sample structure and experimental setup for optical spectra measurement. Upon UV irradiation, the photoresponsive LC molecules can undergo a reversible photoisomerization between the trans (rod-like shape) and the cis (bent shape) molecular forms (shown in magnified part II), which disrupts the local order of LC molecules and makes the system optically active. As shown in Figs. 12(b) and 12(c), there are two obvious transmission bands for each color filter with different aperture size: one is located in a wavelength range of 500-600 nm and the other one in 700-800 nm. They are attributed to coherent interactions between two main plasmons: cylindrical surface plasmons (CSPs) and planar surface plasmons (PSPs). Figure 12(d) shows a typical evolution of the transmission spectra as a function of time under the UV pump for the gold structure with an aperture size of 120 nm. By UV light shining, the trans-isomer transforms into the cis-isomer, which disrupts the local order of the host nematic and forms an isotropic phase. This order change generates a photoinduced refractive index modulation and results in a ~18% decrease in the peak transmission intensity.

    Figure 12(g) shows an all-dielectric metasurface composed of silicon nanodisks integrated into the liquid crystal. The individual nanodisk height and diameter and liquid crystal height are 220 nm, 606 nm, and 170 μm, respectively. Resistance heating of the silicon handle wafer is used to control the temperature and phase of the LCs. Figure 12(h) shows the SEM image of the Si nanodisk metasurface. Liquid crystal is covered by a glass substrate that is coated with a functional layer of poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) with the preferred alignment of the liquid crystal in the x-direction. Figure 12(i) shows the measured normalized transmittance spectra at room temperature with red and cyan solid line for x- and y-polarized incident light, respectively. Heating the sample above the LC phase transition temperature (Tc ~58 ℃) induces a pronounced blue-shift for the electric resonance and a slight red-shift for the magnetic resonance, resulting in identical spectra for x- and y-polarization (red and cyan dashed lines) as the LC switches from its nematic to its isotropic phase.

    Liquid crystals (LCs) are mesophase materials which have properties between liquids and solid crystals. A liquid material has uniform properties in all directions, called isotropic. However, a crystalline solid is anisotropic, meaning it has different optical, electrical, conductivity, and other properties in different directions and its molecules are in a periodic arrangement in one spatial direction. LCs physically behave like liquids but are anisotropic specifically in optical properties like solid crystals. They have mainly used in two different phases named nematic and smectic shown in Fig. 11. In nematic phase, the molecules have the same orientation but are free to drift around and have no periodicity. In the smectic phase, the molecules have the same orientation and are arranged in layers with periodicity. The individual layers in the smectic phase can slip over each other in a manner similar to graphite. Moreover, by increasing the temperatures, the molecules in LCs would be oriented arbitrarily, turning to an isotropic phase, as illustrated in Fig. 11(c).

    Figure 12. Tunable metamaterials using LCs as the active material.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Tunable metamaterials using LCs as the active material.

    (a) Schematic of the sample structure and experimental setup. The inset Ⅰ shows the fabricated square pattern of gold AAAs. The inset Ⅱ shows the working mechanism of the optical driving process. The (b) theoretically calculated and (c) experimentally measured transmission spectra of color filters with different aperture sizes. The inset in (c) shows the measured FWHM of corresponding transmission peaks. (d) The evolution of the transmission spectra as a function of time under the UV pump for the color filter with an aperture size of 120 nm. (e) Schematic view of metamaterial absorber array covered with LC designed for the experiment. (f) Comparison of the measured frequency-dependent absorptivities (A=1−R) in the biased (red continuous line) and unbiased conditions (blue continuous line) with those from numerical calculations (dashed lines). The inset shows the calculated percentage modulation factor as a function of the liquid crystal losses. (g) Schematic view of the silicon nanodisk metasurface integrated into an LC cell. The silicon nanodisk sample is immersed in the LC, and the cell is covered by a layer of brushed PVA for alignment of the LC. A resistor heater is mounted on the backside of the silicon wafer. (h) Scanning electron micrograph of the silicon nanodisk metasurface. (i) Measured normalized transmittance spectra. (j) Schematic illustration of gold nanorods alignment in the nematic LC and (k) gold nanorods alignment in a columnar hexagonal lyotropic LC phase. (l) Experimental extinction spectra of gold nanorods in a nematic LC realigned by a magnetic field. Figure reproduced from: (a–d) ref., John Wiley and Sons; (e, f) ref., John Wiley and Sons; (g–i) ref., American Chemical Society; (j–l) ref., American Chemical Society.

    Semiconductors are the key materials for electronics and photonics. The ability to tune the carrier concentration and the refractive index of semiconductor material renders them promising perspectives for tunable metasurface and metadevices. Recently there have been numerous reports on tunable metasurfaces using a semiconductor as the tunable material for optical tuning, - electrical tuning, and the combination of both electrical and optical excitation, .

    An active metadevice capable of efficient control of THz radiation is proposed using GaAs as the tunable semiconductor. As shown in Figs. 13(f) and 13(g), an array of gold split ring resonators are fabricated on a 1 mm thick n-type GaAs layer grown on a semi-insulating GaAs wafer. Fig. 13(h) shows the working principle of the metadevices through controlling depletion of the carriers in the n-GaAs layer in the gap region. Tuning performance of the metadevice when the polarization of the THz electric field is perpendicular to the DC bias lines is shown in Figs. 13(i) and 13(j) as a function of gate voltage bias. As the reverse bias increases, the resonances in the transmission spectra narrow and increase in amplitude. At 0.72 THz, a 50% relative intensity change of transmission is observed at a reverse gate bias of 16 V. Hence, this device could be used as a reasonably efficient narrowband THz switch/ modulator.

    An optically tunable metasurface is presented using InSb as both the metasurface and the active media. A deep subwavelength InSb 1D grating structure was used as the basic metasurface structure. Figures 13(a) and 13(b) show the planar and cross-sectional SEM images of the fabricated InSb grating and Figure 13(c) illustrates the characterization of the active InSb based metasurface at THz wave incidence with optical tuning by another laser (405 nm). The transmittance of TM and TE polarized THz waves are shown in Figs. 13(d) and 13(e), respectively. The transmittance through an unexcited and excited InSb grating are shown in black and red curves, respectively. Extra free carriers are generated in InSb by the laser excitation which increased electron concentration and resulted in an increase in plasma frequency. As a result, the transmittance minimum of TM wave shifted from 1.3 THz to 1.5 THz and the transmittance at 1.5 THz decreased from 0.6 to 0.32, a change of 46.7%. On the other hand, no significant transmission change for TE polarization is observed.

    Figure 13. Tunable metamaterials using semiconductors as the active material.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Tunable metamaterials using semiconductors as the active material.

    (a) Top and (b) side view SEM images of the fabricated InSb grating and (c) Schematic of the transmission measurement configuration used in FTIR. Measured transmittances of (d) TM and (e) TE polarized THz waves through samples with and without laser excitations. (f) Geometry and dimensions of the THz metamaterial resonator (A=36 μm, G=2 μm, D=10 μm, and W=4 μm). (g) The metamaterial unit cells are connected together with metal wires to serve as a metallic (Schottky) gate. (h) The strength of the resonance is controlled by tuning the substrate charge carrier density near the split gaps which is relative to the voltage bias applied between the Schottky and ohmic contacts (the grey scale indicates the free charge carrier density). (i) Measured transmitted intensity of THz radiation, and (j) the corresponding permittivity for various gate voltage bias. Figure reproduced from: (a–e) ref., Licensed Content Publisher; (f–j) ref., Springer Nature.

    Extensive reports are on the tunability of the resonance frequency of the metasurfaces by altering the period of the unit cells by stretching the substrate, -. The FTIR reflection spectra for an array of resonators on PDMS with a coupling distance of 60 nm are shown in Fig. 14(a). The as-fabricated resonator array had a resonance frequency of 5.78 μm (blue) and it shifted to 6.27 μm (dark red) after 25% stretching parallel to the SRR arms. The red line indicates the response of the array after functionalizing with coated p-mercaptoaniline (pMA). The dotted line shows the cross-polarized measurement for the functionalized array. As shown in Figs. 14(b) and 14(c), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) is also used to design a variable three-dimensional terahertz metamaterial to achieve resonance tunability. Figure 14(d) shows that the resonance frequency of the metamaterial is decreased as the diameter of the tube folded from the metamaterial is increased.

    A highly tunable elastic dielectric metasurface lens using a-Si nano-posts as the resonator and PDMS substrate has been reported. The SEM images of the metasurface before and after the PDMS spin coating are shown in Figs. 14(e) and 14(f), respectively. The dielectric metasurface is operating at 915 nm, with focal distance tuning from 600 μm to 1400 μm with a focusing efficiency above 50%. The measured and analytically predicted focal distances for different strain values versus the square of the stretch ratio are shown in Fig. 14(g). As illustrated in Fig. 14(h), by stretching the metasurface with a stretch ratio of (1+ε), scales its focal length by a factor of (1+ε)2, providing a large tunability. A tunable flat metasurface optical zoom lens on a stretchable PDMS substrate with gold plasmonic resonators has also been reported that the measured focal length could continuously change from 150 to 250 μm.

    Ultrathin metasurfaces and metadevices fabricated on the elastic substrate are flexible and tunable through mechanical deformation like stretching. Different transparent flexible materials have been used to design and fabricate flexible and tunable metasurfaces. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is the most commonly used substrate to make flexible and tunable metasurfaces.

    A strain multiplexed metasurface hologram fabricated with gold nanorods on a stretchable PDMS substrate can generate three different holographic patterns by stretching up to 130%. The schematic illustration of the metasurface is shown in Fig. 14(i). As the substrate is stretched, the holographic image moves away from the device and enlarges in size. The three different holographic patterns by stretching the hologram metasurface are shown in Figs. 14(j)-14(l).

    Figure 14. Flexible tunable metamaterials made on elastic substrates.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Flexible tunable metamaterials made on elastic substrates.

    (a) FTIR reflection spectra for the metamaterial with a coupling distance of 60 nm are shown. The inset shows SEM image of the fabricated sample. Image of (b) 2D planar metamaterial and (c) 3D terahertz metamaterial tube at a diameter of 4.00 mm. (d) Resonance frequency shifts as a function of core diameter for the hollow- and solid-core (cotton and paper) metamaterials tubes. SEM image of (e) the nano-posts before spin coating the first PDMS layer and (f) the nano-posts embedded in the PDMS. (g) Measured and analytically predicted focal distances (i.e. (1+ε)2×f) for different strain values versus the square of the stretch ratio ((1+ε)2). (h) A side view schematic illustration of a dielectric metasurface microlens that by stretching with a stretch ratio of (1+ε), the focal distance changes by (1+ε)2. (i) Schematic illustration of the metasurface hologram on the PDMS substrate. (j) and (k) Experimentally measured hologram images at an image plane 200 μm from the metasurface for a device that is not stretched and stretched. (l) Experimentally captured hologram images at a distance of 340 μm from the metasurface when the device is unstretched, stretched 112%, and 130%. Figure reproduced from: (a) ref., American Chemical Society; (b–d) ref., John Wiley and Sons; (e–h) ref., John Wiley and Sons; (i–l) ref., American Chemical Society.
    Figure 15. Reconfigurable metamaterials using M-NEMS.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Reconfigurable metamaterials using M-NEMS.

    SEM image of (a) the metamaterial molecule array with micro-machined actuators and (b) the close-up top view of the unit cell. The measured reflection coefficient of the metamaterial under the TE polarized incidence in (c) the open-ring state (G=2 μm, 4 μm, and 6 μm), (d) the closed-ring state, and (e) the back-touch state (The simulation results of the induced surface currents by the magnetic response is shown on the right side of each figure). SEM image of (f) the metamaterial molecule array with micro-machined actuators and (g) the close-up top view of the unit cell. The simulated and measured transmission spectra for the TM polarization incident wave at (h) Δ =0, (i) Δ =2.5, 5, 10, 15 μm (from dark to light), and (j) Δ =20 μm. The simulated surface currents and normal magnetic field components are shown on the right side of each figure. (k) SEM image of the fabricated metamaterial (the zoom-in image of the omega-ring design is shown in the inset), (l) Cross-sectional view of released omega-ring showing the angle of curvature (θ) and bending height (δ). (m) and (n) Measured transmission spectra of Omega-ring metamaterial in the TE-polarized and TM-polarized incidence when the voltage bias is 5 V, respectively. (o) SEM image of the reconfigurable plasmonic metamaterial. (p) Schematic of the driving circuit (black) and a section of the metamaterial pattern consisting of a gold nanostructure (yellow) supported by silicon nitride strings (brown). (q) Transmission and (r) reflection spectra of the metamaterial for different static voltages. Figure reproduced from: (a–e) ref., John Wiley and Sons; (f–j) ref., John Wiley and Sons; (k–n) ref., AIP Publishing; (o–r) ref., Springer Nature.

    A switchable magnetic metamaterial is shown in Fig. 15(a). Each unit cell consists of two semi-square 0.5 μm thick aluminum split rings in which one of them is anchored on the substrate and the other one is movable by two identical electrostatic comb-drive actuators on both sides. Hence, the gap between the split rings can be tuned. Figure 15(b) shows how the movable ring could be moved away until it touches the back side of the fixed ring in the neighbor metamaterial unit cell. As shown in Figs. 15(c)-15(e), the reflection coefficient of the metamaterial is tuned as unit cell ring moves from open-ring state to back-touch state. Moreover, It was shown experimentally that the effective permeability (μ) can be changed from negative (-0.26) to positive (0.29) near the resonant frequency.

    A reconfigurable metamaterial is shown in Fig. 15(f), with the wide tunability of resonant frequency by 31% for transverse electric polarization and 22% for transverse magnetic polarization. Fig. 15(g) shows the unit cell consists of a pair of asymmetric split-ring resonators with one fixed to the substrate and the other on a movable frame. Three different configurations of the unit cell are obtained by adjusting the distance Δ between the rings. For example in TM mode, when Δ=0, as shown in Fig. 15(h), the rings touch each other from the front (face-touch state) and create a resonant frequency near 1.42 THz. As is shown in Fig. 15(i), by increasing Δ from 2.5 μm to 15 μm, the resonant frequency decreases from 1.32 THz to 1.22 THz. Finally as shown in Fig. 15(i), when Δ=20 μm, the ring touches the neighbor ring from the back (back-touch state). The resonant frequency becomes 1.16 THz. The strength of dipole-dipole coupling is tuned continuously by controlling the distance between the two rings.

    Micro-nano-electromechanical systems (M-NEMS) are micro and nanometer scale components that integrate electrical and mechanical elements. These devices have the ability to sense, control, and actuate on the micro and nano-scale. They have been utilized to add tunability to a wide range of applications including RF switches in circuits, phase shifters, and antennas-, microphones, speakers, acoustic sensors, and accelerometers-, and recently in metamaterials and metasurfaces, -, -.

    Another approach is using a continuously tunable Omega-ring terahertz metamaterial as shown in Fig. 15(k), while each unit cell consists of an inner disk in the center and an omega-ring around it. They have one layer of 500 nm thick Al on top and a 40 nm thick layer of Al2O3 on the bottom. The schematic side view of a reconfigurable omega-ring is shown in Fig. 15(l). When there is no current, the ring is released at an angle of θ due to residual stress in both layers. However, when a DC voltage is applied to the bias pads on two ends of the rings (bond pads), current flows through the Al metal lines and causes it to heat up. Since Al has a higher expanding rate than Al2O3, the ring will bend downwards. In TE mode, the resonance frequency of the unit cell decreases from 0.67 THz to 0.37 THz as current increases from 0 to 100 mA [shown in Fig. 15(m)]. In TM mode, the resonance frequency decreases from 0.73 THz to 0.43 THz as current increases from 0 to 100 mA [shown in Fig. 15(n)]. The similar approach is used by this group to design different types of tunable metasurfaces, , , , .

    An electromechanically reconfigurable plasmonic metamaterial operating in the near-infrared is shown in Fig. 15(o). The plasmonic metamolecules are formed on two pairs of parallel strings which have opposite voltage. Figure 15(p) shows how the distance between these pair of strings is controlled by the electrostatic force from a few volts of DC voltage. The positive (red) and negative (blue) charges are caused by the driving voltage U and create the pushing and pulling electrostatic forces (pink and green). Since their mass and dimensions are small, they can be driven synchronously to megahertz frequencies. The relative transmission and reflectance spectra of the metamaterial to a reference case where no voltage is applied are shown in Figs. 15(q) and 15(r), respectively. As can be seen, the transmission in the wavelength range of 1.1 μm to 1.3 μm shows around 5% modulation, and the reflectance is modulated up to 8% around a wavelength of 1.5 μm. Such reconfigurable metamaterials could provide continuous modulation of optical signals with megahertz bandwidth at microwatt power levels.

    Although the field of metasurfaces have been introduced recently and designing new types of metasurfaces with novel applications to replace conventional optical elements is still in its early stages, the development of the active metasurfaces and metamaterials have already begun. This article gave an overview of the different types of tunable and reconfigurable metasurfaces and metamaterials through the active materials deployed. We have introduced transparent conductive oxides, ferroelectric materials, 2D materials, phase change materials, liquid crystals, semiconductors, and M-NEMS based on different tuning mechanisms such as electrical, thermal, optical, magnetic, and mechanical covering a wide span of operational frequency.

    Different types of active materials and tuning mechanisms could be selected based on the device structure and application scenario. Lots of work in field of tunable metasurfaces has started and lots more need to be done like in large area low-cost fabrication, besides others. There are huge potentials for tunable metasurfaces and their progress will pave the way for realizing programmable flat optics for applications such as tunable optical lenses, dynamic holographic display and laser beam steering, etc., in the near future.

    Other notable mechanisms used to design tunable metasurfaces and metadevices has been reported in a few articles. For example, electrical control of diodes has been used especially in lower frequency spectrums up to around 10 GHz-. Since the size of diodes limits the minimum size of each unit cell, it is not possible to design tunable metasurfaces for higher frequencies using diodes. Microfluidics is another technology used to design tunable metasurfaces from low frequency around 10 GHz, up to THz spectrum-. Magnesium is another tunable material that can undergo metal-to-dielectric phase-transition to form magnesium hydride (MgH2) by absorbing up to 7.6 wt % hydrogen, which has been used in tunable metamaterials-. Last but not least, ferrites (magnet) materials are used specifically by coupling of the ferrite cuboid with Mie resonance of dielectric materials to magnetically tune the properties of different types of the metamaterials-.

    Operation spectrum Modulation speed Tuning Mechanism Tuning range/depth Reference
    Transparent conductive oxides Visible 10 MHz Electrical 30% 47
    172 kHz Electrical 15% 85
    Ferroelectrics GHz to visible NA Electrical 19% 264
    NA Thermal 43% 52
    NA Optical 1.50% 61
    Two dimensional (2D) materials THz to visible 100 kHz Electrical 47% 50
    20 GHz Electrical 95% 88
    40 MHz Electrical 60% 151
    Phase change materials THz to visible 294 MHz Optical 16% 172
    2.77 GHz Optical 42% 168
    312 MHz Optical 46% 175
    Liquid Crystals (LCs) GHz to visible NA Thermal 15% 103
    NA Optical 18% 101
    20 Hz Electrical 15% 200
    Semiconductors THz to visible NA Electrical 79% 139
    1.2 GHz Optical 46.70% 58
    Elastic materials GHz to visible NA Mechanical 8% 233
    NA Mechanical 50.60% 72
    M-NEMS GHz to visible 1 kHz Electrical 7.50% 76
    1 kHz Electrical 31% 74
    1.5 kHz Electrical 87% 81
    CSV Show Table

    Different methods mentioned in this article are compared in Table 1. Ferroelectric materials are mainly used in the spectral range below and up to THz frequency because of their high tunability but might also find applications in the shorter wavelength range. Phase change materials show large changes in refractive index in the middle and near IR spectrum. Although liquid crystals are mainly used in the visible spectrum, they have enough change in dielectric constant to be used even in the THz and GHz spectra. In general, electrical control through bias voltage or current injection would have their advantages in terms of device control, operation, and integration, by which TCOs, semiconductors, 2D materials, LCs, and phase change materials, as well as M-NEMS, are all promising choices. Thermal control has been used to tune ferroelectrics, phase change materials, and liquid crystals in metasurfaces. Optical tuning enables fast and low power operation and has been used in almost all types of tunable materials, i.e. in phase change materials and LCs to tune local temperature and refractive index, while in TCOs and semiconductors to tune the carrier concentration. Mechanical control is used to stretch or deform the flexible metasurfaces made of elastic materials, which could apply to tunable holograms and wearable electronics. The magnetic field is mainly used in LCs to control the alignment of molecules. One grant challenge for tunable metasurfaces and metadevices is the ability to address individual metasurface element, especially in the visible range, which is currently done mostly using TCOs and ferroelectrics.

  • References

    Shelby R A, Smith D R, Schultz S. Experimental verification of a negative index of refraction. Science 292, 77-79 (2001).

    DOI: 10.1126/science.1058847

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Smith D R, Padilla W J, Vier D C, Nemat-Nasser S C, Schultz S. Composite medium with simultaneously negative permeability and permittivity. Phys Rev Lett 84, 4184-4187 (2000).

    DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Schurig D, Mock J J, Justice B J, Cummer S A, Pendry J B et al. Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies. Science 314, 977-980 (2006).

    DOI: 10.1126/science.1133628

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Landy N I, Sajuyigbe S, Mock J J, Smith D R, Padilla W J. Perfect metamaterial absorber. Phys Rev Lett 100, 207402 (2008).

    DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.207402

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Pendry J B, Schurig D, Smith D R. Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science 312, 1780-1782 (2006).

    DOI: 10.1126/science.1125907

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Smith D R, Vier D C, Koschny T, Soukoulis C M. Electromagnetic parameter retrieval from inhomogeneous metamaterials. Phys Rev E 71, 036617 (2005).

    DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036617

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    View full references list
  • Author Information

    • Arash Nemati On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • Institute of Materials Research & Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Singa-pore 138634, Singapore
      • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore
    • Qian Wang On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • Institute of Materials Research & Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Singa-pore 138634, Singapore
    • Minghui Hong On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore
    • Corresponding author: Jinghua Teng, jh-teng@imre.a-star.edu.sg On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      J H Teng, E-mail: jh-teng@imre.a-star.edu.sg
      • Institute of Materials Research & Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Singa-pore 138634, Singapore
  • Copyright

    Open Access. © The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
  • About this Article

    DOI: 10.29026/oea.2018.180009
    Cite this Article
    Arash Nemati, Qian Wang, Minghui Hong, et al. Tunable and reconfigurable metasurfaces and metadevices. Opto-Electronic Advances 1, 180009 (2018). DOI: 10.29026/oea.2018.180009
    Download Citation
    Article History
    • Received Date May 13, 2018
    • Accepted Date June 20, 2018
    • Available Online June 28, 2018
    • Published Date June 28, 2018
    Article Metrics
    Article Views(54270) PDF Downloads(11182) Article has an altmetric score of 9
    Share:
  • Related Articles

  • Operation spectrum Modulation speed Tuning Mechanism Tuning range/depth Reference
    Transparent conductive oxides Visible 10 MHz Electrical 30% 47
    172 kHz Electrical 15% 85
    Ferroelectrics GHz to visible NA Electrical 19% 264
    NA Thermal 43% 52
    NA Optical 1.50% 61
    Two dimensional (2D) materials THz to visible 100 kHz Electrical 47% 50
    20 GHz Electrical 95% 88
    40 MHz Electrical 60% 151
    Phase change materials THz to visible 294 MHz Optical 16% 172
    2.77 GHz Optical 42% 168
    312 MHz Optical 46% 175
    Liquid Crystals (LCs) GHz to visible NA Thermal 15% 103
    NA Optical 18% 101
    20 Hz Electrical 15% 200
    Semiconductors THz to visible NA Electrical 79% 139
    1.2 GHz Optical 46.70% 58
    Elastic materials GHz to visible NA Mechanical 8% 233
    NA Mechanical 50.60% 72
    M-NEMS GHz to visible 1 kHz Electrical 7.50% 76
    1 kHz Electrical 31% 74
    1.5 kHz Electrical 87% 81
    View in article Downloads

Shelby R A, Smith D R, Schultz S. Experimental verification of a negative index of refraction. Science 292, 77-79 (2001).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1058847

CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith D R, Padilla W J, Vier D C, Nemat-Nasser S C, Schultz S. Composite medium with simultaneously negative permeability and permittivity. Phys Rev Lett 84, 4184-4187 (2000).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184

CrossRef Google Scholar

Schurig D, Mock J J, Justice B J, Cummer S A, Pendry J B et al. Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies. Science 314, 977-980 (2006).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1133628

CrossRef Google Scholar

Landy N I, Sajuyigbe S, Mock J J, Smith D R, Padilla W J. Perfect metamaterial absorber. Phys Rev Lett 100, 207402 (2008).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.207402

CrossRef Google Scholar

Pendry J B, Schurig D, Smith D R. Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science 312, 1780-1782 (2006).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1125907

CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith D R, Vier D C, Koschny T, Soukoulis C M. Electromagnetic parameter retrieval from inhomogeneous metamaterials. Phys Rev E 71, 036617 (2005).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.036617

CrossRef Google Scholar

Vakil A, Engheta N. Transformation optics using graphene. Science 332, 1291-1294 (2011).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1202691

CrossRef Google Scholar

Valentine J, Zhang S, Zentgraf T, Ulin-Avila E, Genov D A et al. Three-dimensional optical metamaterial with a negative refractive index. Nature 455, 376-379 (2008).

DOI: 10.1038/nature07247

CrossRef Google Scholar

Soukoulis C M, Wegener M. Past achievements and future challenges in the development of three-dimensional photonic metamaterials. Nat Photonics 5, 523-530 (2011).

DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2011.154

CrossRef Google Scholar

Jahani S, Jacob Z. All-dielectric metamaterials. Nat Nanotechnol 11, 23-36 (2016).

DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.304

CrossRef Google Scholar

Leonhardt U. Optical conformal mapping. Science 312, 1777-1780 (2006).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1126493

CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith D R, Pendry J B, Wiltshire M C. Metamaterials and negative refractive index. Science 305, 788-792 (2004).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1096796

CrossRef Google Scholar

Shalaev V M. Optical negative-index metamaterials. Nat Photonics 1, 41-48 (2007).

DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2006.49

CrossRef Google Scholar

Boltasseva A, Shalaev V M. Fabrication of optical negative-index metamaterials: Recent advances and outlook. Metamaterials 2, 1-17 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.metmat.2008.03.004

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yu N F, Capasso F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat Mater 13, 139-150 (2014).

DOI: 10.1038/nmat3839

CrossRef Google Scholar

Aieta F, Genevet P, Kats M A, Yu N F, Blanchard R et al. Aberration-free ultrathin flat lenses and axicons at telecom wavelengths based on plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano Lett 12, 4932-4936 (2012).

DOI: 10.1021/nl302516v

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kildishev A V, Boltasseva A, Shalaev V M. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science 339, 1232009 (2013).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1232009

CrossRef Google Scholar

Lin D M, Fan P Y, Hasman E, Brongersma M L. Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements. Science 345, 298-302 (2014).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1253213

CrossRef Google Scholar

Holloway C L, Kuester E F, Gordon J A, O'Hara J, Booth J et al. An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: the two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 54, 10-35 (2012).

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6230714/

Google Scholar

Falcone F, Lopetegi T, Laso M A G, Baena J D, Bonache J et al. Babinet principle applied to the design of metasurfaces and metamaterials. Phys Rev Lett 93, 197401 (2004).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.197401

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ni X J, Kildishev A V, Shalaev V M. Metasurface holograms for visible light. Nat Commun 4, 2807 (2013).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3807

CrossRef Google Scholar

Arbabi A, Horie Y, Bagheri M, Faraon A. Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission. Nat Nanotechnol 10, 937-943 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.186

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yang Y M, Wang W Y, Moitra P, Kravchenko I I, Briggs D P et al. Dielectric meta-reflectarray for broadband linear polarization conversion and optical vortex generation. Nano Lett 14, 1394-1399 (2014).

DOI: 10.1021/nl4044482

CrossRef Google Scholar

Khorasaninejad M, Chen W T, Devlin R C, Oh J, Zhu A Y et al. Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Science 352, 1190-1194 (2016).

DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf6644

CrossRef Google Scholar

Pors A, Nielsen M G, Eriksen R L, Bozhevolnyi S I. Broadband focusing flat mirrors based on plasmonic gradient metasurfaces. Nano Lett 13, 829-834 (2013).

DOI: 10.1021/nl304761m

CrossRef Google Scholar

Decker M, Staude I, Falkner M, Dominguez J, Neshev D N et al. High-efficiency dielectric Huygens' surfaces. Adv Opt Mater 3, 813-820 (2015).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.v3.6

CrossRef Google Scholar

Lalanne P, Astilean S, Chavel P, Cambril E, Launois H. Design and fabrication of blazed binary diffractive elements with sampling periods smaller than the structural cutoff. J Opt Soc Am A 16, 1143-1156 (1999).

DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.16.001143

CrossRef Google Scholar

Sarabandi K, Behdad N. A frequency selective surface with miniaturized elements. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 55, 1239-1245 (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2007.895567

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bayatpur F, Sarabandi K. Single-layer high-order miniaturized-element frequency-selective surfaces. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 56, 774-781 (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2008.919654

CrossRef Google Scholar

Behdad N. Miniaturized-element frequency selective surfaces (MEFSS) using sub-wavelength periodic structures. In Proceedings of 2008 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium 347-350 (IEEE, 2008); http://doi.org/10.1109/RWS.2008.4463500.

http://doi.org/10.1109/RWS.2008.4463500.

" target="_blank">Google Scholar

Si G Y, Zhao Y H, Liu H, Teo S, Zhang M S et al. Annular aperture array based color filter. Appl Phys Lett 99, 033105 (2011).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3608147

CrossRef Google Scholar

Si G Y, Zhao Y H, Lv J T, Lu M Q, Wang F W et al. Reflective plasmonic color filters based on lithographically patterned silver nanorod arrays. Nanoscale 5, 6243-6248 (2013).

DOI: 10.1039/c3nr01419c

CrossRef Google Scholar

Si G Y, Zhao Y H, Leong E S P, Lv J T, Liu Y J. Incident-angle dependent color tuning from a single plasmonic chip. Nanotechnology 25, 455203 (2014).

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/25/45/455203

CrossRef Google Scholar

Jiang X X, Leong E S P, Liu Y J, Si G Y. Tuning plasmon resonance in depth-variant plasmonic nanostructures. Mater Des 96, 64-67 (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.005

CrossRef Google Scholar

McVay J, Engheta N, Hoorfar A. High impedance metamaterial surfaces using Hilbert-curve inclusions. IEEE Microw Wirel Compon Lett 14, 130-132 (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/LMWC.2003.822571

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bayraktar Z, Turpin J P, Werner D H. Nature-inspired optimization of high-impedance metasurfaces with ultrasmall interwoven unit cells. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 10, 1563-1566 (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/LAWP.2011.2178224

CrossRef Google Scholar

Vallecchi A, Langley R J, Schuchinsky A G. High-impedance metasurfaces with interwoven conductor patterns. In Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Advanced Electromagnetic Materials in Microwaves and Optics 280-282 (IEEE, 2014); http://doi.org/10.1109/MetaMaterials.2014.6948675.

http://doi.org/10.1109/MetaMaterials.2014.6948675.

" target="_blank">Google Scholar

Si G Y, Leong E S P, Pan W, Chum C C, Liu Y J. Plasmon-induced transparency in coupled triangle-rod arrays. Nanotechnology 26, 025201 (2014).

http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=JJ0233871475

Google Scholar

Khorasaninejad M, Shi Z, Zhu A Y, Chen W T, Sanjeev V et al. Achromatic metalens over 60 nm bandwidth in the visible and metalens with reverse chromatic dispersion. Nano Lett 17, 1819-1824 (2017).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05137

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yu N F, Genevet P, Kats M A, Aieta F, Tetienne J P et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 334, 333-337 (2011).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1210713

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen X Z, Huang L L, Mühlenbernd H, Li G X, Bai B F et al. Dual-polarity plasmonic metalens for visible light. Nat Commun 3, 1198 (2012).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2207

CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu H, Wang B, Ke L, Deng J, Chum C C et al. High aspect subdiffraction-limit photolithography via a silver superlens. Nano Lett 12, 1549-1554 (2012).

DOI: 10.1021/nl2044088

CrossRef Google Scholar

Mehmood M Q, Mei S T, Hussain S, Huang K, Siew S Y et al. Visible-frequency metasurface for structuring and spatially multiplexing optical vortices. Adv Mater 28, 2533-2539 (2016).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201504532

CrossRef Google Scholar

Qin F, Ding L, Zhang L, Monticone F, Chum C C et al. Hybrid bilayer plasmonic metasurface efficiently manipulates visible light. Sci Adv 2, e1501168 (2016).

DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1501168

CrossRef Google Scholar

Byrnes S J, Lenef A, Aieta F, Capasso F. Designing large, high-efficiency, high-numerical-aperture, transmissive meta-lenses for visible light. Opt Express 24, 5110-5124 (2016).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.24.005110

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen H T, Padilla W J, Cich M J, Azad A K, Averitt R D et al. A metamaterial solid-state terahertz phase modulator. Nat Photonics 3, 148-151 (2009).

DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.3

CrossRef Google Scholar

Huang Y W, Lee H W, Sokhoyan R, Pala R A, Thyagarajan K et al. Gate-tunable conducting oxide metasurfaces. Nano Lett 16, 5319-5325 (2016).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00555

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ou J Y, Plum E, Zhang J F, Zheludev N I. An electromechanically reconfigurable plasmonic metamaterial operating in the near-infrared. Nat Nanotechnol 8, 252-255 (2013).

DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.25

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ju L, Geng B S, Horng J, Girit C, Martin M et al. Graphene plasmonics for tunable terahertz metamaterials. Nat Nanotechnol 6, 630-634 (2011).

DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.146

CrossRef Google Scholar

Lee S H, Choi M, Kim T T, Lee S, Liu M et al. Switching terahertz waves with gate-controlled active graphene metamaterials. Nat Mater 11, 936-941 (2012).

DOI: 10.1038/nmat3433

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bian Y L, Wu C, Li H Q, Zhai J W. A tunable metamaterial dependent on electric field at terahertz with barium strontium titanate thin film. Appl Phys Lett 104, 042906 (2014).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4863669

CrossRef Google Scholar

Singh R, Azad A K, Jia Q X, Taylor A J, Chen H T. Thermal tunability in terahertz metamaterials fabricated on strontium titanate single-crystal substrates. Opt Lett 36, 1230-1232 (2011).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.36.001230

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang B X, Zhai X, Wang G Z, Huang W Q, Wang L L. Frequency tunable metamaterial absorber at deep-subwavelength scale. Opt Mater Express 5, 227-235 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OME.5.000227

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ou J Y, Plum E, Zhang J F, Zheludev N I. Giant nonlinearity of an optically reconfigurable plasmonic metamaterial. Adv Mater 28, 729-733 (2016).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201504467

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ou J Y, Plum E, Jiang L, Zheludev N I. Reconfigurable photonic metamaterials. Nano Lett 11, 2142-2144 (2011).

DOI: 10.1021/nl200791r

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen H T, O'Hara J F, Azad A K, Taylor A J, Averitt R D et al. Experimental demonstration of frequency-agile terahertz metamaterials. Nat Photonics 2, 295-298 (2008).

DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2008.52

CrossRef Google Scholar

Huber A J, Kazantsev D, Keilmann F, Wittborn J, Hillenbrand R. Simultaneous IR material recognition and conductivity mapping by nanoscale near-field microscopy. Adv Mater 19, 2209-2212 (2007).

DOI: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4095

CrossRef Google Scholar

Deng L Y, Teng J H, Liu H W, Wu Q Y, Tang J et al. Direct optical tuning of the terahertz plasmonic response of Insb subwavelength gratings. Adv Opt Mater 1, 128-132 (2013).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.201200032

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu Y, Hu X Y, Fu Y L, Yang H, Gong Q H. Ultralow-power and ultrafast all-optical tunable plasmon-induced transparency in metamaterials at optical communication range. Sci Rep 3, 2338 (2013).

DOI: 10.1038/srep02338

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu Y, Hu X Y, Yang H, Gong Q H. Ultralow-power all-optical tunable double plasmon-induced transparencies in nonlinear metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 104, 211108 (2014).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4881056

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhang F, Hu X Y, Zhu Y, Fu Y L, Yang H et al. Ultrafast all-optical tunable Fano resonance in nonlinear metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 102, 181109 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4804436

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhou Y, Hu X Y, Li C, Yang H, Gong Q H. All-optical tunable dual Fano resonance in nonlinear metamaterials in optical communication range. J Mod Opt 65, 206-212 (2018).

DOI: 10.1080/09500340.2017.1384511

CrossRef Google Scholar

Si G Y, Leong E S P, Jiang X X, Lv J T, Lin J et al. All-optical, polarization-insensitive light tuning properties in silver nanorod arrays covered with photoresponsive liquid crystals. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17, 13223-13227 (2015).

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP00185D

CrossRef Google Scholar

Lapine M, Shadrivov I V, Powell D A, Kivshar Y S. Magnetoelastic metamaterials. Nat Mater 11, 30-33 (2012).

DOI: 10.1038/nmat3168

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zheludev N I, Kivshar Y S. From metamaterials to metadevices. Nat Mater 11, 917-924 (2012).

DOI: 10.1038/nmat3431

CrossRef Google Scholar

Valente J, Ou J Y, Plum E, Youngs I J, Zheludev N I. A magneto-electro-optical effect in a plasmonic nanowire material. Nat Commun 6, 7021 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8021

CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu Q K, Cui Y X, Gardner D, Li X, He S L et al. Self-alignment of plasmonic gold nanorods in reconfigurable anisotropic fluids for tunable bulk metamaterial applications. Nano Lett 10, 1347-1353 (2010).

DOI: 10.1021/nl9042104

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhang F L, Kang L, Zhao Q, Zhou J, Zhao X P et al. Magnetically tunable left handed metamaterials by liquid crystal orientation. Opt Express 17, 4360-4366 (2009).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.17.004360

CrossRef Google Scholar

Tao H, Strikwerda A C, Fan K, Padilla W J, Zhang X et al. Reconfigurable terahertz metamaterials. Phys Rev Lett 103, 147401 (2009).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.147401

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kamali S M, Arbabi E, Arbabi A, Horie Y, Faraon A. Highly tunable elastic dielectric metasurface lenses. Laser Photonics Rev 10, 1002-1008 (2016).

DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201600144

CrossRef Google Scholar

Gupta B, Pandey S, Nahata A, Zhang T, Nahata A. Bistable physical geometries for terahertz plasmonic structures using shape memory alloys. Adv Opt Mater 5, 1601008 (2017).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.201601008

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen Z C, Rahmani M, Gong Y D, Chong C T, Hong M H. Realization of variable three-dimensional terahertz metamaterial tubes for passive resonance tunability. Adv Mater 24, OP143-OP147 (2012).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201290000

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ee H S, Agarwal R. Tunable metasurface and flat optical zoom lens on a stretchable substrate. Nano Lett 16, 2818-2823 (2016).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00618

CrossRef Google Scholar

Fu Y H, Liu A Q, Zhu W M, Zhang X M, Tsai D P et al. A micromachined reconfigurable metamaterial via reconfiguration of asymmetric split-ring resonators. Adv Funct Mater 21, 3589-3594 (2011).

DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201101087

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu W M, Liu A Q, Bourouina T, Tsai D P, Teng J H et al. Microelectromechanical Maltese-cross metamaterial with tunable terahertz anisotropy. Nat Commun 3, 1274 (2012).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2285

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu W M, Liu A Q, Zhang X M, Tsai D P, Bourouina T et al. Switchable magnetic metamaterials using micromachining processes. Adv Mater 23, 1792-1796 (2011).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201004341

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ho C P, Pitchappa P, Lin Y S, Huang C Y, Kropelnicki P et al. Electrothermally actuated microelectromechanical systems based omega-ring terahertz metamaterial with polarization dependent characteristics. Appl Phys Lett 104, 161104 (2014).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4871999

CrossRef Google Scholar

Hand T, Cummer S. Characterization of tunable metamaterial elements using MEMS switches. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 6, 401-404 (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/LAWP.2007.902807

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ma F S, Lin Y S, Zhang X H, Lee C. Tunable multiband terahertz metamaterials using a reconfigurable electric split-ring resonator array. Light Sci Appl 3, e171 (2014).

DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2014.52

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kan T, Isozaki A, Kanda N, Nemoto N, Konishi K et al. Enantiomeric switching of chiral metamaterial for terahertz polarization modulation employing vertically deformable MEMS spirals. Nat Commun 6, 8422 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9422

CrossRef Google Scholar

Han Z L, Kohno K, Fujita H, Hirakawa K, Toshiyoshi H. MEMS reconfigurable metamaterial for terahertz switchable filter and modulator. Opt Express 22, 21326-21339 (2014).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.021326

CrossRef Google Scholar

Pitchappa P, Ho C P, Dhakar L, Lee C. Microelectromechanically reconfigurable interpixelated metamaterial for independent tuning of multiple resonances at terahertz spectral region. Optica 2, 571-578 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000571

CrossRef Google Scholar

Lin Y S, Qian Y, Ma F S, Liu Z, Kropelnicki P et al. Development of stress-induced curved actuators for a tunable THz filter based on double split-ring resonators. Appl Phys Lett 102, 111908 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4798244

CrossRef Google Scholar

Arbabi E, Arbabi A, Kamali S M, Horie Y, Faraji-Dana M et al. MEMS-tunable dielectric metasurface lens. Nat Commun 9, 812 (2018).

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03155-6

CrossRef Google Scholar

Park J, Kang J H, Liu X G, Brongersma M L. Electrically tunable epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) metafilm absorbers. Sci Rep 5, 15754 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/srep15754

CrossRef Google Scholar

Park J, Kang J H, Kim S J, Liu X G, Brongersma M L. Dynamic reflection phase and polarization control in metasurfaces. Nano Lett 17, 407-413 (2017).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04378

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kim J, Son H, Cho D J, Geng B S, Regan W et al. Electrical control of optical plasmon resonance with graphene. Nano Lett 12, 5598-5602 (2012).

DOI: 10.1021/nl302656d

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yao Y, Shankar R, Kats M A, Song Y, Kong J et al. Electrically tunable metasurface perfect absorbers for ultrathin mid-infrared optical modulators. Nano Lett 14, 6526-6532 (2014).

DOI: 10.1021/nl503104n

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yan H G, Li X S, Chandra B, Tulevski G, Wu Y Q et al. Tunable infrared plasmonic devices using graphene/insulator stacks. Nat Nanotechnol 7, 330-334 (2012).

DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2012.59

CrossRef Google Scholar

Fallahi A, Perruisseau-Carrier J. Design of tunable biperiodic graphene metasurfaces. Phys Rev B 86, 195408 (2012).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.195408

CrossRef Google Scholar

Lee B, Park J, Han G H, Ee H S, Naylor C H et al. Fano resonance and spectrally modified photoluminescence enhancement in monolayer MoS2 integrated with plasmonic nanoantenna array. Nano Lett 15, 3646-3653 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01563

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen Y G, Kao T S, Ng B, Li X, Luo X G et al. Hybrid phase-change plasmonic crystals for active tuning of lattice resonances. Opt Express 21, 13691-13698 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.013691

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang Q, Yuan G H, Kiang K S, Sun K, Gholipour B et al. Reconfigurable phase-change photomask for grayscale photolithography. Appl Phys Lett 110, 201110 (2017).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4983198

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhang T H, Mei S T, Wang Q, Liu H, Lim C T et al. Reconfigurable optical manipulation by phase change material waveguides. Nanoscale 9, 6895-6900 (2017).

DOI: 10.1039/C7NR00876G

CrossRef Google Scholar

Peng X Y, Wang B, Teng J H, Kana J B K, Zhang X H. Active near infrared linear polarizer based on VO2 phase transition. J Appl Phys 114, 163103 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4827193

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang D C, Zhang L C, Gu Y H, Mehmood M Q, Gong Y D et al. Switchable ultrathin quarter-wave plate in terahertz using active phase-change metasurface. Sci Rep 5, 15020 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/srep15020

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang Q, Rogers E T F, Gholipour B, Wang C M, Yuan G H et al. Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change materials. Nat Photonics 10, 60-65 (2016).

DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.247

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen Y G, Li X, Luo X G, Maier S A, Hong M H. Tunable near-infrared plasmonic perfect absorber based on phase-change materials. Photonics Res 3, 54-57 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.3.000054

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhao Q, Kang L, Du B, Li B, Zhou J et al. Electrically tunable negative permeability metamaterials based on nematic liquid crystals. Appl Phys Lett 90, 011112 (2007).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2430485

CrossRef Google Scholar

Shrekenhamer D, Chen W C, Padilla W J. Liquid crystal tunable metamaterial absorber. Phys Rev Lett 110, 177403 (2013).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.177403

CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu Y J, Si G Y, Leong E S P, Xiang N, Danner A J et al. Light-driven plasmonic color filters by overlaying photoresponsive liquid crystals on gold annular aperture arrays. Adv Mater 24, OP131-OP135 (2012).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201104440/abstract

Google Scholar

Xiao S M, Chettiar U K, Kildishev A V, Drachev V, Khoo I C et al. Tunable magnetic response of metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 95, 033115 (2009).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3182857

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang X D, Kwon D H, Werner D H, Khoo I C, Kildishev A V et al. Tunable optical negative-index metamaterials employing anisotropic liquid crystals. Appl Phys Lett 91, 143122 (2007).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2795345

CrossRef Google Scholar

Stratford K, Henrich O, Lintuvuori J S, Cates M E, Marenduzzo D. Self-assembly of colloid-cholesteric composites provides a possible route to switchable optical materials. Nat Commun 5, 3954 (2014).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4954

CrossRef Google Scholar

Dai H T, Chen L, Zhang B, Si G Y, Liu Y J. Optically isotropic, electrically tunable liquid crystal droplet arrays formed by photopolymerization-induced phase separation. Opt Lett 40, 2723-2726 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.40.002723

CrossRef Google Scholar

Si G Y, Zhao Y H, Leong E S P, Liu Y J. Liquid-crystal-enabled active plasmonics: a review. Materials 7, 1296-1317 (2014).

DOI: 10.3390/ma7021296

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen H T, Padilla W J, Zide J M O, Gossard A C, Taylor A J et al. Active terahertz metamaterial devices. Nature 444, 597-600 (2006).

DOI: 10.1038/nature05343

CrossRef Google Scholar

Savo S, Shrekenhamer D, Padilla W J. Liquid crystal metamaterial absorber spatial light modulator for THz applications. Adv Opt Mater 2, 275-279 (2014).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.v2.3

CrossRef Google Scholar

Sautter J, Staude I, Decker M, Rusak E, Neshev D N et al. Active tuning of all-dielectric metasurfaces. ACS Nano 9, 4308-4315 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00723

CrossRef Google Scholar

Gao J W, Kempa K, Giersig M, Akinoglu E M, Han B et al. Physics of transparent conductors. Adv Phys 65, 553-617 (2016).

DOI: 10.1080/00018732.2016.1226804

CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards P P, Porch A, Jones M O, Morgan D V, Perks R M. Basic materials physics of transparent conducting oxides. Dalton Trans, 2995-3002 (2004).

http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=JJ0213292985

Google Scholar

Chopra K, Major S, Pandya D K. Transparent conductors—a status review. Thin Solid Films 102, 1-46 (1983).

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(83)90256-0

CrossRef Google Scholar

Riza M A, Ibrahim M A, Ahamefula U C, Teridi M A M, Ludin N A et al. Prospects and challenges of perovskite type transparent conductive oxides in photovoltaic applications. Part Ⅰ-Material developments. Solar Energy 137, 371-378 (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.042

CrossRef Google Scholar

Riza M A, Ibrahim M A, Ahamefula U C, Teridi M A M, Ludin N A et al. Prospects and challenges of perovskite type transparent conductive oxides in photovoltaic applications. Part Ⅱ-Synthesis and deposition. Solar Energy 139, 309-317 (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.045

CrossRef Google Scholar

Silveirinha M, Engheta N. Tunneling of electromagnetic energy through subwavelength channels and bends using ε-near-zero materials. Phys Rev Lett 97, 157403 (2006).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.157403

CrossRef Google Scholar

Alu A, Silveirinha M G, Salandrino A, Engheta N. Epsilon-near-zero metamaterials and electromagnetic sources: Tailoring the radiation phase pattern. Phys Rev B 75, 155410 (2007).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155410

CrossRef Google Scholar

Naik G V, Shalaev V M, Boltasseva A. Alternative plasmonic materials: beyond gold and silver. Adv Mater 25, 3264-3294 (2013).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.v25.24

CrossRef Google Scholar

Naik G V, Kim J, Boltasseva A. Oxides and nitrides as alternative plasmonic materials in the optical range [Invited]. Opt Mater Express 1, 1090-1099 (2011).

DOI: 10.1364/OME.1.001090

CrossRef Google Scholar

Feigenbaum E, Diest K, Atwater H A. Unity-order index change in transparent conducting oxides at visible frequencies. Nano Lett 10, 2111-2116 (2010).

DOI: 10.1021/nl1006307

CrossRef Google Scholar

Shi K F, Haque R R, Zhao B Y, Zhao R C, Lu Z L. Broadband electro-optical modulator based on transparent conducting oxide. Opt Lett 39, 4978-4981 (2014).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.39.004978

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu Y, Hu X Y, Chai Z, Yang H, Gong Q H. Active control of chirality in nonlinear metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 106, 091109 (2015).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4914343

CrossRef Google Scholar

Humphrey J L, Kuciauskas D. Optical susceptibilities of supported indium tin oxide thin films. J Appl Phys 100, 113123 (2006).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2392995

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kasap S, Capper P. Springer Handbook of Electronic and Photonic Materials (Springer, New York, 2006).

Google Scholar

Ahmed A, Goldthorpe I A, Khandani A K. Electrically tunable materials for microwave applications. Appl Phys Rev 2, 011302 (2015).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4906255

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yang X Y, Yang J H, Hu X Y, Zhu Y, Yang H et al. Multilayer-WS2: ferroelectric composite for ultrafast tunable metamaterial-induced transparency applications. Appl Phys Lett 107, 081110 (2015).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4929701

CrossRef Google Scholar

Hu X Y, Zhang Y B, Fu Y L, Yang H, Gong Q H. Low-power and ultrafast all-optical tunable nanometer-scale photonic metamaterials. Adv Mater 23, 4295-4300 (2011).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201101350

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhou Y, Yang X Y, Hu X Y, Yang H, Gong Q H. Multilayer-MoS2-microsheet/(Nano-Au:LiNbO3) for all-optical tunable metamaterial-induced transparency. J Opt 17, 105102 (2015).

DOI: 10.1088/2040-8978/17/10/105102

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bibbò L, Khan K, Liu Q, Lin M, Wang Q et al. Tunable narrowband antireflection optical filter with a metasurface. Photonics Res 5, 500-506 (2017).

DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.5.000500

CrossRef Google Scholar

Luo C Y, Li D, Luo Q, Yue J, Gao P et al. Design of a tunable multiband terahertz waves absorber. J Alloys Compd 652, 18-24 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.089

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yahiaoui R, Němec H, Kužel P, Kadlec F, Kadlec C et al. Tunable THz metamaterials based on an array of paraelectric SrTiO3 rods. Appl Phys A 103, 689-692 (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-011-6335-y

CrossRef Google Scholar

Khuyen B X, Tung B S, Yoo Y J, Kim Y J, Lam V D et al. Ultrathin metamaterial-based perfect absorbers for VHF and THz bands. Curr Appl Phys 16, 1009-1014 (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2016.05.027

CrossRef Google Scholar

Luo C Y, Li Z Z, Guo Z H, Yue J, Luo Q et al. Tunable metamaterial dual-band terahertz absorber. Solid State Commun 222, 32-36 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2015.08.009

CrossRef Google Scholar

Peng R G, Xiao Z Q, Zhao Q, Zhang F L, Meng Y G et al. Temperature-controlled chameleonlike cloak. Phys Rev X 7, 011033 (2017).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.011033

Google Scholar

Zhao Y J, Li B W, Lan C W, Bi K, Qu Z W. Tunable silicon-based all-dielectric metamaterials with strontium titanate thin film in terahertz range. Opt Express 25, 22158-22163 (2017).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.25.022158

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yeh L H, Kiang J F. Microwave tunable metasurfaces implemented with ferroelectric materials and periodical copper wires. Prog Electromagn Res 37, 191-202 (2014).

DOI: 10.2528/PIERM14061606

CrossRef Google Scholar

Gong Z B, Li C, Hu X Y, Yang H, Gong Q H. Active control of highly efficient third-harmonic generation in ultrathin nonlinear metasurfaces. Opt Mater 60, 552-558 (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2016.09.029

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ma Z C, Xu Z M, Luo C Y, Peng J, Li Z P et al. Dynamical thermal metamaterial response at terahertz frequencies. Ferroelectrics 507, 4-11 (2017).

DOI: 10.1080/00150193.2017.1282782

CrossRef Google Scholar

Luo C Y, Li D, Yao J Q, Ling F R. Direct thermal tuning of the terahertz plasmonic response of semiconductor metasurface. J Electromagn Waves Appl 29, 2512-2522 (2015).

DOI: 10.1080/09205071.2015.1111170

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wu L, Du T, Xu N N, Ding C F, Li H et al. A new Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3-Silicon hybrid metamaterial device in terahertz regime. Small 12, 2610-2615 (2016).

DOI: 10.1002/smll.v12.19

CrossRef Google Scholar

Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666-669 (2004).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1102896

CrossRef Google Scholar

Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Katsnelson M I et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197-200 (2005).

DOI: 10.1038/nature04233

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang F, Zhang Y B, Tian C S, Girit C, Zettl A et al. Gate-variable optical transitions in graphene. Science 320, 206-209 (2008).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1152793

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhao X L, Yuan C, Zhu L, Yao J Q. Graphene-based tunable terahertz plasmon-induced transparency metamaterial. Nanoscale 8, 15273-15280 (2016).

DOI: 10.1039/C5NR07114C

CrossRef Google Scholar

Huidobro P A, Kraft M, Maier S A, Pendry J B. Graphene as a tunable anisotropic or isotropic plasmonic metasurface. Acs Nano 10, 5499-5506 (2016).

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b01944

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yao G, Ling F R, Yue J, Luo C Y, Luo Q et al. Dynamically electrically tunable broadband absorber based on graphene analog of electromagnetically induced transparency. IEEE Photonics J 8, 7800808 (2016).

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7368074

Google Scholar

Dabidian N, Kholmanov I, Khanikaev A B, Tatar K, Trendafilov S et al. Electrical switching of infrared light using graphene integration with plasmonic Fano resonant metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 2, 216-227 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/ph5003279

CrossRef Google Scholar

Jadidi M M, Sushkov A B, Myers-Ward R L, Boyd A K, Daniels K M et al. Tunable terahertz hybrid metal-graphene plasmons. Nano Lett 15, 7099-7104 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03191

CrossRef Google Scholar

He X Y, Zhao Z Y, Shi W Z. Graphene-supported tunable near-IR metamaterials. Opt Lett 40, 178-181 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.40.000178

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cai Y J, Zhu J F, Liu Q H. Tunable enhanced optical absorption of graphene using plasmonic perfect absorbers. Appl Phys Lett 106, 043105 (2015).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4906996

CrossRef Google Scholar

Vasić B, Jakovljević M M, Isić G, Gajić R. Tunable metamaterials based on split ring resonators and doped graphene. Appl Phys Lett 103, 011102 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4812989

CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu P Q, Luxmoore I J, Mikhailov S A, Savostianova N A, Valmorra F et al. Highly tunable hybrid metamaterials employing split-ring resonators strongly coupled to graphene surface plasmons. Nat Commun 6, 8969 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9969

CrossRef Google Scholar

Li J X, Yu P, Cheng H, Liu W W, Li Z C et al. Optical polarization encoding using graphene-loaded plasmonic metasurfaces. Adv Opt Mater 4, 91-98 (2016).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.201500398

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhang Y P, Li T T, Chen Q, Zhang H Y, O'Hara J F et al. Independently tunable dual-band perfect absorber based on graphene at mid-infrared frequencies. Sci Rep 5, 18463 (2015).

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26689917

Google Scholar

He X Y, Lin F T, Liu F, Shi W Z. Terahertz tunable graphene Fano resonance. Nanotechnology 27, 485202 (2016).

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/48/485202

CrossRef Google Scholar

Li Q, Tian Z, Zhang X Q, Xu N N, Singh R et al. Dual control of active graphene-silicon hybrid metamaterial devices. Carbon 90, 146-153 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.015

CrossRef Google Scholar

Argyropoulos C. Enhanced transmission modulation based on dielectric metasurfaces loaded with graphene. Opt Express 23, 23787-23797 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.023787

CrossRef Google Scholar

He X Y. Tunable terahertz graphene metamaterials. Carbon 82, 229-237 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.066

CrossRef Google Scholar

Fan Y C, Shen N H, Koschny T, Soukoulis C M. Tunable terahertz meta-surface with graphene cut-wires. ACS Photonics 2, 151-156 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/ph500366z

CrossRef Google Scholar

Papasimakis N, Thongrattanasiri S, Zheludev N I, de Abajo F J G. The magnetic response of graphene split-ring metamaterials. Light-Sci Appl 2, e78 (2013).

DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2013.34

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheng H, Chen S Q, Yu P, Li J X, Xie B Y et al. Dynamically tunable broadband mid-infrared cross polarization converter based on graphene metamaterial. Appl Phys Lett 103, 223102 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4833757

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yao G, Ling F R, Yue J, Luo C Y, Ji J et al. Dual-band tunable perfect metamaterial absorber in the THz range. Opt Express 24, 1518-1527 (2016).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.24.001518

CrossRef Google Scholar

Othman M A, Guclu C, Capolino F. Graphene-based tunable hyperbolic metamaterials and enhanced near-field absorption. Opt Express 21, 7614-7632 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.007614

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kumar A, Low T, Fung K H, Avouris P, Fang N X. Tunable light-matter interaction and the role of hyperbolicity in graphene-hBN system. Nano Lett 15, 3172-3180 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01191

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu B F, Ren G B, Zheng S W, Lin Z, Jian S S. Nanoscale dielectric-graphene-dielectric tunable infrared waveguide with ultrahigh refractive indices. Opt Express 21, 17089-17096 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.017089

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu W R, Xiao F J, Kang M, Sikdar D, Premaratne M. Tunable terahertz left-handed metamaterial based on multi-layer graphene-dielectric composite. Appl Phys Lett 104, 051902 (2014).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4863929

CrossRef Google Scholar

Dong H, Conti C, Marini A, Biancalana F. Terahertz relativistic spatial solitons in doped graphene metamaterials. J Phys B-At Mol Opt Phys 46, 155401 (2013).

DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/46/15/155401

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yin X H, Steinle T, Huang L L, Taubner T, Wuttig M et al. Beam switching and bifocal zoom lensing using active plasmonic metasurfaces. Light-Sci Appl 6, e17016 (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2017.16

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cao T, Wei C W, Simpson R E, Zhang L, Cryan M J. Fast tuning of double Fano resonance using a phase-change metamaterial under low power intensity. Sci Rep 4, 4463 (2014).

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24662968

Google Scholar

Alaee R, Albooyeh M, Tretyakov S, Rockstuhl C. Phase-change material-based nanoantennas with tunable radiation patterns. Opt Lett 41, 4099-4102 (2016).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.41.004099

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cao T, Wei C W, Mao L B. Ultrafast tunable chirped phase-change metamaterial with a low power. Opt Express 23, 4092-4105 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.004092

CrossRef Google Scholar

Carrillo S G C, Nash G R, Hayat H, Cryan M J, Klemm M et al. Design of practicable phase-change metadevices for near-infrared absorber and modulator applications. Opt Express 24, 13563-13573 (2016).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.24.013563

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cao T, Wei C W, Simpson R E, Zhang L, Cryan M J. Rapid phase transition of a phase-change metamaterial perfect absorber. Opt Mater Express 3, 1101-1110 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OME.3.001101

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cao T, Zhang L, Simpson R E, Cryan M J. Mid-infrared tunable polarization-independent perfect absorber using a phase-change metamaterial. J Opt Soc Am B 30, 1580-1585 (2013).

http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=JJ0230387159

Google Scholar

Zou L F, Cryan M, Klemm M. Phase change material based tunable reflectarray for free-space optical inter/intra chip interconnects. Opt Express 22, 24142-24148 (2014).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.024142

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cao T, Wei C W, Mao L B. Numerical study of achiral phase-change metamaterials for ultrafast tuning of giant circular conversion dichroism. Sci Rep 5, 14666 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/srep14666

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cao T, Zhang L, Simpson R E, Wei C W, Cryan M J. Strongly tunable circular dichroism in gammadion chiral phase-change metamaterials. Opt Express 21, 27841-27851 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.027841

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yin X H, Sch ferling M, Michel A K U, Tittl A, Wuttig M et al. Active Chiral Plasmonics. Nano Lett 15, 4255-4260 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/nl5042325

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cao T, Li Y, Wei C W, Qiu Y M. Numerical study of tunable enhanced chirality in multilayer stack achiral phase-change metamaterials. Opt Express 25, 9911-9925 (2017).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.25.009911

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cao T, Simpson R E, Cryan M J. Study of tunable negative index metamaterials based on phase-change materials. J Opt Soc Am B 30, 439-444 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/JOSAB.30.000439

CrossRef Google Scholar

Gholipour B, Zhang J F, MacDonald K F, Hewak D W, Zheludev N I. An all-optical, non-volatile, bidirectional, phase-change meta-switch. Adv Mater 25, 3050-3054 (2013).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.v25.22

CrossRef Google Scholar

Michel A K U, Zalden P, Chigrin D N, Wuttig M, Lindenberg A M et al. Reversible optical switching of infrared antenna resonances with ultrathin phase-change layers using femtosecond laser pulses. ACS Photonics 1, 833-839 (2014).

DOI: 10.1021/ph500121d

CrossRef Google Scholar

Michel A K U, Chigrin D N, Ma T W W, Sch nauer K, Salinga M et al. Using low-loss phase-change materials for mid-infrared antenna resonance tuning. Nano Lett 13, 3470-3475 (2013).

DOI: 10.1021/nl4006194

CrossRef Google Scholar

Li P N, Yang X S, Ma T W W, Hanss J, Lewin M et al. Reversible optical switching of highly confined phonon-polaritons with an ultrathin phase-change material. Nat Mater 15, 870-875 (2016).

DOI: 10.1038/nmat4649

CrossRef Google Scholar

Karvounis A, Gholipour B, MacDonald K F, Zheludev N I. All-dielectric phase-change reconfigurable metasurface. Appl Phys Lett 109, 051103 (2016).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4959272

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chu C H, Tseng M L, Chen J, Wu P C, Chen Y H et al. Active dielectric metasurface based on phase‐change medium. Laser Photonics Rev 10, 986-994 (2016).

DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201600106

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang Q, Maddock J, Rogers E T F, Roy T, Craig C et al. 1.7 Gbit/in.2 gray-scale continuous-phase-change femtosecond image storage. Appl Phys Lett 104, 121105 (2014).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4869575

CrossRef Google Scholar

Naorem R, Dayal G, Ramakrishna S A, Rajeswaran B, Umarji A M. Thermally switchable metamaterial absorber with a VO2 ground plane. Opt Commun 346, 154-157 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2015.01.075

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kocer H, Butun S, Banar B, Wang K, Tongay S et al. Thermal tuning of infrared resonant absorbers based on hybrid gold-VO2 nanostructures. Appl Phys Lett 106, 161104 (2015).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4918938

CrossRef Google Scholar

Savaliya P B, Thomas A, Dua R, Dhawan A. Tunable optical switching in the near-infrared spectral regime by employing plasmonic nanoantennas containing phase change materials. Opt Express 25, 23755-23772 (2017).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.25.023755

CrossRef Google Scholar

Guo P J, Weimer M S, Emery J D, Diroll B T, Chen X Q et al. Conformal coating of a phase change material on ordered plasmonic nanorod arrays for broadband all-optical switching. ACS Nano 11, 693-701 (2017).

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b07042

CrossRef Google Scholar

Hashemi M R M, Yang S H, Wang T Y, Sepúlveda N, Jarrahi M. Electronically-controlled beam-steering through vanadium dioxide metasurfaces. Sci Rep 6, 35439 (2016).

DOI: 10.1038/srep35439

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang D C, Zhang L C, Gong Y D, Jian L K, Venkatesan T et al. Multiband switchable terahertz quarter-wave plates via phase-change metasurfaces. IEEE Photonics J 8, 5500308 (2016).

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7372376

Google Scholar

Seo M, Kyoung J, Park H, Koo S, Kim H S et al. Active terahertz nanoantennas based on VO2 phase transition. Nano Lett 10, 2064-2068 (2010).

DOI: 10.1021/nl1002153

CrossRef Google Scholar

Driscoll T, Palit S, Qazilbash M M, Brehm M, Keilmann F et al. Dynamic tuning of an infrared hybrid-metamaterial resonance using vanadium dioxide. Appl Phys Lett 93, 024101 (2008).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2956675

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu Z H, Evans P G, Haglund R F Jr, Valentine J G. Dynamically reconfigurable metadevice employing nanostructured phase-change materials. Nano Lett 17, 4881-4885 (2017).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01767

CrossRef Google Scholar

Collings P J, Hird M. Introduction to Liquid Crystals: Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, London, 1997).

Google Scholar

Minovich A, Neshev D N, Powell D A, Shadrivov I V, Kivshar Y S. Tunable fishnet metamaterials infiltrated by liquid crystals. Appl Phys Lett 96, 193103 (2010).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3427429

CrossRef Google Scholar

Buchnev O, Ou J Y, Kaczmarek M, Zheludev N I, Fedotov V A. Electro-optical control in a plasmonic metamaterial hybridised with a liquid-crystal cell. Opt Express 21, 1633-1638 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.001633

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhang F L, Zhao Q, Zhang W H, Sun J B, Zhou J et al. Voltage tunable short wire-pair type of metamaterial infiltrated by nematic liquid crystal. Appl Phys Lett 97, 134103 (2010).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3496034

CrossRef Google Scholar

Isić G, Vasić B, Zografopoulos D C, Beccherelli R, Gajić R. Electrically tunable critically coupled terahertz metamaterial absorber based on nematic liquid crystals. Phys Rev Appl 3, 064007 (2015).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.064007

CrossRef Google Scholar

Gorkunov M V, Osipov M A. Tunability of wire-grid metamaterial immersed into nematic liquid crystal. J Appl Phys 103, 036101 (2008).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2837099

CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu Z, Huang C Y, Liu H W, Zhang X H, Lee C. Resonance enhancement of terahertz metamaterials by liquid crystals/indium tin oxide interfaces. Opt Express 21, 6519-6525 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.006519

CrossRef Google Scholar

Buchnev O, Podoliak N, Kaczmarek M, Zheludev N I, Fedotov V A. Electrically controlled nanostructured metasurface loaded with liquid crystal: Toward multifunctional photonic switch. Adv Opt Mater 3, 674-679 (2015).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.v3.5

CrossRef Google Scholar

Buchnev O, Wallauer J, Walther M, Kaczmarek M, Zheludev N I et al. Controlling intensity and phase of terahertz radiation with an optically thin liquid crystal-loaded metamaterial. Appl Phys Lett 103, 141904 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4823822

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zografopoulos D C, Beccherelli R. Tunable terahertz fishnet metamaterials based on thin nematic liquid crystal layers for fast switching. Sci Rep 5, 13137 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/srep13137

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kowerdziej R, Olifierczuk M, Parka J, Wróbel J. Terahertz characterization of tunable metamaterial based on electrically controlled nematic liquid crystal. Appl Phys Lett 105, 022908 (2014).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4890850

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chang C L, Wang W C, Lin H R, Hsieh F J, Pun Y B et al. Tunable terahertz fishnet metamaterial. Appl Phys Lett 102, 151903 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4801648

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kwon D H, Wang X D, Bayraktar Z, Weiner B, Werner D H. Near-infrared metamaterial films with reconfigurable transmissive/reflective properties. Opt Lett 33, 545-547 (2008).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.33.000545

CrossRef Google Scholar

Komar A, Fang Z, Bohn J, Sautter J, Decker M et al. Electrically tunable all-dielectric optical metasurfaces based on liquid crystals. Appl Phys Lett 110, 071109 (2017).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4976504

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kowerdziej R, Jaroszewicz L, Olifierczuk M, Parka J. Experimental study on terahertz metamaterial embedded in nematic liquid crystal. Appl Phys Lett 106, 092905 (2015).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4914032

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen C C, Chiang W F, Tsai M C, Jiang S A, Chang T H et al. Continuously tunable and fast-response terahertz metamaterials using in-plane-switching dual-frequency liquid crystal cells. Opt Lett 40, 2021-2024 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.40.002021

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kowerdziej R, Olifierczuk M, Salski B, Parka J. Tunable negative index metamaterial employing in-plane switching mode at terahertz frequencies. Liq Cryst 39, 827-831 (2012).

DOI: 10.1080/02678292.2012.684461

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bildik S, Dieter S, Fritzsch C, Menzel W, Jakoby R. Reconfigurable folded reflectarray antenna based upon liquid crystal technology. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 63, 122-132 (2015).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2014.2367491

CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu Y J, Si G Y, Leong E S P, Wang B, Danner A J et al. Optically tunable plasmonic color filters. Appl Phys A 107, 49-54 (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-011-6736-y

CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewandowski W, Fruhnert M, Mieczkowski J, Rockstuhl C, Górecka E. Dynamically self-assembled silver nanoparticles as a thermally tunable metamaterial. Nat Commun 6, 6590 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7590

CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu L M, Shadrivov I V, Powell D A, Raihan M R, Hattori H T et al. Temperature control of terahertz metamaterials with liquid crystals. IEEE Trans Terahertz Sci Technol 3, 827-831 (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/TTHZ.2013.2285570

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhao J C, Cheng Y Z, Cheng Z Z. Design of a photo-excited switchable broadband reflective linear polarization conversion metasurface for terahertz waves. IEEE Photonics J 10, 4600210 (2018).

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=8265143

Google Scholar

Xu Z C, Gao R M, Ding C F, Wu L, Zhang Y T et al. Photoexited switchable metamaterial absorber at terahertz frequencies. Opt Commun 344, 125-128 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2015.01.051

CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu X W, Liu H J, Sun Q B, Huang N. Metamaterial terahertz switch based on split-ring resonator embedded with photoconductive silicon. Appl Opt 54, 3478-3483 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/AO.54.003478

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhao X G, Fan K B, Zhang J D, Seren H R, Metcalfe G D et al. Optically tunable metamaterial perfect absorber on highly flexible substrate. Sens Actuators A-Phys 231, 74-80 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2015.02.040

CrossRef Google Scholar

Shcherbakov M R, Liu S, Zubyuk V V, Vaskin A, Vabishchevich P P et al. Ultrafast all-optical tuning of direct-gap semiconductor metasurfaces. Nat Commun 8, 17 (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00019-3

CrossRef Google Scholar

Manjappa M, Srivastava Y K, Cong L Q, Al-Naib I, Singh R. Active photoswitching of sharp fano resonances in THz metadevices. Adv Mater 29, 1603355 (2017).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.v29.3

CrossRef Google Scholar

Seren H R, Keiser G R, Cao L Y, Zhang J D, Strikwerda A C et al. Optically Modulated multiband terahertz perfect absorber. Adv Opt Mater 2, 1221-1226 (2014).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.201400197

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kenanakis G, Zhao R, Katsarakis N, Kafesaki M, Soukoulis C M et al. Optically controllable THz chiral metamaterials. Opt Express 22, 12149-12159 (2014).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.012149

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheng Y Z, Gong R Z, Cheng Z Z. A photoexcited broadband switchable metamaterial absorber with polarization-insensitive and wide-angle absorption for terahertz waves. Opt Commun 361, 41-46 (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2015.10.031

CrossRef Google Scholar

Li Q, Tian Z, Zhang X Q, Singh R, Du L L et al. Active graphene-silicon hybrid diode for terahertz waves. Nat Commun 6, 7082 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8082

CrossRef Google Scholar

Gu J Q, Singh R, Liu X J, Zhang X Q, Ma Y F et al. Active control of electromagnetically induced transparency analogue in terahertz metamaterials. Nat Commun 3, 1151 (2012).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2153

CrossRef Google Scholar

Su X Q, Ouyang C M, Xu N N, Tan S Y, Gu J Q et al. Broadband terahertz transparency in a switchable metasurface. IEEE Photonics J 7, 5900108 (2015).

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7008493

Google Scholar

Zhong L, Zhang B, He T, Lv L F, Hou Y B et al. Conjugated polymer based active electric-controlled terahertz device. Appl Phys Lett 108, 103301 (2016).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4943648

CrossRef Google Scholar

Pryce I M, Kelaita Y A, Aydin K, Atwater H A. Compliant metamaterials for resonantly enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy and refractive index sensing. ACS Nano 5, 8167-8174 (2011).

DOI: 10.1021/nn202815k

CrossRef Google Scholar

Malek S C, Ee H S, Agarwal R. Strain multiplexed metasurface holograms on a stretchable substrate. Nano Lett 17, 3641-3645 (2017).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00807

CrossRef Google Scholar

Pryce I M, Aydin K, Kelaita Y A, Briggs R M, Atwater H A. Highly strained compliant optical metamaterials with large frequency tunability. Nano Lett 10, 4222-4227 (2010).

DOI: 10.1021/nl102684x

CrossRef Google Scholar

Li J N, Shah C M, Withayachumnankul W, Ung B S Y, Mitchell A et al. Mechanically tunable terahertz metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 102, 121101 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4773238

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cui Y B, Zhou J H, Tamma V A, Park W. Dynamic tuning and symmetry lowering of Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructure. ACS Nano 6, 2385-2393 (2012).

DOI: 10.1021/nn204647b

CrossRef Google Scholar

Gutruf P, Zou C J, Withayachumnankul W, Bhaskaran M, Sriram S et al. Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies. ACS nano 10, 133-141 (2016).

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05954

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yoo D, Johnson T W, Cherukulappurath S, Norris D J, Oh S H. Template-stripped tunable plasmonic devices on stretchable and rollable substrates. ACS Nano 9, 10647-10654 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05279

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kim K, Lee D, Eom S, Lim S. Stretchable metamaterial absorber using liquid metal-filled polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Sensors 16, 521 (2016).

DOI: 10.3390/s16040521

CrossRef Google Scholar

Dehghani M, Pakizeh T. Efficient tunability and circuit model of nested-U nanoresonators in optical metasurfaces. J Mod Opt 65, 151-157 (2018).

DOI: 10.1080/09500340.2017.1382591

CrossRef Google Scholar

Nguyen C T C, Katehi L P B, Rebeiz G M. Micromachined devices for wireless communications. Proc IEEE 86, 1756-1768 (1998).

DOI: 10.1109/5.704281

CrossRef Google Scholar

Rebeiz G M, Muldavin J B. Rf mems switches and switch circuits. IEEE Microw Mag 2, 59-71 (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/6668.969936

CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown E R. RF-MEMS switches for reconfigurable integrated circuits. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 46, 1868-1880 (1998).

DOI: 10.1109/22.734501

CrossRef Google Scholar

Nemati A, Ganji B A. UWB monopole antenna with switchable band-notch characteristic using a novel MEMS Afloat. Appl Comput Electrom Soc J 30, 1306-1312 (2015).

http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/112021280/uwb-monopole-antenna-switchable-band-notch-characteristic-using-novel-mems-afloat

Google Scholar

Won Jung C, Lee M J, Li G P, De Flaviis F. Reconfigurable scan-beam single-arm spiral antenna integrated with RF-MEMS switches. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 54, 455-463 (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2005.863407

CrossRef Google Scholar

Mak A C K, Rowell C R, Murch R D, Mak C L. Reconfigurable multiband antenna designs for wireless communication devices. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 55, 1919-1928 (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2007.895634

CrossRef Google Scholar

Nikolaou S, Kingsley N D, Ponchak G E, Papapolymerou J, Tentzeris M M. UWB elliptical monopoles with a reconfigurable band notch using MEMS switches actuated without bias lines. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 57, 2242-2251 (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2009.2024450

CrossRef Google Scholar

Erdil E, Topalli K, Unlu M, Civi O A, Akin T. Frequency tunable microstrip patch antenna using RF MEMS technology. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 55, 1193-1196 (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2007.893426

CrossRef Google Scholar

Rebeiz G M, Tan G L, Hayden J S. RF MEMS phase shifters: Design and applications. IEEE Microw Mag 3, 72-81 (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/MMW.2002.1004054

CrossRef Google Scholar

Scheeper P R, Nordstrand B, Gullov J O, Liu B, Clausen T et al. A new measurement microphone based on MEMS technology. J Microelectromech Syst 12, 880-891 (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2003.820260

CrossRef Google Scholar

Neumann J J Jr, Gabriel K J. CMOS-MEMS membrane for audio-frequency acoustic actuation. Sens Actuators A: Phys 95, 175-182 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00728-2

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bryzek J, Roundy S, Bircumshaw B, Chung C, Castellino K et al. Marvelous MEMS. IEEE Circuits Devices 22, 8-28 (2006).

http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ0213070909/

Google Scholar

Williams M D, Griffin B A, Reagan T N, Underbrink J R, Sheplak M. An AlN MEMS piezoelectric microphone for aeroacoustic applications. J Microelectromech Syst 21, 270-283 (2012).

DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2011.2176921

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ahmadnejad J, Ganji B A, Nemati A. Design, analysis, and modelling of a MEMS capacitive microphone for integration into CMOS circuits. In Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Postgraduate Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PrimeAsia) 186-190 (IEEE, 2013); http://doi.org/10.1109/PrimeAsia.2013.6731202.

http://doi.org/10.1109/PrimeAsia.2013.6731202.

" target="_blank">Google Scholar

Ahmadnejad J, Ganji B A, Nemati A. A mems capacitive microphone modelling for integrated circuits. Int J Eng-Trans C: Aspects 28, 888-895 (2015).

http://www.ije.ir/abstract/%7BVolume:28-Transactions:C-Number:6%7D/=1991

Google Scholar

Ekmekci E, Topalli K, Akin T, Turhan-Sayan G. A tunable multi-band metamaterial design using micro-split SRR structures. Opt Express 17, 16046-16058 (2009).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.17.016046

CrossRef Google Scholar

Debogovic T, Perruisseau-Carrier J. Low loss MEMS-reconfigurable 1-bit reflectarray cell with dual-linear polarization. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 62, 5055-5060 (2014).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2014.2344100

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhang M, Zhang W, Liu A Q, Li F C, Lan C F. Tunable polarization conversion and rotation based on a reconfigurable metasurface. Sci Rep 7, 12068 (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11953-z

CrossRef Google Scholar

Buchnev O, Podoliak N, Frank T, Kaczmarek M, Jiang L D et al. Controlling stiction in nano-electro-mechanical systems using liquid crystals. ACS Nano 10, 11519-11524 (2016).

DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b07495

CrossRef Google Scholar

Isozaki A, Kan T, Takahashi H, Matsumoto K, Shimoyama I. Out-of-plane actuation with a sub-micron initial gap for reconfigurable terahertz micro-electro-mechanical systems metamaterials. Opt Express 23, 26243-26251 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.026243

CrossRef Google Scholar

Stark T, Imboden M, Kaya S, Mertiri A, Chang J et al. MEMS tunable mid-infrared plasmonic spectrometer. ACS Photonics 3, 14-19 (2016).

http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/216296

Google Scholar

Chen K, Razinskas G, Feichtner T, Grossmann S, Christiansen S et al. Electromechanically tunable suspended optical nanoantenna. Nano Lett 16, 2680-2685 (2016).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00323

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kundu A, Das S, Maity S, Gupta B, Lahiri S K et al. A tunable band-stop filter using a metamaterial structure and MEMS bridges on a silicon substrate. J Micromech Microeng 22, 045004 (2012).

DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/22/4/045004

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ma F S, Qian Y, Lin Y S, Liu H W, Zhang X H et al. Polarization-sensitive microelectromechanical systems based tunable terahertz metamaterials using three dimensional electric split-ring resonator arrays. Appl Phys Lett 102, 161912 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4803048

CrossRef Google Scholar

Cong L Q, Pitchappa P, Lee C, Singh R. Active phase transition via loss engineering in a terahertz MEMS metamaterial. Adv Mater 29, 1700733 (2017).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.v29.26

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kadlec C, Skoromets V, Kadlec F, Němec H, Chen H T et al. Electric-field tuning of a planar terahertz metamaterial based on strained SrTiO3 layers. J Phys D: Appl Phys 51, 054001 (2018).

DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/aaa315

CrossRef Google Scholar

Xu W R, Sonkusale S. Microwave diode switchable metamaterial reflector/absorber. Appl Phys Lett 103, 031902 (2013).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4813750

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu B, Feng Y J, Zhao J M, Huang C, Wang Z B et al. Polarization modulation by tunable electromagnetic metamaterial reflector/absorber. Opt Express 18, 23196s (2010).

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010arXiv1010.4378Z

Google Scholar

Burokur S N, Daniel J P, Ratajczak P, De Lustrac A. Tunable bilayered metasurface for frequency reconfigurable directive emissions. Appl Phys Lett 97, 064101 (2010).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3478214

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ma X L, Pan W B, Huang C, Pu M B, Wang Y Q et al. An active metamaterial for polarization manipulating. Adv Opt Mater 2, 945-949 (2014).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.v2.10

CrossRef Google Scholar

Xu H X, Sun S L, Tang S W, Ma S J, He Q et al. Dynamical control on helicity of electromagnetic waves by tunable metasurfaces. Sci Rep 6, 27503 (2016).

DOI: 10.1038/srep27503

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yang H H, Cao X Y, Yang F, Gao J, Xu S H et al. A programmable metasurface with dynamic polarization, scattering and focusing control. Sci Rep 6, 35692 (2016).

DOI: 10.1038/srep35692

CrossRef Google Scholar

Fan Y C, Qiao T, Zhang F L, Fu Q H, Dong J J et al. An electromagnetic modulator based on electrically controllable metamaterial analogue to electromagnetically induced transparency. Sci Rep 7, 40441 (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/srep40441

CrossRef Google Scholar

Tian S C, Liu H X, Li L. Design of 1-bit digital reconfigurable reflective metasurface for beam-scanning. Appl Sci 7, 882 (2017).

DOI: 10.3390/app7090882

CrossRef Google Scholar

Sievenpiper D F, Schaffner J H, Song H J, Loo R Y, Tangonan G. Two-dimensional beam steering using an electrically tunable impedance surface. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 51, 2713-2722 (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2003.817558

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhao J, Cheng Q, Chen J, Qi M Q, Jiang W X et al. A tunable metamaterial absorber using varactor diodes. New J Phys 15, 043049 (2013).

DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/4/043049

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kasirga T S, Ertas Y N, Bayindir M. Microfluidics for reconfigurable electromagnetic metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 95, 214102 (2009).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3268448

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kim H K, Lee D, Lim S. A fluidically tunable metasurface absorber for flexible large-scale wireless ethanol sensor applications. Sensors 16, 1246 (2016).

DOI: 10.3390/s16081246

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang J Q, Liu S C, Guruswamy S, Nahata A. Reconfigurable terahertz metamaterial device with pressure memory. Opt Express 22, 4065-4074 (2014).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.004065

CrossRef Google Scholar

Geng Z X, Zhang X, Fan Z Y, Lv X Q, Chen H D. A route to terahertz metamaterial biosensor integrated with microfluidics for liver cancer biomarker testing in early stage. Sci Rep 7, 16378 (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16762-y

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu W M, Song Q H, Yan L B, Zhang W, Wu P C et al. A flat lens with tunable phase gradient by using random access reconfigurable metamaterial. Adv Mater 27, 4739-4743 (2015).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.v27.32

CrossRef Google Scholar

Baldi A, Gonzalez-Silveira M, Palmisano V, Dam B, Griessen R. Destabilization of the Mg-H system through elastic constraints. Phys Rev Lett 102, 226102 (2009).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.226102

CrossRef Google Scholar

Sterl F, Strohfeldt N, Walter R, Griessen R, Tittl A et al. Magnesium as novel material for active plasmonics in the visible wavelength range. Nano Lett 15, 7949-7955 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03029

CrossRef Google Scholar

Duan X Y, Kamin S, Liu N. Dynamic plasmonic colour display. Nat Commun 8, 14606 (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14606

CrossRef Google Scholar

Duan X Y, Kamin S, Sterl F, Giessen H, Liu N. Hydrogen-regulated chiral nanoplasmonics. Nano Lett 16, 1462-1466 (2016).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05105

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bi K, Zhou J, Zhao H J, Liu X M, Lan C W. Tunable dual-band negative refractive index in ferrite-based metamaterials. Opt Express 21, 10746-10752 (2013).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.010746

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bi K, Guo Y S, Liu X M, Zhao Q, Xiao J H et al. Magnetically tunable Mie resonance-based dielectric metamaterials. Sci Rep 4, 7001 (2014).

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25384397

Google Scholar

Lei M, Feng N Y, Wang Q M, Hao Y N, Huang S G et al. Magnetically tunable metamaterial perfect absorber. J Appl Phys 119, 244504 (2016).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4954224

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wang Q M, Zeng L Y, Lei M, Bi K. Tunable metamaterial bandstop filter based on ferromagnetic resonance. AIP Adv 5, 077145 (2015).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4927399

CrossRef Google Scholar

Du B, Xu Z, Wang J, Xia S. Magnetically tunable ferrite-dielectric left-handed metamaterial. Prog Electromag Res 66, 21-28 (2016).

DOI: 10.2528/PIERC16042806

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bi K, Huang K, Zeng L Y, Zhou M H, Wang Q M et al. Tunable dielectric properties of ferrite-dielectric based metamaterial. PLoS One 10, e0127331 (2015).

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127331

CrossRef Google Scholar

Related Articles
Show full outline

Catalog

    Corresponding author: Jinghua Teng, jh-teng@imre.a-star.edu.sg

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed
    Tunable and reconfigurable metasurfaces and metadevices
    • Figure  1
    • Figure  2
    • Figure  3
    • Figure  4
    • Figure  5
    • Figure  6
    • Figure  7
    • Figure  8
    • Figure  9
    • Figure  10
    • Figure  11
    • Figure  12
    • Figure  13
    • Figure  14
    • Figure  15
    Tunable and reconfigurable metasurfaces and metadevices
    • Operation spectrum Modulation speed Tuning Mechanism Tuning range/depth Reference
      Transparent conductive oxides Visible 10 MHz Electrical 30% 47
      172 kHz Electrical 15% 85
      Ferroelectrics GHz to visible NA Electrical 19% 264
      NA Thermal 43% 52
      NA Optical 1.50% 61
      Two dimensional (2D) materials THz to visible 100 kHz Electrical 47% 50
      20 GHz Electrical 95% 88
      40 MHz Electrical 60% 151
      Phase change materials THz to visible 294 MHz Optical 16% 172
      2.77 GHz Optical 42% 168
      312 MHz Optical 46% 175
      Liquid Crystals (LCs) GHz to visible NA Thermal 15% 103
      NA Optical 18% 101
      20 Hz Electrical 15% 200
      Semiconductors THz to visible NA Electrical 79% 139
      1.2 GHz Optical 46.70% 58
      Elastic materials GHz to visible NA Mechanical 8% 233
      NA Mechanical 50.60% 72
      M-NEMS GHz to visible 1 kHz Electrical 7.50% 76
      1 kHz Electrical 31% 74
      1.5 kHz Electrical 87% 81
    • Table  1

      Comparison of different methods.

        1/1