Plasma and nanoparticle shielding during pulsed laser ablation in liquids cause ablation efficiency decrease
  • Abstract

    Understanding shielding cross-effects is a prerequisite for maximal power-specific nanosecond laser ablation in liquids (LAL). However, discrimination between cavitation bubble (CB), nanoparticle (NP), and shielding, e.g., by the plasma or a transient vapor layer, is challenging. Therefore, CB imaging by shadowgraphy is performed to better understand the plasma and laser beam-NP interaction during LAL. By comparing the fluence-dependent CB volume for ablations performed with 1 ns pulses with reports from the literature, we find larger energy-specific CB volumes for 7 ns-ablation. The increased CB for laser ablation with higher ns pulse durations could be a first explanation of the efficiency decrease reported for these laser systems having higher pulse durations. Consequently, 1 ns-LAL shows superior ablation efficiency. Moreover, a CB cascade occurs when the focal plane is shifted into the liquid. This effect is enhanced when NPs are present in the fluid. Even minute amounts of NPs trapped in a stationary layer decrease the laser energy significantly, even under liquid flow. However, this local concentration in the sticking film has so far not been considered. It presents an essential obstacle in high-yield LAL, shielding already the second laser pulse that arrives and presenting a source of satellite bubbles. Hence, measures to lower the NP concentration on the target must be investigated in the future.

    Keywords

  • loading
  • References

    [1]

    Fojtik A, Henglein A. Laser ablation of films and suspended particles in a solvent-formation of cluster and colloid solutions. Ber Bunsen-Ges Phys Chem 97, 252–254 (1993).

    Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhang DS, Gökce B, Barcikowski S. Laser synthesis and processing of colloids: fundamentals and applications. Chem Rev 117, 3990–4103 (2017).

    DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00468

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3]

    Amans D, Cai WP, Barcikowski S. Status and demand of research to bring laser generation of nanoparticles in liquids to maturity. Appl Surf Sci 488, 445–454 (2019).

    DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.117

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4]

    Dittrich S, Kohsakowski S, Wittek B, Hengst C, Gökce B et al. Increasing the size-selectivity in laser-based g/h liquid flow synthesis of Pt and PtPd nanoparticles for CO and NO oxidation in industrial automotive exhaust gas treatment benchmarking. Nanomaterials 10, 1582 (2020).

    DOI: 10.3390/nano10081582

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5]

    Barcikowski S, Baranowski T, Durmus Y, Wiedwald U, Gökce B. Solid solution magnetic FeNi nanostrand–polymer composites by connecting-coarsening assembly. J Mater Chem C 3, 10699–10704 (2015).

    DOI: 10.1039/C5TC02160J

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6]

    Neumeister A, Jakobi J, Rehbock C, Moysig J, Barcikowski S. Monophasic ligand-free alloy nanoparticle synthesis determinants during pulsed laser ablation of bulk alloy and consolidated microparticles in water. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16, 23671–23678 (2014).

    DOI: 10.1039/C4CP03316G

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    View full references list
  • Author Information

  • Supplementary Information

  • Copyright

    Open Access. © The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
  • About this Article

    DOI: 10.29026/oea.2021.200072
    Cite this Article
    Sarah Dittrich, Stephan Barcikowski, Bilal Gökce. Plasma and nanoparticle shielding during pulsed laser ablation in liquids cause ablation efficiency decrease. Opto-Electronic Advances 4, 200072 (2021). DOI: 10.29026/oea.2021.200072
    Download Citation
    Article History
    • Received Date October 19, 2020
    • Accepted Date December 02, 2020
    • Available Online January 26, 2021
    • Published Date January 26, 2021
    Article Metrics
    Article Views(10143) PDF Downloads(1182) Article has an altmetric score of 3
    Share:
  • Related Articles

[1]

Fojtik A, Henglein A. Laser ablation of films and suspended particles in a solvent-formation of cluster and colloid solutions. Ber Bunsen-Ges Phys Chem 97, 252–254 (1993).

Google Scholar

[2]

Zhang DS, Gökce B, Barcikowski S. Laser synthesis and processing of colloids: fundamentals and applications. Chem Rev 117, 3990–4103 (2017).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00468

CrossRef Google Scholar

[3]

Amans D, Cai WP, Barcikowski S. Status and demand of research to bring laser generation of nanoparticles in liquids to maturity. Appl Surf Sci 488, 445–454 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.117

CrossRef Google Scholar

[4]

Dittrich S, Kohsakowski S, Wittek B, Hengst C, Gökce B et al. Increasing the size-selectivity in laser-based g/h liquid flow synthesis of Pt and PtPd nanoparticles for CO and NO oxidation in industrial automotive exhaust gas treatment benchmarking. Nanomaterials 10, 1582 (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/nano10081582

CrossRef Google Scholar

[5]

Barcikowski S, Baranowski T, Durmus Y, Wiedwald U, Gökce B. Solid solution magnetic FeNi nanostrand–polymer composites by connecting-coarsening assembly. J Mater Chem C 3, 10699–10704 (2015).

DOI: 10.1039/C5TC02160J

CrossRef Google Scholar

[6]

Neumeister A, Jakobi J, Rehbock C, Moysig J, Barcikowski S. Monophasic ligand-free alloy nanoparticle synthesis determinants during pulsed laser ablation of bulk alloy and consolidated microparticles in water. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16, 23671–23678 (2014).

DOI: 10.1039/C4CP03316G

CrossRef Google Scholar

[7]

Amendola V, Riello P, Meneghetti M. Magnetic nanoparticles of iron carbide, iron oxide, iron@iron oxide, and metal iron synthesized by laser ablation in organic solvents. J Phys Chem C 115, 5140–5146 (2011).

DOI: 10.1021/jp109371m

CrossRef Google Scholar

[8]

Amendola V, Fortunati I, Marega C, Abdelhady AL, Saidaminov MI et al. High-purity hybrid organolead halide perovskite nanoparticles obtained by pulsed-laser irradiation in liquid. ChemPhysChem 18, 1047–1054 (2017).

DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201600863

CrossRef Google Scholar

[9]

Streubel R, Bendt G, Gökce B. Pilot-scale synthesis of metal nanoparticles by high-speed pulsed laser ablation in liquids. Nanotechnology 27, 205602 (2016).

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/20/205602

CrossRef Google Scholar

[10]

Reichenberger S, Marzun G, Muhler M, Barcikowski S. Perspective of surfactant-free colloidal nanoparticles in heterogeneous catalysis. ChemCatChem 11, 4489–4518 (2019).

DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201900666

CrossRef Google Scholar

[11]

Rodio M, Coluccino L, Romeo E, Genovese A, Diaspro A et al. Facile fabrication of bioactive ultra-small protein-hydroxyapatite nanoconjugates via liquid-phase laser ablation and their enhanced osteogenic differentiation activity. J Mater Chem B 5, 279–288 (2017).

DOI: 10.1039/C6TB02023B

CrossRef Google Scholar

[12]

Ikehata T, Onodera Y, Nunokawa T, Hirano T, Ogura SI et al. Photodynamic therapy using upconversion nanoparticles prepared by laser ablation in liquid. Appl Surf Sci 348, 54–59 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.097

CrossRef Google Scholar

[13]

Hupfeld T, Wegner A, Blanke M, Doñate‐Buendía C, Sharov V et al. Plasmonic Seasoning: giving color to desktop laser 3D printed polymers by highly dispersed nanoparticles. Adv Optical Mater 8, 2000473 (2020).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.202000473

CrossRef Google Scholar

[14]

Doñate-Buendía C, Frömel F, Wilms MB, Streubel R, Tenkamp J et al. Oxide dispersion-strengthened alloys generated by laser metal deposition of laser-generated nanoparticle-metal powder composites. Mater Des 154, 360–369 (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.044

CrossRef Google Scholar

[15]

Hupfeld T, Laumer T, Stichel T, Schuffenhauer T, Heberle J et al. A new approach to coat PA12 powders with laser-generated nanoparticles for selective laser sintering. Procedia CIRP 74, 244–248 (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.103

CrossRef Google Scholar

[16]

Muniz-Miranda M, Gellini C, Giorgetti E. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering from copper nanoparticles obtained by laser ablation. J Phys Chem C 115, 5021–5027 (2011).

DOI: 10.1021/jp1086027

CrossRef Google Scholar

[17]

Amendola V, Litti L, Meneghetti M. LDI-MS assisted by chemical-free gold nanoparticles: enhanced sensitivity and reduced background in the low-mass region. Anal Chem 85, 11747–11754 (2013).

DOI: 10.1021/ac401662r

CrossRef Google Scholar

[18]

Jendrzej S, Gökce B, Epple M, Barcikowski S. How size determines the value of gold: economic aspects of wet chemical and laser-based metal colloid synthesis. ChemPhysChem 18, 1012–1019 (2017).

DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201601139

CrossRef Google Scholar

[19]

Neuenschwander B, Jaeggi B, Schmid M, Rouffiange V, Martin P E. Optimization of the volume ablation rate for metals at different laser pulse-durations from ps to fs. Proc SPIE 8243, 824307 (2012).

DOI: 10.1117/12.908583

CrossRef Google Scholar

[20]

Dittrich S, Streubel R, McDonnell C, Huber HP, Barcikowski S et al. Comparison of the productivity and ablation efficiency of different laser classes for laser ablation of gold in water and air. Appl Phys A 125, 432 (2019).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-019-2704-8

CrossRef Google Scholar

[21]

Neuenschwander B, Jaeggi B, Schmid M, Hennig G. Surface structuring with ultra-short laser pulses: basics, limitations and needs for high throughput. Phys Proc 56, 1047–1058 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.017

CrossRef Google Scholar

[22]

Streubel R, Barcikowski S, Gökce B. Continuous multigram nanoparticle synthesis by high-power, high-repetition-rate ultrafast laser ablation in liquids. Opt Lett 41, 1486–1489 (2016).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.41.001486

CrossRef Google Scholar

[23]

Račiukaitis G, Brikas M, Gečys P, Voisiat B, Gedvilas M. Use of high repetition rate and high power lasers in microfabrication: how to keep the efficiency high?. J Laser Micro/Nanoeng 4, 186–191 (2009).

DOI: 10.2961/jlmn.2009.03.0008

CrossRef Google Scholar

[24]

Forster M, Égerházi L, Haselberger C, Huber C, Kautek W. Femtosecond laser interaction with pulsed-laser deposited carbon thin films of nanoscale thickness. Appl Phys A 102, 27–33 (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-010-6013-5

CrossRef Google Scholar

[25]

Belevtsev BI, Komnik YF, Beliayev EY. Electron relaxation in disordered gold films. Phys Rev B 58, 8079–8086 (1998).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.8079

CrossRef Google Scholar

[26]

Johnson PB, Christy RW. Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys Rev B 6, 4370–4379 (1972).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370

CrossRef Google Scholar

[27]

McPeak KM, Jayanti SV, Kress SJP, Meyer S, Iotti S et al. Plasmonic films can easily be better: rules and recipes. ACS Photonics 2, 326–333 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/ph5004237

CrossRef Google Scholar

[28]

Babar S, Weaver JH. Optical constants of Cu, Ag, and Au revisited. Appl Opt 54, 477–481 (2015).

DOI: 10.1364/AO.54.000477

CrossRef Google Scholar

[29]

Olmon RL, Slovick B, Johnson TW, Shelton D, Oh SH et al. Optical dielectric function of gold. Phys Rev B 86, 235147 (2012).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.235147

CrossRef Google Scholar

[30]

Werner WSM, Glantschnig K, Ambrosch-Draxl C. Optical constants and inelastic electron-scattering data for 17 elemental metals. J Phys Chem Ref Data 38, 1013–1092 (2009).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3243762

CrossRef Google Scholar

[31]

Gamaly EG, Rode AV, Luther-Davies B, Tikhonchuk VT. Ablation of solids by femtosecond lasers: ablation mechanism and ablation thresholds for metals and dielectrics. Phys Plasmas 9, 949–957 (2002).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1447555

CrossRef Google Scholar

[32]

Stuart BC, Feit MD, Herman S, Rubenchik AM, Shore BW et al. Optical ablation by high-power short-pulse lasers. J Opt Soc Am B 13, 459–468 (1996).

DOI: 10.1364/JOSAB.13.000459

CrossRef Google Scholar

[33]

Tomko J, Naddeo JJ, Jimenez R, Tan Y, Steiner M et al. Size and polydispersity trends found in gold nanoparticles synthesized by laser ablation in liquids. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17, 16327–16333 (2015).

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP01965F

CrossRef Google Scholar

[34]

Venkatakrishnan K, Stanley P, Sivakumar NR, Tan B, Lim LEN. Effect of scanning resolution and fluence fluctuation on femtosecond laser ablation of thin films. Appl Phys A 77, 655–658 (2003).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-002-1668-1

CrossRef Google Scholar

[35]

Krüger J, Dufft D, Koter R, Hertwig A. Femtosecond laser-induced damage of gold films. Appl Surf Sci 253, 7815–7819 (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.02.164

CrossRef Google Scholar

[36]

Boedefeld R, Schreiber J, Gessner H, Welsch E, Theobald W et al. Optical damage of sputtered gold films irradiated with femtosecond laser pulses. Proc SPIE 4347, 45–52 (2001).

DOI: 10.1117/12.425075

CrossRef Google Scholar

[37]

Starinskiy SV, Shukhov YG, Bulgakov AV. Laser-induced damage thresholds of gold, silver and their alloys in air and water. Appl Surf Sci 396, 1765–1774 (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.221

CrossRef Google Scholar

[38]

Kalus MR, Lanyumba R, Lorenzo-Parodi N, Jochmann MA, Kerpen K et al. Determining the role of redox-active materials during laser-induced water decomposition. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21, 18636–18651 (2019).

DOI: 10.1039/C9CP02663K

CrossRef Google Scholar

[39]

Kalus MR, Reimer V, Barcikowski S, Gökce B. Discrimination of effects leading to gas formation during pulsed laser ablation in liquids. Appl Surf Sci 465, 1096–1102 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.224

CrossRef Google Scholar

[40]

Sakka T, Masai S, Fukami K, Ogata YH. Spectral profile of atomic emission lines and effects of pulse duration on laser ablation in liquid. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc 64, 981–985 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2009.07.018

CrossRef Google Scholar

[41]

Kanitz A, Kalus MR, Gurevich EL, Ostendorf A, Barcikowski S et al. Review on experimental and theoretical investigations of the early stage, femtoseconds to microseconds processes during laser ablation in liquid-phase for the synthesis of colloidal nanoparticles. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 28, 103001 (2019).

DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595/ab3dbe

CrossRef Google Scholar

[42]

Shih CY, Wu CP, Shugaev MV, Zhigilei LV. Atomistic modeling of nanoparticle generation in short pulse laser ablation of thin metal films in water. J Colloid Interface Sci 489, 3–17 (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.029

CrossRef Google Scholar

[43]

Shih CY, Shugaev MV, Wu CP, Zhigilei LV. Generation of subsurface voids, incubation effect, and formation of nanoparticles in short pulse laser interactions with bulk metal targets in liquid: molecular dynamics study. J Phys Chem C 121, 16549–16567 (2017).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02301

CrossRef Google Scholar

[44]

Shih CY, Shugaev MV, Wu CP, Zhigilei LV. The effect of pulse duration on nanoparticle generation in pulsed laser ablation in liquids: insights from large-scale atomistic simulations. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22, 7077–7099 (2020).

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP00608D

CrossRef Google Scholar

[45]

Kanitz A, Förster DJ, Hoppius JS, Weber R, Ostendorf A et al. Pump-probe microscopy of femtosecond laser ablation in air and liquids. Appl Surf Sci 475, 204–210 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.184

CrossRef Google Scholar

[46]

Kanitz A, Hoppius JS, Fiebrandt M, Awakowicz P, Esen C et al. Impact of liquid environment on femtosecond laser ablation. Appl Phys A 123, 674 (2017).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-017-1280-z

CrossRef Google Scholar

[47]

Tamura A, Matsumoto A, Fukami K, Nishi N, Sakka T. Simultaneous observation of nascent plasma and bubble induced by laser ablation in water with various pulse durations. J Appl Phys 117, 173304 (2015).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4919729

CrossRef Google Scholar

[48]

DellʼAglio M, Gaudiuso R, de Pascale O, de Giacomo A. Mechanisms and processes of pulsed laser ablation in liquids during nanoparticle production. Appl Surf Sci 348, 4–9 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.082

CrossRef Google Scholar

[49]

Kumar B, Thareja RK. Growth of titanium nanoparticles in confined plasma. Phys Plasmas 19, 033516 (2012).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3697978

CrossRef Google Scholar

[50]

Noack J, Vogel A. Laser-induced plasma formation in water at nanosecond to femtosecond time scales: calculation of thresholds, absorption coefficients, and energy density. IEEE J Quantum Electron 35, 1156–1167 (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/3.777215

CrossRef Google Scholar

[51]

Vogel A, Venugopalan V. Mechanisms of pulsed laser ablation of biological tissues. Chem Rev 103, 577–644 (2003).

DOI: 10.1021/cr010379n

CrossRef Google Scholar

[52]

Vogel A, Busch S, Parlitz U. Shock wave emission and cavitation bubble generation by picosecond and nanosecond optical breakdown in water. J Acoust Soc Am 100, 148–165 (1996).

DOI: 10.1121/1.415878

CrossRef Google Scholar

[53]

Boulais É, Lachaine R, Meunier M. Plasma mediated off-resonance plasmonic enhanced ultrafast laser-induced nanocavitation. Nano Lett 12, 4763–4769 (2012).

DOI: 10.1021/nl302200w

CrossRef Google Scholar

[54]

Kotaidis V, Plech A. Cavitation dynamics on the nanoscale. Appl Phys Lett 87, 213102 (2005).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2132086

CrossRef Google Scholar

[55]

Lombard J, Biben T, Merabia S. Ballistic heat transport in laser generated nano-bubbles. Nanoscale 8, 14870–14876 (2016).

DOI: 10.1039/C6NR02144A

CrossRef Google Scholar

[56]

Neumann J, Brinkmann R. Self-limited growth of laser-induced vapor bubbles around single microabsorbers. Appl Phys Lett 93, 033901 (2008).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2957030

CrossRef Google Scholar

[57]

Lapotko D. Optical excitation and detection of vapor bubbles around plasmonic nanoparticles. Opt Express 17, 2538–2556 (2009).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.17.002538

CrossRef Google Scholar

[58]

Siems A, Weber SAL, Boneberg J, Plech A. Thermodynamics of nanosecond nanobubble formation at laser-excited metal nanoparticles. New J Phys 13, 043018 (2011).

DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/4/043018

CrossRef Google Scholar

[59]

Ko B, Lu W, Sokolov AV, Lee HWH, Scully MO et al. Multi-pulse laser-induced bubble formation and nanoparticle aggregation using MoS2 nanoparticles. Sci Rep 10, 15753 (2020).

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72689-x

CrossRef Google Scholar

[60]

Kotaidis V, Dahmen C, von Plessen G, Springer F, Plech A. Excitation of nanoscale vapor bubbles at the surface of gold nanoparticles in water. J Chem Phys 124, 184702 (2006).

DOI: 10.1063/1.2187476

CrossRef Google Scholar

[61]

Koechner W. Solid-State Laser Engineering Vol. 1 (Springer Series in Optical Sciences, New York, 2006).

Google Scholar

[62]

Letzel A, Santoro M, Frohleiks J, Ziefuß AR, Reich S et al. How the re-irradiation of a single ablation spot affects cavitation bubble dynamics and nanoparticles properties in laser ablation in liquids. Appl Surf Sci 473, 828–837 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.025

CrossRef Google Scholar

[63]

Reich S, Letzel A, Gökce B, Menzel A, Barcikowski S et al. Incubation effect of pre-irradiation on bubble formation and ablation in laser ablation in liquids. ChemPhysChem 20, 1036–1043 (2019).

DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201900075

CrossRef Google Scholar

[64]

Liu JM. Simple technique for measurements of pulsed Gaussian-beam spot sizes. Opt Lett 7, 196–198 (1982).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.7.000196

CrossRef Google Scholar

[65]

Wang QX, Manmi K. Three dimensional microbubble dynamics near a wall subject to high intensity ultrasound. Phys Fluids 26, 032104 (2014).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4866772

CrossRef Google Scholar

[66]

Taccogna F, Dell’Aglio M, Rutigliano M, Valenza G, de Giacomo A. On the growth mechanism of nanoparticles in plasma during pulsed laser ablation in liquids. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 26, 045002 (2017).

DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595/aa595b

CrossRef Google Scholar

[67]

Reich S, Schönfeld P, Letzel A, Kohsakowski S, Olbinado M et al. Fluence threshold behaviour on ablation and bubble formation in pulsed laser ablation in liquids. ChemPhysChem 18, 1084–1090 (2017).

DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201601198

CrossRef Google Scholar

[68]

Bulgakova NM, Bulgakov AV, Bourakov IM, Bulgakova NA. Pulsed laser ablation of solids and critical phenomena. Appl Surf Sci 197–198, 96–99 (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00310-0

CrossRef Google Scholar

[69]

Kohsakowski S, Seiser F, Wiederrecht JP, Reichenberger S, Vinnay T et al. Effective size separation of laser-generated, surfactant-free nanoparticles by continuous centrifugation. Nanotechnology 31, 095603 (2020).

DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab55bd

CrossRef Google Scholar

[70]

Riabinina D, Chaker M, Margot J. Dependence of gold nanoparticle production on pulse duration by laser ablation in liquid media. Nanotechnology 23, 135603 (2012).

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/13/135603

CrossRef Google Scholar

[71]

Stasic J, Joksic G, Zivkovic L, Mihailescu IN, Ghica C et al. Focusing geometry-induced size tailoring of silver nanoparticles obtained by laser ablation in water. Laser Phys 24, 106005 (2014).

DOI: 10.1088/1054-660X/24/10/106005

CrossRef Google Scholar

[72]

Elsayed KA, Imam H, Ahmed MA, Ramadan R. Effect of focusing conditions and laser parameters on the fabrication of gold nanoparticles via laser ablation in liquid. Opt Laser Technol 45, 495–502 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.06.004

CrossRef Google Scholar

[73]

Waag F, Gökce B, Barcikowski S. Ablation target cooling by maximizing the nanoparticle productivity in laser synthesis of colloids. Appl Surf Sci 466, 647–656 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.030

CrossRef Google Scholar

[74]

Maciulevičius M, Vinčiūnas A, Brikas M, Butsen A, Tarasenka N et al. Pulsed-laser generation of gold nanoparticles with on-line surface Plasmon resonance detection. Appl Phys A 111, 289–295 (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-012-7535-9

CrossRef Google Scholar

[75]

Reich S, Schönfeld P, Wagener P, Letzel A, Ibrahimkutty S et al. Pulsed laser ablation in liquids: impact of the bubble dynamics on particle formation. J Colloid Interface Sci 489, 106–113 (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.08.030

CrossRef Google Scholar

[76]

Tanabe R, Nguyen TTP, Sugiura T, Ito Y. Bubble dynamics in metal nanoparticle formation by laser ablation in liquid studied through high-speed laser stroboscopic videography. Appl Surf Sci 351, 327–331 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.030

CrossRef Google Scholar

[77]

Metwally K, Mensah S, Baffou G. Fluence threshold for photothermal bubble generation using plasmonic nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 119, 28586–28596 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09903

CrossRef Google Scholar

[78]

Liu HW, Chen F, Wang XH, Yang Q, Bian H et al. Influence of liquid environments on femtosecond laser ablation of silicon. Thin Solid Films 518, 5188–5194 (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.04.043

CrossRef Google Scholar

[79]

Delfour L, Itina TE. Mechanisms of ultrashort laser-induced fragmentation of metal nanoparticles in liquids: numerical insights. J Phys Chem C 119, 13893–13900 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02084

CrossRef Google Scholar

[80]

Dakka A, Lafait J, Sella C, Berthier S, Abd-Lefdil M et al. Optical properties of Ag–TiO2 nanocermet films prepared by cosputtering and multilayer deposition techniques. Appl Opt 39, 2745–2753 (2000).

DOI: 10.1364/AO.39.002745

CrossRef Google Scholar

[81]

Lau M, Barcikowski S. Quantification of mass-specific laser energy input converted into particle properties during picosecond pulsed laser fragmentation of zinc oxide and boron carbide in liquids. Appl Surf Sci 348, 22–29 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.053

CrossRef Google Scholar

[82]

Werner D, Furube A, Okamoto T, Hashimoto S. Femtosecond laser-induced size reduction of aqueous gold nanoparticles: in situ and pump−probe spectroscopy investigations revealing coulomb explosion. J Phys Chem C 115, 8503–8512 (2011).

DOI: 10.1021/jp112262u

CrossRef Google Scholar

[83]

Ziefuß AR, Reichenberger S, Rehbock C, Chakraborty I, Gharib M et al. Laser fragmentation of colloidal gold nanoparticles with high-intensity nanosecond pulses is driven by a single-step fragmentation mechanism with a defined Educt particle-size threshold. J Phys Chem C 122, 22125–22136 (2018).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04374

CrossRef Google Scholar

[84]

Sylvestre JP, Kabashin AV, Sacher E, Meunier M. Femtosecond laser ablation of gold in water: influence of the laser-produced plasma on the nanoparticle size distribution. Appl Phys A 80, 753–758 (2005).

DOI: 10.1007/s00339-004-3081-4

CrossRef Google Scholar

[85]

Brujan EA, Nahen K, Schmidt P, Vogel A. Dynamics of laser-induced cavitation bubbles near an elastic boundary. J Fluid Mech 433, 251–281 (2001).

DOI: 10.1017/S0022112000003347

CrossRef Google Scholar

[86]

Harris DM, Pucci G, Prost V, Quintela Casal J, Bush JWM. Video: The merger of a bubble and a soap film. In 68th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics - Gallery of Fluid Motion (American Physical Society, 2015).

Google Scholar

[87]

Lewis WK, Whitman WG. Principles of gas absorption. Ind Eng Chem 16, 1215–1220 (1924).

DOI: 10.1021/ie50180a002

CrossRef Google Scholar

[88]

Shih CY, Streubel R, Heberle J, Letzel A, Shugaev MV et al. Two mechanisms of nanoparticle generation in picosecond laser ablation in liquids: the origin of the bimodal size distribution. Nanoscale 10, 6900–6910 (2018).

DOI: 10.1039/C7NR08614H

CrossRef Google Scholar

[89]

Long JY, Eliceiri M, Vangelatos Z, Rho Y, Wang LT et al. Early dynamics of cavitation bubbles generated during ns laser ablation of submerged targets. Opt Express 28, 14300–14309 (2020).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.391584

CrossRef Google Scholar

[90]

Jakubith M. Grundoperationen Und Chemische Reaktionstechnik: Eine Einführung in Die Technische Chemie (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998).

Google Scholar

Related Articles
Show full outline

Catalog

    Bilal Gökce

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed
    Plasma and nanoparticle shielding during pulsed laser ablation in liquids cause ablation efficiency decrease
    • Figure  1

      Shadowgraphy setup for cavitation bubble imaging during 1 ns, Q-switched laser ablation in water; the solid black lines represent the trigger signals sent by the camera. Also, the signal of the camera and the photodiode are sent to an oscilloscope. In the exemplary oscillogram, the camera and laser pulse signals are shown. The blue-shaded area in this diagram represents the laser's response time to the trigger signal and the gray-shaded area the resulting corrected delay time, which is the time between the laser pulse and the moment of image acquisition.

    • Figure  2

      The maximal cavitation bubble volume for different laser intensities are shown for a 1 ns laser (a) and a 7 ns laser (b)67. The productivity m and the ablation efficiency m _spec in (b) are taken from ref.20. For both lasers, the productivity and ablation efficiency are determined at 12 J/cm2. Moreover, the powerspecific maximal CB volume is shown for both lasers (c).

    • Figure  3

      The distance between the target surface and the lenses is varied for the 1 ns laser system at maximal laser power, the resulting nominal change in the laser fluence (a), the determined maximal cavitation bubble volume (b), the corresponding productivity (c), and the mass fraction of particles < 10 nm are shown. The gray area in (a) – (d) marks the focal distances where bubble cascades are observed. The exemplary images show bubbles at distances shorter than (orange), within (yellow), and larger (green) than the range where successive bubbles occurred.

    • Figure  4

      Energy difference of CBs produced in a pure colloid compared to the respective CB produced in water with different colloid concentrations and with the focal plane shifted into the liquid layer (dark blue squares) as well as the focal plane virtually shifted behind the target (light blue circles) (a). Images show exemplary CBs with the focal plane shifted into the liquid layer (b) and virtually shifted behind the target (c) at a NP concentration of approximately 20 mg/L as marked by the squares in (a).

    • Figure  5

      The sketches illustrate the stationary liquid layer above the target and the first cavitation bubble of an image sequence (a). The formed NP are partially trapped in the stationary layer leading to satellite bubble formation, as shown in the sketch, and observed experimentally (b); please note that the sketches in the middle are not depicted on the correct time scale for the sake of the message, the scale bar measures 250 µm.

    • Figure  6

      The influence of the NP in the stationary liquid layer is examined under liquid flow conditions by comparing the CB size of consecutive laser pulse with and without a cleaning procedure in between. After 25 laser pulses, the stationary liquid layer is enriched with NP, and a constant cavitation bubble size is reached (a). When the ablation chamber and target are rinsed between two consecutive pulses, a NP-free stationary liquid layer is generated, leading to the formation of an increased cavitation bubble and the absence of satellite bubbles (b), the comparison of the volume increase between the 25th and 26th pulse for (a) and (b) is plotted in (c).

    • Figure  1
    • Figure  2
    • Figure  3
    • Figure  4
    • Figure  5
    • Figure  6