Processing math: 0%
New website getting online, testing
Active odd-mode-metachannel for single-conductor systems
  • Abstract

    Although tremendous efforts have been devoted to investigating planar single-conductor circuits, it remains challenging to provide tight confinement of electromagnetic field and compatibility with active semi-conductor components such as amplifier, harmonic generator and mixers. Single-conductor spoof surface plasmon polariton (SSPP) structure, which is one of the most promising planar single-conductor transmission media due to the outstanding field confinement, still suffers from the difficulty in integrating with the active semi-conductor components. In this paper, a new kind of odd-mode-metachannel (OMM) that can support odd-mode SSPPs is proposed to perform as the fundamental transmission channel of the single-conductor systems. By introducing zigzag decoration, the OMM can strengthen the field confinement and broaden the bandwidth of odd-mode SSPPs simultaneously. More importantly, the active semi-conductor amplifier chip integration is achieved by utilizing the intrinsic potential difference on OMM, which breaks the major obstacle in implementing the single-conductor systems. As an instance, an amplifier is successfully integrated on the single-conductor OMM, which can realize both loss compensation and signal amplification. Meanwhile, the merits of OMM including crosstalk suppression, low radar cross section (RCS), and flexibility are comprehensively demonstrated. Hence, the proposed OMM and its capability to integrate with the active semi-conductor components may provide a new avenue to future single-conductor conformal systems and smart skins.

    Keywords

  • Modern planar circuits and systems are based on the combination of multi-conductor transmission media and active semi-conductor components. However, typical multi-conductor transmission media (e.g., microstrip and coplanar waveguide) usually require large metallic ground, which leads to two limitations: 1) large metallic surfaces, especially multi-layer metallic surfaces, make the circuit too rigid to construct flexible or soft systems, and 2) large metallic surfaces increase the radar cross section (RCS) of the whole systems. To solve the problems, exploring compact single-conductor transmission media without large metallic ground is a possible path. Although single-conductor transmission media such as Goubau lines- have been studied for decades, underdevelopment of single-conductor systems compared to multi-conductor ones are caused by the insufficient electromagnetic field confinement and poor compatibility with active semi-conductor technology of single-conductor media. Mature active semi-conductor components including amplifier, harmonic generator and mixers require signal input in the form of voltage. In other words, sufficient electrical potential difference in the transmission medium is necessary for active semi-conductor-component integration, which can be easily met by multi-conductor structures but is still a problem for planar single-conductor media.

    Similar to traditional microwave transmission media, multi-conductor ultra-thin SSPP technology grows rapidly and displays vitality of this field. The landmark achievement of sub-diffraction-limited signal wireless communication carried by the multi-conductor SSPP system demonstrates the superiority of SSPPs. Nevertheless, multi-conductor ultra-thin SSPP technology provides no obvious advantages in breaking the two limitations of multi-conductor transmission media mentioned above. Meanwhile, although single-conductor SSPPs have been proved to possess the ability of field confinement and conformal propagation, they are still far away from systematic applications because there is no good method to integrate key active semi-conductor components such as amplifier into single-conductor SSPP circuits. Thus, seeking a feasible method to solve the problems of multi-conductor transmission media and break the bottleneck of single-conductor transmission media simultaneously is still urgent.

    In this paper, we propose a new kind of odd-mode-metachannel (OMM) for single-conductor systems. Firstly, potential of active semi-conductor-component integration is theoretically analyzed. Then, basic design principle of the OMM to strengthen field confinement and broaden bandwidth simultaneously is presented. Further, a single-conductor amplifier integrated in OMM is achieved by utilizing odd-mode field potential difference of the OMM. It should be noted that the proposed amplifier integration method can be extended into almost all active semi-conductor components in microwave and terahertz systems. Meanwhile, three merits of crosstalk suppression based on odd-even-mode orthogonality, low RCS and flexibility of the OMM are demonstrated as well. Hence, the proposed OMM may overcome the obstacles of realizing single-conductor systems and provide one more avenue to future smart skins.

    Spoof surface plasmon polaritons (SSPPs)- are special type of surface waves which can mimic the optical natural surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs)-, and can be supported by both single-conductor and multi-conductor plasmonic metamaterials in microwave and terahertz bands through specially decorated metallic surfaces or strips-. Due to the properties of field confinement, controllable dispersion and great compatibility with planar circuit technology, ultra-thin SSPP structures have been proved to possess many merits in microwave and terahertz engineering such as low crosstalk-, minimized packaging, , low RCS and low-cost electromagnetic protection. Based on these merits, SSPPs are utilized to realize a series of novel devices including filters-, modulators, , antennas-, and even landmark systems such as wireless body sensor networks and wireless communication system.

    Figure 3. Geometrical parameters and dispersion curves of the typical SSPP waveguide and the OMM. (a) Geometrical parameters of the typical SSPP structure, where the width of the center strip is w fixed as 4 mm, the period of the unit is p, the width of the grooves is a and the width of the narrow strip is w0. (b) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying a, where p = 1.5 mm, w0 = 1 mm. (c) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying p, where a = 0.75 mm and w0 = 1 mm. (d) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying w0, where p = 1.5 mm, a = 0.75 mm. (e) Geometrical parameters of the OMM, where the width of the center strip is w1 fixed as 4 mm, the period of the unit is p1, the width of the narrow strip is w01, the folding extent of the zigzag grooves is described by X and Y. (f) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying X, where w1 = 4 mm, w01 = 2.8 mm, a1 = 0.3 mm, p1 = 1.5 mm, Y=0.2 mm.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Geometrical parameters and dispersion curves of the typical SSPP waveguide and the OMM. (a) Geometrical parameters of the typical SSPP structure, where the width of the center strip is w fixed as 4 mm, the period of the unit is p, the width of the grooves is a and the width of the narrow strip is w0. (b) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying a, where p = 1.5 mm, w0 = 1 mm. (c) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying p, where a = 0.75 mm and w0 = 1 mm. (d) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying w0, where p = 1.5 mm, a = 0.75 mm. (e) Geometrical parameters of the OMM, where the width of the center strip is w1 fixed as 4 mm, the period of the unit is p1, the width of the narrow strip is w01, the folding extent of the zigzag grooves is described by X and Y. (f) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying X, where w1 = 4 mm, w01 = 2.8 mm, a1 = 0.3 mm, p1 = 1.5 mm, Y=0.2 mm.

    Figure 7. Experiments of the amplifier-integrated OMM. (a) Top view of the sample. (b) Bottom view of the sample. (c) Measured S-parameters of the sample. (d) The photograph of the EM scanning system composed of a VNA and a monopole probe installed in a mechanical platform in an EM shielding chamber. (e, f) The measured near-electric-field distributions of the amplifier-integrated OMM sample at (e) 14 and (f) 16 GHz.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Experiments of the amplifier-integrated OMM. (a) Top view of the sample. (b) Bottom view of the sample. (c) Measured S-parameters of the sample. (d) The photograph of the EM scanning system composed of a VNA and a monopole probe installed in a mechanical platform in an EM shielding chamber. (e, f) The measured near-electric-field distributions of the amplifier-integrated OMM sample at (e) 14 and (f) 16 GHz.

    In addition to the strengthened field confinement and active semi-conductor-component integration, we discuss three more advantages of the OMM for single-conductor systems as well. First, we investigate crosstalk suppression of the OMM based on odd-even-mode orthogonality. As shown in Fig. 3, the proposed OMM can support not only odd-mode but also even-mode SSPPs. Considering the case of plane antenna array, feeding waveguides may be arranged parallel as shown in Fig. 8(a). A typical 50 Ω CPW excitation of the even-mode SSPP channel is selected. By arranging the two channels in a distance of 5 mm, the crosstalk of typical even-even and odd-even coupling pairs are compared, as shown in Fig. 8(b) to 8(e). It is observed that average crosstalk suppression of about 30 dB can be realized utilizing the odd-even-mode orthogonality of the proposed OMM.

    where C1 and C2 are two constants, ω is the frequency, ε0 is the permittivity of vacuum, km is the wave number of the metal and β is the propagation coefficient of the SPP mode. The electrical potential difference between the two surfaces of metal can be calculated by

    Figure 9. Flexibility test of the amplifier-integrated OMM.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Flexibility test of the amplifier-integrated OMM.

    For experimental demonstrating the active semi-conductor-component integration of the proposed OMM, a sample of amplifier-integrated OMM with total length of 122.3 mm is fabricated, as shown in Fig. 7(a) and 7(b). Here, a broadband low noise amplifier chip MAAL-011130 is used as the instance of active semi-conductor component due to its compact package size and appropriate working band. In the experiment, standard 2.40 mm JACK (FEMALE) end launch connector is used to connect two ports of the sample and coaxial cables of the vector network analyzer (VNA) AV3672B. Measured S-parameters of the sample are shown in Fig. 7(c). Compared to a pure OMM with nearly the same length of 123 mm, average gain of about 6.2 dB in the main band (13 to 17 GHz) of the OMM and peak gain of 12.5 dB at 14.1 GHz can be obtained, which demonstrates successful integration of the OMM and amplifier chip. To visualize the amplification of odd-mode SSPPs, near-electric-field distributions of the sample are measured using an EM scanning system composed of a VNA and a monopole probe installed in a mechanical platform in an EM chamber, as shown in Fig. 7(d). In Fig. 7(e) to 7(g), measure near-electric-field distribution of the sample at 14 and 16 GHz are exhibited, where the odd-mode field and transmission gain can be observed visually. In fact, this integration method based on the novel field nature of OMMs can be extended to almost all active semi-conductor components required in wireless communication or radar systems, such as power amplifiers and harmonic generators.

    where k and k0 are the wavenumber of the SSPP mode and free space mode, respectively. Absolute-value electric-field distributions on the cross section of the typical SSPP (X = 0 mm) waveguide and the OMM (X = 0.7 mm) are shown in Fig. 5(a) to 5(c), which visually demonstrate the strengthened field confinement for both even- and odd-mode SSPPs led by introducing zigzag grooves.

    {E_z} = {C_1}\frac{\beta }{{\omega {ε _0}{ε _{\rm{m}}}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{j}}\beta x}}{{\rm{e}}^{{k_{\rm{m}}}z}} + {C_2}\frac{\beta }{{\omega {ε _0}{ε _{\rm{m}}}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{j}}\beta x}}{{\rm{e}}^{ - {k_{\rm{m}}}z}} \;,
    Figure 8. Crosstalk suppression and low RCS properties of the OMM. (a) Coupling pair of SSPP channel. (b) Crosstalk of typical even-even coupling pair and odd-even coupling pair. (c) RCS of the OMM compared to that of a CPW with the same total size.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Crosstalk suppression and low RCS properties of the OMM. (a) Coupling pair of SSPP channel. (b) Crosstalk of typical even-even coupling pair and odd-even coupling pair. (c) RCS of the OMM compared to that of a CPW with the same total size.

    Normalized field integral of different modes.

    ParametersExEyEz
    Even mode of the OMM 18.5073 0.0012 1
    Odd mode of the OMM 0.5273 25.8723 1
    Odd mode of the SOMM 2.995 93.139 1
    Mode of the slot line 0.16 11.6556 1
    CSV Show Table
    Figure 1. The insulator-metal-insulator model.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    The insulator-metal-insulator model.

    v = \sqrt {{k^2} + k_0^2} \;,

    For exciting the OMM efficiently, a conversion structure to convert traditional quasi-transverse electromagnetic (quasi-TEM) mode and odd-mode SSPPs, as shown in Fig. 6(a). Using a microstrip-slot transition, the even quasi-TEM mode is transferred into odd slot mode. Then the odd-mode signal on the slot is coupled onto a tapered coplanar waveguide and transferred into the odd-mode SSPPs through gradient grooves and flaring grounds. The geometrical details are listed in Table 1. Through mirror replication of the conversion structure in Fig. 6(a), both ends of the OMM are transferred to microstrip ports, which is convenient for coaxial cable feeding. Transmission and reflection performances of the conversion structure is shown in Fig. 6(b), where the length of the OMM is 30 mm (20 units). A broad reflection band from 9.4 to 17.7 GHz and desired transmission efficiency in the main field-confinement band from 13 to 17 GHz are observed. The odd-mode SSPPs at low frequencies possess too weak field confinement ability to keep energy propagating, and those near the higher cutoff frequency suffer from the dielectric and metallic loss. Thus, the band from 13 to 17 GHz is the main band of the OMM.

    {h_{\rm{e}}} = \left( {{w_1} - {w_{01}}} \right) \cdot {{\sqrt {{X^2} + {Y^2}} } / {2Y}}\;.

    The analysis of insulator-metal-insulator model is different from the SSPP cases but can qualitatively inspire the idea of using odd-mode SSPPs to provide internal electrical potential difference. Hence, we propose the idea of utilizing odd-mode SSPPs to achieve active semi-conductor-component integration, as indicated in Fig. 2.

    The Ez field in region II (–aza) can be expressed as

    V = \int_{ - a}^a {{E_z}} {\rm{d}}z \;.

    Integration of active semi-conductor components is the key step to implement system construction. Utilizing odd-mode property of the OMM, a compact conversion structure is designed to convert odd-mode SSPP waves into voltage input of chips, as shown in Fig. 6(c). The OMM is converted into a slot line through a slotted OMM (SOMM) whose electric-field distributions are shown in Fig. 5(m–o). Then a typical slot-microstrip transition can be used to realize standard input/output port for packaged chips. Detailed geometrical parameters of the conversion structure are listed in Table 1 as well. Quantitatively, cross-section field integral of different modes in Fig. 5 and odd mode of the SOMM are listed in Table 2 to demonstrate the similarity of odd-mode OMM and slot line. Integral of all field components are normalized to that of Ez. Slot line supports a nearly transverse electrical (TE) mode which possesses small integral value of Ex and great integral value of Ey. It can be observed from Table 2 that even mode of the OMM is greatly different from mode of the slot line, while odd mode of the OMM and odd mode of the SOMM possess similar property with that of the slot line.

    According to the continuity of Ex and Hy at the boundary of the upper surface (z = a) and the lower surface (z = –a), an even mode requires that C1 = –C2. Then, it is easy to know that the electrical potential difference V for the even mode is 0, which indicates that the even-mode SPPs in the model cannot support internal electrical potential difference. However, for an odd mode where C1 = C2, the non-zero electrical potential difference V can be calculated by

    Figure 6. The conversion structures. (a) Conversion structure between the quasi-TEM mode and odd-mode SSPPs, where 5 linearly gradient SSPP units are employed. (b) Simulated S-parameters of the conversion structure, where the OMM is composed of 46 units. (c) The compact conversion structure to convert odd-mode SSPP waves into voltage input of chips.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    The conversion structures. (a) Conversion structure between the quasi-TEM mode and odd-mode SSPPs, where 5 linearly gradient SSPP units are employed. (b) Simulated S-parameters of the conversion structure, where the OMM is composed of 46 units. (c) The compact conversion structure to convert odd-mode SSPP waves into voltage input of chips.

    Geometrical parameters of the conversion structures.

    ParametersValues (mm)ParametersValuesParametersValues(mm)ParametersValues (mm)
    r1 0.9 Lt 20 mm r3 0.6 r4 0.7
    r2 0.9 Lx 12.5 mm Ss 0.3 r5 0.7
    d1 1 Ly 6 mm Ls1 8.85 d3 0.9
    d2 1.2 ac 0.00587 Ls2 2.1 d4 0.7
    S 0.2 bc 2 Ls3 3.1 Wg 9.4
    Wm 0.4 cc 0.8 Ws 0.7
    i 0.6 g 0.2 mm Lg 14.3
    CSV Show Table

    Then, we reveal the tradeoff between broadening bandwidth and strengthening field confinement of single-conductor odd-mode SSPPs. Typical single-conductor ultra-thin SSPP structure is constructed by a metallic strip with periodic comb grooves, as shown in Fig. 3(a). The substrate is a Rogers RO3010 board with relative permittivity εr = 11.2, loss tangent tanδ = 0.0022 and thickness of 0.508 mm. This structure can support the even mode (mode 1) and the odd mode (mode 2) of SSPPs, which can be visually observed in Fig. 4. Different from the even-mode SSPPs that works in the band from 0 GHz to the cutoff frequency, the odd-mode SSPPs possess narrow-band-pass nature because the single-conductor strip could shorten the odd-mode waves at low frequencies. The stop band of odd-mode SSPPs can be estimated by the split of the even- and odd-mode as well since the odd mode far away from the even mode will approach a radiating mode. Figure 3(b) to 3(d) exhibit the dispersion curves of SSPPs under varying geometrical parameters, where the total width w is fixed as 4 mm. Here, all the dispersion curves are normalized to p = 1.5 mm because the change of p in Fig. 3(c) will affect the dispersion curves observation. It can be easily observed in Fig. 3(d) that split of the even- and odd-mode SSPPs is dominated by the width of the narrow strip w0. Increasing w0 can decrease the lower cutoff frequency but simultaneously weaken the field confinement of the odd-mode SSPPs since the depth of the grooves is decreased as well. Thus, there is a tradeoff between broadening bandwidth and strengthening field confinement of odd-mode SSPPs with the fixed transverse width w.

    Since it is hard to analyze ultra-thin SSPP structures with complex geometrical using analytical expressions, a brief discussion of odd-mode SPPs in the insulator-metal-insulator model is carried out to provide a qualitative reference of odd-mode SSPPs, as shown in Fig. 1. In this model, insulator in region I (z > a) and region III(z < –a) are identical and with the relative permittivity of εd, and metal in region II (–aza) are with the permittivity of εm. SPP waves propagate along the x direction.

    Second, for revealing the low RCS merits of the single-conductor OMM, simulated RCS results of the OMM, a CPW and a microstrip board with the same total size are shown in Fig. 8(c). It is observed that the CPW and microstrip board possess nearly the same RCS because their metallic areas are almost identical. Since the ratio of the metallic surface area of the OMM to that of the CPW is near 1:2, the RCS of the OMM is lower than the CPW board by about 3 dB on average.

    Here, we propose a new OMM with zigzag grooves, as shown in Fig. 3(e). Zigzag grooves are introduced into the OMM to strengthen the field confinement. Unit structure in Fig. 3(e) is with width w1 = 4 mm, period p1 = 1.5 mm and width of the narrow strip w01 =2.8 mm. Folding extent of the zigzag grooves is described by X and Y. The geometrical equivalent depth of zigzag grooves he, can be expressed as

    V = {C_1}\frac{{2\beta }}{{\omega {ε _0}{ε _{\rm{m}}}{k_{\rm{m}}}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{j}}\beta x}}\left( {{{\rm{e}}^{{k_{\rm{m}}}a}} - {{\rm{e}}^{ - {k_{\rm{m}}}a}}} \right) \;.
    Figure 4. Cutoff frequency and decay factor curves with varying X, where the other parameters are the same with those in Fig. 3(f).
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Cutoff frequency and decay factor curves with varying X, where the other parameters are the same with those in Fig. 3(f).

    Figure 5. Electric-field distributions of the cross sections of the SSPP structures at 15 GHz. (a–c) Absolute value of electric-field distributions on the cross-section of (a) even-mode of the typical SSPP (X = 0 mm) waveguide, (b) even mode and (c) odd mode of the OMM (X = 0.7 mm). (d) X-component, (e) Y-component and (f) Z-component of electric field of even mode of the OMM. (g) X-component, (h) Y-component and (i) Z-component of electric field of odd mode of the OMM. (j) X-component, (k) Y-component and (l) Z-component of electric field of slot line. (m) X-component, (n) Y-component and (o) Z-component of electric field of SOMM.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Electric-field distributions of the cross sections of the SSPP structures at 15 GHz. (ac) Absolute value of electric-field distributions on the cross-section of (a) even-mode of the typical SSPP (X = 0 mm) waveguide, (b) even mode and (c) odd mode of the OMM (X = 0.7 mm). (d) X-component, (e) Y-component and (f) Z-component of electric field of even mode of the OMM. (g) X-component, (h) Y-component and (i) Z-component of electric field of odd mode of the OMM. (j) X-component, (k) Y-component and (l) Z-component of electric field of slot line. (m) X-component, (n) Y-component and (o) Z-component of electric field of SOMM.

    Flexibility test of gain (dB) of the amplifier-integrated OMM.

    Radius13 GHz14 GHz15 GHz16 GHz17 GHz
    11 cm 3.5 16.2 13.1 6.3 16.8
    14 cm 3.4 15.8 13.7 7.3 16.7
    22 cm 6.0 22.3 17.5 14.9 18.9
    CSV Show Table

    It is worth noting that although even-mode SSPPs can be converted into CPW or microstrip ports to connect packaged chips, cumbersome conversion structures occupying large spaces are required because the potential difference exists between the even-mode SSPP waveguide and infinity, which is vastly different from that of typical chip input port. Combining all the designed sections, the whole amplifier-integrated OMM is shown in Fig. 2.

    It can be observed from Eq. (4) that even though large w01 limits the space of grooves, the equivalent depth of zigzag grooves can still be enlarged by increasing the folding extent. Figure 3(f) shows the dispersion curves of the OMM with varying X and fixed w1, w01, a1, p1 and Y. The field confinement is obviously improved by enlarging X while the lower cutoff frequency of the odd mode will not increase, which indicates that broadening bandwidth and strengthening field confinement of single-conductor odd-mode SSPPs can be realized simultaneously. Quantitatively, cutoff frequency and decay factor with varying X are shown in Fig. 4, where the decay factor v is calculated by

    At last, the flexibility of the amplifier-integrated OMM is tested as well. A lengthened sample with the length of 236.3 mm is bent on a foam cylinder with near-air electric properties and different radius r, as shown in Fig. 9. Measured gains of the amplifier-integrated OMM with different bending radius compared to a pure OMM with nearly the same length of 237 mm are listed in Table 3. It can be observed that the OMM can be easily bent to a dramatic angle, which is difficult for traditional microstrips or CPWs with large and rigid metallic surfaces in the view of mechanics. Meanwhile, efficient gain performance of the amplifier-integrated OMM can be maintained under large-angle bending. Hence, the OMM is verified to be adequate for conformal applications as well.

    Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the whole amplifier-integrated OMM.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Schematic diagram of the whole amplifier-integrated OMM.

    To investigate the mode similarity of the OMM and traditional multi-conductor transmission medium (e. g. slot line) that can provide voltage input for active semi-conductor components, detailed electric-field component distributions of the OMM and the slot line are exhibited in Fig. 5(d–l). It can be observed that even-mode SSPP possesses zero potential difference between the two sides of the metachannel, because the integral of Y-component along the dash line in Fig. 5(e) is 0. In contrast, the integral of Y-component along the imaginary line of odd-mode SSPP in Fig. 5(h) has non-zero value, which is similar to the slot line. Hence, the similarity of single-conductor OMM and slot line indicates that the OMM can be easily converted into an active semi-conductor-component port with voltage input or output.

    This paper proposes a new kind of odd-mode-metachannel to perform as the fundamental transmission medium for single-conductor system. Basic designing tradeoff of bandwidth and field confinement of odd-mode SSPPs is resolved by introducing zigzag decorations onto the SSPP structure. Merits including low RCS, crosstalk suppression and flexibility of the OMM are verified. Utilizing the intrinsic potential difference on the OMM, novel integration between planar single-conductor medium and active semi-conductor component is achieved, which is difficult in traditional view. Beyond the single-conductor area, it is also possible to extend the idea of utilizing odd-mode field to excite active semi-conductor components into multi-conductor areas such as integrated circuit design. In conclusion, the proposed OMM and the method of active semi-conductor-component integration remove the major obstacles of realizing conformal single-conductor systems and provide an avenue to future smart skins.

    We are grateful for financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 62101122, 61871127, 61701108 and 61631007, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under Grant BK20210212, and the 111 Project under Grant No. 111-2-05.

    The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • References

    [1]

    Goubau G. Open wire lines. IRE Trans Microw Theory Tech 4, 197–200 (1956).

    DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.1956.1125062

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2]

    Akalin T, Treizebré A, Bocquet B. Single-wire transmission lines at terahertz frequencies. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 54, 2762–2767 (2006).

    DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2006.874890

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3]

    Pendry JB, Martín-Moreno L, Garcia-Vidal FJ. Mimicking surface plasmons with structured surfaces. Science 305, 847–848 (2004).

    DOI: 10.1126/science.1098999

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4]

    Hibbins AP, Evans BR, Sambles JR. Experimental verification of designer surface plasmons. Science 308, 670–672 (2005).

    DOI: 10.1126/science.1109043

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5]

    Yu NF, Wang QJ, Kats MA, Fan JA, Khanna SP et al. Designer spoof surface Plasmon structures collimate terahertz laser beams. Nat Mater 9, 730–735 (2010).

    DOI: 10.1038/nmat2822

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6]

    Kats MA, Woolf D, Blanchard R, Yu NF, Capasso F. Spoof Plasmon analogue of metal-insulator-metal waveguides. Opt Express 19, 14860–14870 (2011).

    DOI: 10.1364/OE.19.014860

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    View full references list
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(32)

    1. Lou, B., Yao, G., Cui, F. et al. Design of hybrid metagrating microstructures with high efficiency and large angle focusing. Indian Journal of Physics, 2025, 99(3): 1145-1156. DOI:10.1007/s12648-024-03330-0
    2. Fan, Y., He, P.H., Liu, Y. et al. Continuously tunable low-loss phase shifter using weak-dispersion spoof surface plasmon polaritons. Optics Letters, 2024, 49(24): 7234-7237. DOI:10.1364/OL.544612
    3. Hang He, P., Chi Zhang, H., Yun Niu, L. et al. Reconfigurable dual-mode meta-waveguide. Materials and Design, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113447
    4. Kumari, P., Das, S. Isolation improvement between two tightly coupled QMSIW MIMO antenna elements using spoof surface plasmon polariton structure. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 2024, 66(11): e70017. DOI:10.1002/mop.70017
    5. Xu, J., Xu, L., Liu, F. et al. Numerical Modeling of Tunable Reflection Scattering Angle Control Based on Ge2Sb2Te5 Phase Change Metamaterials. Physics of Wave Phenomena, 2024, 32(2): 105-116. DOI:10.3103/S1541308X24700055
    6. Huang, X., Chai, F., Yang, Y. et al. Biosensor based on all-dielectric mechanically tunable woven metasurface. Optics and Laser Technology, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110383
    7. Liao, Z., Wu, S., Guo, J. et al. Efficient Amplification of Large-Signal Spoof Surface Plasmon Polaritons in a Subwavelength Size. Advanced Materials Technologies, 2024, 9(5): 2301901. DOI:10.1002/admt.202301901
    8. Huang, W., Li, C., Fang, B. et al. Research progress of terahertz wave dynamic control of digital coded metasurfaces. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107977
    9. Wen, L., Hu, W., Pang, B. et al. Spoof Surface Plasmon Polariton-Based Antenna and Array by Exciting Both Even- and Odd-Mode Resonances. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2024, 72(2): 1593-1602. DOI:10.1109/TAP.2023.3335840
    10. Yao, D.Y., He, P.H., Shen, J.J. et al. Characteristic Impedance Extraction of Miniaturized On-Chip Spoof Surface Plasmon Polariton Transmission Lines. ICMMT - International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology, 2024. DOI:10.1109/ICMMT61774.2024.10672138
    11. Xuan, X., Cheng, Z., Zhang, Z. et al. Design of a Wideband Highly Efficient Power Amplifier Using Spoof Surface Plasmon Polaritons Matching Structure. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2024, 52(7): 2717-2724. DOI:10.1109/TPS.2024.3431718
    12. Wen Cheng, Z., Cheng Liang, J., Sun, S. et al. Frequency-Reconfigurable Dual-Band and Dual-Polarization Antenna Based on Corrugated Meta-Structure. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2024, 72(12): 9024-9034. DOI:10.1109/TAP.2024.3472276
    13. Yang, Y., Kong, W., Wang, C. et al. Enhancing imaging resolution of superlens through transient illumination. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. DOI:10.1117/12.3023235
    14. Liu, W., Zhou, Z., Zhou, J. Optimization of doping design for planar P-N homologous junction perovskite solar cells. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2024. DOI:10.3389/fchem.2024.1378332
    15. Yang, S., Liu, S., He, F. et al. Compact Muti-Frequency Band-Pass Filters Based on High-Order Mode of Folded Line Spoof Surface Plasmon Polaritons Waveguide. IEEE Access, 2024. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3352256
    16. Qi, J., Li, C., Xia, Y. et al. Research progress of biomolecular detection based on metasurfaces. Infrared Physics and Technology, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.infrared.2023.105111
    17. Najafy, V., Abbasi-Arand, B., Hesari-Shermeh, M. A semi-analytical method for characterization of fractal spoof surface plasmon polaritons with a transfer matrix and bloch theory. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 15055. DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-41050-3
    18. Homayoon, F., Heidari, A.-A., Pezhman, M.-M. A Low-Profile High-Performance Endfire Antenna Based on Spoof Surface Plasmon Polaritons. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 2023, 22(12): 2891-2895. DOI:10.1109/LAWP.2023.3303638
    19. Arghandeh, F., Abbasi-Arand, B., Hesari-Shermeh, M. A wideband and compact Quasi-Yagi antenna based on spoof surface plasmon polaritons. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 11054. DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-37419-z
    20. He, P.H., Zhang, H.C., Fan, Y. et al. Environment-Adaptive Meta-Channel. Advanced Functional Materials, 2023, 33(47): 2302080. DOI:10.1002/adfm.202302080
    21. Daiyan, K.M., Abi, S.B., Rashid, A.B.M.H.-U. et al. Effects of Variation in Geometric Parameters and Structural Configurations on the Transmission Characteristics of Terahertz-Range Spoof Surface Plasmon Polariton Interconnects for Interchip Data Communication: A Finite Element Method Study. Electronics (Switzerland), 2023, 12(17): 3719. DOI:10.3390/electronics12173719
    22. Fan, Y., He, P.H., Niu, L.Y. et al. Spoof-Surface-Plasmon-Polariton Metawaveguide and its Application in Frequency-Shift Keying. Physical Review Applied, 2023, 19(4): 044063. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.044063
    23. Xu, Q., Lang, Y., Jiang, X. et al. Meta-optics inspired surface plasmon devices. 2023, 2(1): R02. DOI:10.3788/PI.2023.R02
    24. He, P.H., Fan, Y., Niu, L.Y. et al. Analysis, Reduction, and Utilization of Loss in Reconfigurable Spoof Surface Plasmon Polaritons. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2023, 71(3): 945-955. DOI:10.1109/TMTT.2022.3228778
    25. Gao, L., Jiang, Z., Chen, Y. et al. An electromagnetic modulator based on electrically controllable meta-molecule analogue to spontaneous emission cancellation. Frontiers in Physics, 2023. DOI:10.3389/fphy.2023.1142792
    26. Wei, J., Li, W., Niu, L.Y. et al. Bendable transmission line and amplifier of spoof surface plasmon polaritons at microwave frequencies. Optics Express, 2023, 31(1): 755-764. DOI:10.1364/OE.479642
    27. Yang, Z., Zhao, T., Zhang, P. et al. All-dielectric tunable zero-refractive index metamaterials based on phase change materials. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, 2023, 62(1): 20230161. DOI:10.1515/rams-2023-0161
    28. Niu, L.Y., He, P.H., Zhang, H.C. et al. A Low-Loss Reconfigurable Spoof Surface Plasmon Polariton Transmission Line. 2023. DOI:10.1109/ICMMT58241.2023.10277369
    29. Wu, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Y. et al. Power Amplifier on Spoof Surface Plasmon Polaritons. 2023. DOI:10.23919/ACES-China60289.2023.10249326
    30. Niu, L.Y., Zhang, H.C., He, P.H. et al. Electromagnetic compatibility technologies based on multi-functional spoof surface plasmon polariton channels. JPhys Photonics, 2023, 5(1): 014003. DOI:10.1088/2515-7647/acacda
    31. He, P.H., Yao, D., Zhang, H.C. et al. Ultra-compact on-chip spoof surface plasmon polariton transmission lines with enhanced field confinements. JPhys Photonics, 2022, 4(4): 044002. DOI:10.1088/2515-7647/ac9874
    32. Yao, D.Y., He, P.H., Zhang, H.C. et al. Miniaturized Photonic and Microwave Integrated Circuits Based on Surface Plasmon Polaritons. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 2022. DOI:10.2528/PIER22060501

    Other cited types(0)

  • Author Information

    • Pei Hang He On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
      • Institute of Electromagnetic Space, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    • Ling Yun Niu On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
      • Institute of Electromagnetic Space, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    • Yi Fan On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
      • Institute of Electromagnetic Space, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    • Corresponding author: Hao Chi Zhang, hczhang0118@seu.edu.cn On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      HC Zhang, E-mail: hczhang0118@seu.edu.cn
      • State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
      • Institute of Electromagnetic Space, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    • Le Peng Zhang On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
      • Institute of Electromagnetic Space, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    • Dayue Yao On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
      • Institute of Electromagnetic Space, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    • Wen Xuan Tang On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      • State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
      • Institute of Electromagnetic Space, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    • Corresponding author: Tie Jun Cui, tjcui@seu.edu.cn On this SiteOn Google Scholar
      TJ Cui, E-mail: tjcui@seu.edu.cn
      • State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
      • Institute of Electromagnetic Space, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
  • Copyright

    Open Access. © The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
  • About this Article

    DOI: 10.29026/oea.2022.210119
    Cite this Article
    Pei Hang He, Ling Yun Niu, Yi Fan, et al. Active odd-mode-metachannel for single-conductor systems. Opto-Electronic Advances 5, 210119 (2022). DOI: 10.29026/oea.2022.210119
    Download Citation
    Article History
    • Received Date September 16, 2021
    • Accepted Date December 02, 2021
    • Available Online June 29, 2022
    • Published Date August 24, 2022
    Article Metrics
    Article Views(6138) PDF Downloads(1035) Article has an altmetric score of 28
    Share:
  • Related Articles

  • ParametersValues (mm)ParametersValuesParametersValues(mm)ParametersValues (mm)
    r1 0.9 Lt 20 mm r3 0.6 r4 0.7
    r2 0.9 Lx 12.5 mm Ss 0.3 r5 0.7
    d1 1 Ly 6 mm Ls1 8.85 d3 0.9
    d2 1.2 ac 0.00587 Ls2 2.1 d4 0.7
    S 0.2 bc 2 Ls3 3.1 Wg 9.4
    Wm 0.4 cc 0.8 Ws 0.7
    i 0.6 g 0.2 mm Lg 14.3
    View in article Downloads
  • ParametersExEyEz
    Even mode of the OMM 18.5073 0.0012 1
    Odd mode of the OMM 0.5273 25.8723 1
    Odd mode of the SOMM 2.995 93.139 1
    Mode of the slot line 0.16 11.6556 1
    View in article Downloads
  • Radius13 GHz14 GHz15 GHz16 GHz17 GHz
    11 cm 3.5 16.2 13.1 6.3 16.8
    14 cm 3.4 15.8 13.7 7.3 16.7
    22 cm 6.0 22.3 17.5 14.9 18.9
    View in article Downloads
[1]

Goubau G. Open wire lines. IRE Trans Microw Theory Tech 4, 197–200 (1956).

DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.1956.1125062

CrossRef Google Scholar

[2]

Akalin T, Treizebré A, Bocquet B. Single-wire transmission lines at terahertz frequencies. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 54, 2762–2767 (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2006.874890

CrossRef Google Scholar

[3]

Pendry JB, Martín-Moreno L, Garcia-Vidal FJ. Mimicking surface plasmons with structured surfaces. Science 305, 847–848 (2004).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1098999

CrossRef Google Scholar

[4]

Hibbins AP, Evans BR, Sambles JR. Experimental verification of designer surface plasmons. Science 308, 670–672 (2005).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1109043

CrossRef Google Scholar

[5]

Yu NF, Wang QJ, Kats MA, Fan JA, Khanna SP et al. Designer spoof surface Plasmon structures collimate terahertz laser beams. Nat Mater 9, 730–735 (2010).

DOI: 10.1038/nmat2822

CrossRef Google Scholar

[6]

Kats MA, Woolf D, Blanchard R, Yu NF, Capasso F. Spoof Plasmon analogue of metal-insulator-metal waveguides. Opt Express 19, 14860–14870 (2011).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.19.014860

CrossRef Google Scholar

[7]

Woolf D, Kats MA, Capasso F. Spoof surface Plasmon waveguide forces. Opt Lett 39, 517–520 (2014).

DOI: 10.1364/OL.39.000517

CrossRef Google Scholar

[8]

Erementchouk M, Joy SR, Mazumder P. Electrodynamics of spoof Plasmons in periodically corrugated waveguides. Proc Roy Soc A 472, 20160616 (2016).

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2016.0616

CrossRef Google Scholar

[9]

Zhang HC, He PH, Liu ZX, Tang WX, Aziz A et al. Dispersion analysis of deep-subwavelength-decorated metallic surface using field-network joint solution. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 66, 2923–2933 (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2018.2823820

CrossRef Google Scholar

[10]

Zhang HC, He PH, Gao XX, Lu JY, Cui TJ et al. Loss analysis of plasmonic metasurfaces using field-network-joint method. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 67, 3521–3526 (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2901123

CrossRef Google Scholar

[11]

Garcia-Vidal FJ, Fernández-Domínguez AI, Martin-Moreno L, Zhang HC, Tang W et al. Spoof surface plasmon photonics. Rev. Mod. Phys 94, 025004 (2022).

DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.025004

CrossRef Google Scholar

[12]

Wen XM, Bi YG, Yi FS, Zhang XL, Liu YF et al. Tunable surface plasmon-polariton resonance in organic light-emitting devices based on corrugated alloy electrodes. Opto-Electron Adv 4, 200024 (2021).

DOI: 10.29026/oea.2021.200024

CrossRef Google Scholar

[13]

Barnes WL, Dereux A, Ebbesen TW. Surface Plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 424, 824–830 (2003).

DOI: 10.1038/nature01937

CrossRef Google Scholar

[14]

Jones AC, Olmon RL, Skrabalak SE, Wiley BJ, Xia YN et al. Mid-IR plasmonics: near-field imaging of coherent Plasmon modes of silver nanowires. Nano Lett 9, 2553–2558 (2009).

DOI: 10.1021/nl900638p

CrossRef Google Scholar

[15]

Fang N, Lee H, Sun C, Zhang X. Sub-diffraction-limited optical imaging with a silver superlens. Science 308, 534–537 (2005).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1108759

CrossRef Google Scholar

[16]

Chen Q, Liang L, Zheng Q L, Zhang YX, Wen L. On-chip readout plasmonic mid-IR gas sensor. Opto-Electron Adv 3, 190040 (2020).

DOI: 10.29026/oea.2020.190040

CrossRef Google Scholar

[17]

Shen XP, Cui TJ, Martin-Cano D, Garcia-Vidal FJ. Conformal surface plasmons propagating on ultrathin and flexible films. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 40–45 (2013).

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210417110

CrossRef Google Scholar

[18]

He PH, Zhang HC, Tang W X, Wang ZX, Yan RT et al. A multi-layer spoof surface Plasmon polariton waveguide with corrugated ground. IEEE Access 5, 25306–25311 (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2768481

CrossRef Google Scholar

[19]

Kianinejad A, Chen ZN, Qiu CW. Full modeling, loss reduction, and mutual coupling control of spoof surface Plasmon-based meander slow wave transmission lines. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 66, 3764–3772 (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2018.2841857

CrossRef Google Scholar

[20]

He PH, Zhang HC, Gao XX, Yun L, Tang WX et al. A novel spoof surface Plasmon polariton structure to reach ultra-strong field confinements. Opto-Electron Adv 2, 190001 (2019).

Google Scholar

[21]

Zhang HC, He PH, Tang WX, Luo Y, Cui TJ. Planar spoof SPP transmission lines: Applications in microwave circuits. IEEE Microw Mag 20, 73–91 (2019).

Google Scholar

[22]

Zhang JJ, Zhang HC, Gao XX, Zhang LP, Niu LY et al. Integrated spoof plasmonic circuits. Sci Bull 64, 843–855 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.01.022

CrossRef Google Scholar

[23]

He PH, Fan Y, Zhang HC, Zhang LP, Tang M et al. Characteristic impedance extraction of spoof surface Plasmon polariton waveguides. J Phys D:Appl Phys 54, 385102 (2021).

DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac0460

CrossRef Google Scholar

[24]

Zhang HC, Cui TJ, Zhang Q, Fan YF, Fu XJ. Breaking the challenge of signal integrity using time-domain spoof surface Plasmon polaritons. ACS Photonics 2, 1333–1340 (2015).

DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00316

CrossRef Google Scholar

[25]

Liang Y, Yu H, Zhang HC, Yang C, Cui TJ. On-chip sub-terahertz surface Plasmon polariton transmission lines in CMOS. Sci Rep 5, 14853 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/srep14853

CrossRef Google Scholar

[26]

Liang Y, Yu H, Feng GY, Apriyana AAA, Fu XJ et al. An energy-efficient and low-crosstalk sub-THz I/O by surface Plasmonic Polariton interconnect in CMOS. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 65, 2762–2774 (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2017.2666808

CrossRef Google Scholar

[27]

Joy SR, Yu H, Mazumder P. Properties of spoof Plasmon in thin structures. Proc Roy Soc A 474, 20180205 (2018).

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2018.0205

CrossRef Google Scholar

[28]

Joy SR, Erementchouk M, Yu H, Mazumder P. Spoof Plasmon interconnects—communications beyond RC limit. IEEE Trans Commun 67, 599–610 (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2874242

CrossRef Google Scholar

[29]

Gao XX, Zhang HC, He PH, Wang ZX, Lu JY et al. Crosstalk suppression based on mode mismatch between spoof SPP transmission line and microstrip. IEEE Trans Comp, Pack Manuf Technol 9, 2267–2275 (2019).

Google Scholar

[30]

Zhang HC, Tang WX, Xu J, Liu S, Liu JF et al. Reduction of shielding-box volume using SPP-Like transmission lines. IEEE Trans Comp, Pack Manuf Technol 7, 1486–1492 (2017).

Google Scholar

[31]

He PH, Zhang HC, Tang WX, Cui TJ. Shielding spoof surface Plasmon Polariton transmission lines using dielectric Box. IEEE Microw Wirel Compon Lett 28, 1077–1079 (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/LMWC.2018.2878968

CrossRef Google Scholar

[32]

Han YJ, Wang JF, Gong SH, Li YF, Zhang Y et al. Low RCS antennas based on dispersion engineering of spoof surface Plasmon Polaritons. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 66, 7111–7116 (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2018.2869206

CrossRef Google Scholar

[33]

He PH, Ren Y, Shao CZ, Zhang HC, Zhang LP et al. Suppressing high-power microwave pulses using spoof surface Plasmon Polariton mono-pulse antenna. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 69, 8069–8079 (2021).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2021.3083836

CrossRef Google Scholar

[34]

Guan DF, You P, Zhang QF, Xiao K, Yong SW. Hybrid spoof surface Plasmon Polariton and substrate integrated waveguide transmission line and its application in filter. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 65, 4925–4932 (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2017.2727486

CrossRef Google Scholar

[35]

Guan DF, You P, Zhang QF, Yang ZB, Liu HW et al. Slow-wave half-mode substrate integrated waveguide using spoof surface Plasmon Polariton structure. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 66, 2946–2952 (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2018.2825385

CrossRef Google Scholar

[36]

Zhang HC, He PH, Gao XX, Tang WX, Cui TJ. Pass-band reconfigurable spoof surface Plasmon polaritons. J Phys:Condens Matter 30, 134004 (2018).

DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/aaab85

CrossRef Google Scholar

[37]

Zhang HC, Cui TJ, Luo Y, Zhang JJ, Xu J et al. Active digital spoof plasmonics. Natl Sci Rev 7, 261–269 (2020).

DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwz148

CrossRef Google Scholar

[38]

Zhang LP, Zhang HC, Tang M, He PH, Niu LY et al. Integrated multi-scheme digital modulations of spoof surface Plasmon polaritons. Sci China Inform Sci 63, 202302 (2020).

DOI: 10.1007/s11432-020-2972-0

CrossRef Google Scholar

[39]

Han YJ, Li YF, Ma H, Wang JF, Feng DY et al. Multibeam antennas based on spoof surface Plasmon Polaritons mode coupling. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 65, 1187–1192 (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2016.2647588

CrossRef Google Scholar

[40]

Kianinejad A, Chen ZN, Qiu CW. A single-layered spoof-Plasmon-mode leaky wave antenna with consistent gain. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 65, 681–687 (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2016.2633161

CrossRef Google Scholar

[41]

Kianinejad A, Chen ZN, Zhang L, Liu W, Qiu CW. Spoof Plasmon-based slow-wave excitation of dielectric resonator antennas. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 64, 2094–2099 (2016).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2016.2545738

CrossRef Google Scholar

[42]

Zhang HC, Liu L, He PH, Lu JY, Zhang LP et al. A wide-angle broadband converter: from odd-mode spoof surface Plasmon Polaritons to spatial waves. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 67, 7425–7432 (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2935671

CrossRef Google Scholar

[43]

Lu JY, Zhang HC, He PH, Zhang LP, Cui TJ. Design of miniaturized antenna using corrugated microstrip. IEEE T Antenn Propag 68, 1918–1924 (2020).

DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2963209

CrossRef Google Scholar

[44]

Tian X, Lee PM, Tan YJ, Wu TLY, Yao HC et al. Wireless body sensor networks based on metamaterial textiles. Nat Electron 2, 243–251 (2019).

DOI: 10.1038/s41928-019-0257-7

CrossRef Google Scholar

[45]

Zhang HC, Zhang LP, He PH, Xu J, Qian C et al. A plasmonic route for the integrated wireless communication of subdiffraction-limited signals. Light:Sci Appl 9, 113 (2020).

DOI: 10.1038/s41377-020-00355-y

CrossRef Google Scholar

[46]

Zhang HC, Liu S, Shen XP, Chen LH, Li LM et al. Broadband amplification of spoof surface Plasmon polaritons at microwave frequencies. Laser Photonics Rev 9, 83–90 (2015).

DOI: 10.1002/lpor.201400131

CrossRef Google Scholar

[47]

Maier SA. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, New York, 2007).

Google Scholar

Links
Related Articles
Show full outline

Catalog

    Corresponding author: Tie Jun Cui, tjcui@seu.edu.cn

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed
    Active odd-mode-metachannel for single-conductor systems
    • Figure  1

      The insulator-metal-insulator model.

    • Figure  2

      Schematic diagram of the whole amplifier-integrated OMM.

    • Figure  3

      Geometrical parameters and dispersion curves of the typical SSPP waveguide and the OMM. (a) Geometrical parameters of the typical SSPP structure, where the width of the center strip is w fixed as 4 mm, the period of the unit is p, the width of the grooves is a and the width of the narrow strip is w0. (b) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying a, where p = 1.5 mm, w0 = 1 mm. (c) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying p, where a = 0.75 mm and w0 = 1 mm. (d) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying w0, where p = 1.5 mm, a = 0.75 mm. (e) Geometrical parameters of the OMM, where the width of the center strip is w1 fixed as 4 mm, the period of the unit is p1, the width of the narrow strip is w01, the folding extent of the zigzag grooves is described by X and Y. (f) Dispersion curves of the typical SSPP structure with varying X, where w1 = 4 mm, w01 = 2.8 mm, a1 = 0.3 mm, p1 = 1.5 mm, Y=0.2 mm.

    • Figure  4

      Cutoff frequency and decay factor curves with varying X, where the other parameters are the same with those in Fig. 3(f).

    • Figure  5

      Electric-field distributions of the cross sections of the SSPP structures at 15 GHz. (ac) Absolute value of electric-field distributions on the cross-section of (a) even-mode of the typical SSPP (X = 0 mm) waveguide, (b) even mode and (c) odd mode of the OMM (X = 0.7 mm). (d) X-component, (e) Y-component and (f) Z-component of electric field of even mode of the OMM. (g) X-component, (h) Y-component and (i) Z-component of electric field of odd mode of the OMM. (j) X-component, (k) Y-component and (l) Z-component of electric field of slot line. (m) X-component, (n) Y-component and (o) Z-component of electric field of SOMM.

    • Figure  6

      The conversion structures. (a) Conversion structure between the quasi-TEM mode and odd-mode SSPPs, where 5 linearly gradient SSPP units are employed. (b) Simulated S-parameters of the conversion structure, where the OMM is composed of 46 units. (c) The compact conversion structure to convert odd-mode SSPP waves into voltage input of chips.

    • Figure  7

      Experiments of the amplifier-integrated OMM. (a) Top view of the sample. (b) Bottom view of the sample. (c) Measured S-parameters of the sample. (d) The photograph of the EM scanning system composed of a VNA and a monopole probe installed in a mechanical platform in an EM shielding chamber. (e, f) The measured near-electric-field distributions of the amplifier-integrated OMM sample at (e) 14 and (f) 16 GHz.

    • Figure  8

      Crosstalk suppression and low RCS properties of the OMM. (a) Coupling pair of SSPP channel. (b) Crosstalk of typical even-even coupling pair and odd-even coupling pair. (c) RCS of the OMM compared to that of a CPW with the same total size.

    • Figure  9

      Flexibility test of the amplifier-integrated OMM.

    • Figure  1
    • Figure  2
    • Figure  3
    • Figure  4
    • Figure  5
    • Figure  6
    • Figure  7
    • Figure  8
    • Figure  9
    Active odd-mode-metachannel for single-conductor systems
    • ParametersValues (mm)ParametersValuesParametersValues(mm)ParametersValues (mm)
      r1 0.9 Lt 20 mm r3 0.6 r4 0.7
      r2 0.9 Lx 12.5 mm Ss 0.3 r5 0.7
      d1 1 Ly 6 mm Ls1 8.85 d3 0.9
      d2 1.2 ac 0.00587 Ls2 2.1 d4 0.7
      S 0.2 bc 2 Ls3 3.1 Wg 9.4
      Wm 0.4 cc 0.8 Ws 0.7
      i 0.6 g 0.2 mm Lg 14.3
    • ParametersExEyEz
      Even mode of the OMM 18.5073 0.0012 1
      Odd mode of the OMM 0.5273 25.8723 1
      Odd mode of the SOMM 2.995 93.139 1
      Mode of the slot line 0.16 11.6556 1
    • Radius13 GHz14 GHz15 GHz16 GHz17 GHz
      11 cm 3.5 16.2 13.1 6.3 16.8
      14 cm 3.4 15.8 13.7 7.3 16.7
      22 cm 6.0 22.3 17.5 14.9 18.9
    • Table  1

      Geometrical parameters of the conversion structures.

        1/3
    • Table  2

      Normalized field integral of different modes.

        2/3
    • Table  3

      Flexibility test of gain (dB) of the amplifier-integrated OMM.

        3/3