Processing math: 100%
Helicity-dependent THz emission induced by ultrafast spin photocurrent in nodal-line semimetal candidate Mg3Bi2
  • Abstract

    Helicity-dependent ultrafast spin current generated by circularly polarized photons in topological materials holds the crux to many technological improvements, such as quantum communications, on-chip communication processing and storage. Here, we present the manipulation of helicity-dependent terahertz emission generated in a nodal line semimetal candidate Mg3Bi2 by using photon polarization states. The terahertz emission is mainly ascribed to the helicity-dependent photocurrent that is originated from circular photogalvanic effects, and the helicity-independent photocurrent that is attributed to linear photogalvanic effect. Our work will inspire more explorations into novel nodal line semimetals and open up new opportunities for developing ultrafast optoelectronics in the topological system.

    Keywords

  • In this paper, we exploit the chiral-controlled spin photocurrent in nodal line semimetal candidate Mg3Bi2 through terahertz emission spectroscopy. By investigating the emitted THz electromagnetic wave under the photon injection, we found the polarity and chirality of the photocurrents can be manipulated by polarized near-infrared optical pump on a picosecond timescale. In addition, we demonstrate that the chirality-dependent terahertz emission is mainly originated from the circular photogalvanic effect (CPGE), which is associated with the angular momentum selection rules of topological surface states.

    Generation and control of an ultrafast spin-photocurrent in topological materials are of great significance. On the one hand, the spin-photocurrent generated in a picosecond timescale permits ultrafast optical manipulation. Proverbially, efficient devices could be realized for data storage and processing if the spin degree of freedom is utilized. However, the processing of information calls for the generation and control of spin current in transient time to achieve ultrafast operations, especially at frequencies coming up to the undeveloped terahertz band. Fortunately, the unique chiral behavior of spin photocurrent in topological materials permits the ultrafast operation under circularly polarized light without an external bias field. On the other hand, the spin-photocurrent induced electromagnetic wave in the terahertz frequency domain has been proven to be an efficient helical terahertz (THz) emitter, . It is worth mentioning that the generation and manipulation of helical THz pulses in the past mainly depend on the complicated pulse shaping or two color manipulation of the incident laser while emitters possess no intrinsic optical chirality. Therefore, the ability to explore the topological materials with peculiar spin-momentum locking or chiral properties is of crucial importance.

    Nodal-line semimetals (NLSs), which host one-dimensional closed-loop or line degeneracies formed by the crossing of two bands, have been proposed recently as a family of topological phase materials-. The distinguishing characteristic of NLSs is their two dimensional (2D) drumhead-like surface states, which are embedded into the 'direct gap' between conduction and valence band in the 2D projection of the nodal ring, -. Up to now, NLSs have been intensively studied in many compounds such as PtSn4, Cu3PdN, PbTaSe2, TlTaSe2, Mg3Bi2. Among them, Mg3Bi2 is a significant thermoelectric material with excellent performance in the process of energy conversion. The good thermoelectric performance of Mg3Bi2-based materials may be closely related to its topological properties. Mg3Bi2 is predicted to be NLSs in the absence of spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and become a strong topological insulator when SOC is considered. Taking SOC into consideration in the calculation, the drumhead surface band would split and transform into topological surface states, with a small bulk energy gap of about 35 meV opening at the line nodes. However, the topological properties can hardly be enclosed by experiments due to the heavily p-doped Mg vacancies, . Thus, Mg3Bi2 is usually called as a candidate for NLSs. Fortunately, a recent work has revealed that Mg3Bi2 is a semimetal with topological surface states by in-situ angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), and further investigation for the optical properties of Mg3Bi2 is still in need.

    Mg3Bi2 is a layered Kagome lattice structure with the space group of Pˉ3m1, as shown in Figs. 1(a) and 1(b). Mg and Bi atoms assemble in layers naturally with five atomic layers stacking along the (001) crystal orientation. Mg3Bi2 thin films were grown on the transparent sapphire (Al2O3) substrates by using molecular beam epitaxy. A Se capping layer is essential to protect the Mg3Bi2 film from oxidation in the atmosphere and prevent the thin film from the evaporation of pulsed-laser illumination. The details of sample preparation are discussed in the supplementary information. Figures 1(d) and 1(e) display the in-situ RHEED (reflection high-energy electron diffraction) patterns along Γ-K and Γ-M directions, and the sharp streaks indicating the high quality of the film. XRD spectrum in Fig. 1(f) shows the (001), (002), (003), (004), and (005) diffraction peaks of Mg3Bi2. In-plane lattice constant deduced from the RHEED streak spacing is about 0. 4763 nm, which is in good agreement with the results from references, .

    Figure 1. Characterization of the Mg3Bi2 film.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Characterization of the Mg3Bi2 film.

    Crystal structure of Mg3Bi2 from (a) side view and (b) top view. (c) The bulk and the projected (001) Brillouin zones of Mg3Bi2. RHEED patterns of the Mg3Bi2 film grown on the sapphire substrate, with the incident electron beam along the (d)Γ-K and (e)Γ-M directions, respectively. (f) XRD patterns of the Mg3Bi2 film, with all the (0, 0, 1n) diffraction peaks marked.

    The helicity-dependent terahertz emissions along the vertical direction (Ex) were measured by rotating a quarter-wave plate with an angle of α at incident angle θ = -45° and +45°, respectively, which were shown in Fig. 3. The polar plots of terahertz waveforms (0~4.5 ps) in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c) illustrate a clear polarity reversal at different helicity of optical excitations. According to the polarization trajectory, the polarization and chirality of the THz wave can be manipulated by the switching of circular or linear polarization of the incident light. Such controllability stems from the chiral ultrafast photocurrents derived from the polarized femtosecond optical pulses. Twofold symmetry was observed in the α-scan patterns, which gives more profound insights into the origins of terahertz emissions.

    Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (TDS) is a crucial method to confirm the properties of topological states and the dynamics of charge carriers on a sub-picosecond timescale, , -. In the process of exploring topological properties, it is significant to separate the surface signals from the bulk backgrounds-. Fortunately, it has been verified that circularly polarized light could give rise to the asymmetric depopulation of spin-polarized surface states by optical selection rule and then generate a spin-polarized photocurrent, , , , . This transient process is known as the circular photogalvanic effect and can be detected by a femtosecond laser pulse. Based on Maxwell equations, the transient variation in the current density on picosecond timescale will generate electromagnetic radiation with the frequencies located in the THz region (1 THz =1 ps-1), which can be described by

    ETHztJ.

    As another controllable measurement, we explore the relationship between the THz emission response and the power of incident optical pulses centered at 800 nm, with the polarization state fixed to right-hand circular polarization. It is apparent that the increase of the laser power augments the amplitude of the emitted THz waves but does not change the shape of the waveform, as shown in Fig. 5(a). Through fast Fourier transformations (FFT) of the THz waveforms, Figure 5(b) displays the frequency domain that covers the frequency range up to 2 THz. On the other hand, the peak value for all of the spectra is centered around 0.55 THz, which is in very good agreement with the results for the time-domain analysis. Additionally, as illustrated in Fig. 5(c), a linear behavior is indicated in the dependence of the THz peak amplitude on the incident pump power up to 1800 μJ/cm2. Figure 5(d) displays the azimuthal-scan (φ-scan) results for the peak-to-peak amplitudes of the terahertz radiations with linearly polarized optical pulses at nearly normal incidence (θ~0°) from Mg3Bi2 thin films. The azimuthal scan strongly depends on the crystal structure of samples. Obviously, Mg3Bi2 owns a centrosymmetric lattice structure for bulk, but the inversion symmetry of the top and bottom surface is broken. We deduce that the anisotropy of the azimuthal-scan results is related to the broken inversion symmetry of the surface.

    In this equation, the coefficient C represents the contribution from helicity-dependent circular photogalvanic effect. L1 describes the helicity-independent linear photogalvanic effect, , , . It has been reported that both C and L1 are related to the topological surface states, and they are predicted to be associated with the Berry phase in spin-orbital coupled quantum well structures theoretically, . It is worth noting that the LPGE depends on the crystal symmetry or the linear polarization of light and is generally only excited on the surface of the sample. L2 represents the photon drag effect (PDE), which is linked by the linear momentum transfer between incident photons and electrons. Optical rectification (OR), as a second-order nonlinear optical process, is the major process to coefficient D, which is following the well-known second-harmonic generation in noncentrosymmetric materials, , , , , .

    Figure 3. (a) Schematic of the THz emission configuration. Polar plots of terahertz waveforms (0~4.65 ps) as a function of α at (b) θ =-45º and (c) +45º, respectively, for φ = 0º. The colors represent the amplitude of the terahertz emissions. Terahertz waveforms for excitation with left-hand circularly polarized, linearly polarized, and right-hand circularly polarized optical pulses at (d) θ =-45º and (e) +45º, respectively.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (a) Schematic of the THz emission configuration. Polar plots of terahertz waveforms (0~4.65 ps) as a function of α at (b) θ =-45º and (c) +45º, respectively, for φ = 0º. The colors represent the amplitude of the terahertz emissions. Terahertz waveforms for excitation with left-hand circularly polarized, linearly polarized, and right-hand circularly polarized optical pulses at (d) θ =-45º and (e) +45º, respectively.

    Figure 4. (a) and (b) represent the α-dependent terahertz amplitude at t = 2.46 ps. The red solid lines are the best fit with Eq. (2). The symbol ↔, the counterclockwise arrow ↺, and the clockwise arrow ↻ denote linearly polarized (black: α = 0°), left-hand circularly polarized (pink: α = 45°), and right-hand circularly polarized (green: α = 135°) incident photons, respectively. (c) and (d) display the α-dependent coefficients C (red line), L1 (blue line), L2 (orange line), and D (blue line) extracted [using Eq. (2)] individually from (a) and (b).
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (a) and (b) represent the α-dependent terahertz amplitude at t = 2.46 ps. The red solid lines are the best fit with Eq. (2). The symbol ↔, the counterclockwise arrow ↺, and the clockwise arrow ↻ denote linearly polarized (black: α = 0°), left-hand circularly polarized (pink: α = 45°), and right-hand circularly polarized (green: α = 135°) incident photons, respectively. (c) and (d) display the α-dependent coefficients C (red line), L1 (blue line), L2 (orange line), and D (blue line) extracted [using Eq. (2)] individually from (a) and (b).

    Figures 3(d) and 3(e) show the time domain terahertz waveforms of the Mg3Bi2 thin film for incident angle θ = -45° and +45° respectively, with linearly polarized (LP, α = 0°, red line), right-hand circularly polarized (RHCP, α = 45°, black line), and left-hand circularly polarized (LHCP, α = 135°, blue line) optical excitations. The key observation is that signals obtained from the right and left-handed circularly polarized light are completely in opposite phase for both θ = -45° and +45°, and for helicity-fixed optical excitation (both RHCP and LHCP), a similar polarity reversal was also found when the polarized light incident angle θ alternates from -45° in Fig. 3(d) to 45° in Fig. 3(e). This phenomenon usually results from the reversed incident photon helicity. THz signals from the linearly polarized light were also in the opposite phase for θ = -45° and +45°. Obviously, both the magnitude and temporal shape of the THz waveform depend strongly on the light polarization and the incident angle. These results are consistent with the scenario for the helicity-dependent terahertz emission: the spin-polarized current generated by incident photon polarization is the major contributor to this process, -, .

    Terahertz signals in the Ey direction appear in a polarization-independent manner, which are substantially different from Ex, as shown in Fig. S3. On the one hand, signals in Ey direction are relatively weak compared with that in Ex direction. On the other hand, according to the fitting result, Ey is dominated by a polarization-independent D. L2 plays a minor role, while C and L1 can be neglected. These results suggest that the helicity-controlled terahertz emission mainly results from the polarization-dependent photocurrent in Ex direction, rather than the polarization-independent photocurrent in Ey direction. Such distinct features in Ex and Ey directions may lead to an elliptically polarized transient THz field.

    In addition, THz spectroscopy is a viable contactless alternative that can complement conventional transport measurement without the necessity for electrodes or background signal that may disturb the system, . This is especially important for the study of chiral-photocurrent in a topological system, and this technique has recently provided valuable information in topological insulators such as Bi2Se3, , Sb2Te3, as well as in Dirac and Weyl semimetals, like graphene, , TaAs and so on. Besides, the chirality-dependent photocurrents resulting from TSSs can be controlled by the polarization of the incident light, which demonstrates the potential for optoelectronics, , . To date, no dynamical behavior of ultrafast photocurrent and its associated electromagnetic wave has been explored in Mg3Bi2, even in nodal line semimetals.

    To shed more light on the emission mechanism, terahertz radiation arising from the linearly polarized light can be further investigated. A half-wave plate is used to clarify the relationship between ETHz with the linear polarization angle α. The incident angle θ is fixed at 45°. The relationship between pump polarization angle and terahertz amplitude near the peak values is shown in Fig. 6(a). We found that ETHz induced by the linearly polarized light can be well described by a sinusoidal function with a period of 180°. The amplitude of the wave excited by linearly polarized light is approximately three times smaller than that of the wave excited by circularly polarized light, compared with Figs. 4(a) and 4(b). When the polarization angle of the pump beam α is changed from 0° to 90°, the polarity of the emitted THz pulse is reversed, as shown in Fig. 6(b). No THz emission is detected at a polarization angle of α = 45°. This phenomenon can be described by a second-order nonlinear optical process. The different intensity and period of terahertz signals excited by linearly or circularly polarized light further verified the dominant role of topological surface states in spintronic terahertz emission.

    Based on our results, the amplitude and phase of Ex are dominated by C (CPGE, 34.87%) and L1 (LPGE, 51.72%), which were revealed in Figs. 4(c), 4(d) and Fig. S2. The extracted CPGE component of the emitted THz electric field follows a sinusoidal dependence of 2α whose periodicity matches a change for the spin direction of the incident light. However, the LPGE part shows a 4α periodicity because it has no response to the helicity of the incident ray. Both of them are coincident with the rotational symmetry of the Dirac cone of TIs. Another ~11.46% component is from the polarization independent optical rectification effect, while PDE can be omitted (only 1.95%). The above results indicate that the THz emission is generated by the topological surface states of the Mg3Bi2 thin film.

    Figure 2. Schematic view of helicity-dependent terahertz radiation process.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Schematic view of helicity-dependent terahertz radiation process.

    ETHz(α)=Csin(2α)+L1sin(4α)+L2cos(4α)+D.

    Here, ETHz represents the radiated electric field, and J expresses the transient current, . The schematic view of this process can be described in Fig. 2.

    To further comprehend the origin of THz emission in Mg3Bi2, it is essential to figure out the mechanisms behind the generation of time-resolved photocurrent. We extracted the α-dependent THz amplitudes at the specific moment (t = 2.46 ps), which shows the largest variation of light response and can be controlled by rotating the QWP by an angle of α, as shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b). Based on the description of helicity-dependent photocurrents in topological insulators, the terahertz electric field can be inferred as ETHz(α, t)∝∂J(α, t)/∂t, , , . Thus, the α-dependent peak values can be well fitted using the equation as follows:

    Figure 5. (a) THz waveforms at different photoexcitation power with the wavelength center in 800 nm. (b) Fast Fourier transformations (FFT) spectra for the directly measured terahertz waveforms that are shown in (a). (c) THz amplitude versus the power of the incident laser beam. (d) The azimuthal dependent (φ-dependent) absolute amplitude of THz emission waveforms with linear polarized optical pulses.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (a) THz waveforms at different photoexcitation power with the wavelength center in 800 nm. (b) Fast Fourier transformations (FFT) spectra for the directly measured terahertz waveforms that are shown in (a). (c) THz amplitude versus the power of the incident laser beam. (d) The azimuthal dependent (φ-dependent) absolute amplitude of THz emission waveforms with linear polarized optical pulses.

    Figure 6. (a) THz amplitude as a function of the linear polarization angle α. The red solid line shows the fitting results using a sinusoidal function. (b) Terahertz waveforms for excitation with a linearly polarized angel at α = 0º, 45 º and 90º, respectively.
    Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    (a) THz amplitude as a function of the linear polarization angle α. The red solid line shows the fitting results using a sinusoidal function. (b) Terahertz waveforms for excitation with a linearly polarized angel at α = 0º, 45 º and 90º, respectively.

    The schematic of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 3(a) and the diagram of our terahertz emission system is depicted in Fig. S1. The Mg3Bi2 thin film was set up in the transmission direction of the pump light. The optical pulses with a central wavelength of 800 nm (1.55 eV) were focused on the crystal surface at an incident angle of θ to generate ultrafast photocurrent and then the terahertz wave was radiated. The vertical and horizonal components (along the Ex and Ey direction) of the emitted THz pulses were detected by electro-optical sampling, respectively. The polarization and chirality of optical pulses are controlled by rotating a quarter-wave plate (QWP) with an angle of α. The impact from bulk transient currents of Mg3Bi2 may contribute to the terahertz emissions in out-of-plane (perpendicular to the surface of the samples) direction, and these can be canceled by polarization settings of terahertz detection.

    In conclusion, for the first time, we demonstrated that spin photocurrent induced helicity-dependent terahertz emission could be realized in nodal-line semimetal candidate Mg3Bi2. The polarization directions and magnitudes of helical THz wave can be easily controlled without any THz waveplate. The polarization control is mainly originated from polarity-dependent photocurrent, and then can be effectively manipulated by circular photogalvanic effect. Such an intrinsic spintronic emitter shows promising characteristics and is easily accessible. Finally, this work will open up intriguing opportunities for fundamental studies of novel THz emission, THz spintronics, and THz modulation devices by using topological materials.

    We thank Prof. J. B. Qi for helpful discussions and are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.11804387, 11802339, 11805276, 11902358, 61805282, and 61801498); the Scientific Researches Foundation of National University of Defense Technology (Grant Nos. ZK18-03-22, ZK18-01-03 and ZK18-03-36).

    M. Y. Tong and Y. Z. Hu contributed equally to this work. J. Tian and M. Y. Tong conceived the idea and designed the research; M. Y. Tong and X. N. Xie fabricated all the samples; Y. Z. Hu performed the optical measurement. T. Jiang, Z. Y. Wang, X. A. Cheng and X. G. Zhu analysed the data; M. Y. Tong and Y. Z. Hu co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.

    The authors declare no competing financial interests.

    Supplementary information for this paper is available at https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2020.200023

  • References

    Lodahl P, Mahmoodian S, Stobbe S, Rauschenbeutel A, Schneeweiss P et al. Chiral quantum optics. Nature 541, 473-480 (2017).

    DOI: 10.1038/nature21037

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Kampfrath T, Sell A, Klatt G, Pashkin A, Mährlein S et al. Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves. Nat Photonics 5, 31-34 (2011).

    DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.259

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Wolf S A, Awschalom D D, Buhrman R A, Daughton J M, von Molnár S et al. Spintronics: a spin-based electronics vision for the future. Science 294, 1488-1495 (2001).

    DOI: 10.1126/science.1065389

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Ferguson B, Zhang X C. Materials for terahertz science and technology. Nat Mater 1, 26-33 (2002).

    DOI: 10.1038/nmat708

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    McIver J W, Hsieh D, Steinberg H, Jarillo-Herrero P, Gedik N. Control over topological insulator photocurrents with light polarization. Nat Nanotechnol 7, 96-100 (2012).

    DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.214

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Braun L, Mussler G, Hruban A, Konczykowski M, Schumann T et al. Ultrafast photocurrents at the surface of the three-dimensional topological insulator Bi2Se3. Nat Commun 7, 13259 (2016).

    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13259

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    View full references list
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(20)

    1. Ren, Z., Hu, Y., He, W. et al. Terahertz Metamaterials Inspired by Quantum Phenomena. Research, 2025. DOI:10.34133/research.0597
    2. Bano, S., Peng, Y., Aizawa, T. et al. Realizing enhanced thermoelectric performance in an n-type Mg3(Bi, Sb)2-based film. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2023, 11(43): 15130-15137. DOI:10.1039/d3tc02611f
    3. Tomarchio, L., Mou, S., Mosesso, L. et al. THz Generation from the Topological Nodal Line Semimetal Co2MnGa. ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 2023, 5(3): 1437-1443. DOI:10.1021/acsaelm.2c01376
    4. Yang, S., Cheng, L., Qi, J. Terahertz Emission in Quantum Materials. Ultrafast Science, 2023. DOI:10.34133/ultrafastscience.0047
    5. Chernomyrdin, N.V., Musina, G.R., Nikitin, P.V. et al. Terahertz technology in intraoperative neurodiagnostics: A review. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2023, 6(5): 220071. DOI:10.29026/oea.2023.220071
    6. Song, F., Zu, X., Zhang, Z. et al. Ultrafast Drift Current Terahertz Emission Amplification in the Monolayer WSe2/Si Heterostructure. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2022, 13(49): 11398-11404. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03347
    7. Feng, Z., Tan, W. Magnetic and spintronic materials and their applications. Emergent Micro and Nanomaterials for Optical, Infrared, and Terahertz Applications, 2022. DOI:10.1201/9781003202608-10
    8. Feng, Y., Ren, J.-T., Ke, S.-S. et al. Distinguishing Majorana and Andreev bound states in a topological superconducting nanowire with a potential barrier. Physica E: Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.physe.2022.115247
    9. Tong, M., Hu, Y., He, W. et al. Light-Driven Spintronic Heterostructures for Coded Terahertz Emission. ACS Nano, 2022, 16(5): 8294-8300. DOI:10.1021/acsnano.2c02160
    10. Li, Z., Yan, Q., Zhang, G. et al. High-Frequency Terahertz Wave Generation with Cascaded Difference Frequency Generation at Polariton Resonance | [在极化声子共振区基于级联差频产生高频太赫兹波]. Zhongguo Jiguang/Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49(7): 0714002. DOI:10.3788/CJL202249.0714002
    11. Zhou, H., Liu, S., Yang, M. et al. Flexible Sb0.405Te0.595 photodetectors with broadband spectral response up to 4.5 µm. Acta Materialia, 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117631
    12. Xi, F., Yang, H., Khayrudinov, V. et al. Enhanced terahertz emission from mushroom-shaped InAs nanowire network induced by linear and nonlinear optical effects. Nanotechnology, 2022, 33(8): 085207. DOI:10.1088/1361-6528/ac3948
    13. Sadowski, G., Zhu, Y., Shu, R. et al. Epitaxial growth and thermoelectric properties of Mg3Bi2thin films deposited by magnetron sputtering. Applied Physics Letters, 2022, 120(5): 051901. DOI:10.1063/5.0074419
    14. Sun, W., Wang, X., Zhang, Y. Terahertz generation from laser-induced plasma. Opto-Electronic Science, 2022, 1(8) DOI:10.29026/oes.2022.220003
    15. Cao, T., Lian, M., Chen, X. et al. Multi-cycle reconfigurable THz extraordinary optical transmission using chalcogenide metamaterials. Opto-Electronic Science, 2022, 1(1) DOI:10.29026/oes.2022.210010
    16. He, X., Liu, D., Wang, H. et al. Field distribution of the Z2 topological edge state revealed by cathodoluminescence nanoscopy. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2022, 5(4): 210015. DOI:10.29026/oea.2022.210015
    17. He, W., Cheng, X., Tong, M. et al. Molecularization of meta-atoms for electromagnetically induced transparency resonance and quality-factor switching. Optics Express, 2021, 29(26): 42607-42620. DOI:10.1364/OE.437597
    18. Tong, M., Hu, Y., He, W. et al. Ultraefficient Terahertz Emission Mediated by Shift-Current Photovoltaic Effect in Layered Gallium Telluride. ACS Nano, 2021, 15(11): 17565-17572. DOI:10.1021/acsnano.1c04601
    19. Tan, Z., Fan, F., Zhao, D. et al. Linear-polarized terahertz isolator by breaking the gyro-mirror symmetry in cascaded magneto-optical metagrating. Nanophotonics, 2021, 10(16): 4141-4148. DOI:10.1515/nanoph-2021-0416
    20. Tong, M., Hu, Y., Wang, Z. et al. Enhanced Terahertz Radiation by Efficient Spin-to-Charge Conversion in Rashba-Mediated Dirac Surface States. Nano Letters, 2021, 21(1): 60-67. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03079

    Other cited types(1)

  • Author Information

  • Supplementary Information

  • Copyright

    Open Access. © The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
  • About this Article

    DOI: 10.29026/oea.2020.200023
    Cite this Article
    Mingyu Tong, Yuze Hu, Xiangnan Xie, et al. Helicity-dependent THz emission induced by ultrafast spin photocurrent in nodal-line semimetal candidate Mg3Bi2. Opto-Electronic Advances 3, 200023 (2020). DOI: 10.29026/oea.2020.200023
    Download Citation
    Article History
    • Received Date June 23, 2020
    • Accepted Date September 14, 2020
    • Available Online December 23, 2020
    • Published Date December 23, 2020
    Article Metrics
    Article Views(7923) PDF Downloads(2114)
    Share:
  • Related Articles

Lodahl P, Mahmoodian S, Stobbe S, Rauschenbeutel A, Schneeweiss P et al. Chiral quantum optics. Nature 541, 473-480 (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/nature21037

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kampfrath T, Sell A, Klatt G, Pashkin A, Mährlein S et al. Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves. Nat Photonics 5, 31-34 (2011).

DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.259

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wolf S A, Awschalom D D, Buhrman R A, Daughton J M, von Molnár S et al. Spintronics: a spin-based electronics vision for the future. Science 294, 1488-1495 (2001).

DOI: 10.1126/science.1065389

CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferguson B, Zhang X C. Materials for terahertz science and technology. Nat Mater 1, 26-33 (2002).

DOI: 10.1038/nmat708

CrossRef Google Scholar

McIver J W, Hsieh D, Steinberg H, Jarillo-Herrero P, Gedik N. Control over topological insulator photocurrents with light polarization. Nat Nanotechnol 7, 96-100 (2012).

DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.214

CrossRef Google Scholar

Braun L, Mussler G, Hruban A, Konczykowski M, Schumann T et al. Ultrafast photocurrents at the surface of the three-dimensional topological insulator Bi2Se3. Nat Commun 7, 13259 (2016).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13259

CrossRef Google Scholar

Gao Y, Kaushik S, Philip E J, Li Z, Qin Y et al. Chiral terahertz wave emission from the Weyl semimetal TaAs. Nat Commun 11, 720 (2020).

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14463-1

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhang Z L, Chen Y P, Cui S, He F, Chen M et al. Manipulation of polarizations for broadband terahertz waves emitted from laser plasma filaments. Nat Photonics 12, 554-559 (2018).

DOI: 10.1038/s41566-018-0238-9

CrossRef Google Scholar

Burkov A A, Hook M D, Balents L. Topological nodal semimetals. Phys Rev B 84, 235126 (2011).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.235126

CrossRef Google Scholar

Fang C, Chen Y G, Kee H Y, Fu L. Topological nodal line semimetals with and without spin-orbital coupling. Phys Rev B 92, 081201 (2015).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.081201

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bian G, Chang T R, Sankar R, Xu S Y, Zheng H et al. Topological nodal-line fermions in spin-orbit metal PbTaSe2. Nat Commun 7, 10556 (2016).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10556

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bian G, Chang T R, Zheng H, Velury S, Xu S Y et al. Drumhead surface states and topological nodal-line fermions in TlTaSe2. Phys Rev B 93, 121113 (2016).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.121113

CrossRef Google Scholar

Yang S Y, Yang H, Derunova E, Parkin S S P, Yan B H et al. Symmetry demanded topological nodal-line materials. Adv Phys: X 3, 1414631 (2018).

DOI: 10.1080/23746149.2017.1414631

Google Scholar

Yu R, Weng H M, Fang Z, Dai X, Hu X. Topological node-line semimetal and dirac semimetal state in antiperovskite Cu3PdN. Phys Rev Lett 115, 036807 (2015).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.036807

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wu Y, Wang L L, Mun E, Johnson D D, Mou D X et al. Dirac node arcs in PtSn4. Nat Phys 12, 667-671 (2016).

DOI: 10.1038/nphys3712

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chang T R, Pletikosic I, Kong T, Bian G, Huang A et al. Realization of a type-Ⅱ nodal-line semimetal in Mg3Bi2. Adv Sci 6, 1800897 (2019).

DOI: 10.1002/advs.201800897

CrossRef Google Scholar

Mao J, Zhu H T, Ding Z W, Liu Z H, Gamage G A et al. High thermoelectric cooling performance of n-type Mg3Bi2-based materials. Science 365, 495-498 (2019).

DOI: 10.1126/science.aax7792

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhou T, Zhu X G, Tong M Y, Zhang Y, Luo X B et al. Experimental evidence of topological surface states in Mg3Bi2 films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Chin Phys Lett 36, 117303 (2019).

DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/36/11/117303

CrossRef Google Scholar

Tu C M, Chen Y C, Huang P, Chuang P Y, Lin M Y et al. Helicity-dependent terahertz emission spectroscopy of topological insulator Sb2Te3 thin films. Phys Rev B 96, 195407 (2017).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.195407

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhang X M, Jin L, Dai X F, Liu G D. Topological Type-Ⅱ nodal line semimetal and dirac semimetal state in stable kagome compound Mg3Bi2. J Phys Chem Lett 8, 4814-4819 (2017).

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02129

CrossRef Google Scholar

Sánchez-Barriga J, Golias E, Varykhalov A, Braun J, Yashina L V et al. Ultrafast spin-polarization control of Dirac fermions in topological insulators. Phys Rev B 93, 155426 (2016).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.155426

CrossRef Google Scholar

Maysonnave J, Huppert S, Wang F, Maero S, Berger C et al. Terahertz generation by dynamical photon drag effect in graphene excited by femtosecond optical pulses. Nano Lett 14, 5797-5802 (2014).

DOI: 10.1021/nl502684j

CrossRef Google Scholar

Plank H, Golub L E, Bauer S, Bel'kov V V, Herrmann T et al. Photon drag effect in (Bi1-xSbx)2Te3 three-dimensional topological insulators. Phys Rev B 93, 125434 (2016).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.125434

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhu L G, Kubera B, Fai Mak K, Shan J. Effect of surface states on terahertz emission from the Bi2Se3 surface. Sci Rep 5, 10308 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/srep10308

CrossRef Google Scholar

Zhang K X, Zhang Y Z, Wang X C, Yan T M, Jiang Y H. Continuum electron giving birth to terahertz emission. Photonics Res 8, 760-767 (2020).

DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.377408

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bas D A, Muniz R A, Babakiray S, Lederman D, Sipe J E et al. Photocurrents in Bi2Se3: bulk versus surface, and injection versus shift currents. Opt Express 24, 23583 (2016).

DOI: 10.1364/OE.24.023583

CrossRef Google Scholar

Park B C, Kim T H, Sim K I, Kang B Y, Kim J W et al. Terahertz single conductance quantum and topological phase transitions in topological insulator Bi2Se3 ultrathin films. Nat Commun 6, 6552 (2015).

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7552

CrossRef Google Scholar

He L, Xiu F X, Yu X X, Teague M, Jiang W J et al. Surface-dominated conduction in a 6 nm thick Bi2Se3 thin film. Nano Lett 12, 1486-1490 (2012).

DOI: 10.1021/nl204234j

CrossRef Google Scholar

Pan Y, Wang Q Z, Yeats A L, Pillsbury T, Flanagan T C et al. Helicity dependent photocurrent in electrically gated (Bi1-xSbx)2Te3 thin films. Nat Commun 8, 1037 (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00711-4

CrossRef Google Scholar

Hamh S Y, Park S H, Jerng S K, Jeon J H, Chun S H et al. Helicity-dependent photocurrent in a Bi2Se3 thin film probed by terahertz emission spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 94, 161405 (2016).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.161405

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kampfrath T, Battiato M, Maldonado P, Eilers G, Nötzold J et al. Terahertz spin current pulses controlled by magnetic heterostructures. Nat Nanotechnol 8, 256-260 (2013).

DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.43

CrossRef Google Scholar

Kinoshita Y, Kida N, Miyamoto T, Kanou M, Sasagawa T et al. Terahertz radiation by subpicosecond spin-polarized photocurrent originating from Dirac electrons in a Rashba-type polar semiconductor. Phys Rev B 97, 161104 (2018).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.161104

CrossRef Google Scholar

Wu Y, Elyasi M, Qiu X P, Chen M J, Liu Y et al. High-performance THz emitters based on ferromagnetic/nonmagnetic heterostructures. Adv Mater 29, 1603031 (2017).

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201603031

CrossRef Google Scholar

Bahk Y M, Ramakrishnan G, Choi J, Song H, Choi G et al. Plasmon enhanced terahertz emission from single layer graphene. ACS Nano 8, 9089-9096 (2014).

DOI: 10.1109/IRMMW-THz.2012.6380480

CrossRef Google Scholar

Sirica N, Tobey R I, Zhao L X, Chen G F, Xu B et al. Tracking ultrafast photocurrents in the Weyl semimetal TaAs using THz emission spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 122, 197401 (2019).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.197401

CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen M J, Wu Y, Liu Y, Lee K, Qiu X P et al. Current-enhanced broadband THz emission from spintronic devices. Adv Opt Mater 7, 1801608 (2019).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.201801608

CrossRef Google Scholar

Moore J E, Orenstein J. Confinement-induced berry phase and helicity-dependent photocurrents. Phys Rev Lett 105, 026805 (2010).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.026805

CrossRef Google Scholar

Dong J P, Gradwohl K P, Xu Y D, Wang T, Zhang B B et al. Terahertz emission from layered GaTe crystal due to surface lattice reorganization and in-plane noncubic mobility anisotropy. Photonics Res 7, 518-525 (2019).

DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.7.000518

CrossRef Google Scholar

Miltos Maragkakis G, Psilodimitrakopoulos S, Mouchliadis L, Paradisanos I, Lemonis A et al. Imaging the crystal orientation of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides using polarization-resolved second-harmonic generation. Opto-Electron Adv 2, 190026 (2019).

DOI: 10.29026/oea.2019.190026

CrossRef Google Scholar

Hu Y Z, Jiang T, Zhou J H, Hao H, Sun H et al. Ultrafast terahertz frequency and phase tuning by all-optical molecularization of metasurfaces. Adv Optical Mater 7, 1901050 (2019).

DOI: 10.1002/adom.201901050

CrossRef Google Scholar

Related Articles
Show full outline

Catalog

    Corresponding author: Tian Jiang, tjiang@nudt.edu.cn

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed
    Helicity-dependent THz emission induced by ultrafast spin photocurrent in nodal-line semimetal candidate Mg3Bi2
    • Figure  1

      Characterization of the Mg3Bi2 film.

    • Figure  2

      Schematic view of helicity-dependent terahertz radiation process.

    • Figure  3

      (a) Schematic of the THz emission configuration. Polar plots of terahertz waveforms (0~4.65 ps) as a function of α at (b) θ =-45º and (c) +45º, respectively, for φ = 0º. The colors represent the amplitude of the terahertz emissions. Terahertz waveforms for excitation with left-hand circularly polarized, linearly polarized, and right-hand circularly polarized optical pulses at (d) θ =-45º and (e) +45º, respectively.

    • Figure  4

      (a) and (b) represent the α-dependent terahertz amplitude at t = 2.46 ps. The red solid lines are the best fit with Eq. (2). The symbol ↔, the counterclockwise arrow ↺, and the clockwise arrow ↻ denote linearly polarized (black: α = 0°), left-hand circularly polarized (pink: α = 45°), and right-hand circularly polarized (green: α = 135°) incident photons, respectively. (c) and (d) display the α-dependent coefficients C (red line), L1 (blue line), L2 (orange line), and D (blue line) extracted [using Eq. (2)] individually from (a) and (b).

    • Figure  5

      (a) THz waveforms at different photoexcitation power with the wavelength center in 800 nm. (b) Fast Fourier transformations (FFT) spectra for the directly measured terahertz waveforms that are shown in (a). (c) THz amplitude versus the power of the incident laser beam. (d) The azimuthal dependent (φ-dependent) absolute amplitude of THz emission waveforms with linear polarized optical pulses.

    • Figure  6

      (a) THz amplitude as a function of the linear polarization angle α. The red solid line shows the fitting results using a sinusoidal function. (b) Terahertz waveforms for excitation with a linearly polarized angel at α = 0º, 45 º and 90º, respectively.

    • Figure  1
    • Figure  2
    • Figure  3
    • Figure  4
    • Figure  5
    • Figure  6