Processing math: 100%

Huang YJ, Xiao TX, Chen S, Xie ZW, Zheng J et al. All-optical controlled-NOT logic gate achieving directional asymmetric transmission based on metasurface doublet. Opto-Electron Adv 6, 220073 (2023). doi: 10.29026/oea.2023.220073
Citation: Huang YJ, Xiao TX, Chen S, Xie ZW, Zheng J et al. All-optical controlled-NOT logic gate achieving directional asymmetric transmission based on metasurface doublet. Opto-Electron Adv 6, 220073 (2023). doi: 10.29026/oea.2023.220073

Article Open Access

All-optical controlled-NOT logic gate achieving directional asymmetric transmission based on metasurface doublet

More Information
  • Optical logic gates play important roles in all-optical logic circuits, which lie at the heart of the next-generation optical computing technology. However, the intrinsic contradiction between compactness and robustness hinders the development in this field. Here, we propose a simple design principle that can possess multiple-input-output states according to the incident circular polarization and direction based on the metasurface doublet, which enables controlled-NOT logic gates in infrared region. Therefore, the directional asymmetric electromagnetic transmission can be achieved. As a proof of concept, a spin-dependent Janus metasurface is designed and experimentally verified that four distinct images corresponding to four input states can be captured in the far-field. In addition, since the design method is derived from geometric optics, it can be easily applied to other spectra. We believe that the proposed metasurface doublet may empower many potential applications in chiral imaging, chiroptical spectroscopy and optical computing.
  • Since the information processing efficiency for traditional electron-based computing technology with excessive Ohmic loss is intrinsically limited by the RC delay as well as the data transfer speed among different modules, optical computing is a promising alternative1, 2. Due to its unique properties of ultrahigh processing speed, ultralow power consumption and parallel operation capability for ref.3, 4, optical computing has been treated as a potential platform to meet the demands for large calculation amount and low-cost energy consumption. Akin to its electron-based counterpart, logic operations are also required in optical circuits to lay the foundation for the implementation of computing. Therefore, constructing and exploring all-optical logic gates (LGs) with robust performance, complete logic function and ease of implementation is now a hotspot in the fields of optics, plasmonics and photonics5.

    To date, although many related works have been reported to achieve all-optical logic operations based on linear or nonlinear optical effects, their performances are still limited by their intrinsic drawbacks. For nonlinear cases6-8, since the optical LGs are mostly based on the third-order nonlinear susceptibility that heavily depends on the precise manipulation of control light and pump light, the robustness for these devices can hardly meet the requirements for practical applications. For linear cases, the methodologies mainly include interference effects and on-chip plasmonic effects9-12. The limitation for the former one is the rigid interference conditions and complicated optical paths, which lead to performance instability as well as device cumbersome11, 12, while the latter one is restricted by stringent demand for the size of input beams to avoid cross talk and false output9, 10.

    Metasurface, as a kind of artificial surface composed of subwavelength unit cells, has attracted much attention in recent years due to its unique properties such as small footprints, flexible functions and planar geometries13-17. By ingeniously aligning the meta atoms and choosing proper materials, many novel phenomena and applications have been witnessed including electromagnetic absorption18-23, flat lensing24-28, surface cloaking29, 30, polarization control31-36 and meta-hologram37-40. Recently, metasurface-based all-optical LGs were also proposed that have already manifested many exotic advantages over the traditional counterparts due to their more compact structures and higher operation efficiency5, 41-43. However, most of the presented works only realized basic LGs with “AND”, “OR” or “NOT” operations, while additional logic operations will be needed for practical application.

    Here, in order to further enhance the operation robustness and miniature of the optical device, we propose a metasurface-based all-optical LG with simple yet generalized methodology. Distinct from previously reported works that need specific manipulations for the incident light, this designed all-optical LG exhibits a highly efficient response simply under plane wave incidence according to its incident direction and spin state. Besides, it possesses multiple-input-output states that behave as a controlled-NOT (CNOT) LG. Similar to its quantum counterpart44, 45, control signal (CS) ε1 and target signal (TS) ε2 are two basic elements in the all-optical CNOT LG. Mathematically, such operation can be described as:

    |ϵ1|ϵ2|ϵ1|ϵ1ϵ2, (1)

    where ε1,2=0 or 1 describes their incident states and ⊕ denotes the logic modulation. As shown in Eq. (1), the input CS determines the change of TS and the value of CS is invariant during the operation. Therefore, the CNOT LG can be expressed by the unitary operation:

    |00|01|10|11|00|01|10|11(1000010000010010). (2)

    Equation (2) shows that if the input CS equals “0”, the output TS maintains its value. Otherwise, the output TS will be altered accordingly (“0” to “1” or “1” to “0”). To further present the working mechanism of the proposed metasurface-based CNOT LG, Fig. 1 shows the far-field responses after incident light passing through the metasurface doublet under different conditions. It can be inferred that four diverse responses can be obtained, which perfectly match with the demand for aforementioned CNOT LG. In this case, CS is the spin state of incident light, while its incident direction is TS.

    Figure 1.  Schematic for the proposed all-optical CNOT LG. (ad) Far-field responses under different incident conditions that correspond to (a) no focus, (b) two foci, (c) one focus with small focal distance and (d) one focus with large focal distance. The corresponding truth-table is shown in the inset with spin state as CS and incident direction as TS, which is perfectly matched with that in Eq. (2).

    To illustrate the mechanism for the aforementioned all-optical CNOT LG, we begin with the analysis of a typical anisotropic unit cell as shown in Fig. 2(a). According to the theory of geometric phase (also known as Pancharatnam-Berry phase)46, when plane wave E impinges on such transparent optical scatterer, the transmission electromagnetic field E' can be linked with E by a Jones matrix as

    E=(cosδ2isinδ2e2iφisinδ2e2iφcosδ2)E, (3)

    where δ is the phase difference between orthogonal linear polarizations, φ is the orientation angle between the unit cell main axis and x axis. Therefore, Eq. (3) can be further simplified as

    E=cos(δ2)Eisin(δ2)×[E|ERRexp(i2φ)|L+E|ELLexp(i2φ)|R], (4)

    where |L and |R denote left- (LCP) and right-handed circularly polarized (RCP) waves, respectively. The first term in the right side of Eq. (4) indicates that a part of the output beam keeps the same polarization as the incidence without phase shift, while the second term shows that another part of the output beam will reverse its spin and acquire an extra phase shift depending on φ, which is defined as geometric phase. Thus, in order to increase the operation efficiency, the ideal unit cell for most of the geometric phase based metasurfaces is a high-performance half wave plate (HHWP) with δ=π and the co-polarized transmitted waves are generally treated as noises. Since incident light with opposite spins will experience reversed phase shifts, these metasurfaces exhibit conjugated directional performance as shown in Fig. S1. It should be mentioned that although recent design methods can decouple the spin-dependent phase response by combining geometric phase with propagation phase47, 48, the conjugated responses are still existing so that the phase shift under LCP front incidence (RCP front incidence) is always equal to that under RCP back incidence (LCP back incidence).

    To break the spin-dependent directional transmission conjugation, we propose a metasurface doublet with a metasurface (M1) composed of HHWP unit cells at the front side and another metasurface (M2) composed of low-performance half wave plate (LHWP) unit cells with δ=π/2 at the back side. In the simulation, the device is all-silicon with permittivity obtained from measurement49 and the details are given in the Experimental section. It can be inferred from Fig. 2(b) and 2(f) that the polarization conversion ratio (defined as the transmittance of cross-polarized light to transmitted light) at 28.3 THz is larger than 98% for HHWP unit cell and about 50% for LHWP unit cell. Besides, the simulated phase delays in Fig. 2(b) and 2(f) are well accorded with the geometric phase that the implemented phase θ of the unit cells is solely dependent on their orientation angle φ with θ=±2φ,where ± is determined by the incident spin. Therefore, the transmitted light can be fully manipulated by the HHWP unit cells, while only half of the transmitted light is manipulated by the LHWP unit cells. Figure S2 performs a full-wave simulation for beam deflection to further illustrate this issue. Furthermore, the results in Fig. 2(c) and 2(h) indicate that the transmittance of proposed unit cells is nearly unchanged with different orientation angles. The physical mechanism for the HHWP and LHWP can be attributed to different magnetic couplings in the two cases as shown in Fig. 2(d) and 2(g). Apparently, the magnetic field enhancement in the former case is much larger than that in the latter one, which explains the difference for polarization conversion.

    Figure 2.  Unit cells for the CNOT LG metasurface doublet. (a, e) Schematic for HHWP and LHWP unit cells, respectively. P=4.5 μm, h=6 μm, l1=3.7 μm, w1=1.2 μm, l2=2.9 μm and w2=2.05 μm. (b, f) Corresponding polarization conversion ratio (left panel) and phase delay (right panel) with different φ for cross-polarized waves at 28.3 THz under LCP incidence. (c, g) Corresponding transmittance at φ=0 (solid lines) and φ=π/4 (dashed lines) from 27–29 THz. (d, h) Corresponding magnetic field distributions at –28.3 THz.

    In order to achieve highly efficient all-optical CNOT LG, M1 is designed as a convex lens for LCP front (RCP back) incidence with focal distance f1, and M2 is also designed as a convex lens for LCP front (RCP back) incidence with focal distance f2. Therefore, due to the transmission conjugation of the geometric phase, both metalenses are concave lenses for RCP front incidence and LCP back incidence with focal distances –f1 and –f2, respectively. In this case, the transmitted field under certain incident direction and spin state can be calculated simply by geometric optics50. Figure S3 gives detailed deductions for the calculation when the substrate thickness d is assumed to be much smaller than f1 and f2. It should be mentioned that in all four cases the output can be divided to two parallel parts: One is solely given by M1 with a focal distance ±f1, the other is the doublet effect by M1 and M2 that the focal distance f3 can be calculated as f3=±|(f1f2)/(f1f2)|, where ± is determined by the incident spin and direction. Apparently, a positive focal distance indicates that the focal spot can be observed in the transmitted side, otherwise the focal spot cannot be observed.

    To further illustrate this issue, Fig. 3 depicts corresponding numerical results based on vectorial diffraction theory51. In this case, the phase delay and the transmitted amplitude of the metasurface doublet are retrieved from the simulated results for the unit cells. The diameter of the metasurface doublet is d1=6 mm, the focal distances f1 and f2 are set as 3d1 and 9d2. It can be inferred that focal spots can be observed at two locations at z=18 mm (f1, white dashed lines) and 27 mm (f3, blue dashed lines), which matches well with the results calculated by geometric optics. The calculated intensity contrast ratio (ICR) is defined as ICR=I1/I0, where I1 and I0 indicate the intensity at a certain position, and the subscripts (1 or 0) are according with those in the insets of Fig. 3. The calculated ICRs are larger than 30.2 dB at z= f1 and 26.8 dB at z= f3 which demonstrates the robustness of the proposed method. In fact, the ICR can be further increased simply by enlarging the size of device or shortening the focal distance. Full-wave simulations are performed using the time domain solver of the commercial software CST Microwave Studio and the corresponding results are shown in Fig. S3. It can be inferred that the simulated results match well with their calculated counterparts that four different outputs can be clearly observed.

    Figure 3.  Numerical far-field results in x-z plane under different incident conditions. (a) Front RCP incidence. (b) Front LCP incidence. (c) Back RCP incidence. (d) Back LCP incidence. The insets show the 2D normalized intensity distributions at z=18 mm (white dashed lines) and 27 mm (blue dashed lines). When a focal spot can be observed at certain focal plane, the corresponding truth table is “1”, otherwise the truth table is “0”.

    As a proof of concept, corresponding experiments are carried out as shown in Fig. 4. Figure 4(a) depicts SEM images of the fabricated M1 and M2 with negligible surface roughness and vertical sidewalls with a sidewall angle >80° (details of the fabrication process is given in the Experimental section). The schematic illustration of the measurement setup is shown in Fig. 4(b) and the optical path in experiment is shown in Fig. S4. A CO2 laser with working frequency of 28.3 THz is used as the light source. After passing through an attenuator to adjust the intensity, the incident wave will propagate through a linear polarizer (LP) followed by a quarter-wave plate (λ/4). Then the generated circularly polarized beam will pass through a beam expander (BE) and illuminate on the sample (SA). An infrared charge-coupled device (CCD) (640 × 512 pixels, pixel size 12 μm × 12 μm) is used to measure the far-field images. By changing the angle between the main axes of LP and λ/4, the spin state of the generated circularly polarized wave can be altered. The measured results are given in Fig. 4(c–f) that correspond to their theoretical counterparts in the insets of Fig. 3(a–d), respectively. The cross section views on the focal plane for the four cases are shown in Fig. S5 with measured ICRs of 8.6 dB at z= f1 and 8 dB at z= f3. The measured results are smaller than the calculated results, which may be due to two reasons. Firstly, the background noise for the infrared CCD cannot be eliminated that will decrease the obtained ICR. Secondly, the imperfect fabrication of the metasurface will also unavoidably influence the performance of the device. Besides, due to the wavelength-independent nature of the geometric phase of the unit cells as shown in Fig. 2(c) and 2(g), the proposed all-optical CNOT LG can work efficiently within a certain bandwidth. For instance, Fig. S6 depicts corresponding results at 27 and 29 THz, demonstrating that a similar performance can be realized as that in Fig. 3 except for the slight shift of the focal distance. To demonstrate the advantages of the proposed all-optical CNOT LG, a comparison between the proposed device and other previously reported works is shown in Table S1 in the Supplementary information.

    Figure 4.  Experiment for the asymmetric transmission metasurface doublet. (a) SEM images for the front (left) and back (right) side of the metasurface. (b) Schematic illustration of the measurement setup. LP: linear polarizer. λ/4: quarter wave plate. BE: beam expander. SA: sample. (cf) Intensity distributions at z=18 mm and 27 mm. (c) Front RCP incidence. (d) Front LCP incidence. (e) Back RCP incidence. (f) Back LCP incidence.

    In fact, except for the above mentioned case, the focal spot can also be shaped by adding extra phase shifts. For example, Fig. S7 shows the results when a vortex phase is added to M2. In this case, a donut-shaped focal spot can be observed at z= f3. Moreover, a promising application for the all-optical CNOT LG is to achieve asymmetric electromagnetic transmission for information encryption. Although previously reported Janus metasurfaces were able to realize directional asymmetric transmission, the method is designed for single polarization that half of the incident power is intrinsically blocked due to super-cell strategy52, 53. Since the proposed metasurface doublet can achieve multiple-input-output performance, it can be used to design Janus metasurfaces for both orthogonal polarizations as shown in Fig. 5. Figure 5(a) shows the schematic flow chart of the design process which is similar to that in ref.54. Firstly, the phase distributions φ1 and φ2 for the two original images “32” and “35” are obtained by point source algorithm, respectively. Then, the orientations of HHWP unit cells on the front side of the Janus metasurface are determined by geometric phase according to φ1. Since the image plane of the designed Janus metasurface with the size of 1 mm2 is designed at 30 mm away from the front side, considering the thickness of the substrate of 0.5 mm, φ2 is designed so that the distance from the image plane to the back of the metasurface is 29.5 mm. Secondly, the phase distribution φ3 for “32” on the back side of the Janus metasurface is obtained from φ1 by considering the propagation phase in the substrate with fast Fourier transformation (FFT) and inverse fast Fourier transformation (IFFT). Lastly, the orientation of the LHWP unit cells on the back side of the Janus metasurface is obtained by combining φ2 and φ3. The calculated and measured far-field images at the image plane at different conditions are given in Fig. 5(b–e). The measured optical path is the same as that in Fig. 4(b). Due to limited size of the CCD, only part of the images can be captured in the experiment. It can be inferred from Fig. 5(d) and 5(e) that the target images “32” and “35” can be obtained under RCP and LCP back incidence, respectively. When the incident direction is opposite, the far-field images under LCP and RCP incidence are changed to “38” and none as shown in Fig. 4(b) and 4(c), respectively. It should be mentioned that the distance from the designed image plane to the metasurface for the four cases in Fig. 5 is the same and the target images can still be well observed with low cross talk. Therefore, different information can be encoded to the Janus metasurface depending on the incident spin and propagation direction. Although the result presented in Fig. 5(b) exhibits no specific image, it is theoretically possible to encode arbitrary information in this channel, which has been demonstrated by other works55, 56.

    Figure 5.  Demonstration of the directional Janus metasurface for orthogonal polarizations. (a) Schematic flow chart of the design process. FFT: fast Fourier transformation. IFFT: inverse fast Fourier transformation. (be) Calculated and measured far-field images at the same image plane under different incident conditions. (b) Front RCP incidence. (c) Front LCP incidence. (d) Back RCP incidence. (e) Back LCP incidence.

    In fact, from the perspective of geometric optics, the proposed device in Fig. 3 can also be treated as a spin-selective directional metalens. Different from previously reported works with symmetrical and fixed imaging performance24, 25, the proposed metasurface doublet has the capability to adjust the focal distance (as shown in Fig. 3(c) and 3(d)) or achieve dual imaging at two image planes (as shown in Fig. 3(b)), which may find many exciting applications for chiral sensing and imaging57-59. Besides, since the polarization conversion ratios for the fabricated HHWP and LHWP unit cells may differ from the simulated results due to the imperfection of fabrication, we also discuss the influence of such deviation on the performance of the proposed devices in the Supplementary information.

    In summary, we propose a simple yet powerful design methodology to achieve an all-optical CNOT LG with metasurface doublet. By ingeniously aligning two metasurfaces with different polarization conversion ratios and phase distributions, multiple input-output performance can be realized depending on the incident spin state and direction. Both theoretical and measured results demonstrate the robustness and broadband nature of the designed device. Furthermore, a CNOT LG-based Janus metasurface is also characterized and shows that the asymmetric electromagnetic transmission can be achieved for orthogonal circularly polarized incidence. Since the design method is derived from geometric optics, it can be easily extended to other part of the spectrum, which will enable more fascinating applications in optical computing, chiral optics and electromagnetic communications.

    Numerical simulation: Considering the symmetry of the structure, to reduce the amount of calculation, the simulated results in Fig. 2 were obtained using the finite element method in CST Microwave Studio with unit cell boundaries in xy directions and open boundary in z direction. A fine tetrahedral mesh was applied with adaptive mesh refinement to ensure the accuracy of the results. The magnetic field distributions were calculated by using the build-in magnetic field monitors in CST Microwave Studio.

    Device fabrication: The schematic diagram of the fabrication process is shown in Fig. S8. The proposed devices were mainly fabricated by ultraviolet lithography and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching processes. Firstly, a 1 μm thick SiO2 layer was coated on the back side of the cleaned double-polished silicon substrate as the protect layer by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). Then, a 1 μm thick positive photoresist (AZ5214) was spin-coated onto the front side of the substrate and prebaked at 110 °C for 1 min, followed by the ultraviolet lithography and corresponding developing processes. Next, ICP etching was used to fabricate the HHWP unit cells on the front side, and the photoresist was removed after etching. Then, a 6 μm thick SiO2 layer was coated on the front side of the substrate to protect the fabricated unit cells. After etching the protect SiO2 layer on the back side, the same processes were carried out to fabricate the LHWP unit cells on the back side. Lastly, the protect SiO2 layer on the front side was etched. The tested alignment accuracy between the doublet was within 1.5 μm.

  • This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12104326, 12104329 and 62105228), Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2022NSFSC2000) and the Opening Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Optical Technologies on Nano-Fabrication and Micro-Engineering. P. Müller-Buschbaum acknowledges funding by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany´s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2089/1 – 390776260 (e-conversion) and TUM.solar in the context of the Bavarian Collaborative Research Project Solar Technologies Go Hybrid (SolTech). T. Xiao is grateful for the support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC).

  • Y. Huang and T. Xiao proposed the original idea. L. Li and P. Müller-Buschbaum supervised the project. Z. Xie, J. Zheng and J. Zhu participated the discussion of the research. S. Chen, Y. Su and W. Chen carried out the experiments and collected the data. Y. Huang, K. Liu and M. Tang analyzed all data. Y. Huang and L. Li wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • These authors contributed equally to this work

  • [1] Caulfield HJ, Dolev S. Why future supercomputing requires optics. Nat Photonics 4, 261–263 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.94

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Kirchain R, Kimerling L. A roadmap for nanophotonics. Nat Photonics 1, 303–305 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.84

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Silva A, Monticone F, Castaldi G, Galdi V, Alù A et al. Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials. Science 343, 160–163 (2014). doi: 10.1126/science.1242818

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Zhu TF, Zhou YH, Lou YJ, Ye H, Qiu M et al. Plasmonic computing of spatial differentiation. Nat Commun 8, 15391 (2017). doi: 10.1038/ncomms15391

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Qian C, Lin X, Lin XB, Xu J, Sun Y et al. Performing optical logic operations by a diffractive neural network. Light Sci Appl 9, 59 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41377-020-0303-2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] McCutcheon MW, Rieger GW, Young JF, Dalacu D, Poole PJ et al. All-optical conditional logic with a nonlinear photonic crystal nanocavity. Appl Phys Lett 95, 221102 (2009). doi: 10.1063/1.3265736

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Tucker RS. The role of optics in computing. Nat Photonics 4, 405 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.162

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Xu QF, Lipson M. All-optical logic based on silicon micro-ring resonators. Opt Express 15, 924–929 (2007). doi: 10.1364/OE.15.000924

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Sang YG, Wu XJ, Raja SS, Wang CY, Li HZ et al. Broadband multifunctional plasmonic logic gates. Adv Opt Mater 6, 1701368 (2018). doi: 10.1002/adom.201701368

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Fu YL, Hu XY, Lu CC, Yue S, Yang H et al. All-optical logic gates based on nanoscale plasmonic slot waveguides. Nano Lett 12, 5784–5790 (2012). doi: 10.1021/nl303095s

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Liu Q, Ouyang ZB, Wu CJ, Liu CP, Wang JC. All-optical half adder based on cross structures in two-dimensional photonic crystals. Opt Express 16, 18992–19000 (2008). doi: 10.1364/OE.16.018992

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Zavalin AI, Shamir J, Vikram CS, Caulfield HJ. Achieving stabilization in interferometric logic operations. Appl Opt 45, 360–365 (2006). doi: 10.1364/AO.45.000360

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Luo XG, Pu MB, Guo YH, Li X, Zhang F et al. Catenary functions meet electromagnetic waves: opportunities and promises. Adv Opt Mater 8, 2001194 (2020). doi: 10.1002/adom.202001194

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Krasikov S, Tranter A, Bogdanov A, Kivshar Y. Intelligent metaphotonics empowered by machine learning. Opto-Electron Adv 5, 210147 (2022). doi: 10.29026/oea.2022.210147

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Zeng C, Lu H, Mao D, Du YQ, Hua H et al. Graphene-empowered dynamic metasurfaces and metadevices. Opto-Electron Adv 5, 200098 (2022). doi: 10.29026/oea.2022.200098

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Luo XG. Metamaterials and metasurfaces. Adv Opt Mater 7, 1900885 (2019). doi: 10.1002/adom.201900885

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Luo XG. Metasurface waves in digital optics. J Phys Photonics 2, 041003 (2020). doi: 10.1088/2515-7647/ab9bf8

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Huang YJ, Luo J, Pu MB, Guo YH, Zhao ZY et al. Catenary electromagnetics for ultra-broadband lightweight absorbers and large-scale flat antennas. Adv Sci 6, 1801691 (2019). doi: 10.1002/advs.201801691

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Yu P, Besteiro LV, Huang YJ, Wu J, Fu L et al. Broadband metamaterial absorbers. Adv Opt Mater 7, 1800995 (2019). doi: 10.1002/adom.201800995

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Huang YJ, Xiao TX, Xie ZW, Zheng J, Su YR et al. Multistate nonvolatile metamirrors with tunable optical chirality. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13, 45890–45897 (2021). doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c14204

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Cao T, Lian M, Chen XY, Mao LB, Liu K et al. Multi-cycle reconfigurable THz extraordinary optical transmission using chalcogenide metamaterials. Opto-Electron Sci 1, 210010 (2022).

    Google Scholar

    [22] Song MW, Wang D, Peana S, Choudhury S, Nyga P et al. Colors with plasmonic nanostructures: a full-spectrum review. Appl Phys Rev 6, 041308 (2019). doi: 10.1063/1.5110051

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Song MW, Wang D, Kudyshev ZA, Xuan Y, Wang ZX et al. Enabling optical steganography, data storage, and encryption with plasmonic colors. Laser Photonics Rev 15, 2000343 (2021). doi: 10.1002/lpor.202000343

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Wang SM, Wu PC, Su VC, Lai YC, Chen MK et al. A broadband achromatic metalens in the visible. Nat Nanotechnol 13, 227–232 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0052-4

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Chen WT, Zhu AY, Sanjeev V, Khorasaninejad M, Shi ZJ et al. A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible. Nat Nanotechnol 13, 220–226 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0034-6

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Qin F, Liu BQ, Zhu LW, Lei J, Fang W et al. π-phase modulated monolayer supercritical lens. Nat Commun 12, 32 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20278-x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Wang YL, Fan QB, Xu T. Design of high efficiency achromatic metalens with large operation bandwidth using bilayer architecture. Opto-Electron Adv 4, 200008 (2021).

    Google Scholar

    [28] Fan QB, Xu WZ, Hu XM, Zhu WQ, Yue T et al. Trilobite-inspired neural nanophotonic light-field camera with extreme depth-of-field. Nat Commun 13, 2130 (2022). doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29568-y

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Yang YH, Jing LQ, Zheng B, Hao R, Yin WY et al. Full-polarization 3D metasurface cloak with preserved amplitude and phase. Adv Mater 28, 6866–6871 (2016). doi: 10.1002/adma.201600625

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Qian C, Zheng B, Shen YC, Jing L, Li EP et al. Deep-learning-enabled self-adaptive microwave cloak without human intervention. Nat Photonics 14, 383–390 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0604-2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Yue Z, Li JT, Li J, Zheng CL, Liu JY et al. Terahertz metasurface zone plates with arbitrary polarizations to a fixed polarization conversion. Opto-Electron Sci 1, 210014 (2022). doi: 10.29026/oes.2022.210014

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Chen Y, Yang XD, Gao J. 3D Janus plasmonic helical nanoapertures for polarization-encrypted data storage. Light Sci Appl 8, 45 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0156-8

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Huo PC, Zhang S, Fan QB, Lu YQ, Xu T. Photonic spin-controlled generation and transformation of 3D optical polarization topologies enabled by all-dielectric metasurfaces. Nanoscale 11, 10646–10654 (2019). doi: 10.1039/C8NR09697J

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Han BW, Li SJ, Li ZY, Huang GS, Tian JH et al. Asymmetric transmission for dual-circularly and linearly polarized waves based on a chiral metasurface. Opt Express 29, 19643–19654 (2021). doi: 10.1364/OE.425787

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Li ZY, Li SJ, Han BW, Huang GS, Guo ZX et al. Quad-band transmissive metasurface with linear to dual-circular polarization conversion simultaneously. Adv Theory Simul 4, 2100117 (2021). doi: 10.1002/adts.202100117

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Li SJ, Li ZY, Han BW, Huang GS, Liu XB et al. Multifunctional coding metasurface with left and right circularly polarized and multiple beams. Front Mater 9, 854062 (2022). doi: 10.3389/fmats.2022.854062

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Li X, Chen LW, Li Y, Zhang XH, Pu MB et al. Multicolor 3D meta-holography by broadband plasmonic modulation. Sci Adv 2, e1601102 (2016). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601102

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Zhang XH, Pu MB, Guo YH, Jin JJ, Li X et al. Colorful metahologram with independently controlled images in transmission and reflection spaces. Adv Funct Mater 29, 1809145 (2019). doi: 10.1002/adfm.201809145

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Huang YJ, Xiao TX, Xie ZW, Zheng J, Su YR et al. Single-layered reflective metasurface achieving simultaneous spin-selective perfect absorption and efficient wavefront manipulation. Adv Opt Mater 9, 2001663 (2021). doi: 10.1002/adom.202001663

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Gao H, Fan XH, Xiong W, Hong MH. Recent advances in optical dynamic meta-holography. Opto-Electron Adv 4, 210030 (2021). doi: 10.29026/oea.2021.210030

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Meymand RE, Soleymani A, Granpayeh N. All-optical AND, OR, and XOR logic gates based on coherent perfect absorption in graphene-based metasurface at terahertz region. Opt Commun 458, 124772 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2019.124772

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Zhang ZJ, Yang JB, Bai W, Han YX, He X et al. All-optical switch and logic gates based on hybrid silicon-Ge2Sb2Te5 metasurfaces. Appl Opt 58, 7392–7396 (2019). doi: 10.1364/AO.58.007392

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Zhao ZH, Wang Y, Ding XM, Li HY, Fu JH et al. Compact logic operator utilizing a single-layer metasurface. Photonics Res 10, 316–322 (2022). doi: 10.1364/PRJ.439036

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Gazzano O, Almeida MP, Nowak AK, Portalupi SL, Lemaître A et al. Entangling quantum-logic gate operated with an ultrabright semiconductor single-photon source. Phys Rev Lett 110, 250501 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.250501

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Schmidt-Kaler F, Häffner H, Riebe M, Gulde S, Lancaster GPT et al. Realization of the Cirac–Zoller controlled-NOT quantum gate. Nature 422, 408–411 (2003). doi: 10.1038/nature01494

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Bliokh KY, Rodríguez-Fortuño FJ, Nori F, Zayats AV. Spin–orbit interactions of light. Nat Photonics 9, 796–808 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.201

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Mueller JPB, Rubin NA, Devlin RC, Groever B, Capasso F. Metasurface polarization optics: independent phase control of arbitrary orthogonal states of polarization. Phys Rev Lett 118, 113901 (2017). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.113901

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Huo PC, Zhang C, Zhu WQ, Liu MZ, Zhang S et al. Photonic spin-multiplexing metasurface for switchable spiral phase contrast imaging. Nano Lett 20, 2791–2798 (2020). doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00471

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Zhang F, Pu MB, Li X, Gao P, Ma XL et al. All-dielectric metasurfaces for simultaneous giant circular asymmetric transmission and wavefront shaping based on asymmetric photonic spin–orbit interactions. Adv Funct Mater 27, 1704295 (2017). doi: 10.1002/adfm.201704295

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Mansuripur M. Classical Optics and Its Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).

    Google Scholar

    [51] Pu MB, Li X, Ma XL, Wang YQ, Zhao ZY et al. Catenary optics for achromatic generation of perfect optical angular momentum. Sci Adv 1, e1500396 (2015). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500396

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Chen K, Ding GW, Hu GW, Jin ZW, Zhao JM et al. Directional janus metasurface. Adv Mater 32, 1906352 (2020). doi: 10.1002/adma.201906352

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] Sun QR, Zhang ZJ, Huang YJ, Ma XL, Pu MB et al. Asymmetric transmission and wavefront manipulation toward dual-frequency meta-holograms. ACS Photonics 6, 1541–1546 (2019). doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00303

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Georgi P, Wei QS, Sain B, Schlickriede C, Wang YT et al. Optical secret sharing with cascaded metasurface holography. Sci Adv 7, eabf9718 (2021). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf9718

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Zhang XH, Li X, Jin JJ, Pu MB, Ma XL et al. Polarization-independent broadband meta-holograms via polarization-dependent nanoholes. Nanoscale 10, 9304–9310 (2018). doi: 10.1039/C7NR08428E

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Huang LL, Mühlenbernd H, Li XW, Song X, Bai BF et al. Broadband hybrid holographic multiplexing with geometric metasurfaces. Adv Mater 27, 6444–6449 (2015). doi: 10.1002/adma.201502541

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Groever B, Chen WT, Capasso F. Meta-lens doublet in the visible region. Nano Lett 17, 4902–4907 (2017). doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01888

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Arbabi A, Arbabi E, Kamali SM, Horie Y, Han S et al. Miniature optical planar camera based on a wide-angle metasurface doublet corrected for monochromatic aberrations. Nat Commun 7, 13682 (2016). doi: 10.1038/ncomms13682

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Yu LG, Fan YB, Wang YJ, Zhang C, Yang WH et al. Spin angular momentum controlled multifunctional all-dielectric metasurface doublet. Laser Photonics Rev 14, 1900324 (2020). doi: 10.1002/lpor.201900324

    CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Related articles

    Yi Chen, Simeng Zhang, Ying Tian, Chenxia Li, Wenlong Huang, Yixin Liu, Yongxing Jin, Bo Fang, Zhi Hong, Xufeng Jing
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2024, 7(8)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2024.240095
    Ruichao Zhu, Jiafu Wang, Tianshuo Qiu, Dingkang Yang, Bo Feng, Zuntian Chu, Tonghao Liu, Yajuan Han, Hongya Chen, Shaobo Qu
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2023, 6(8)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2023.220148
    Mingbo Pu
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2025, 8(2)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2025.250017
    Yongjae Jo, Hyemi Park, Hyeyoung Yoon, Inki Kim
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2024, 7(12)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2024.240122
    Yuejiao Zhou, Tong Liu, Changhong Dai, Dongyi Wang, Lei Zhou
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2024, 7(11)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2024.240086
    Jia Chen, Dapeng Wang, Guangyuan Si, Siew Lang Teo, Qian Wang, Jiao Lin
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2023, 6(8)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2023.220141
    Qiuying Li, Minggui Liang, Shuoqing Liu, Jiawei Liu, Shizhen Chen, Shuangchun Wen, Hailu Luo
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2025
    Qingsong Wang, Yao Fang, Yu Meng, Han Hao, Xiong Li, Mingbo Pu, Xiaoliang Ma, Xiangang Luo
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2024, 7(12)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2024.240112
  • Supplementary information for All-optical controlled-NOT logic gate achieving directional asymmetric transmission based on metasurface doublet
  • 1.  Xie, Y., Krasavin, A.V., Roth, D.J. et al. Unidirectional chiral scattering from single enantiomeric plasmonic nanoparticles. Nature Communications, 2025, 16(1): 1125.
    2.  Li, D., Gu, M., Li, C. et al. The innovation in planar optics: Technological breakthroughs and application prospects of metalens. Precision Engineering, 2025.
    3.  Yang, Z., Deng, C., Zhang, M. et al. Dual-pattern infrared polarization converter based on a double-arrowhead metasurface. Optical Materials Express, 2025, 15(4): 685-697.
    4.  Wu, P., Gu, M., Li, C. et al. Research progress on dynamic holographic display technology based on metasurfaces. Optics and Laser Technology, 2025.
    5.  Jia, M., Zhao, C., Wang, H. et al. Flexible terahertz beam manipulation and convolution operations in light-controllable digital coding metasurfaces. iScience, 2025, 28(2): 111688.
    6.  Zhao, F., Jing, X., Yu, M. Research progress on the principle and application of metalenses based on metasurfaces. Journal of Applied Physics, 2025, 137(5): 050701.
    7.  Li, H., Mu, D., Cui, Z. et al. Research on terahertz bessel beams based on metasurface. Photonics and Nanostructures - Fundamentals and Applications, 2025.
    8.  Lu, W., Zhang, W., Song, Q. et al. Terahertz smart devices based on phase change material VO2 and metamaterial graphene that combine thermally adjustable absorption and selective transmission. Optics and Laser Technology, 2025.
    9.  Pan, M., Tang, H., Su, J. et al. Four-band tunable narrowband optical absorber built on surface plasmonically patterned square graphene. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, 2025.
    10.  Sun, J., Chai, Z., Yang, Y. et al. Atomic spin precession electro-optic modulation detection based on guided mode resonant lithium niobate metasurfaces. Nanoscale, 2025, 17(5): 2700-2708.
    11.  He, S., Tian, Y., Zhou, H. et al. Review for Micro-Nano Processing Technology of Microstructures and Metadevices. Advanced Functional Materials, 2025.
    12.  Zhang, Q., Xu, X., Guo, Y. et al. Scaled transverse translation by planar optical elements for sub-pixel sampling and remote super-resolution imaging. Nanophotonics, 2025.
    13.  Zou, J.-H., Sui, J.-Y., Zhang, H.-F. An electromagnetic logic metastructure realizing half addition and half subtraction operations based on a virtual polarizer. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 37(1): 017169.
    14.  Kang, M., Chen, L., Qin, S. et al. Bifunctional Electromagnetic Manipulation of Surface Waves Using Metasurfaces Under One Circularly Polarized Incidence. Photonics, 2025, 12(1): 91.
    15.  Liu, Y., Gu, M., Tian, Y. et al. 3D Printed Metamaterial Absorber Based on Vanadium Dioxide Phase Transition Control Prepared at Room Temperature. Laser and Photonics Reviews, 2025.
    16.  Huang, W.. Novel View Synthesis Based on Similar Perspective. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 2025, 36(1): e70006.
    17.  He, L., Chen, K., Sun, T. et al. Research on thermal resistance Performance: Broadband solar absorber based on laminated circular ring − disk microstructure. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2025.
    18.  Lu, K., Qi, J., Gu, M. et al. Microfluidic Biosensors Based on Dual-Layer Metasurfaces. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2025, 25(1): 419-425.
    19.  Wang, T., Wang, W., Han, W. et al. Dual-band all-optical logic gate based on coherent control principles. Optics Communications, 2025.
    20.  Yang, H., Yang, J., Wu, J. A metasurface processor that supports synchronous operation of analog and digital computing. Optics and Laser Technology, 2025.
    21.  Zhang, L., Ouyang, C., Wang, P. et al. Non-invasive in-situ monitoring of deep etching processes using terahertz metasurfaces. Optics Express, 2024, 32(26): 46999-47010.
    22.  An, K., Ma, C., Sun, T. et al. A perfect ultra-wideband solar absorber with a multilayer stacked structure of Ti–SiO2–GaAs: structure and outstanding characteristics. Dalton Transactions, 2024, 54(4): 1574-1582.
    23.  Zhang, L., Zhao, Z., Tao, L. et al. A Review of Cascaded Metasurfaces for Advanced Integrated Devices. Micromachines, 2024, 15(12): 1482.
    24.  Li, Y., Liu, F., Zheng, M. et al. Reconfigurable metasurface design with hallucination and stealth capabilities. European Physical Journal D, 2024, 78(12): 148.
    25.  Zhu, W., Fang, B., Guo, H. et al. Development of a broadband and high-absorption graphene thermoelectric terahertz power meter. Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, 2024, 130(12): 948.
    26.  Solati Masouleh, S., Hosseininejad, S.E. Terahertz beam shaping using space-time phase-only coded metasurfaces. Nano Communication Networks, 2024.
    27.  Ke, L., Yang, Y., Zhu, M. et al. Tight focusing of fractional-order topological charge vector beams by cascading metamaterials and metalens. Microsystems and Nanoengineering, 2024, 10(1): 146.
    28.  Wei, X., Sun, Y., Liang, Y. et al. Multiband and bidirectional multiplexing asymmetric optical transmission empowered by nanograting-coupled defective multilayer photonic crystal. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 21190.
    29.  Wu, Y., Tao, W., Zhao, F. et al. Review for metamaterials and metasurfaces based on vanadium dioxide phase change materials. Optics and Laser Technology, 2024.
    30.  Qiao, J., Feng, G., Yao, G. et al. Research progress on the principle and application of multi-dimensional information encryption based on metasurface. Optics and Laser Technology, 2024.
    31.  Lin, C.-Y., Huang, J.-H., Su, H.-T. et al. Directionally Asymmetric in Orbital Angular Momentum Generation Using Single-Layer Dielectric Janus Metasurfaces. Advanced Optical Materials, 2024, 12(31): 2401335.
    32.  Cheng, X., Jin, Y., Tang, Y. et al. Image wireless transmission based on microwave digital coding metasurfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics, 2024, 41(11): D31-D39.
    33.  He, X., Li, C., Fang, B. et al. Multichannel information transmission via a dual-frequency point space-time coding metasurface. Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics, 2024, 41(11): D15-D23.
    34.  Huang, W., Li, C., Tian, Y. Far field ring beam generation based on 3-bit encoded metasurface. Journal of Optics (United Kingdom), 2024, 26(11): 115102.
    35.  Kim, H., Jung, J., Shin, J. Bidirectional Vectorial Holography Using Bi-Layer Metasurfaces and Its Application to Optical Encryption. Advanced Materials, 2024, 36(44): 2406717.
    36.  Xu, X., Zheng, S., Ke, S. et al. Holographic multiplexing recording with an orthogonal polarized array. Optics Express, 2024, 32(21): 36405-36419.
    37.  Liu, Y., Tian, Y., Li, C. et al. All-dielectric double-layer honeycomb tunable metamaterial absorber with integrated gold nanoparticles. Photonics Research, 2024, 12(10): 2344-2353.
    38.  He, X., Li, Y., Tang, Y. et al. Review for wireless communication system based on space–time-coding digital metasurfaces. Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics, 2024, 130(10): 187.
    39.  Liu, X., Li, Y., Yao, G. et al. Perfect vortex beams generation based on reflective geometric phase metasurfaces. Chinese Journal of Physics, 2024.
    40.  Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Cui, F. et al. Coding Metasurface Beam Modulation Based on Phase Change Materials. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2024, 54(5): 175.
    41.  Xin, H., Feng, G., Wang, Q. et al. Multi-channel vortex beam based on single layer transmission-type metal metasurface. Optics and Laser Technology, 2024.
    42.  Tao, W., Wu, Y., Zhao, F. et al. Research progress in metamaterials and metasurfaces based on the phase change material Ge2Sb2Te5. Optics and Laser Technology, 2024.
    43.  Kuang, K., Wang, Q., Chang, F. et al. Theoretical study of an electrochemically controlled polymer nanoantenna for optical switch. Applied Optics, 2024, 63(26): 6872-6879.
    44.  Peng, S., Wang, T., Shaikh, M.S. et al. Enhanced near-infrared absorption in Au-hyperdoped Si: interplay between mid-gap states and plasmon resonance. Optics Express, 2024, 32(19): 32966-32976.
    45.  Ou, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, F. et al. High-efficiency and broadband asymmetric spin–orbit interaction based on high-order composite phase modulation. Nanophotonics, 2024, 13(22): 4203-4210.
    46.  Zheng, R., Yi, Y., Song, Q. et al. Dual-Tuned Terahertz Absorption Device Based on Vanadium Dioxide Phase Transition Properties. Materials, 2024, 17(17): 4287.
    47.  Zhu, J., Li, C., Fang, B. et al. Advancements in biosensing detection based on terahertz metasurfaces. Optics and Laser Technology, 2024.
    48.  Qi, P., Yuan, X., Zhang, D. et al. Comprehensive design of all-optical logic devices utilizing polarization holography. Optics Express, 2024, 32(17): 30419-30435.
    49.  Chen, Y., Zhang, S., Tian, Y. et al. Focus control of wide-angle metalens based on digitally encoded metasurface. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2024, 7(8): 240095.
    50.  Sande, S.I., Deng, Y., Bozhevolnyi, S.I. et al. Spin-controlled generation of a complete polarization set with randomly-interleaved plasmonic metasurfaces. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2024, 7(8): 240076.
    51.  Gan, S., Zhao, T., Mei, X. et al. Broadband Spin-Selective Wavefront Manipulations with Generalized Pancharatnam–Berry Phase Metasurface. Photonics, 2024, 11(8): 690.
    52.  Xu, J., Xu, P., Yang, Z. et al. Freeform metasurface design with a conditional generative adversarial network. Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, 2024, 130(8): 530.
    53.  Yang, Z., Wang, X., Jin, Y. et al. Calculation and experiment of carpet illusionary cloaking modeling based on coding metasurface. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2024.
    54.  Bao, H., Zhang, F., Pu, M. et al. Field-Driven Inverse Design of High-Performance Polarization-Multiplexed Meta-devices. Laser and Photonics Reviews, 2024, 18(8): 2301158.
    55.  Xu, T., Yi, Y., Song, Q. et al. Design of a Far-Infrared Broadband Metamaterial Absorber with High Absorption and Ultra-Broadband. Coatings, 2024, 14(7): 799.
    56.  Chen, P., Yi, Y., Song, Q. et al. Simulation and Analysis of a Near-Perfect Solar Absorber Based on SiO2-Ti Cascade Optical Cavity. Photonics, 2024, 11(7): 604.
    57.  Li, Y., Xu, J., Liu, F. et al. Broadband achromatic transmission stealth cloak based on all dielectric metasurfaces. Physica Scripta, 2024, 99(7): 075536.
    58.  Li, Y., Xu, J., Liu, F. et al. Design and Analysis of Terahertz Wave Tunable Metamaterial with High Refractive Index. Silicon, 2024, 16(11): 4621-4633.
    59.  Lu, W., Wu, P., Bian, L. et al. Perfect adjustable absorber based on Dirac semi-metal high sensitivity four-band high frequency detection. Optics and Laser Technology, 2024.
    60.  Chen, J., Hong, L., Lei, J. et al. High-Performance Terahertz Coherent Perfect Absorption with Asymmetric Graphene Metasurface. Photonics, 2024, 11(6): 544.
    61.  Liu, W., Li, J. Simulation Study on Tunable Terahertz Bandpass Filter Based on Metal–Silicon–Metal Metasurface. Photonics, 2024, 11(6): 559.
    62.  Zhang, R., Qiao, S., Luo, Y. et al. Structured-Light 3D Imaging Based on Vector Iterative Fourier Transform Algorithm. Nanomaterials, 2024, 14(11): 929.
    63.  Hu, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, Y. et al. Deep-learning-assisted inverse design of polarization-multiplexed structural color filters with ultrahigh saturation based on all-dielectric metasurface. Results in Physics, 2024.
    64.  Yang, Y., Xin, H., Liu, Y. et al. Intelligent metasurfaces: Integration of artificial intelligence technology and metasurfaces. Chinese Journal of Physics, 2024.
    65.  Cui, F., Huang, X., Zhou, Q. et al. Magnetic toroidal dipole resonance terahertz wave biosensor based on all-silicon metasurface. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2024.
    66.  Chen, B., Yu, S., Lu, W. et al. Mid-infrared bimodal wide metamaterial absorber based on double-layer silicon nitride structure. Materials Research Bulletin, 2024.
    67.  Xu, L., Zheng, Y., Guo, Y. et al. Recent Advances in Polarization Manipulation of Metasurfaces (Invited) | [超 构 表 面 偏 振 调 控 最 新 研 究 进 展(特 邀)]. Guangxue Xuebao/Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(10): 1026012.
    68.  Tsai, W.-C., Chang, C.-H., Yu, T.-C. et al. High-Efficiency and Large-Angle Homo-Metagratings for the Near-Infrared Region. Photonics, 2024, 11(5): 392.
    69.  Chen, C., Jin, X., Li, H. et al. Metalens with mixed catenary-pillar nanostructures for improved focusing efficiency. Optics Communications, 2024.
    70.  Liang, C., Wang, J., Huang, T. et al. Structural-color meta-nanoprinting embedding multi-domain spatial light field information. Nanophotonics, 2024, 13(9): 1665-1675.
    71.  Zhou, S., Dong, S., He, T. et al. Design of Far-Infrared High-Efficiency Polarization-Independent Retroreflective Metasurfaces. Micromachines, 2024, 15(4): 538.
    72.  Shi, Y., Zhang, H., Li, H. et al. Localized spin-selective interference assisted broadband tunable chirality with diatomic all-dielectric metasurfaces. Optics and Laser Technology, 2024.
    73.  Cheng, X., Li, C., Fang, B. et al. Metasurface-based wireless communication technology and its applications. Journal of Applied Physics, 2024, 135(12): 120702.
    74.  Huang, L., Zhao, R., Ji, L. et al. Chiral composite metamaterials with gradient phase index for vortex electromagnetic−wave generation and attenuation. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2024.
    75.  Lou, B., Xu, J., Liu, F. et al. Scattering control based on geometric phase reflection-type coded metasurface. Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials, Rapid Communications, 2024, 18(3-4): 113-119.
    76.  Li, J., Li, J., Yi, F. Particle Swarm Optimization of Multilayer Multi-Sized Metamaterial Absorber for Long-Wave Infrared Polarimetric Imaging. Micromachines, 2024, 15(3): 319.
    77.  Yang, H., Yang, J., Wu, J. Metasurface computing components that support dual channel parallel processing and provide full type logic gate options. Results in Physics, 2024.
    78.  Dong, L., Kong, W., Zhang, F. et al. Ultra-thin sub-diffraction metalens with a wide field-of-view for UV focusing. Optics Letters, 2024, 49(5): 1189-1192.
    79.  Li, X., Chen, C., Guo, Y. et al. Monolithic Spiral Metalens for Ultrahigh-Capacity and Single-Shot Sorting of Full Angular Momentum State. Advanced Functional Materials, 2024, 34(7): 2311286.
    80.  Fan, B., Tang, H., Wu, P. et al. Actively Tunable “Single Peak/Broadband” Absorbent, Highly Sensitive Terahertz Smart Device Based on VO2. Micromachines, 2024, 15(2): 208.
    81.  Wu, H., Yi, Y., Zhang, N. et al. Inverse design broadband achromatic metasurfaces for longwave infrared. Optical Materials, 2024.
    82.  Ahmed, A., Cao, Q., Khan, M.I. et al. An ultra-thin multifunctional chiral metasurface with asymmetric transmission, cross-polarization conversion, and circular dichroism for Ku- and K-band applications. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2024, 57(3): 035001.
    83.  Qiao, J., Li, C., Tian, Y. et al. Double-Validation Metasurface Holographic Encryption Based on XOR Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2024.
    84.  Xiao, G., Zhang, J., Yang, H. et al. Dual-Control Tunable Metalens With Large Zoom Range. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2024, 42(24): 8853-8858.
    85.  Yang, Y., Jiang, J., Li, C. et al. Flexible Control of Encoded Metasurface Holographic Imaging Based on Fourier Convolution Principle. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2024, 42(21): 7516-7522.
    86.  Chen, Y., Huang, X., Yao, G. et al. Microfluidic Sensor Based on Substrate-Free Non-Uniform Metagrating. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2024, 42(21): 7498-7506.
    87.  Chen, S., Ha, Y., Zhang, F. et al. Towards the performance limit of catenary meta-optics via field-driven optimization. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2024, 7(5): 230145.
    88.  Liu, Y., Li, C., Tang, Y. et al. Terahertz Wave all-Dielectric Broadband Tunable Metamaterial Absorber. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2024, 42(21): 7686-7692.
    89.  Zhang, J.C., Chen, M.K., Fan, Y. et al. Miniature tunable Airy beam optical meta-device. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2024, 7(2): 230171.
    90.  Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Han, S. et al. Metasurface Enhanced Upconversion Efficiency for High-Performance Pixel-Less Thermal Imaging. Photonics, 2023, 10(12): 1301.
    91.  Mei, F., Qu, G., Sha, X. et al. Cascaded metasurfaces for high-purity vortex generation. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 6410.
    92.  Yang, H., Chen, Y., Wu, Y. et al. Analog signal metasurface processor supporting mathematical operator reconfiguration. Optics Letters, 2023, 48(21): 5451-5454.
    93.  Jiang, L., Yu, S., Kou, N. Asymmetric Transmission of OAM Vortex Waves by Cylindrical Janus Metasurface. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 2023, 22(11): 2654-2658.
    94.  Wang, J., Chen, S., Qiu, Y. et al. Chiral Metasurface Multifocal Lens in the Terahertz Band Based on Deep Learning. Micromachines, 2023, 14(10): 1925.
    95.  Zhang, M., Zhang, N., Dong, P. et al. All-Metal Coding Metasurfaces for Broadband Terahertz RCS Reduction and Infrared Invisibility. Photonics, 2023, 10(9): 962.
    96.  Deng, Q., Yang, J., Lan, X. et al. Investigations of generalized Pancharatnam-Berry phase in all-dielectric metasurfaces. Results in Physics, 2023.
    97.  Hu, Y., Tang, Z., Hu, J. et al. Application and influencing factors analysis of Pix2pix network in scattering imaging. Optics Communications, 2023.
    98.  Li, J.. From Liquid Crystal on Silicon and Liquid Crystal Reflectarray to Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Post-5G Networks. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2023, 13(13): 7407.
    99.  Liu, X., Zhang, D., Wang, L. et al. Parallelized and Cascadable Optical Logic Operations by Few-Layer Diffractive Optical Neural Network. Photonics, 2023, 10(5): 503.
    100.  Xin, H., Yang, J., Tang, M.-C. et al. Broadband electrically controlled reflective metasurface for reconfigurable circularly polarized wavefront manipulation. Optics Express, 2023, 31(8): 13518-13527.
    101.  Hu, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, W. et al. Single-Layered Phase-Change Metasurfaces Achieving Polarization- and Crystallinity-Dependent Wavefront Manipulation. Photonics, 2023, 10(3): 344.
    102.  Wu, R., Yang, J.-Y., Zhang, H.-C. All-optical logic gate based on nonlinear effects of two-dimensional photonic crystals | [基于二维光子晶体非线性效应的全光逻辑门]. Chinese Optics, 2023.
    103.  Xu, D., Xu, W., Yang, Q. et al. All-optical object identification and threedimensional reconstruction based on optical computing metasurface. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2023, 6(12): 230120.
    104.  Hu, J., Tang, Z., Lan, X. et al. Switchable edge detection and imaging based on a phase-change metasurface with Ge2Sb2Se4Te1 | [基于相变材料 Ge2Sb2Se4Te1 的可切换边缘检测与聚焦成像超表面]. Guangdian Gongcheng/Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2023, 50(8): 220284.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-030255075100125150Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 83.5 %FULLTEXT: 83.5 %PDF: 16.5 %PDF: 16.5 %FULLTEXTPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area DistributionOthers: 57.9 %Others: 57.9 %United States: 16.5 %United States: 16.5 %Russia: 10.6 %Russia: 10.6 %Germany: 4.3 %Germany: 4.3 %France: 2.5 %France: 2.5 %United Kingdom: 1.6 %United Kingdom: 1.6 %India: 1.3 %India: 1.3 %Japan: 1.2 %Japan: 1.2 %Singapore: 0.5 %Singapore: 0.5 %Canada: 0.5 %Canada: 0.5 %Sweden: 0.3 %Sweden: 0.3 %Spain: 0.3 %Spain: 0.3 %Australia: 0.3 %Australia: 0.3 %Brazil: 0.3 %Brazil: 0.3 %Finland: 0.2 %Finland: 0.2 %Italy: 0.1 %Italy: 0.1 %Portugal: 0.1 %Portugal: 0.1 %Slovenia: 0.1 %Slovenia: 0.1 %Bahrain: 0.1 %Bahrain: 0.1 %Mexico: 0.1 %Mexico: 0.1 %Saudi Arabia: 0.1 %Saudi Arabia: 0.1 %Egypt: 0.1 %Egypt: 0.1 %Greece: 0.1 %Greece: 0.1 %Netherlands: 0.1 %Netherlands: 0.1 %Austria: 0.1 %Austria: 0.1 %Slovakia: 0.1 %Slovakia: 0.1 %Switzerland: 0.1 %Switzerland: 0.1 %Norway: 0.1 %Norway: 0.1 %Israel: 0.1 %Israel: 0.1 %Turkey: 0.1 %Turkey: 0.1 %Belgium: 0.1 %Belgium: 0.1 %Thailand: 0.0 %Thailand: 0.0 %Armenia: 0.0 %Armenia: 0.0 %Republic of Korea: 0.0 %Republic of Korea: 0.0 %Romania: 0.0 %Romania: 0.0 %Hungary: 0.0 %Hungary: 0.0 %New Zealand: 0.0 %New Zealand: 0.0 %Denmark: 0.0 %Denmark: 0.0 %Poland: 0.0 %Poland: 0.0 %OthersUnited StatesRussiaGermanyFranceUnited KingdomIndiaJapanSingaporeCanadaSwedenSpainAustraliaBrazilFinlandItalyPortugalSloveniaBahrainMexicoSaudi ArabiaEgyptGreeceNetherlandsAustriaSlovakiaSwitzerlandNorwayIsraelTurkeyBelgiumThailandArmeniaRepublic of KoreaRomaniaHungaryNew ZealandDenmarkPolandHighcharts.com
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(8579) PDF downloads(1626) Cited by(104)

Access History

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint