
Citation: | Maksimovic J, Hu JW, Ng SH, Katkus T, Seniutinas G et al. Beyond Lambertian light trapping for large-area silicon solar cells: fabrication methods. Opto-Electron Adv 5, 210086 (2022). doi: 10.29026/oea.2022.210086 |
Solar installations will soon provide 1 TW of power from
It was recently shown that photonic crystals (PhC) made via surface texturing and targeting the 0.9–1.2 μm spectral range is the key to surpassing the light trapping Lambertian limit6. A thin 10-μm device layer of silicon-on-insulator (SOI) was textured by inverted pyramid or tee-pee PhC structures of lattice constant
Interdigitated back contacts (IBC) solar cells are currently the most efficient, breaking through the long-held 25% efficiency and performing above 26%, closing the gap to the Lambertian limit11, 12. The final selection of an optimised surface texturing will be made upon full characterisation of the material's response11. Recently, it was shown that surface recombination velocity (SRV) in IBC Si solar cells can reach 10 cm/s after processing11. Surface nano-texturing by nanoscale needles - black-Si - can be utilised for anti-reflective function13. However, when black-Si was applied to Si solar cells, the best efficiency of only ~ 22% was achieved14. Also, a prohibitively high SRV value of
In this study, we compare two different methods to define and fabricate PhC light trapping on Si using etch mask patterning by: 1) direct laser writing by ablation and 2) stepper photo-lithography. For comparison, electron beam lithography (EBL) (as in ref.6) was also used. Process development and challenges are compared towards the goals of large area
The simplest method to define a mask for plasma-based reactive ion etching (RIE) and/or wet etch of Si is direct laser ablation of sub-1 μm diameter holes in a film (Figure 2). Chromium, which is known for good adhesion to many different surfaces and is compatible with plasma and wet etch protocols of Si, was e-beam evaporated on Si and used for the mask. The refractive index of Si and Cr at
The diameter of the ablated hole
A detailed summary of the width
A dielectric alumina Al2O3 film of 20–30 nm, which serves as a part of an antireflection and passivation coating of IBC cells11, can be used for fabrication of PhC patterns on Si using the same laser ablation method demonstrated for Cr at slightly larger laser pulse energy (
Finally, to show capability to process thin Si wafers of
Steppers reduce and project patterns from a reticle onto a silicon wafer. A
We used conventional Si-wafers since IBC cell geometry is not compatible with SOI layer stacks. Cr masks were patterned by EBL to define PhC pattern with subsequent wet KOH etching. Figure 6(a) shows final PhC with μm made on four regions. Chromium coating helped with charge removal and surface positioning (height) for EBL writing. Small ridges
Figure 7 shows a summary of the spectral characterisation made of different samples in this study; reflectance from the stepper lithography prepared samples was reported in ref.24, where the highest aspect ratio patterns
With optical the
JMAPD=ehc∫λ=1200nmλ=300nmλ×IAM1.5(λ)×A(λ)dλ, | (1) |
where the constants are:
Laser patterning of a Cr or Al2O3 mask has the fundamental advantage of not using vacuum chambers for the lithography step for pattern definition and can be up-scaled for large area fabrication. By combining high stage scanning speeds (10 cm/s and faster) with high repetition rates (200–600 kHz), it was possible to efficiently pattern
In areas where there were missing holes at the laser ablation sites (missed pulse, slight change in spatial laser mode, etc.), an interesting pattern developed after under etch (Fig. 3(b)). During the initial etch, the expected inverted pyramid pattern formed under the mask. When etching of the PhC pattern continued through to under etch, an upward pyramid was formed at the location where intended hole was not ablated. These unexpected defects are therefore favourable for the creation of deeper PhC patterns since the crystal orientation of the Si precludes aspect ratios much greater than 1. The results suggest that by creating a checkerboard hole pattern instead of a regular array, each inverted pyramid will be surrounded by four regular pyramids. The resultant PhC will have double the spatial frequency. This type of defect-mode can be intentionally designed to fabricate deeper PhC patterns and will be explored further.
Future studies will focus on changing the ratio of SF6 to CHF3 to affect the anisotropy (difference in etch rate between in x-y and z) during the dry etching28. Tilted angle etching of Si was tested29, however, there was a strong difference in depth of the etched pattern at different distances from the electrode. Hence, using this method to control the shape of etched pits is less promising for PhC textured surfaces on solar cells even if predicts a close to Lambertian light trapping30.
With RIE, varying the bias power greatly influences the etch anisotropy, which is important since the under-etch and aspect ratio
Two different fabrication methods for large-area (
Holes of 350–400 nm were opened in a Cr or Al2O3 mask by single laser pulse irradiation, with writing speeds of 10 cm/s. Smaller holes with 180–245 nm diameter were fabricated in the Cr mask by the second method, stepper projection photo-lithography and lift-off. The plasma etching rate of Si vs hole diameter,
Due to strong under etch, the surface of Si where damage occurred during hole ablation is removed by plasma etch. A subsequent KOH or TMAH31 etch step for Si surfaces can be added for the lowest SRV and best quality at the very end of PhC fabrication. Use of dielectric Al2O3 mask is expected to help further reduction of SRV and simplify surface texturing steps.
Future improvement of large area fs-laser pattering could employ Bessel-like beams to increase tolerance to surface tracking32 and adopt stitch-free laser writing33. The main advantage of direct laser writing is due to it’s vacuum-free mode of operation in mask definition. Over the last 20 years, the trend for the average power of ultra-short pulsed lasers has been to double every two years, analogous to Moore’s law scaling34 as reported by Amplitude Ltd. lasers35, i.e. the number of photons packed in time (power) scales like the transistors per area/volume on a chip. Flexibility of material processing by burst mode ablation36, 37 has fueled larger-area
The energy balance of the absorbed, reflected, and transmitted parts of light energy
Direct fs-laser writing by ablation of Cr-on-Si mask was carried out with a solid state Yb:KGW laser (Pharos, Light Conversion, Ltd. Vilnius, Lithuania) at the
Laser fabrication was carried out in air (cleanroom, class 1000). Crystalline c-Si (n-type; Phosphorus-doped)
All samples were cleaned in acetone and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) prior and post etching to minimise surface contamination. A Cr thin film deposition on Si was made by an electron beam evaporation (Kurt J. Lesker AXXIS system) A reactive ion etching (RIE) was carrier out with RIE-101iPH (Samco) equipped with a load-lock system. Structural and optical characterisation of laser ablated regions and PhC structures were carried out by the SEM operation mode of EBL writer (Raith EBL 150TWO).
An i-line (365 nm) stepper NIKON NSR-2205i12D at Nano-Processing Facility (NPF) AIST, Tsukuba, Japan was used for this study. A reticle mask (inset in Fig. 5(a)) consisting of four square regions with different PhC period, Λ, between a square array of
An adhesion promoter for photoresist Hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) was applied on Si wafers by dip coating after which 700 nm of positive resist (PFI-38) was spin coated onto the 6-inch Si substrate. After pre-baking at 90° for one minute, an exposure of 25 regions over 6-inch Si wafer was carried automatically (step & repeat; inset in Fig. 5(b)). Different exposure time (sub-1 s) was programmed for each step to optimise the exposure dose (
A Vistec EBPG5000plusES EBL writer was used for definition of the KOH wet-etch masks. Two approaches were used, the first produced a Si3N4 mask, the second produced a Cr mask. The first approach used a combination of LPCVD of Si3N4, E-Beam Lithography (EBL) and Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE) to transfer the patterns into the Si3N4. The fabrication started from growing 250 nm Si3N4 on both sides of an SOI substrate with 10 μm-thick device layer (inset of Fig. 1(c)). Both, plasma enhanced and low pressure chemical vapour deposition (PECVD & LPCVD) were tested to form the mask layer. The LPCVD was chosen since it provided more homogeneous, low stress, and porous-free films. A positive ZEP520 EBL resist was used for patterning. The array of patterned squares was oriented to align with the Si wafer flat. After development, the EBL exposure left a grid pattern of unexposed ZEP520 outlining the exposed Si3N4 square areas. The width of the outline made of unexposed ZEP520 resist was optimised in the design step considering the under-etch of Si below the mask. The resulting ZEP520 grid was used as a mask for DRIE of the Si3N4 layer below. After DRIE and stripping the resist, the final mask consisted in a Si3N4 grid pattern outlining exposed square areas of Si. Particular care was taken to fully open the patterned areas into the Si3N4 in order to expose the Si underneath while preventing excessive etching of the Si substrate. After KOH etching, the Si3N4 mask was removed with HF. The final device was cleaned with Piranha solution. Photo-lithography was used to define back-side locations for eventual Si etching using AZ-family resist followed by RIE etch of Si3N4 and stripping of the residual resist mask.
In the second approach, a Cr mask was made by EBL, Cr e-beam evaporation and lift-off. This approach was carried out on 4-inch Si
For potassium hydroxide (KOH) etch, a solution was prepared using 2 litres of 30% KOH which was then saturated with isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (2 cm surface layer). Etching was carried out at
Plasma etching of tee-pee patterns was carried out with SF6 50 sccm, CHF3 10 sccm, O2 10 sccm for 5 to 30 minutes (etch time dictated different structures); the RF ICP was 180 W, bias 0 W, He pressure 2.70 kPa at a process pressure of 2.5 Pa. Etching of black-Si was made by process: SF6 77 sccm, O2 100 sccm for 5 min at RF ICP 300 W, bias 5 W, He pressure 2.70 kPa and process pressure of 2 Pa.
We are grateful for project support by Nano-Processing Facility (NPF), AIST, Tsukuba, Japan where we were granted access to photo-lithography stepper. This work was granted by ARC DP190103284 "Photonic crystals: the key to breaking the silicon-solar cell efficiency barrier" project. S. Juodkazis is grateful to the visiting professor program at the Institute of Advanced Sciences at Yokohama National University (2018-20) and to Nanotechnology Ambassador fellowship at MCN (2012-19). This work was performed in part at the Melbourne Centre for Nanofabrication (MCN) in the Victorian Node of the Australian National Fabrication Facility (ANFF). We thank Workshop-of-Photonics (WOP) Ltd., Lithuania for patent licence and technology transfer project by which the industrial fs-laser fabrication setup was acquired for Nanolab, Swinburne. We are grateful to Dan Kapsaskis and An Lee for the training at the characterisation facility.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
†These authors contributed equally to this work
[1] | Wilson GM, Al-Jassim M, Metzger WK, Glunz SW, Verlinden P et al. The 2020 photovoltaic technologies roadmap. J Phys D: Appl Phys 53, 493001 (2020). doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab9c6a |
[2] | Jäger-Waldau A. PV status report 2019. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2019). |
[3] | Green M, Dunlop E, Hohl-Ebinger J, Yoshita M, Kopidakis N et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 57). Prog Photovoltaics: Res Appl 29, 3–15 (2021). doi: 10.1002/pip.3371 |
[4] | Shockley W, Queisser HJ. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. J Appl Phys 32, 510–519 (1961). doi: 10.1063/1.1736034 |
[5] | Bhattacharya S, John S. Beyond 30% conversion efficiency in silicon solar cells: a numerical demonstration. Sci Rep 9, 12482 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48981-w |
[6] | Hsieh ML, Kaiser A, Bhattacharya S, John S, Lin SY. Experimental demonstration of broadband solar absorption beyond the lambertian limit in certain thin silicon photonic crystals. Sci Rep 10, 11857 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68704-w |
[7] | Bhattacharya S, Baydoun I, Lin M, John S. Towards 30% power conversion efficiency in thin-silicon photonic-crystal solar cells. Phys Rev Appl 11, 014005 (2019). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.014005 |
[8] | Simovski C, Tretyakov S. Nanostructures for enhancement of solar cells. In Simovski C, Tretyakov S. An Introduction to Metamaterials and Nanophotonics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020) p. 245–303. |
[9] | Yamaguchi M, Lee KH, Sato D, Araki K, Kojima N et al. Overview of Si tandem solar cells and approaches to PV-powered vehicle applications. MRS Adv 5, 441–450 (2020). doi: 10.1557/adv.2020.66 |
[10] | https://www.nrel.gov/grid/solar-resource/spectra-am1.5.html (2021). accessed 1 April 2021. |
[11] | Hollemann C, Haase F, Schäfer S, Krügener J, Brendel R et al. 26.1%-efficient POLO-IBC cells: quantification of electrical and optical loss mechanisms. Prog Photovoltaics: Res Appl 27, 950–958 (2019). doi: 10.1002/pip.3098 |
[12] | Green MA. The path to 25% silicon solar cell efficiency: history of silicon cell evolution. Prog Photovoltaics: Res Appl 17, 183–189 (2009). doi: 10.1002/pip.892 |
[13] | Nishijima Y, Komatsu R, Ota S, Seniutinas G, Balčytis A et al. Anti-reflective surfaces: cascading nano/microstructuring. APL Photon 1, 076104 (2016). doi: 10.1063/1.4964851 |
[14] | Chai JYH, Wong BT, Juodkazis S. Black-silicon-assisted photovoltaic cells for better conversion efficiencies: a review on recent research and development efforts. Mater Today Energy 18, 100539 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100539 |
[15] | Ščajev P, Malinauskas T, Seniutinas G, Arnold MD, Gentle A et al. Light-induced reflectivity transients in black-Si nanoneedles. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 144, 221–227 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.08.030 |
[16] | Peibst R. Still in the game. Nat Energy 6, 333–334 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00822-9 |
[17] | Richter A, Müller R, Benick J, Feldmann F, Steinhauser B et al. Design rules for high-efficiency both-sides-contacted silicon solar cells with balanced charge carrier transport and recombination losses. Nat Energy 6, 429–438 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00805-w |
[18] | Köhler M, Pomaska M, Procel P, Santbergen R, Zamchiy A et al. A silicon carbide-based highly transparent passivating contact for crystalline silicon solar cells approaching efficiencies of 24%. Nat Energy 6, 529–537 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00806-9 |
[19] | Bonse J, Baudach S, Krüger J, Kautek W, Lenzner M. Femtosecond laser ablation of sili con–modification thresholds and morphology. Appl Phys A 74, 19–25 (2002). doi: 10.1007/s003390100893 |
[20] | Wolff CH, Whitlock S, Lowe RM, Sidorov AI, Hall BV. Fabricating atom chips with femtosecond laser ablation. J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys 42, 085301 (2009). doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/42/8/085301 |
[21] | Kirchner R, Neumann V, Winkler F, Strobel C, Völkel S et al. Anisotropic etching of pyramidal silica reliefs with metal masks and hydrofluoric acid. Small 16, 2002290 (2020). doi: 10.1002/smll.202002290 |
[22] | Nishijima Y, Balčytis A, Naganuma S, Seniutinas G, Juodkazis S. Kirchhoff’s metasurfaces towards efficient photo-thermal energy conversion. Sci Rep 9, 8284 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44781-4 |
[23] | Chen Q, Liang L, Zheng QL, Zhang YX, Wen L. On-chip readout plasmonic mid-IR gas sensor. Opto-Electron Adv 3, 190040 (2020). doi: 10.29026/oea.2020.190040 |
[24] | Maksimovic J, Hu JW, Ng SH, Katkus T, Seniutinas G et al. Large area > 1 cm2 light trapping patterns for Si solar cells. In Proceedings of SPIE 11696, Advanced Fabrication Technologies for Micro/Nano Optics and Photonics XIV 57–68 (SPIE, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2578303. |
[25] | Misra D, Heasell EL. Electrical damage to silicon devices due to reactive ion etching. Semicond Sci Technol 5, 229–236 (1990). doi: 10.1088/0268-1242/5/3/008 |
[26] | Mu XC, Fonash SJ, Oehrlein GS, Chakravarti SN, Parks C et al. A study of CClF3/H2 reactive ion etching damage and contamination effects in silicon. J Appl Phys 59, 2958–2967 (1986). doi: 10.1063/1.336934 |
[27] | Green MA. Self-consistent optical parameters of intrinsic silicon at 300 K including temperature coefficients. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 92, 1305–1310 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.009 |
[28] | Kuang P, Eyderman S, Hsieh ML, Post A, John S et al. Achieving an accurate surface profile of a photonic crystal for near-unity solar absorption in a super thin-film architecture. ACS Nano 10, 6116–6124 (2016). doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b01875 |
[29] | Gailevičius D, Ryu M, Honda R, Lundgaard S, Suzuki T et al. Tilted black-Si: ~0.45 form-birefringence from sub-wavelength needles. Opt Express 28, 16012–16026 (2020). doi: 10.1364/OE.392646 |
[30] | Han SE, Chen G. Toward the lambertian limit of light trapping in thin nanostructured silicon solar cells. Nano Lett 10, 4692–4696 (2010). doi: 10.1021/nl1029804 |
[31] | Fan YJ, Han PD, Liang P, Xing YP, Ye Z et al. Differences in etching characteristics of TMAH and KOH on preparing inverted pyramids for silicon solar cells. Appl Surf Sci 264, 761–766 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.10.117 |
[32] | Mikutis M, Kudrius T, Šlekys G, Paipulas D, Juodkazis S. High 90% efficiency Bragg gratings formed in fused silica by femtosecond gauss-Bessel laser beams. Opt Mater Express 3, 1862–1871 (2013). doi: 10.1364/OME.3.001862 |
[33] | Jonušauskas L, Gailevičius D, Rekštytė S, Baldacchini T, Juodkazis S et al. Mesoscale laser 3D printing. Opt Express 27, 15205–15221 (2019). doi: 10.1364/OE.27.015205 |
[34] | Han ML, Smith D, Ng SH, Anand V, Katkus T et al. Ultra-short-pulse lasers – materials - applications. Eng Proc 11, 44 (2021). |
[35] | Mottay EP. Femtosecond lasers for high throughput surface engineering. In Proceedings of SPIE 11768, SPIE Photonics West Industry Events 1176807 (SPIE, 2021);https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2593536. |
[36] | Kerse C, Kalaycıoğlu H, Elahi P, Çetin B, Kesim DK et al. Ablation-cooled material removal with ultrafast bursts of pulses. Nature 537, 84–88 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nature18619 |
[37] | Förster DJ, Jäggi B, Michalowski A, Neuenschwander B. Review on experimental and theoretical investigations of ultra-short pulsed laser ablation of metals with burst pulses. Materials 14, 3331 (2021). doi: 10.3390/ma14123331 |
[38] | Bonaccurso E. Laser-treated superhydrophobic surfaces to reduce ice build-up in aeronautical applications. In Proceedings of the SPIE 11768, SPIE Photonics West Industry Events (SPIE, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2593541. |
[39] | Hodgson N, Steinkopff A, Heming S, Allegre H, Haloui H et al. Ultrafast laser machining: process optimization and applications. In Proceedings of the SPIE 11673, Laser Applications in Microelectronic and Optoelectronic Manufacturing (LAMOM) XXVI 1167308 (SPIE, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2584178. |
[40] | http://www.lelandstanfordjunior.com/KOH.html (2020). accessed 1 January 2020. |
[41] | https://www.brewerscience.com/products/protective-coatings/ (2020). accessed 1 January 2020. |
[42] | Gokhale AB, Abbaschian GJ. The Cr-Si (chromium-silicon) system. J Phase Equilib 8, 474–484 (1987). doi: 10.1007/BF02893156 |
[43] | Vailionis A, Gamaly EG, Mizeikis V, Yang W, Rode AV et al. Evidence of superdense aluminium synthesized by ultrafast microexplosion. Nat Commun 2, 445 (2011). doi: 10.1038/ncomms1449 |
[44] | Juodkazis S, Nishimura K, Misawa H, Ebisui T, Waki R et al. Control over the crystalline state of sapphire. Adv Mat 18, 1361–1364 (2006). doi: 10.1002/adma.200501837 |
Supplementary information for Beyond Lambertian light trapping for large-area silicon solar cells: fabrication methods |
![]() |
Why Si solar cells? (a) Absorption coefficient α of Si vs. photon energy (black line, grey shading) and solar spectrum profile (blue line, purple shading) at air mass AM1.5 ground conditions10. The arrow points to the bandgap energy Eg. (b) Calculated absorbance for a Si slab with different thickness in single and multiple (the Lambertian limt) passes. (c) Absorbance of 10-μm-thick Si (device layer of SOI): single pass, Lambertian limit, and calculated PhC light trapping for the used geometry6. Inset shows the PhC structure made on a Si-on-insulator (SOI) substrate which exceed the ray optics Lambertian limit6.
Cr etch mask defined by direct laser writing. (a) Calibration of the ablated hole diameter D2 ∝ ln(Ep) vs. the pulse energy Ep. The threshold 0.36 nJ (0.09 J/cm2, 0.41 TW/cm2) and 5.15 nJ (1.35 J/cm2, 5.85 TW/cm2) are the intersections of dashed-lines with x-axis. The solid-line is expected evolution of D2 defined by the beam waist r = 0.61λ/NA. Top-inset shows light field E simulations for the NA = 0.9 focusing used with a Cr film on Si, for λ = 515 nm; the finite difference time domain (FDTD, Lumerical) was used. (b) SEM image of the ablated 30 nm Cr film; Ep = 1.7 nJ. The inset shows a closeup view of the ablated holes in the Cr film; the thumbnail image of the Airy pattern of the focal spot is scale matched. (c) SEM image of sample after 10 min plasma etch. The contrast change reveals the width W of the plasma etched Si (SF6:CHF3:O2 at 5:1:1 flow rate ratio). The inset shows photo of 2 × 2 cm2 area of ablated Cr mask on Si (before etch).
SEM images of a hard mask for RIE made in 50-nm-thick Cr film by laser ablation with 515 nm wavelength, 230 fs single laser pulses. Etched pattern after Cr mask removal. The inset shows an under-etch in the region where one ablation opening in the mask was absent. Conditions: NA = 0.9 lens was used, write speed 10 cm/s, pulse energy 5 nJ, laser repetition rate 200 kHz.
(a) 10-μm-thick Si wafer cut by Ep ≈ 0.8 μJ energy fs-laser pulses (1030 nm/230 fs/200 kHz) using NA = 0.14 objective lens at 1 cm/s scan speed (5 passes with focus on the surface). SEM image of the 10-μm-thick Si wafer after cutting and patterning. Optical image of the 100-mm-diameter Si wafer on a plastic film. (b) PhC surface etched through holes ablated by fs-laser to define the Cr etch mask; NA = 0.9 lens was used, write speed 10 cm/s, pulse energy 12 nJ, laser repetition rate 200 kHz. Note the step height between regions with different period Λ. This step change is due to the under etch which is also responsible for formation of the upward-pyramid shown in inset of Fig. 3(b).
(a) Photo of the dot patterns (resist on Si) after exposure, development and dicing. Insets: (bottom) image of the entire 6-inch Si wafer after exposure and development; (top) the stepper reticle used for the i-line (365 nm Hg) 5× reduction (positive resist: the exposed regions are removed). (b) SEM images of 50-nm Cr film e-beam evaporated on 700-nm-thick resist patterns before and after lift-off; exposure was made by projection lithography on Si. Circular marker shows d = 200 nm for comparison with developed holes. Bottom-insets shows slanted-view images of the patterns after lift-off. Top-right inset shows the hole openings D for the four segments of PhC patterns with different periods shown in (a).
(a) Photo of large 2 × 2 cm2 light trapping PhC patterns KOH etched through a chromium-mask defined by EBL; period Λ = 3.1 μm. SEM images of the final PhC pattern on 500-μm-thick n-type Si(100) wafer. (b) Color-coded presentation of portions of the absorbed A, reflected, R (measured) and transmitted T = (1 − R)10−OD (measured) light at different wavelengths from 1.67 to 25 μm (or 6000–400 cm–1 in wavenumbers
Spectral characterisation of PhC light trapping. (a) Reflectance R measured with an integrating sphere for a Si wafer, PhC on SoI (see Fig. 1(c)), and PhC defined by EBL. Note all four segments (top inset in (b)) showed the same (overlapping) spectral profile. Top inset shows (n + iκ) components27. Interference fringes of SoI sample are defined by Si thickness t = λ1λ2/[2n(λ2− λ1)] ≈ 11 μm (near-IR; n = 3.46). (b) Portions of reflected R (measured), transmitted T (measured) and absorbed A = 1 − R − T portions. Inset shows a photo of the 4-inch wafer with 4 EBL defined PhCs. (c) Reflectance of different PhC patterns prepared by laser writing and EBL which were either plasma and wet etched (note lg-axis for R). The light spot size on the sample was