Citation: | Tingting Wu, Qiangxian Huang, Rui Zhang, et al. Three-degree-of-freedom common-path laser measurement system[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2017, 44(8): 811-817. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-501X.2017.08.008 |
[1] | 陈强华, 吴健, 殷纯永.双频激光远程直线度/同轴度测量系统[J].中国激光, 2002, 29(7): 625-630. Chen Qianghua, Wu Jian, Yin Chunyong. Long range straightness/coaxiality measurement system using dual-frequency laser[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2002, 29(7): 625-630. |
[2] | 匡萃方, 冯其波, 张斌, 等.直线导轨四自由度同时测量方法的研究[J].中国激光, 2005, 32(9): 1266-1270. Kuang Cuifang, Feng Qibo, Zhang Bin, et al. Study of the method for measuring four-degree-of-freedom geometric errors of a linear stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2005, 32(9): 1266-1270. |
[3] | 上海耶葛精密仪器有限公司. SP-15000TR三光束激光干涉仪[EB/OL]. (2014-01) [2017-04]. http://www.shjaeger.com/product/128.html. Shanghai Jaeger Precision Instrument Co., Ltd. SP-15000TR three-beam laser interferometer[EB/OL]. (2014-01) [2017-04]. http://www.shjaeger.com/product/128.html. |
[4] | Kim J W, Kang C S, Kim J A, et al. A compact system for simultaneous measurement of linear and angular displacements of nano-stages[J]. Optics Express, 2007, 15(24): 15759-15766. doi: 10.1364/OE.15.015759 |
[5] | 吕勇, 冯其波, 刘立双, 等.基于多准直光的六自由度测量方法[J].红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(11): 3597-3602. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2014.11.016 Lü Yong, Feng Qibo, Liu Lishuang, et al. Six-degree-of-freedom measurement method based on multiple collimated beams[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2014, 43(11): 3597-3602. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2014.11.016 |
[6] | Sutton A J, Gerberding O, Heinzel G, et al. Digitally enhanced homodyne interferometry[J]. Optics Express, 2012, 20(20): 22195-22207. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.022195 |
[7] | 段小艳, 任冬梅.激光干涉法微位移测量技术综述[J].计测技术, 2012, 32(6): 1-5, 13. doi: 10.12060/j.issn.1000-7202.2012.06.01 Duan Xiaoyan, Ren Dongmei. Review of high-resolution measuring method of displacement using laser interferometer[J]. Metrology & Measurement Technology, 2012, 32(6): 1-5, 13. doi: 10.12060/j.issn.1000-7202.2012.06.01 |
[8] | Wu Wanduo, Huang Qiangxian, Wang Chaoqun, et al. The analysis and design of a large stroke with high-precision polarized laser interferometer system[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2016, 679: 129-134. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.679 |
[9] | 程晓锋, 蒋晓东, 郑万国, 等. KDP晶体光学均匀性检测实验研究[J].光电工程, 2008, 35(2): 25-28. Cheng Xiaofeng, Jiang Xiaodong, Zheng Wanguo, et al. Measurement of optical uniformity of KDP crystals[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2008, 35(2): 25-28. |
[10] | 韩旭东, 艾华.共光路移相单频激光干涉测长系统[J].光学技术, 2004, 30(2): 195-198. Han Xudong, Ai Hua. Common-path and phase-shifting single frequency laser interferometer for length measurement[J]. Optical Technique, 2004, 30(2): 195-198. |
[11] | 刘壮, 李英博, 张浩钧, 等.菲涅尔透镜激光四象限定位系统光学设计[J].光电工程, 2016, 43(9): 62-66, 71. Liu Zhuang, Li Yingbo, Zhang Haojun, et al. Optical design for laser four-quadrant location system based on Fresnel Lens[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2016, 43(9): 62-66, 71. |
[12] | Keem T, Gonda S, Misumi I, et al. Simple, real-time method for removing the cyclic error of a homodyne interferometer with a quadrature detector system[J]. Applied Optics, 2005, 44(17): 3492-3498. doi: 10.1364/AO.44.003492 |
[13] | 胡红波, 于梅.零差激光干涉仪正交相位误差的分析[J].光电工程, 2012, 39(12): 55-62. Hu Hongbo, Yu Mei. Analysis of quadrature phase-shift error for homodyne interferometer[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2012, 39(12): 55-62. |
[14] | Hu Pengcheng, Zhu Jinghao, Zhai Xiaoyu, et al. DC-offset-free homodyne interferometer and its nonlinearity compensation[J]. Optics Express, 2015, 23(7): 8399-8408. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.008399 |
In the field of advanced processing and manufacturing, precision guide and stage are the important moving parts, which ensure the accuracy of machine tool manufacturing and instrument measurement. The precise installation and adjustment of guide and stage, the detection and control of their location and motion, need to measure multiple spatial parameters of the moving object simultaneously. The traditional commercial measurement instruments, such as the HP5529A Dynamic Calibrator and the Renishaw laser interferometer, can only measure one parameter at a time, and the measurement process is very complicated. Therefore, multi-parameter measurement has become one of the research focuses. At present, domestic and foreign research institutions and manufacturers have developed some measurement devices, but they have the disadvantages of complex structure, uneasy adjustment, small measurement range and low measurement accuracy.
In order to simplify the measurement structure, expand the measurement range and improve the measurement accuracy, a three-degree-of-freedom common-path laser measurement system, which is a combination of the laser interferometer with the auto-collimator, can realize the measurement of three parameters of displacement, yaw and pitch angles simultaneously with the advantages of large stroke, high precision and non-contact.
Common optical path arrangement was adopted to design the three-degree-of-freedom laser measurement system for measuring 1D displacement and 2D angles of a moving stage simultaneously on the basis of the principles of Michelson interference and laser auto-collimation. In the displacement measurement, the fine resolution of displacement measurement was achieved by using polarization interference and optical path difference doubling technique. Adopting four-beam-signal detection technique and signal differential processing, high-quality displacement output signals were obtained. In the angle measurement, changes in yaw and pitch of a moving stage caused the position change of the mirror which was mounted on the stage. The incident beam was reflected by the mirror and detected by a four-quadrant detector. According to the position change of the spot, yaw and pitch angles were detected precisely. In order to verify the effectiveness of the system, the stability and resolution tests and the comparison experiments with the British Renishaw XL-80 laser interferometer were done. Experimental results show that the system has the resolution of 0.8 nm for displacement measurement and 0.2″ for angle measurement. Compared with the results of XL-80 laser interferometer, the maximum deviation of displacement measurement is less than 100 nm within the measurement range of 50 mm. The maximum deviations of yaw and pitch are 0.5″ and 0.4″.
The schematic diagram of the optical path.
The principle of angle measurement.
General design of laser measurement system.
(a) Calibration result of yaw angle. (b) Calibration result of pitch angle.
(a) Testing of the displacement stability. (b) Testing of the angle stability
(a) Testing of displacement resolution. (b) Testing of angle resolution.
Comparison experiment of displacement.
(a) Comparison experiment of yaw angle. (b) Comparison experiment of pitch angle.