Sun Chunsheng, Zhang Shuang, Zhang Xiaohui. Deceiving ability of typical natural objects used for false target in laser decoy jamming[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2019, 46(1): 180453. doi: 10.12086/oee.2019.180453
Citation: Sun Chunsheng, Zhang Shuang, Zhang Xiaohui. Deceiving ability of typical natural objects used for false target in laser decoy jamming[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2019, 46(1): 180453. doi: 10.12086/oee.2019.180453

Deceiving ability of typical natural objects used for false target in laser decoy jamming

More Information
  • Aiming at the application of natural objects false target in laser decoy jamming, its deceiving ability characterized by decoy airspace was calculated and analyzed. On the premise of full considering the reflection characteristics of target, the intensity of jamming-indicating laser, atmospheric laser attenuation coefficient, and other factors, the analysis model of decoy jamming ability for false target was established under the condition of suppression coefficient K (≥1). Furthermore, the effectual decoy airspace of common natural objects was analyzed under typical condition. The results show that the effective cheating airspace of false target is closely related to the type of targets, and the deceiving ability of vegetation, gravel and diffuse reflection objects is enhanced in turn under the same conditions. There exists a mirror reflection component that is much smaller than the diffuse reflection component in the decoy airspace of vegetation and gravel natural objects, and the variation of the incident angle of jamming laser has obvious influence on the distribution of effectual decoy airspace. However, there is no obvious trend change rule for the decoy airspace of vegetation targets with the incidence angle. The research results are instructive for the reasonable application of typical natural objects used for false target.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 吕跃广, 孙晓泉.激光对抗原理与应用[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2015: 185-186.

    Google Scholar

    Lv Y G, Sun X Q. Fundamentals and Applications of Laser Countermeasures[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2015: 185-186.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 陈蔚, 龚赤坤, 陆君, 等.激光角度欺骗干扰设备对自然地物激光假目标的设置[J].红外与激光工程, 2012, 41(2): 452-456. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2012.02.033

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Chen W, Gong C K, Lu J, et al. Selection of laser angle deceptive interference to natural objects[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2012, 41(2): 452-456. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2012.02.033

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] 仝力鹏, 宋德安.激光角度欺骗干扰中的自然地物假目标区域选择研究[J].中国人民解放军电子工程学院学报, 2011, 30(2): 50-53.

    Google Scholar

    Tong L P, Song D A. Research on selection of areas where natural objects serving as decoys in laser angle deception jamming[J]. Journal of PLA Electronic Engineering Institute, 2011, 30(2): 50-53.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 孙春生, 张晓晖, 饶炯辉, 等.激光引偏干扰中漫反射板假目标的布设方法[J].激光与红外, 2013, 43(3): 252-255. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2013.03.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Sun C S, Zhang X H, Rao J H, et al. Layout of diffuse reflection board used for laser decoying[J]. Laser & Infrared, 2013, 43(3): 252-255. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2013.03.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] 孙春生, 张晓晖, 张爽.激光引偏干扰中假目标的防护角与应用[J].激光与红外, 2017, 47(3): 347-351. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2017.03.018

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Sun C S, Zhang X H, Zhang S. Guarded angle of laser decoy in laser trick jamming[J]. Laser & Infrared, 2017, 47(3): 347-351. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2017.03.018

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Feidenhans'l N A, Hansen P E, Pilný L, et al. Comparison of optical methods for surface roughness characterization[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2015, 26: 085208. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/26/8/085208

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Wen J G, Liu Q, Xiao Q, et al. Characterizing land surface anisotropic reflectance over rugged terrain: a review of concepts and recent developments[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(3): 370. doi: 10.3390/rs10030370

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Sun Z Q, Wu D, Zhao Y S. Improved kernel-driven semi-empirical bidirectional reflectance factor models for characterizing the reflection of vegetation covers: considering a specular kernel[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 260-261: 95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.06.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] 吴振森, 谢东辉, 谢品华, 等.粗糙表面激光散射统计建模的遗传算法[J].光学学报, 2002, 22(8): 897-901. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2239.2002.08.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Wu Z S, Xie D H, Xie P H, et al. Modeling reflectance function from rough surface and algorithms[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2002, 22(8): 897-901. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2239.2002.08.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Torrance K E, Sparrow E M. Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1967, 57(9): 1105-1114. doi: 10.1364/JOSA.57.001105

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] 杨玉峰, 吴振森, 曹运华.一种实用型粗糙面六参数双向反射分布函数模型[J].光学学报, 2012, 32(2): 0229001.

    Google Scholar

    Yang Y F, Wu Z S, Cao Y H. Practical six-parameter bidirectional reflectance distribution function model for rough surface[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2012, 32(2): 0229001.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 陈玉丹, 张维安, 陈玉成, 等.多类目标样片激光散射特性研究[J].应用光学, 2011, 32(6): 1251-1256.

    Google Scholar

    Chen Y D, Zhang W A, Chen Y C, et al. Laser scattering characteristic of several object samples[J]. Journal of Applied Optics, 2011, 32(6): 1251-1256.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 王安祥, 吴振森.光散射模型中遮蔽函数的参数反演[J].红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(1): 332-337. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2014.01.059

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Wang A X, Wu Z S. Parameter inversion of shadowing function in light scattering model[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2014, 43(1): 332-337. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2014.01.059

    CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Overview: Laser decoy jamming is an effective way to combat semi-active laser guided weapons. Diffuse reflecting targets or natural objects are usually used as false targets in laser decoy jamming system. The deceiving ability of the false targets directly determines the layout method and application effect of the false targets. Due to the Lambert reflection characteristics of diffuse reflector target, its deflection ability is easy to be known, while the laser reflection characteristics of natural objects are much more complex. The deflection ability of natural objects is affected by many factors, such as the type of natural object, the parameters of incident laser and the seeker parameters of incoming missile. It is of great significance to study the deflection ability of natural object false target under typical conditions for improving the flexibility of laser decoy jamming system and giving full play to its combat effectiveness. The deceiving ability characterized by effectual decoy airspace of typical natural objects was calculated and analyzed in this paper. Firstly, on the premise of fully considering the target reflection characteristics, jamming-indicating laser intensity, atmospheric laser attenuation coefficient and other factors, the analysis model of false target deflection ability was established under the condition of signal suppression coefficient K (≥1), which was a complex expression related to the bidirectional reflection distribution function of false target and the parameters of application conditions. Then, a five-parameter semi-empirical statistical model based on the Torrance-Sparrow model was selected to describe the bi-directional laser reflection characteristics of typical natural objects. The undetermined parameters in the statistical model were derived from the research results of existing literatures, and the parameters related to the application conditions in the deflection analysis model were based on the general engineering practice. Based on these preconditions, the effective decoy airspace of typical natural object false targets was calculated and the deceiving ability was analyzed. The results show that the effective cheating airspace of false target is closely related to the type of targets, and the deceiving ability of vegetation, gravel and diffuse reflection objects is enhanced in turn under the same conditions. There exists a mirror reflection component that is much smaller than the diffuse reflection component in the decoy airspace of vegetation and gravel natural objects, and for vegetation targets, the variation of the incident angle of jamming laser has obvious influence on the distribution of effectual decoy airspace. However, there is no obvious trend change rule of the decoy airspace with the incidence angle. The research results are instructive for the reasonable application of typical natural objects used as false target.

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(6)

Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(6427) PDF downloads(2307) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Article Contents

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint