Chen Yuzhang, Ye Ting, Cheng Chaojie, et al. Degradation and optimal recovery of underwater turbulent imaging[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2018, 45(12): 180233. doi: 10.12086/oee.2018.180233
Citation: Chen Yuzhang, Ye Ting, Cheng Chaojie, et al. Degradation and optimal recovery of underwater turbulent imaging[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2018, 45(12): 180233. doi: 10.12086/oee.2018.180233

Degradation and optimal recovery of underwater turbulent imaging

    Fund Project: Supported by Research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education in China (Q20171010)
More Information
  • In order to comprehensively and objectively study the degenerate factors of underwater turbulent imaging and optimize the corresponding image restoration algorithms, a reusable submarine imaging experiment system with a controllable turbulent flow condition is established. The circulating water pump is used to control the intensity of turbulence in the laboratory tank.The bubble generator is used to generate micro bubbles. The image sensor is used to obtain the images of sinusoidal stripe target plates under different conditions. The effect of turbulent flow field, path radiation and fluid media on submarine imaging in turbulent flow were studied, and the differences and applicability of modulation transfer functions (MTFs) of three degradation factors are compared by combining image restoration and super-resolution reconstruction. The experimental results show that the turbulent flow field causes MTF declines of the low spatial frequency, and the path radiation and fluid media lead to the decrease of modulation contrast of the high spatial frequency. In the restoration of the underwater turbulent degraded image, the MTF of the turbulent flow field is suitable for image restoration, and the MTFs of the path radiation and fluid media are suitable for image reconstruction.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Gilbert G D, Honey R C. Optical turbulence in the sea[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 1971, 24: 49-56. doi: 10.1117/12.953476

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Hou W L, Lee Z, Weidemann A D. Why does the Secchi disk disappear? An imaging perspective[J]. Optics Express, 2007, 15(6): 2791-2802. doi: 10.1364/OE.15.002791

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Hou W L, Gray D J, Weidemann A D, et al. Comparison and validation of point spread models for imaging in natural waters[J]. Optics Express, 2008, 16(13): 9958-9965. doi: 10.1364/OE.16.009958

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Hou W L. A simple underwater imaging model[J]. Optics Letters, 2009, 34(17): 2688-2690. doi: 10.1364/OL.34.002688

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Hou W L, Jarosz E, Woods S, et al. Impacts of underwater turbulence on acoustical and optical signals and their linkage[J]. Optics Express, 2013, 21(4): 4367-4375. doi: 10.1364/OE.21.004367

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Hou W L, Woods S, Jarosz E, et al. Optical turbulence on underwater image degradation in natural environments[J]. Applied Optics, 2012, 51(14): 2678-2686. doi: 10.1364/AO.51.002678

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Farwell N, Korotkova O. Intensity and coherence properties of light in oceanic turbulence[J]. Optics Communications, 2012, 285(6): 872-875. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2011.10.020

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Farwell N H, Korotkova O. Multiple phase-screen simulation of oceanic beam propagation[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 2014, 9224: 922416. doi: 10.1117/12.2062683

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Nootz G, Hou W L, Dalgleish F R, et al. Determination of flow orientation of an optically active turbulent field by means of a single beam[J]. Optics Letters, 2013, 38(13): 2185-2187. doi: 10.1364/OL.38.002185

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Nootz G, Jarosz E, Dalgleish F R, et al. Quantification of optical turbulence in the ocean and its effects on beam propagation[J]. Applied Optics, 2016, 55(31): 8813-8820. doi: 10.1364/AO.55.008813

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Nootz G, Matt S, Kanaev A, et al. Experimental and numerical study of underwater beam propagation in a Rayleigh-Bénard turbulence tank[J]. Applied Optics, 2017, 56(22): 6065-6072. doi: 10.1364/AO.56.006065

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Matt S, Hou W L, Woods S, et al. A novel platform to study the effect of small-scale turbulent density fluctuations on underwater imaging in the ocean[J]. Methods in Oceanography, 2014, 11: 39-58. doi: 10.1016/j.mio.2015.01.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Matt S, Hou W L, Goode W, et al. Introducing SiTTE: a controlled laboratory setting to study the impact of turbulent fluctuations on light propagation in the underwater environment[J]. Optics Express, 2017, 25(5): 5662-5683. doi: 10.1364/OE.25.005662

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] 孙立颖, 夏珉, 韩捷飞, 等.湍流环境中水下成像系统的调制传递函数研究[J].光学学报, 2016, 36(8): 0801002.

    Google Scholar

    Sun L Y, Xia M, Han J F, et al. Research of modulation transfer function of underwater imaging system in turbulent environment[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2016, 36(8): 0801002.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 蒲欢, 季小玲.海洋湍流中光学成像相关问题研究[J].光学学报, 2016, 36(10): 1026014.

    Google Scholar

    Pu H, Ji X L. Problems of optical imaging in oceanic turbulence[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2016, 36(10): 1026014.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 王马华, 赵正敏, 王士湖, 等.基于改进湍流模型和偏振成像技术的水下退化图像复原方法[J].农业工程学报, 2013, 29(S1): 203-209.

    Google Scholar

    Wang M H, Zhao Z M, Wang S H, et al. Restoring method for underwater degraded images based on improved turbulence model and polarization imaging[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(S1): 203-209.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 杨爱萍, 张莉云, 曲畅, 等.基于加权L1正则化的水下图像清晰化算法[J].电子与信息学报, 2017, 39(3): 626-633.

    Google Scholar

    Yang A P, Zhang L Y, Qu C, et al. Underwater images visibility improving algorithm with weighted L1 regularization[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2017, 39(3): 626-633.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 杨爱萍, 曲畅, 王建, 等.基于水下成像模型的图像清晰化算法[J].电子与信息学报, 2018, 40(2): 298-305.

    Google Scholar

    Yang A P, Qu C, Wang J, et al. Underwater image visibility restoration based on underwater imaging model[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2018, 40(2): 298-305.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 靳晓娟, 邓志良.基于L1范数和正交梯度算子的超分辨率重建[J].应用光学, 2012, 33(2): 305-312.

    Google Scholar

    Jin X J, Deng Z L. Super resolution reconstruction based on L1-norm and orthogonal gradient operator[J]. Journal of Applied Optics, 2012, 33(2): 305-312.

    Google Scholar

    [20] Chen Y Z, Yang W L, Tan H Y, et al. Image enhancement for LD based imaging in turbid water[J]. Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 2016, 127(2): 517-521. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.10.161

    CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Overview: At present, the related researches of underwater turbulence mainly include three major categories. The first category is the theoretical calculation based on turbulent structure function and scattering properties. The second category is to use the refractive index power spectra to construct experimental systems for indoor or outdoor experimental measurements and analysis. The third category is the simulation testing based on the PIV system. The existing three categories of research methods have different emphases, and few literatures compare them.

    In order to comprehensively and objectively study the degenerate factors of underwater turbulent imaging and optimize the corresponding image restoration algorithms, a reusable submarine imaging experiment system with a turbulent flow controllable condition is established. The circulating water pump is used to provide water force, and the water valve is used to control the turbulent flow field in the laboratory tank. The bubble generator is used to generate micro bubbles, and the bubbles is used as tracer particles. Image sensor is used to obtain the images of sinusoidal stripe target plates under different conditions. In order to reduce the experimental error, the experiment is conducted in a dark environment.

    Through indoor and outdoor field experiments, the effect of turbulent flow field, path radiation and fluid media on submarine imaging in turbulent flow are studied. The modulation transfer function (MTF) of the underwater turbulence degradation is correspondingly extracted and analyzed for the three models. The adaptation performance and advantages of the three MTFs are compared and analyzed by using several typical image processing algorithms in turbulent image restoration and super-resolution reconstruction. The objective evaluation criteria such as information capacity (IC), blur metric (BM), and gray mean grads (GMG) are used to compare the objective effect of image processing. The experimental results show that the turbulent flow field, path radiation and fluid media affect the underwater imaging process in turbulent water. The turbulent flow field is the main factor that causes the degradation of underwater imaging in the low spatial frequency. The path radiation and fluid media are the main causes of image degradation. In the restoration of the underwater turbulent degraded image, the MTF of the turbulent flow field is suitable for the image restoration, and the MTFs of the path radiation and turbulent fluid media are suitable for the image super-resolution reconstruction. Compared with other methods of the same class, the information capacity and the gray mean grads value are larger and the blur metric value is smaller.

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(8)

Tables(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(7218) PDF downloads(2780) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Article Contents

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint