Ye Fengfei, Yu Deping, Wan Yongjian, et al. Study on the variable pressure CCOS polishing technology[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2018, 45(4): 170642. doi: 10.12086/oee.2018.170642
Citation: Ye Fengfei, Yu Deping, Wan Yongjian, et al. Study on the variable pressure CCOS polishing technology[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2018, 45(4): 170642. doi: 10.12086/oee.2018.170642

Study on the variable pressure CCOS polishing technology

    Fund Project: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Fund (51405313)
More Information
  • In grinding and polishing of the aspherical and freeform surface, the CCOS technology is widely used. It commonly uses constant pressure during polishing, and thus the desired amount of material to be remove depends on the dwell time. This paper focuses on the variable pressure CCOS polishing technology. It adds one more degree of freedom to the polishing process, in which the desired amount of material to be removed is controlled by both the polishing pressure and the dwell time. Firstly, a mathematical model was established for the variable pressure polishing process. Then, the stability and response speed of the output force of the polishing tool, and the stability of removal function was measured and analyzed. Finally, a material removal experiment that applied sinusoidal force was carried out on a K9 material mirror. Results show that frequency of the measured force is the same as that of the ideal sinusoidal polishing force, with a standard deviation of the force error being about 0.35 N. Its effect on PV and RMS of the finish surface is less than 9%. The spatial period of the measured surface profile is the same as that of surface profile obtained by simulation of the sinusoidal polishing process. The surface profile error is within 17%. In this paper, variable pressure polishing was achieved, and its effectiveness for optical processing was verified.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 瑞·威廉森. 光学元件制造技术[M]. 田爱玲, 苏俊宏, 译. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2016.

    Google Scholar

    Williamson R. Field guide to optical fabrication[M]. Tian A L, Su J H, trans. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar

    [2] Walker D, Yu G Y, Gray C, et al. Process automation in computer controlled polishing[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 806: 684-689. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1136

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Rao Z M, Guo B, Zhao Q L. Investigation of contact pressure and influence function model for soft wheel polishing[J]. Applied Optics, 2015, 54(27): 8091-8099. doi: 10.1364/AO.54.008091

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] El Khalick Mohammad A, Hong J, Wang D W. Design of a force-controlled end-effector with low-inertia effect for robotic polishing using macro-mini robot approach[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2018, 49: 54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2017.05.011

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Tian F J, Li Z G, Lv C, et al. Polishing pressure investigations of robot automatic polishing on curved surfaces[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 87(1-4): 639-646. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-8527-2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] 范敏, 刘凤, 王佩, 等.大口径非球面光学研抛压力控制系统[J].光学精密工程, 2015, 23(4): 1019-1026.

    Google Scholar

    Fan M, Liu F, Wang P, et al. Polishing pressure control system for large caliber aspherical optics[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2015, 23(4): 1019-1026.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 田洪东. 基于研抛力控制的复杂曲面精密研抛技术研究[D]. 长春: 长春工业大学, 2016.

    Google Scholar

    Tian H D. Complex surface precision polishing technology research bases on polishing force controled[D]. Changchun: Changchun University of Technology, 2016.http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10190-1016759727.htm

    Google Scholar

    [8] Li L X, Xue D L, Deng W J, et al. Positive dwell time algorithm with minimum equal extra material removal in deterministic optical surfacing technology[J]. Applied Optics, 2017, 56(32): 9098-9104. doi: 10.1364/AO.56.009098

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Schinhaerl M, Rascher R, Stamp R, et al. Utilisation of time-variant influence functions in the computer controlled polishing[J]. Precision Engineering, 2008, 32(1): 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2007.04.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] 徐勇, 殷跃红.变压强研磨数学力学原理与去除效率分析[J].科学通报, 2016, 61(8): 862-871.

    Google Scholar

    Xu Y, Yin Y H. The effect of varied lapping pressure on the material removal rate of optics lapping[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(8): 862-871.

    Google Scholar

    [11] Liu H T, Wan Y J, Zeng Z G, et al. Freeform surface grinding and polishing by CCOS based on industrial robot[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 2016, 9683: 96832D. doi: 10.1117/12.2243652

    CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Overview: The aspherical and freeform surface mirror, as one of the key elements in optical system, is needed more and more. Both higher figure accuracy and higher fabricating efficiency are demended with the development of the optical systems. In grinding and polishing of the aspherical and freeform surface, the CCOS technology is widely used. It is a process during which errors can be corrected quantificationally by a small tool that can follow the local curves of the aspherical and freeform surface. The CCOS technology commonly uses constant pressure during polishing, and thus the desired amount of material to be removed depends on the dwell time. This paper focuses on the variable pressure CCOS polishing technology. It adds one more degree of freedom to the polishing process, in which the desired amount of material to be removed is controlled by both the polishing pressure and the dwell time. Firstly, a mathematical model was established for the variable pressure polishing process. Then, the stability and response speed of the output force of the polishing tool, and the stability of removal function was measured and analyzed. Finally, a material removal experiment that applied sinusoidal force was carried out on a K9 material mirror. Results show that: 1) The mathematical model for the variable pressure polishing process is correct; 2) Frequency of the measured force is the same as that of the ideal sinusoidal polishing force, with a standard deviation of the force error being about 0.35 N. Its effect on PV and RMS of the finish surface is less than 9%; 3) The spatial period of the measured surface profile is the same as that of surface profile obtained by simulation of the sinusoidal polishing process. The surface profile error is within 17%. In this paper, variable pressure polishing was achieved, and its effectiveness for optical processing was verified. Compared with the constant pressure CCOS polishing technology, the variable pressure CCOS polishing technology adds one more degree of freedom to the polishing process, so it need to control both the polishing pressure and the dwell time. In theory, it can improve processing efficiency and convergence rate. At the same time, it need have higher requirements for the force active control system, such as the output force range, response speed and precision. These performance parameters can affect the processing results. Therefore,the key to developing the variable pressure CCOS polishing technology is to research the polishing tool, which must have high performance force active control system.

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(12)

Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(8124) PDF downloads(2683) Cited by(0)

Access History
Article Contents

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint